Authentic Cisco Certification Exam 300-540 Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Cisco SP Core Optimization Knowledge

Cisco IOS supportsBGP Multipathfor installing multiple equal-cost BGP routes (both iBGP and eBGP) into the routing table. The correct global BGP command syntax to set the number of allowable parallel BGP paths is:

maximum-paths

For BGP specifically, the form is:

maximum-paths bgp

This enables the router to install up to the specified number of equal-cost BGP routes (iBGP and eBGP) into the RIB and then potentially into the FIB.

Setting:

maximum-paths bgp 6

allowssixparallel ECMP paths learned via BGP—this matches the requirement in the question.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. multipath eibgp 6Not a valid Cisco IOS command.

C. maximum paths bgp routers 6Invalid syntax.

D. maximum-paths eibgp 6The correct keyword isbgp, noteibgp.Cisco does not use “eibgp” in this context; IOS supports BGP multipath across iBGP/eBGP automatically when configured under maximum-paths bgp.

In a VXLAN BGP EVPNMulti-Siteenvironment:

DCI trackingmonitors the health of the DCI links. If all DCI-tracking interfaces go down, the leaf can incorrectly keep advertising or learning remote MAC/IP reachability, leading to packet loss and sub-optimal forwarding for servers in that VLAN/L2VNI.

For proper operation, eachDCI-facing interfacemust be enabled with evpn multisite dci-tracking so that the Multi-Site border leaf tracks reachability over that link.

When using EVPN Multi-Site, BUM (broadcast, unknown unicast, multicast) traffic toward remote sites is typically handled viaingress replication, not multicast groups, for each L2VNI participating in Multi-Site. The configuration snippet shows an L2VNI (vn-segment 16535) still mapped to mcast-group 239.1.1.0, which is inconsistent with Multi-Site recommendations and contributes to packet loss.

Therefore, to fix the problem:

Enable DCI tracking on the uplink:

interface Ethernet1/1

evpn multisite dci-tracking

This restores proper DCI-link state monitoring for Multi-Site. →Option C

Change the L2VNI behavior from multicast to Multi-Site ingress replication:

Under the VNI for VLAN 11, configure:

evpn

vni 16535 l2

multisite ingress-replication

or the equivalent command for the specific NX-OS release, thereby aligning the L2VNI with EVPN Multi-Site design and eliminating packet loss. →Option D

Options A and B are ELAM (embedded logic analyzer) filters used only for packet capture and do not resolve the forwarding issue.

Option E is an ACL line unrelated to EVPN VXLAN or DCI tracking and does not address the underlying problem.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation Based on Designing and Implementing Cisco Service Provider Cloud Network Infrastructure Knowledge

When connectingcarrier-neutral facilities (CNFs)ordata centerswithin the same metropolitan area, service providers typically usehigh-bandwidth, low-latency optical transport methods. The most appropriate and commonly deployed interconnection technology is:

DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) ring, which provides:

High capacity (10G, 40G, 100G, 400G)

Low latency

Redundancy through ring or mesh topologies

Multi-wavelength multiplexing for cost efficiency

Carrier-grade reliability for metro interconnect services

This aligns with cloud interconnect and metro transport design used in service provider environments.

Evaluation of the Options

A. OSPF backbone area adjacency

This is a routing protocol adjacency, not a physical connection method. It requires a transport link underneath but does not represent the physical interconnect itself.

B. Private wireless connection

Not suitable for CNF or metro DC interconnect because it lacks the bandwidth, reliability, and deterministic performance required for large-scale carrier-grade interconnects.

C. DWDM ring

This is the correct method. DWDM-based metro fiber rings are the standard for connecting carrier-neutral facilities in the same metro region.

D. CAT6e connection

This is limited to short-distance copper Ethernet (tens of meters). It is not used for metro-scale interconnects or between CNFs.