Authentic Netskope Certification Exam NSK101 Questions Answers

In this scenario, policy B is more restrictive than policy A, as it blocks users from downloading files from any OS other than Mac or Windows for cloud storage, while policy A only generates alerts when any user downloads, uploads, or shares files on a cloud storage application. Therefore, policy B should be implemented before policy A, as the policy order determines the order of evaluation and enforcement of the policies. If policy A is implemented before policy B, then policy B will never be triggered, as policy A will match all the download activities for cloud storage and generate alerts. The policy order is important; policies are not independent of each other, as they may have overlapping or conflicting conditions and actions. These two policies would actually work together, as long as they are ordered correctly. References: Netskope Security Cloud Operation & Administration (NSCO&A) - Classroom Course, Module 5: Real-Time Policies, Lesson 3: Policy Order.

The exhibit displays rules related to detecting compromised accounts, data exfiltration, and malicious insiders. These types of activities are typically analyzed and detected through user behavior analytics, which involves monitoring and analyzing the behavior of users to identify anomalies that may indicate security incidents or threats.

Behavior Analytics is a component of the Netskope platform that focuses on identifying potential security risks based on user behavior. This includes monitoring for compromised accounts, data exfiltration, and identifying malicious insiders. These analytics help in proactively identifying and mitigating threats by analyzing patterns and anomalies in user activities.

References:

The exhibit showing rules related to compromised accounts, data exfiltration, and malicious insiders aligns with the capabilities provided by Behavior Analytics.

Documentation from the Netskope Knowledge Portal on the behavior analytics capabilities supports this identification.

In a CASB-only deployment of Netskope, there could be several reasons why Dropbox.com traffic is not visible in SkopeIT:

Certificate Pinning:

The Dropbox Web application might be using certificate pinning, which means it only accepts specific certificates for its connections. This can prevent the traffic from being steered to the Netskope tenant because the proxy's certificate might not match the pinned certificate​​​​.

Configuration of Dropbox Domains:

If the Dropbox domains are not properly configured to be steered to the Netskope tenant, then the traffic will bypass the Netskope inspection and will not be visible in SkopeIT. Ensuring that the domains are configured correctly is essential for the traffic to be captured and analyzed by Netskope​​​​.

References:

"Certificate pinning prevents the interception of traffic by requiring that the presented certificate matches a known good certificate. This can interfere with traffic steering in CASB deployments."​​​​.

"Proper configuration of application domains is necessary to ensure traffic is steered to the Netskope tenant for inspection and visibility."​​​​.