Authentic Fortinet Certification Exam NSE6_FNC_AD-7.6 Questions Answers

In FortiNAC-F, the expiration of a guest or contractor account is determined by the configuration settings within theAccount Creation Wizardand the associatedGuest/Contractor Template. While a template can define a default " Account Duration " (as seen in the 12-hour setting in the second exhibit), theAccount Creation Wizardallows an administrator to manually specify or override the start and end parameters for a specific user session.

According to theFortiNAC-F Administration Guideregarding guest management, theAccount End Datefield in the creation wizard is the definitive timestamp for when the account object will be disabled or deleted from the system. In the provided exhibit (Account Creation Wizard), the administrator has explicitly set theAccount Start Dateto2025/09/12 08:00:00and theAccount End Dateto2025/09/13 17:00:00.

Even though the template indicates an " Account Duration " of 12 hours, this value typically serves as a pre-populated default. When a manual date and time are entered into the wizard, those specific values take precedence for that individual account. The account will remain active and valid until5:00 PM (17:00:00)on the following day,2025/09/13. It is also important to note the " Login Availability " from the template (8:00 AM - 7:00 PM); while the accountexistsuntil the 13th at 17:00:00, the user would only be able to authenticate during the active hours defined by the login schedule on both days.

" When creating an account, the administrator can select a template to provide default settings. However, specific values such as theAccount End Datecan be modified within theAccount Creation Wizard. The date and time specified in the ' Account End Date ' field determines the absolute expiration of the account. Once this time is reached, the account is moved to an expired state and the user ' s network access is revoked. " —FortiNAC-F Administration Guide: Guest and Contractor Account Management.

The correct answer is D . The log output shows the local IP address as 192.168.10.10 , which the question identifies as the primary FortiNAC-F server. In the same output, FortiNAC-F reports inControl true and controlServer true , which means the local primary server is currently the control server. The line showing communication to 192.168.10.110 returns Running - Not In Control , confirming that the secondary server is alive but is not the active controlling node.

This matches FortiNAC-F 1+1 HA behavior. The study guide describes a 1+1 HA pair as an active-passive deployment where one FortiNAC-F device is designated primary and the other secondary. Database and configuration synchronization keep the devices aligned, but only one server is in control at a time. If the primary fails, the secondary assumes control automatically; otherwise, the primary remains the active control server.

Option A is wrong because the secondary explicitly reports Not In Control . Option B is wrong because the output does not show database replication failure. Option C is wrong because failover is not in progress; the output shows a stable state where the primary is in control and the secondary is running as the passive node.

In FortiNAC-F, accountability and forensic tracking of configuration changes are managed through theAdmin Auditingfunctionality. When an administrator performs an action that modifies the system state—such as creating a policy, changing a device ' s status, or adding a switch port to anEnforcement Group—the system generates an audit record. This record is essential for troubleshooting scenarios where unauthorized or accidental configuration changes have occurred, leading to unintended network behavior.

TheAdmin Auditingview (found underLogs > Admin Auditing) provides a comprehensive log of the " Who, What, and When " for every administrative session. Each entry includes the username of the administrator, the source IP address from which they accessed the FortiNAC-F console, a precise timestamp, and a detailed description of the modification. In the scenario described, where ports have been incorrectly added to enforcement groups, the Admin Auditing view allows a supervisor to filter by the specific " Port " or " Group " object to identify exactly which administrator executed the command.

In contrast, theEvent Managementview (B) is designed to monitor system and network events, such as RADIUS authentications, host connections, and SNMP trap arrivals. While it tracks system activity, it does not typically log the manual configuration changes performed by admins. ThePort Changesview (C) tracks the operational history of a port (such as VLAN assignment changes and host movements) but does not attribute the administrative assignment of the port to a group. Finally, theSecurity Eventsview (D) is dedicated to alerts triggered by security rules and external threat feeds.

" Admin Auditing displays a record of all modifications made to the FortiNAC-F system by an administrator. This view includes the administrator ' s name, the date and time of the change, and a description of the action taken. It is the primary resource for determining which administrative user performed a specific configuration change, such as modifying port group memberships or altering policy settings. " —FortiNAC-F Administration Guide: Logging and Auditing Section.