CCCS-203b Exam Dumps - CrowdStrike CCCS Questions and Answers

The secure and recommended way to test whether firewall restrictions are causing CSPM operation failures is to verify that the required CrowdStrike IP addresses are allowlisted. Falcon Cloud Security relies on outbound API communication between CrowdStrike and the cloud provider. If firewall rules block this traffic, asset inventory collection and IOM detection can fail even though registration appears successful.

CrowdStrike publishes a list of IP addresses and endpoints that must be permitted for proper operation. Validating firewall allowlists against this documentation is a low-risk, best-practice troubleshooting step that preserves security controls while testing connectivity assumptions.

Temporarily opening firewalls to all inbound traffic is insecure and strongly discouraged. Dismissing firewall-related causes without validation can delay resolution. Therefore, the correct and secure approach is to check that the CrowdStrike IP addresses are allowlisted.

To automate response actions when a vulnerability is discovered in a container image, CrowdStrike Falcon Fusion uses the triggerKubernetes and containers > Image assessment > Vulnerabilities. This trigger activates when Falcon identifies vulnerabilities during container image scanning and assessment.

Image assessment vulnerabilities occurpre-runtime, making this trigger ideal for shift-left security automation. Actions such as sending notifications, opening tickets, tagging images, or blocking deployments via policy enforcement can be automatically initiated before vulnerable images reach production.

TheContainer detectionstrigger applies to runtime events, not image vulnerabilities.Vulnerabilities user actiontriggers depend on manual interaction and are not suitable for automated detection-driven workflows.

By using the image assessment vulnerability trigger, organizations can integrate Falcon Cloud Security findings directly into CI/CD pipelines and remediation workflows, ensuring faster response and reduced risk exposure.

Therefore, the correct Fusion workflow trigger isKubernetes and containers > Image assessment > Vulnerabilities.

Cloud Groups in CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security are designed to logically segment cloud resources so users can focus only on what is relevant to their role or responsibility. The primary way cloud groups reduce noise is bynarrowing a user’s scope of analysis through filtered cloud resources.

By grouping resources based on criteria such as account, region, service, or tags, Cloud Groups ensure that analysts and responders only see findings related to the resources they own or manage. This minimizes alert fatigue, reduces unnecessary exposure to unrelated findings, and improves investigation efficiency.

Cloud Groups do not assign permissions directly; permissions are managed through Falcon RBAC roles. They also do not primarily function as exclusion mechanisms—although exclusions may be applied, their core purpose is scoping and contextualization.

CrowdStrike best practices emphasize Cloud Groups as a way to align security visibility with organizational structure, enabling teams to operate more efficiently and responsibly. Therefore, the correct answer isNarrow a user’s scope of analysis by filtering cloud resources.

CrowdStrike recommends enablingDrift Preventionwhen container workloads have beendesigned to be immutable. Immutable infrastructure is a core cloud-native principle where containers are not modified after deployment. Any change to a running container—such as installing packages or modifying files—indicates potential misconfiguration or malicious activity.

Drift Prevention enforces this principle by blocking or alerting on runtime changes that deviate from the original container image. This makes it highly effective for production environments where containers should run exactly as built and deployed.

In development or testing environments, containers often change dynamically, making Drift Prevention impractical due to excessive false positives. Similarly, containers that must download or install packages at startup inherently require runtime modification and are not suitable candidates for Drift Prevention.

Enabling Drift Prevention at the wrong time can disrupt legitimate workloads. Therefore, CrowdStrike guidance clearly states that Drift Prevention should be enabledonly after workloads are intentionally designed to be immutable, making optionCthe correct answer.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security supportsscheduled reportingas the preferred mechanism for automatically distributing security findings to stakeholders who may not have direct access to the Falcon console. When container vulnerabilities need to be reviewed on aweekly basis, the correct and most operationally efficient approach is tocreate a scheduled report covering the last 7 days.

Scheduled reports can be configured to run automatically and delivered via email to designated recipients, including users without Falcon console access. This makes them ideal for cross-functional teams, auditors, or management who require regular visibility into container risk without interactive access.

UsingAdvanced Event Searchrequires console access and manual execution, which does not meet the requirement for automatic distribution. Dashboards also require console access and cannot be securely shared externally. A 24-hour report would not align with the stated weekly review cadence and could result in incomplete visibility.

CrowdStrike documentation and best practices recommend scheduled reports for recurring compliance, vulnerability, and risk reporting use cases. Therefore, the correct solution is tocreate a scheduled report to list vulnerable container data from the last 7 days.

Falcon Cloud Security categorizes IOAs usingMITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques, enriched withcloud-provider contextto accurately represent cloud-native attack behavior.

To identifyDefense Evasion via Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Toolsactivity specifically withinAzure, analysts must filter IOAs usingMITRE Tactic and Techniquewhile also scoping the environment to thecloud provider. This ensures visibility into attacker behaviors such as disabling logging, modifying security services, or impairing monitoring controls at the cloud-provider level.

Filtering by attack type alone lacks the structured MITRE mapping required for accurate investigative workflows. Service-level filters are insufficient because impairment of defenses in cloud environments often impacts provider-managed services rather than individual workloads.

Therefore,MITRE Tactic and Technique – Cloud provideris the correct and most precise filter to identify Azure-specific defense evasion IOAs.

To secure an AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) cluster running on Amazon Linux 2–based EC2 instanceswith container-level visibility, CrowdStrike Falcon documentation identifies theFalcon Container Sensor for Linuxas the correct solution. This sensor is part of Falcon Cloud Security and is purpose-built to protect Kubernetes and containerized workloads.

The Falcon Container Sensor for Linux is deployed as a container (commonly as a DaemonSet) on each Kubernetes worker node. It integrates with the underlying Linux kernel to observe container runtime activity while maintaining Kubernetes awareness. This allows CrowdStrike to deliver deep visibility into container processes, file system activity, network connections, and inter-container behavior—capabilities that are not available with host-only sensors.

TheFalcon Sensor for Linuxprotects the EC2 host operating system but does not provide container-aware telemetry or Kubernetes context. TheFalcon Kubernetes Admission Controlleris a pre-runtime control used to enforce image and deployment policies at admission time, not to provide runtime detection.Image Assessment at Runtimeis a feature for evaluating container images and is not a deployable sensor.

Because the requirement explicitly includesruntime protection and container-level visibility within EKS, the Falcon Container Sensor for Linux is the only option that fully satisfies these needs according to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security architecture and documentation.

WhenAWS Systems Manager (SSM)is unavailable,Ansibleis the supported and recommended IT automation tool for generating an inventory of unmanaged workloads and deploying the Falcon sensor using1-click sensor deployment workflows.

CrowdStrike integrates with Ansible to enable discovery, inventory generation, and automated sensor installation across cloud and on-prem environments. Ansible’s agentless architecture makes it especially suitable when native cloud management services are unavailable or restricted.

Other tools listed—Jet, Rudder, and Puppet—are not natively integrated with Falcon’s 1-click deployment workflows for unmanaged workload discovery in cloud environments.

Therefore,Ansibleis the correct answer.

To allow an analyst to reviewcloud control plane Indicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs)while maintaining least-privilege access, CrowdStrike recommends assigning theCSPM Misconfiguration Viewerrole.

Cloud control plane IOMs focus on identifying insecure configurations across cloud providers, such as overly permissive IAM roles, disabled logging, public exposure of services, or noncompliant security settings. The CSPM Misconfiguration Viewer role grantsread-only accessto these findings, allowing analysts to investigate risks without making configuration changes.

Other roles provide broader access than required.Cloud Security Managerincludes administrative and modification privileges, exceeding least-privilege requirements.Kubernetes and Containers Managerfocuses on container and Kubernetes security, not cloud control plane configurations.Cloud Compliance Vieweris oriented toward compliance frameworks rather than detailed misconfiguration analysis.

By assigning the CSPM Misconfiguration Viewer role, organizations ensure analysts can perform their investigative duties safely and appropriately, aligning with CrowdStrike’s role-based access control (RBAC) best practices.

To confirm whether malware exists within a container image, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security directs investigators to reviewImage detection findings. These findings are generated during container image assessments, where Falcon performs deep inspection of image layers, binaries, and embedded artifacts.

Image detection findings include indicators of known malware, suspicious executables, malicious scripts, and other threats identified through CrowdStrike’s threat intelligence and detection engines. Because container images are often reused across environments, identifying malware at the image level is critical to preventing widespread propagation.

Other options do not directly confirm malware within an image.Drift indicatorsrelate to changes in a running container compared to its original image, not malware embedded in the image itself.Container alertsare typically runtime detections triggered by behavior during execution.Container misconfigurationsfocus on insecure settings rather than malicious code.

By reviewing image detection findings, security teams can identify infected images early, remediate by rebuilding clean images, and prevent deployment through policy enforcement mechanisms such as the Kubernetes Admission Controller. Therefore, the correct investigation path for suspected malware in a container image isImage detection findings.