Using the table above, which of the following HCC(s) should be assigned for documentation stating the patient has resolving AKI due to ATN, creatinine levels slowly returning to baseline, and CKD- stage 3-4?
In HCC risk adjustment, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is captured by stage-based HCCs that are hierarchical—only the highest supported CKD stage in the hierarchy is counted for RAF when multiple stages (or a range) are referenced. The documentation includes “CKD – stage 3–4,” which indicates the patient’s baseline CKD severity falls somewhere between stage 3 and stage 4. When selecting from the provided table, stage 4 maps to HCC 327 and is higher than stage 3 categories (HCC 328 for stage 3B and HCC 329 for stage 3 except 3B). AKI due to ATN describes an acute process and does not replace the need to capture baseline CKD stage when it is clinically relevant and documented. Outpatient CDI best practice would be to query the provider to specify the exact CKD stage (since “3–4” is imprecise), but when forced to choose from the hierarchy shown, the correct HCC assignment based on the highest stated stage in the documented range is HCC 327 (CKD stage 4).
Question # 45
Which of the following is the MOST compliant provider query?
Options:
A.
“Noted that this patient is being referred for a colonoscopy. She has no documented GI symptoms and has a family history of colon cancer. When this patient is seen, please clarify whether this is a screening colonoscopy or diagnostic colonoscopy.”
B.
“The patient has a past medical history of CAD, HF, and COPD. Please document these conditions during the encounter today if they are still being treated.”
C.
“According to a visit last year, this patient has a history of alcohol use; quit two years ago; previously drank 6-9 beers daily, 10-12 beers on weekend. Patient now attends AA meetings. Is the patient’s alcohol use now in remission?”
D.
“Noted that the patient has skin that is ‘warm and dry with no rashes or lesions’; however, nursing documentation describes a ‘stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer’ requiring wet-to-dry dressing changes. Please add the pressure ulcer to your ED assessment note if appropriate.”
The most compliant query is the one that is clinically supported, non-leading, and focused on clarifying documentation for correct reporting and medical necessity—without directing the provider to “add” diagnoses or document conditions for payment purposes. Option A presents relevant clinical context (no GI symptoms; family history) and asks the provider to clarify whether the planned colonoscopy is screening or diagnostic, which is a legitimate documentation clarification affecting correct code selection and coverage rules. It does not imply a desired answer and does not instruct the provider to document additional diagnoses. Option B is problematic because it instructs the provider to “document these conditions” if treated, which can be perceived as prompting and is not tied to encounter-specific indicators. Option C is based primarily on historical information and asks a yes/no about remission, which can be leading and may not reflect current-visit evaluation. Option D effectively asks the provider to add a diagnosis based on nursing documentation, which risks leading language and requires provider confirmation and assessment. Therefore, A is most compliant.