CGEIT Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

The best way to ensure new systems can be adequately supported once in production is to require operational management be identified in the business case. This means that the business case should include the costs, benefits, risks and resources associated with the operation and maintenance of the new system, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the operational staff. By doing so, the business case can ensure that the new system is aligned with the business objectives and can deliver value to the stakeholders. Additionally, the business case can help to secure the commitment and support of the operational management for the new system. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 3: Benefits Realization1; COBIT 5: Enabling Processes, chapter 4, section 4.2.22; Building A Governance System: A Review of Information Flow and Items Component

 The first course of action when the use of new technology in an enterprise will require specific expertise and updated system development processes is to assess the gap between current and required staff competencies. This course of action involves identifying the skills, knowledge, and abilities that are needed to implement and manage the new technology, and comparing them with the existing capabilities of the IT staff. By assessing the gap between current and required staff competencies, the enterprise can determine the extent and nature of the sourcing challenge, and plan for appropriate solutions, such as training, hiring, or outsourcing. According to one source1, “A competency gap analysis is a process of identifying the difference between what is required for a person to perform their role effectively and what they actually possess.” The other options are not the first course of action when the use of new technology in an enterprise will require specific expertise and updated system development processes, but rather some of the steps or outcomes that can follow or result from the gap assessment. Performing a risk assessment on potential outsourcing is a step that involves evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of delegating some or all of the IT functions related to the new technology to an external service provider. This step can be done after assessing the gap between current and required staff competencies, and identifying outsourcing as a viable option. Updating the enterprise architecture (EA) with the new technology is a step that involves incorporating the new technology into the holistic view of the enterprise’s IT environment, including its goals, principles, standards, policies, processes, technologies, and systems. This step can be done after assessing the gap between current and required staff competencies, and ensuring that the new technology aligns with the enterprise’s strategic objectives and business requirements. Reviewing the IT balanced scorecard for sourcing opportunities is an outcome that involves measuring and reporting on the performance and value of IT sourcing activities and outcomes. This outcome can be done after assessing the gapbetween current and required staff competencies, and implementing the chosen sourcing solution. References := What is Competency Gap Analysis? Definition & Examples

 Defining a strategy for IT measurement is the best way to determine whether the KPIs adequately support organizational objectives, as it would help to establish a clear vision, scope, purpose, and alignment of the IT measurement activities. A strategy for IT measurement would also help to identify the relevant stakeholders, roles, responsibilities, and expectations for the IT measurement process, and to define the criteria, methods, and tools for selecting, collecting, analyzing, and reporting the KPIs. The other options are not as effective, as they do not address the root cause of the board’s question, which is the lack of a coherent and consistent approach to IT measurement. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Performance Measurement and Reporting, Subsection 3.3.1: Performance Measurement and Reporting Overview, Page 112 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Performance Measurement and Reporting, Subsection 3.3.2: Performance Measurement and Reporting Process, Page 113 : The Value of IT Governance

 Appointing an IT representative to the business risk committee is the best way to address senior management’s concern about IT investment risks, as it would ensure that IT risks are properly identified, assessed, and communicated to the business stakeholders. The IT representative would also be able to align IT risk management with the enterprise’s risk appetite and strategy, and provide input and feedback on the IT investment decisions. The other options are not as effective, as they do not involve direct collaboration and communication between IT and business on risk matters. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.1: IT Risk Management Overview, Page 153 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.2: IT Risk Management Process, Page 156 :CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.5: Roles and Responsibilities for IT Risk Management, Page 161

 This is because an organizational change management program is a systematic approach to managing the human side of change and ensuring that the people affected by the change are ready, willing, and able to adopt it1. An organizational change management program can help to address the fatigue and frustration of the employees by providing them with clear communication, stakeholder engagement, training and coaching, leadership support, and feedback mechanisms2. An organizational change management program can also help to increase the success rate and benefits realization of the IT projects by reducing resistance, enhancing collaboration, and improving performance3.

The other options are less effective than option A, as they do not address the root cause of the problem or provide a comprehensive solution. Establishing “Reward and Recognition” efforts to boost employee morale may be helpful, but not sufficient, to overcome the fatigue and frustration of the employees. Rewards and recognition can motivate and appreciate the employees for their efforts and achievements, but they do not necessarily help them to cope with the changes or learn the new capabilities4. Improving the system development life cycle (SDLC) process may be useful, but not relevant, to address the fatigue and frustration of the employees. The SDLC process is a framework that defines the tasks and activities involved in developing, testing, deploying, and maintaining IT systems. While improving the SDLC process can enhance the quality and efficiency of IT systems, it does not directly affect the employees’ readiness or willingness to adopt them. Assessing current business and IT competencies may be important, but not enough, to address the fatigue and frustration of the employees. Assessing competencies can help to identify the gaps and needs of the employees in terms of knowledge, skills, and abilities required for their roles. However, assessing competencies alone does not provide any solutions or support for closing those gaps or meeting those needs.

A business impact analysis (BIA) report is the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. A BIA report is a document that identifies and evaluates thepotential effects of disruptions to critical business functions and processes. A BIA report can help estimate the financial, operational, reputational, and legal impacts of a risk event, as well as the recovery time and resources needed to resume normal operations. A BIA report can also help prioritize the recovery strategies and objectives based on the criticality and urgency of the business functions and processes.

The other options are not the most valuable input when quantifying the loss associated with a major risk event. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that provide an early warning of potential threats to the organization’s objectives and performance. KRIs can help monitor and measure the risk exposure and effectiveness of risk management activities, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. IT environment threat modeling is a technique that identifies and analyzes the possible vulnerabilities and attack vectors in an IT system or network. Threat modeling can help improve the security and resilience of IT assets and services, but it does not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are the maximum acceptable time frames for restoring business functions and processes after a disruption. RTOs can help determine the recovery priorities and strategies, but they do not directly quantify the loss associated with a risk event.

For more information on BIA and quantifying loss, you can refer to these web sources:

What is Business Impact Analysis? Definition, Benefits & Examples

Quantifying Loss Associated with Major Risk Event - Exam-Answer

Quantifying the Qualitative Technology Risk Assessment - ISACA

A responsive risk awareness culture is the best reflection of mature risk management in an enterprise, because it implies that the organization has a high level of risk maturity that enables it to reduce noise and focus more effectively on truly high-risk concerns, choose cost-effective solutions for the risk management priorities, and execute reliably1. A responsive risk awareness culture also means that the organization has a clear and consistent risk appetite and tolerance, and that the employees are cognizant of the relevant risks as part of their actions2. A responsive risk awareness culture also fosters trust, collaboration, and innovation among the stakeholders, and helps the organization to adapt to changing business environments and emerging risks3.

The other options are not as indicative of mature risk management in an enterprise, because they are either too narrow or too reactive. A regularly updated risk register is a useful tool forcataloguing, tracking, and mitigating risks, but it does not necessarily reflect the strategic alignment, integration, or performance of the risk management process4. Ongoing risk assessment is an essential activity for identifying and evaluating risks, but it does not guarantee that the risks are prioritized, communicated, or managed effectively5. Ongoing investment in risk mitigation is a sign of commitment to risk management, but it does not ensure that the investment is aligned with the risk appetite and tolerance, or that it delivers value to the organization5.

 Enterprise architecture (EA) is the most important input for managing the risk associated with creating a mobile application, because it provides a holistic view of the current and future state of the enterprise’s IT environment, including its goals, principles, standards, policies, processes, technologies, and systems. EA helps to identify the gaps, dependencies, constraints, and opportunities for the mobile application initiative, and to align it with the enterprise’s strategic objectives and business requirements. EA also helps to assess the impact of the mobile application on the existing IT infrastructure, security, performance, and compliance. By using EA as an input for IT risk management, the enterprise can ensure that the mobile application is designed, developed, deployed, and maintained in a consistent, coherent, and optimal way that minimizes the potential risks and maximizes the expected benefits. The other options are not the most important input for managing the risk associated with creating a mobile application, but rather some of the outputs or outcomes of IT risk management. An IT risk scorecard is a tool that measures and reports the performance of IT risk management activities and controls. An enterprise risk appetite is a statement that defines the level and type of risk that an enterprise is willing to accept or avoid in pursuit of its objectives. Business requirements are the specifications that describe what the mobile application should do and how it should meet the needs and expectations of the users and stakeholders. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2020, page 15; Enterprise Architecture as Business Capabilities Architecture

 The owner of data stored in an external cloud is the business leader who is most impacted by the loss of data. This is because the data owner is the person who has the accountability and authority over a specific dataset, and who is responsible for its security, quality, classification, and access control12. The data owner is usually a senior-level employee or a subject-matter expert who has the knowledge and motivation to ensure that the data is handled correctly and in compliance with policies and regulations2. The data owner is not the same as the data custodian, who is the person who implements the technical and operational measures to protect and manage the data according to the data owner’s directives2. Therefore, the risk manager, the contract manager, and the vendor are not the data owners, as they do not have the final say or accountability over the data stored in the external cloud. References: What Is a Data Owner? - Firewall Times1, Data Owners vs. Data Stewards vs. Data Custodians - CPO Magazine2

The most effective way for a CIO to govern business unit deployment of shadow IT applications in a cloud environment is to educate the executive team about the risk associated with shadow ITapplications. This is because shadow IT applications are often deployed without the knowledge or approval of the central IT organization, and may pose security, compliance, and performance risks to the enterprise. By raising awareness of these risks among the executive team, the CIO can foster a culture of IT governance and alignment, and encourage the business units to follow the established application implementation process. References: CGEIT Certification | Certified in Governance of Enterprise IT | ISACA1, IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager2

The first thing that should be done when developing the metadata management process for the new software platform is to request an impact analysis. An impact analysis is a process of assessing the potential effects of a change on the existing system, processes, and stakeholders1. An impact analysis can help to identify the following aspects2:

The scope and objectives of the change: What are the expected benefits and outcomes of the new software platform? How does it align with the enterprise strategy and goals?

The current state and baseline: What are the existing data sources, formats, standards, and quality levels? How are they documented, stored, and accessed? Who are the data owners, stewards, and users?

The gaps and risks: What are the data changes that will occur due to the new software platform? How will they affect the data quality, security, privacy, and compliance? What are the potential challenges or issues that may arise during or after the transition?

The mitigation and contingency plans: How can the data changes be minimized or avoided? How can the data quality, security, privacy, and compliance be ensured or improved? What are the alternative solutions or fallback options in case of failure or disruption?

By requesting an impact analysis, the organization can gain a better understanding of the data environment and the implications of the new software platform. This can help to develop a metadata management process that is consistent, effective, and adaptable to the change. References: Impact Analysis: A Key Aspect of Preventing Problems | Project …1, Impact Analysis: The Key to Successful Change Management2

Establishing the objectives and expected benefits is the most important step when developing effective metrics for the measurement of solution delivery, because it defines the purpose, scope, and value of the solution and how it aligns with the business goals and needs. By establishing the objectives and expected benefits, IT leaders can identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will measure the progress, quality, and outcomes of the solution delivery. KPIs are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound metrics that track and evaluate the performance of the solution delivery against the objectives and expected benefits. KPIs can also help IT leaders to communicate the value proposition of the solution to the stakeholders, monitor and manage the risks and issues that may affect the solution delivery, and ensure that the solution meets or exceeds the expectations of the customers and users. References := Automation: metrics that measure success, 4 Types of Key Performance Metrics To Track (With Examples), A guide to measuring benefits effectively

The CIO communicating why IT governance is important to the enterprise is the best way to increase the likelihood of its success, as it helps to create awareness, understanding, and buy-in from the stakeholders and staff involved in the IT governance program. The CIO can also communicate the benefits, objectives, and expectations of the IT governance program, and how italigns with the enterprise strategy and vision123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

 Management transparency is the most important driver of IT governance, because it enables the alignment of IT and business goals, the accountability of IT performance and value, the communication and collaboration among stakeholders, and the compliance with laws and regulations. Management transparency refers to the degree to which information about IT decisions, processes, outcomes, and risks is shared openly and honestly with relevant parties, such as the board of directors, senior management, business units, IT staff, customers, and regulators. Management transparency can help to build trust, confidence, and support for IT initiatives, as well as to identify and address any issues or gaps in IT governance12. References: What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy. Definition of IT Governance (ITG) - IT Glossary | Gartner.

Standards-based reference architecture and design specifications. A reference architecture is a set of principles, patterns, standards, and best practices that guide the design and implementation of IT solutions. A design specification is a detailed document that describes the technical requirements, features, and functionalities of an IT solution. By using standards-based reference architecture and design specifications, an enterprise can ensure that its IT infrastructure is aligned with its business needs and goals, and that it can support the integration, compatibility, and scalability of its IT systems and services. Some examples of standards-based reference architectures are: The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) 1, The Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF) 2, and The Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (CCRA) 3.