Critical Data Elements are identified so that organizations can concentrate governance and Data Quality effort where failure would create the greatest business impact.
Not every attribute deserves the same level of profiling, monitoring, stewardship, lineage documentation, control, and remediation. Applying identical controls to every field would usually be economically inefficient and may divert resources away from information that supports regulation, financial reporting, key operations, customer outcomes, or strategic decisions.
The DMBOK2 maintenance revision explicitly adds and clarifies the concept of a Critical Data Element within Chapter 13.
Once a CDE is identified, the organization can define applicable quality dimensions, measurable rules, thresholds, ownership, authoritative sources, lineage, issue escalation, and monitoring frequency.
Criticality is contextual. An attribute may be critical to one process and relatively insignificant to another. The decision should therefore reflect documented business use and risk rather than technical prominence.
Metadata remains essential because it links the CDE to definitions, systems, lineage, owners, and quality controls.
Reference Topics: DAMA-DMBOK2 Chapter 13 — Critical Data Elements; Prioritization; Business Impact; Risk; Data Governance; Metadata.
===============