RVT_ELEC_01101 Exam Dumps - Autodesk Certified Professional Questions and Answers

In Autodesk Revit, phasing is used to represent different stages of a project — for example, existing conditions, demolition, and new construction — all within a single model. Each view is assigned to a specific phase, and elements in that view are displayed according to their phase status (created, existing, demolished, or temporary).

According to the Autodesk Revit User’s Guide (Phasing and Phase Filters section):

“Each element in a project has 2 key phase-related parameters:

Phase Created – the phase in which the element was created.

Phase Demolished – the phase in which the element is demolished.These parameters control how elements display in different views depending on the view’s assigned phase and phase filter.”— Revit User’s Guide, Chapter: Phasing and Phase Filters

Revit automatically applies Graphic Overrides to display phase statuses. These are defined under Manage tab → Phases → Graphic Overrides. The categories include:

Existing

Demolished

New

Temporary

“Elements that are both created and demolished in the same phase are considered Temporary and display using the Temporary graphic override settings.”

— Revit MEP User’s Guide, Managing Phases and Graphic Overrides

Applying This to the Exhibit:

In the exhibit, the project includes multiple phases (Phase 1 through Phase 5). The designer is currently working in Phase 3.

Elements created and demolished in the same phase (Phase 3) are displayed as Temporary.

Elements created in earlier phases (e.g., Phase 1) and demolished in the current phase (Phase 3) are displayed as Demolished.

Elements created in later phases (e.g., Phase 4) do not yet exist and are not shown.

Therefore:

A. Elements that will be demolished in Phase 4 → not applicable; those elements are still active in Phase 3.

B. Elements created in Phase 1 and demolished in Phase 3 → will appear as Demolished, not Temporary.

C. Elements created and demolished in Phase 3 → correctly displayed using Temporary graphic overrides.

D. Elements created and demolished in Phase 2 → would not appear in Phase 3 (they were already removed).

Verified References from Revit Electrical Design Documentation:

Autodesk Revit MEP User’s Guide (2011), “Working with Phases”:

“Elements created and demolished in the same phase are shown using the Temporary phase graphic override settings.”

Autodesk Revit Architecture and MEP Official Study Guide, “Phasing and Phase Filters”:

“Temporary elements exist only during the phase in which they are created and demolished; they are displayed using the temporary override graphics.”

In Autodesk Revit Electrical Design, when an electrical designer needs to directly connect Panel B to Panel A without a breaker—such that Panel A’s load includes the total load from Panel B—the correct method is to configure both panels to use the same distribution system and to set Panel B’s connection type to Feed Through Lugs.

According to the Autodesk Revit MEP User Guide, Chapter 17: Electrical Systems, under “Creating Power and Lighting Circuits” and “Panel Properties” sections:

“When connecting panels in series, ensure both devices share the same distribution system. If a subpanel is required to pass its total load through to another panel without circuit protection, specify the connection type as Feed Through Lugs. This connection allows the upstream panel to include the total connected load from the subpanel in its own load summary.”

The feed-through lugs configuration enables the second panel (Panel B) to be electrically tied to the first (Panel A) as though it were an extension of the same bus. Unlike breaker or main-lug-only setups, the feed-through configuration does not insert a protective breaker between the two panels. Instead, it provides a continuous feeder connection where the parent panel’s load schedule automatically aggregates the downstream panel’s total load.

This setting is found in Revit’s Properties Palette for electrical equipment:

Under Electrical - Circuiting, the designer must ensure both panels use the same Distribution System (e.g., 208Y/120V 3Φ 4W).

Then, under Connection Type, select Feed Through Lugs.

The Smithsonian Facilities Revit Template Electrical Standards Guide also confirms this best practice:

“Feed-through panels are used when a subpanel’s total load must be reported in the main distribution panel without additional breakers. Both panels must share identical voltage and phase configurations within the same distribution system.”

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. The “subfeed lug breaker” introduces a breaker, contradicting the requirement of no breaker.

B. “Circuit subfeed panel type” is not a standard Revit configuration; Revit uses connection types instead.

D. Transformers alter the voltage distribution; the question specifies a direct connection within the same system.

Therefore, the correct configuration that meets all design and load reflection requirements is:

✅ C. Both panels are assigned to the same distribution system, and the connection type is set to feed through lugs.

According to the Autodesk Revit MEP User’s Guide (Chapter 17 – Electrical Systems), when creating power and lighting circuits, Revit enforces specific compatibility rules to ensure the accuracy and integrity of electrical systems. The document explicitly states:

“Circuits connect similar electrical components to form an electrical system. Once created, you can edit circuits to add or remove components, connect a circuit to a panel, add wiring runs, and view circuit and panel properties… A component can be connected in a circuit if it is compatible with the other components in the circuit and if it has an available connector.”

Furthermore, it continues:

“When circuits are created for a power system, only compatible devices can be connected. All devices in a circuit must specify the same distribution system (voltage and number of poles). The distribution system can be specified by type parameters or instance parameters. When you create a circuit where all the devices have the distribution system specified as instance parameters, Revit MEP displays a Specify Circuit Information dialog where you can specify values for the number of poles and voltage prior to creating the circuit.”

Additionally, the documentation clarifies that circuits must exist within the same project model to maintain system logic and consistency. It explains that “circuits connect similar electrical components within a particular system,” which implicitly enforces that items must reside in the same model file. Revit’s data structure does not allow cross-model circuit connections, since circuit logic, load calculations, and panel assignments depend on shared model parameters and hosted relationships between electrical families.

Therefore, the two rules enforced by Revit when creating a power circuit are:

A. Items on the circuit must be in the same model.This ensures data integrity and consistency across electrical systems, as circuits cannot span multiple linked models.

C. Items on the circuit must be assigned the same voltage definition.This guarantees that only devices with matching voltage and pole configurations can be logically and electrically connected to the same circuit.

Other options, such as requiring apparent load values or association with transformers, are not mandatory for circuit creation—they are design considerations applied after circuits are established. Worksets (option D) manage collaboration, not circuit validity.

Verified Reference:

Autodesk Revit MEP 2011 User’s Guide, Chapter 17 “Electrical Systems,” Sections Creating Circuits and Creating Power and Lighting Circuits, pp. 461–463.

In Autodesk Revit for Electrical Design, arrowheads on leader lines—such as those used with tags, text notes, or annotations—are controlled through Type Properties, not through instance properties or free-end options.

According to the Revit MEP User’s Guide – Annotating Chapter (Chapter 47 and 42), the section “Modifying Tags” explains:

“Select the tag, and on the Properties palette, click (Edit Type). In the Type Properties dialog, select a value for Leader Arrowhead to add an arrowhead to the leader line.”

This confirms that the arrowhead is defined at the type level, meaning any change applies to all tags or text notes of that annotation type throughout the project. The Leader Arrowhead property allows the designer to choose from predefined arrowhead styles (like “Filled Arrow,” “Dot,” “Tick Mark,” etc.), which are defined globally under:

Manage tab → Settings panel → Additional Settings → Arrowheads.

Furthermore, the document specifies under “Leader Arrowhead Properties”:

“Sets the arrowhead shape on the leader line. The value is the name of the arrowhead style defined by the Arrowheads tool.”

This behavior applies to all annotation categories, including text notes, keynotes, material tags, and electrical device tags, maintaining consistency across all view types in an electrical project.

Therefore, Option C is the correct answer because arrowheads are configured via Type Properties, while the other options are inaccurate:

Option A (Free End) only defines leader attachment behavior.

Option B (Instance properties) does not include a “Leader Arrowhead” toggle.

Option D (Enable Leader Line) only adds or removes a leader line, not the arrowhead style.

In Autodesk Revit, when an electrical designer creates a callout view, the software automatically generates a new dependent or independent view based on the selected callout type. However, if a callout is accidentally linked to the wrong or redundant view, the designer can easily reassign it to another existing view without recreating the callout. This can be done using the Reference Other View property in the Properties palette.

According to the Revit MEP User’s Guide (Chapter 47 “Views and Callouts”):

“To link a callout to an existing view rather than creating a new one, select the callout, and under the properties for that element, use Reference Other View to specify the desired target view.”

This means that when the designer selects the callout (in this case, shown as “L0 - Power - Callout 1” in the Project Browser), they can modify the Reference Other View setting from the Properties palette to point to a different, pre-existing detail view or callout view—for example, one showing an enlarged power distribution layout or switchboard detail.

This is the most efficient workflow because:

It avoids recreating or redrawing the callout (unlike Option C).

It preserves all annotation and sheet referencing data.

It ensures alignment and consistency across sheet references.

The Smithsonian Facilities Revit Template User’s Guide reinforces this standard Revit practice:

“When a view reference or callout is incorrectly associated, use the Reference Other View property to redirect the annotation to an existing detail or dependent view.”

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Change its type from the Type Selector: Callout types control annotation style (not the referenced view).

C. Delete and recreate: This is unnecessary and inefficient.

D. Open the callout view and change its type: Callout type cannot be changed directly once created; it’s controlled by view properties.

Therefore, the correct and Revit-recommended approach is Option A: Select the callout and choose a detail view under Reference Other View.

In Revit, when editing a family in the Family Editor and reloading it into a project, Revit handles type changes using specific update rules. Types that are renamed overwrite their earlier version in the project because they retain the same internal type ID. Types that are added to the family also appear in the project once reloaded.

Initially, the family contains two types:

Above Counter

Plain

The changes made in the Family Editor are:

1️⃣ Rename Plain → Standard

2️⃣ Add a new type named GFCI

According to documented Revit behavior for type updates:

“When a family is reloaded into the project, any renamed family type replaces its previous version while maintaining its parameter assignments. Newly created types are added as additional family types available for placement within the project.”

Therefore:

Plain no longer exists because it was renamed

Standard now exists in its place

GFCI is added as a new family type

Above Counter remains unchanged

Thus, the family in the project now contains:

✅ Above Counter

✅ GFCI

✅ Standard

???? This matches answer choice:

B. Above Counter, GFCI, Standard

To ensure consistency and efficiency when multiple branch panel schedules require identical formatting, Revit allows applying a panel schedule template to one or more schedules simultaneously.

The documented procedure states:

“You can apply a template to one or more existing panel schedules.”

And further:

“Select the panel schedule(s).

For Apply Templates, specify the template to apply to the selected panel.”

This functionality lets an electrical designer select all 24 branch panel schedules in the Project Browser, right‑click and apply the desired template to update formatting across all selected schedules in a single operation.

When performing an Interference Check in Revit, the Interference Report dialog is generated. This report lists all interfering elements found. To select or locate a specific element—such as a cable tray fitting—the designer must use the Show command.

The official workflow from the Revit documentation clearly states:

“To see one of the elements that is intersected, select its name in the Interference Report dialog, and click Show. The current view displays the problem.”

This confirms that selecting the row that lists the interfering cable tray fitting and clicking Show will highlight and activate the view containing the clashing element—allowing it to be modified or moved to resolve the conflict.

This means the designer must:

Click the row containing the cable tray fitting in the Message list.

Click Show to highlight and locate it in the model view so the clash can be addressed directly.

This reference explicitly confirms that Show is the correct method to select the clashing cable tray fitting from the interference results in order to resolve the conflict.