Advanced-CAMS-Audit Exam Dumps - ACAMS AML Certifications Questions and Answers

A customer identification program (CIP) mandates that financial institutions obtain specific information from customers during account opening. This includes verifying identity through reliable documents, understanding the purpose of the account, and assessing associated risks.

Advanced CAMS-Audit and FATF recommendations highlight the necessity of robust account opening procedures as the foundation for AML compliance​​.

Steps to Assess the External Review Report:

Validate the scope, methodology, and findings of the external review to determine its adequacy and reliability.

Identify any gaps or areas that require additional scrutiny by internal audit.

Rationale for Review Instead of Reliance:

Relying solely on external reviews without validation risks overlooking key compliance deficiencies. Internal audit must establish an independent assessment to corroborate findings​​.

CAMS-Audit Recommendations:

CAMS-Audit stresses the importance of critical evaluation of third-party reports and ensuring internal audit findings align with organizational compliance priorities​​

Significance of Finding 4 in Scenario and Threshold Calibration:

Finding 4typically points to issues with the alignment of customer segmentation or risk profiling. Incorrect segmentation or categorization directly impacts the assignment of scenarios and thresholds, leading to clients being subjected to inappropriate monitoring settings​​.

For example, placing a low-risk client in a high-risk threshold group can cause unnecessary alerts, while the opposite scenario might miss genuine suspicious activities​​.

Other Options Evaluated:

Finding 2:May relate to broader systemic issues but does not specifically highlight misalignment with thresholds or scenarios.

Finding 5:Typically involves data accuracy concerns but does not directly result in the application of incorrect scenarios or thresholds.

Finding 7:Often pertains to gaps in coverage or monitoring rather than specific issues in the calibration of scenarios and thresholds.

Advanced CAMS-Audit Context:

Advanced CAMS-Audit emphasizes the importance of precise customer segmentation and scenario calibration to ensure transaction monitoring systems operate efficiently and effectively. Findings pointing to misalignments in these areas are critical indicators of potential weaknesses​​.

Regulatory Relevance:

FATF and Basel Committee standards require risk-based monitoring tailored to the risk profile of each customer. Misaligned thresholds violate this principle, potentially leading to regulatory scrutiny​​.

Conclusion:The correct answer isB. Finding 4, as it identifies the misalignment of scenarios and thresholds with customer risk profiles, which is a critical issue in ensuring effective AML monitoring systems.

Response to Deficiencies:

Engaging a third party ensures an independent, expert evaluation of deficiencies and the creation of a robust remediation plan​​.

This aligns with regulatory expectations for addressing material AML program weaknesses effectively​​.

Reviewing the Risk Assessment:

A risk assessment reveals whether privately-owned ATMs are identified and properly evaluated in terms of potential AML risks.

Auditor's Task:

Confirm that specific policies and procedures are now in place to address identified risks from the previous assessment.

Relevance to CAMS-Audit Standards:

Risk assessments are fundamental in identifying gaps in policies and procedures for high-risk areas like privately-owned ATMs​​.

Importance of Risk Assessment and Controls:

A money laundering risk assessment identifies inherent risks and vulnerabilities the institution faces, forming the foundation for mitigation efforts​​.

Internal controls, including policies and procedures, are critical to operationalize the risk assessment and ensure compliance with AML requirements​​.

Irrelevant Options:

C:A management action plan is remedial, not preventive.

D:The list of PEPs is specific to high-risk individuals, not the institution's overall risk framework.

E:Law enforcement logs provide insight into reactive measures but not ongoing control adequacy.

A. Documentation Requirements: Proper documentation ensures transparency and traceability of the testing process and outcomes.

B. Sampling Method: Establishing the sampling methodology ensures that the test results are representative of the population and risks being assessed.

D. Test Objectives and Population Selection: These elements help align the testing approach with the identified risks and objectives, ensuring the focus is on mitigating the most critical issues.

CAMS-Audit emphasizes robust documentation and sampling techniques to maintain the integrity and reliability of audit findings​​.

In follow-up strategies, the focus should be on ensuring accountability and tracking progress. Establishing a target completion date and regularly updating the status of remedial actions ensures timely and effective resolution of deficiencies.

CAMS-Audit emphasizes tracking timelines and milestones for corrective actions to align with regulatory expectations and internal compliance frameworks​​.

Executive Summary Requirements:

The statement focuses on clear, evidence-based findings, critical for reflecting material deficiencies in enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients​​.

Guidelines for Reporting:

FATF emphasizes the consistent application of risk rating systems to ensure ML/TF risks are adequately mitigated​​.

Presentation of Exceptions:

Auditors must analyze the exceptions based on their likelihood of occurrence and potential impact on compliance and operational risks before presenting findings to the auditee​​.

Supporting Standards:

Basel and FATF emphasize prioritizing findings based on their materiality and risk implications during the audit process​.