Advanced-CAMS-Audit Exam Dumps - ACAMS AML Certifications Questions and Answers

B. Periodic Checks: Regular monitoring ensures that implemented rules align with updated specifications and are functioning as intended, reducing the risk of deviation from compliance standardsints Before Release**: Establishing validation checkpoints ensures that all releases comply with documented specifications, mitigating risks of errors in the risk rating model

Enhanced due diligence is necessary to identify potential risks associated with high-value transactions such as art sales, a known method for money laundering.

CAMS-Audit guidelines recommend updating client records with findings to maintain transparency and prepare for regulatory scrutiny​​.

This approach ensures compliance with due diligence requirements and mitigates reputational and financial crime risks.

Finding 1

This finding likely pertains to foundational gaps in the organization's risk assessment framework or the absence of a comprehensive understanding of inherent risks. Without addressing this, the organization cannot adequately identify, assess, or mitigate risks effectively.

According to CAMS-Audit standards, a thorough risk assessment is the cornerstone of an effective AML/CFT program. It helps to prioritize resources and design appropriate controls based on the identified risk levels​​.

Critical Role in Understanding Risks

Remediating foundational issues ensures that the organization has a clear understanding of its risk exposure across all products, services, and jurisdictions. This step is essential before addressing downstream issues such as customer due diligence (CDD) gaps or monitoring inefficiencies.

Alignment with Regulatory Requirements

FATF guidelines and CAMS-Audit practices emphasize that risk assessment should precede other remediation efforts. Without this, the organization may address symptoms rather than root causes of compliance and operational risks​​.

A. Ongoing Due Diligence: FATF Recommendations emphasize the need for ongoing monitoring and due diligence of NPOs to detect and prevent misuse for terrorist financing​​.

C. Diversion of Funds: Identifying and mitigating risks of fund diversion to terrorist organizations is a critical component in evaluating NPO vulnerabilities​​.

Comparison Against Past Suspicious Activity Reported:

This evaluates whether the new thresholds are identifying similar or improved patterns of suspicious activity compared to prior thresholds.

Helps validate that the updated thresholds align with the institution's AML risk profile and regulatory expectations.

Above-the-Line and Below-the-Line Testing:

Above-the-line tests verify that alerts generated by the thresholds include expected suspicious transactions.

Below-the-line tests assess transactions below the threshold to ensure no significant suspicious activities are missed.

CAMS-Audit Reference:

Advanced CAMS-Audit frameworks emphasize the importance of both historical comparison and robust testing methodologies to validate transaction monitoring system updates​​.

Critical Impact:

Absence of CDD processes during product launch leaves the institution exposed to onboarding high-risk customers without proper risk assessment​​.

Guidelines and Compliance:

FATF standards emphasize embedding CDD in all stages of customer interaction to mitigate ML/TF risks​​.

=========================

Importance of Coverage Assessment:

Coverage assessment ensures that the TM scenarios address the full spectrum of identified money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing (TF) risks relevant to the organization.

This aligns with FATF Recommendations on risk-based approaches and the effectiveness of transaction monitoring systems​​.

Key Reference Justification:

Basel Committee guidelines stress that financial institutions must regularly review their transaction monitoring coverage to ensure alignment with the risk landscape​​.

Comprehensive Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Activities in the Planning Phase:

The planning phase involves understanding the scope, objectives, and framework for the audit.

Preliminary discussions with management set the stage for identifying critical processes and potential risk areas.

Key Actions:

Scheduling preliminary discussions ensures alignment on audit goals.

A walk-through of key processes provides insight into workflows and control mechanisms.

Alignment with CAMS-Audit Principles:

Effective planning as described in CAMS-Audit guidelines prioritizes communication and process understanding during initial audit phases​​.

C:Designating the account as a PEP-account triggers additional monitoring and controls as PEPs inherently pose higher risks​​.

D:Enhanced due diligence (EDD) and ongoing monitoring are essential for PEPs to track their financial activities closely and address any anomalies​​.

E:Documenting the details of the asset-holding arrangement provides clarity on the customer's profile and any associated risks​​.

Jurisdictional risk is critical in correspondent banking due to potential exposure to countries with weaker AML/CFT controls, high corruption levels, or sanctions.