EFM Exam Dumps - NCC C-EFM Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

The tracing clearly shows recurrent deep variable decelerations, characterized by:

Abrupt onset (<30 sec)

Sharp V-shape

Rapid descent and ascent

Depth exceeding 60–70 bpm drops

Occurring with most contractions

This pattern is highly consistent with cord compression, which is the physiologic basis of variable decelerations. According to NCC, NICHD, AWHONN, Miller, and Menihan, recurrent (≥50% of contractions) deep variables with slow return to baseline indicate fetal compromise and require targeted intervention.

The patient has already been repositioned, so first-line management has failed. NCC emphasizes that the next recommended intervention for recurrent variable decelerations, particularly when maternal repositioning is ineffective, is amnioinfusion. This intervention relieves cord compression by restoring fluid around the umbilical cord.

Why the other choices are incorrect:

A. Apply a spiral electrode – NOT appropriate

Spiral electrodes improve signal quality but do not treat cord compression.

The tracing is already clearly interpretable, and the issue is physiologic, not technical.

B. Decrease the oxytocin – Not the best next step

Decreasing oxytocin is appropriate when tachysystole is contributing to fetal intolerance.

This strip shows normal contraction frequency (about every 2–3 minutes) and no tachysystole.

Thus, reducing oxytocin alone will not relieve cord compression.

C. Perform an amnioinfusion – CORRECT

NCC-approved references repeatedly state:

For recurrent variable decelerations that persist after maternal repositioning, amnioinfusion is recommended to reduce the frequency and depth of decelerations.

It can improve fetal oxygenation, decrease cord compression, and reduce the need for operative delivery.

It is the intervention most directly targeted to the pathophysiology of this pattern.

Therefore, C. Perform an amnioinfusion is the correct next management step.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

The tracing demonstrates:

Baseline: approx. 140 bpm

Variability: minimal-to-moderate (fluctuating but not consistently moderate)

Decelerations: shallow variable decelerations

Accelerations: not consistently present

According to NICHD/NCC definitions:

Category I requires ALL of the following:

Baseline 110–160

Moderate variability

No late or variable decelerations

Early decels and accelerations may be present

This tracing does not have consistently moderate variability and does have variable decelerations, so it is not Category I.

Category III requires ANY of the following:

Absent variability with recurrent late decels

Absent variability with recurrent variable decels

Absent variability with bradycardia

Sinusoidal pattern

This tracing does not show absent variability, bradycardia, or recurrent significant lates.

Category II includes:

Minimal variability

Absence of accelerations

Variable decelerations

Tracings not clearly Category I or III

This strip fits Category II exactly due to minimal variability + intermittent variable decelerations.

Thus, the correct classification is Category II.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

The fetal heart rate is calculated from the interval between consecutive R waves in the fetal ECG. Shorter R-R intervals indicate more beats per unit of time, therefore resulting in a higher heart rate. AWHONN and Menihan both note that fetal ECG monitoring measures instantaneous rate based on R-R spacing, and “shorter intervals correspond to fetal tachycardia.”

Simpson & Creehan reinforce that fetal heart rate variability and baseline are derived from these R-R intervals, with shorter intervals consistently producing faster rates. Miller’s Pocket Guide describes the relationship simply: “Short R-R = faster rate; long R-R = slower rate.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

A prolonged deceleration is defined by NICHD and NCC as:

A deceleration lasting ≥2 minutes but <10 minutes

Decrease in FHR of ≥15 bpm

Can occur with or without uterine contractions

This tracing shows:

A deep drop in FHR down to ~60–70 bpm

Duration lasting several minutes

Recovery back to baseline

Moderate variability present afterward

Because variability remains present and the tracing does not show:

Absent variability

Recurrent late decelerations

Recurrent variable decelerations with absent variability

Bradycardia for ≥10 minutes

…it does not meet criteria for Category III.

It is also not bradycardia, because bradycardia requires:

Baseline <110 bpm for 10 minutes or longer

Therefore the correct interpretation is a prolonged deceleration.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs):

NCC references (AWHONN, Menihan, Simpson, Creasy & Resnik) consistently state that fetal accelerations are a reassuring sign of intact neurologic function. Accelerations represent the interaction of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches moderated through the central nervous system, reflecting effective autonomic regulation.

AWHONN specifically describes fetal accelerations as:

• A maturity marker of CNS function,

• Reflecting vigorous fetal movement,

• Demonstrating adequate oxygenation,

• Indicating a well-oxygenated brainstem and cortex.

Simpson & Miller emphasize that accelerations require both systems to be functioning and respond appropriately, which confirms CNS integration, not sympathetic or parasympathetic dominance alone.

Therefore, spontaneous accelerations indicate an integrated CNS response, making Option C the correct NCC-aligned answer.

=====================================================================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Amnioinfusion is considered an intrauterine resuscitative intervention used specifically for recurrent variable decelerations caused by cord compression. NCC, AWHONN, Miller, and Menihan consistently teach that variables occur when the umbilical cord becomes compressed, reducing fetal oxygenation. When oligohydramnios or decreased amniotic fluid volume is present, the cord is more vulnerable to compression.

Why amnioinfusion is used:

Amnioinfusion works by:

Increasing intraamniotic fluid volume

Reducing umbilical cord compression

Decreasing the frequency and severity of variable decelerations

This directly targets the pathophysiology behind recurrent variables.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Dilute thick meconium – NOT supported by NCC

Historically, amnioinfusion was studied for meconium dilution, but major organizations—including NCC-aligned sources—state that amnioinfusion is NOT recommended for the sole purpose of diluting meconium. It does not reduce meconium aspiration syndrome and is no longer indicated for that purpose.

B. Restore uterine blood flow – NOT accurate

Uterine blood flow is addressed through maternal positioning, fluid bolus, reducing uterine tachysystole, and minimizing vasoconstriction—not via amnioinfusion. Amnioinfusion does not physiologically affect uterine perfusion.

C. Treat oligohydramnios – CORRECT

Recurrent variables with thick meconium often occur in the setting of low fluid, which worsens cord compression.

NCC-recommended indications include:

Recurrent variable decelerations unresponsive to repositioning

Suspected or confirmed oligohydramnios

Thick meconium may be associated with low fluid, but the purpose of amnioinfusion is to alleviate cord compression by restoring fluid volume, not to dilute the meconium.

Thus, the correct answer is C. Treat oligohydramnios.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

This tracing shows recurrent late decelerations accompanied by absent variability.

Per NICHD/NCC, a tracing is Category III if ANY of the following are present:

Absent variability AND recurrent late decelerations

Absent variability AND recurrent variable decelerations

Absent variability AND bradycardia

Sinusoidal pattern

In this strip:

Variability is absent

Decelerations are recurrent and late

The determining feature for the classification is absent variability, which indicates significant risk for fetal acidemia.

The contraction pattern (option B) does not determine category.

The deceleration type alone (option C) does not determine Category III without absent variability.

Thus, the classification is Category III because of absent variability.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References (No URLs):

Interpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings in the NCC C-EFM exam follows the standardized NICHD three-tier classification, which is fully adopted in NCC’s content outline and recommended references such as AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practices, Miller’s EFM Pocket Guide, Menihan, Simpson’s Perinatal Nursing, and Creasy & Resnik.

Baseline:

The tracing demonstrates an FHR baseline around 145–150 bpm, which falls within the normal range of 110–160 bpm. NCC references define baseline as the mean FHR rounded to increments of 5 bpm over a 10-minute window.

Variability:

The strip shows minimal variability, with amplitude fluctuations approximately 0–2 bpm.

According to NCC-aligned definitions:

Moderate variability: 6–25 bpm

Minimal variability: 1–5 bpm

Absent variability: undetectable amplitude

This tracing shows minimal variability, not moderate, so it cannot be Category I.

Accelerations:

No accelerations are present. Lack of accelerations alone does not classify the tracing as Category III.

Decelerations:

There are no recurrent late decelerations, no recurrent variable decelerations, and no prolonged decelerations. Without these, and with minimal variability, the tracing does not meet Category III criteria.

Category III criteria (per NICHD/NCC):

Must include at least one of the following:

Absent variability with recurrent late decelerations

Absent variability with recurrent variable decelerations

Absent variability with bradycardia

Sinusoidal pattern

None of these are present.

Category II criteria (per NICHD/NCC):

Category II includes tracings that are not Category I or III.

Examples specifically listed include:

Minimal variability

Absent accelerations after fetal stimulation

Tachycardia

Bradycardia without absent variability

Variable or late decelerations occurring intermittently

Because this tracing shows minimal variability, a normal baseline, no accelerations, and no recurrent decelerations, it fits squarely into Category II.

Therefore, the correct classification is Category II.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

The tracing shows the classic features of variable decelerations:

Abrupt onset (<30 seconds from baseline to nadir)

Rapid drop followed by a rapid recovery

Significant variability in shape, depth, and timing

“Shouldering”—brief accelerations before or after the deceleration, typical of cord compression

The decelerations vary in appearance and timing relative to contractions

In second stage, this pattern is extremely common due to:

Recurrent cord compression during descent

Maternal pushing

Reduced amniotic fluid with advancing labor

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Intermittent late decelerations

Late decelerations are uniform, smooth, begin after the contraction peak, and recover after the contraction ends.

This tracing shows abrupt, variable-shaped, non-uniform decels → NOT late decels.

C. Wandering baseline

A wandering baseline is a slowly fluctuating, low-amplitude, smooth, preterminal pattern.

This tracing shows an identifiable baseline with variability and clear decelerations, not wandering baseline.

Thus, the tracing is most consistent with variable decelerations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Assessment of likely fetal acid–base status is grounded in NCC-aligned principles that correlate fetal pH with fetal heart rate patterns, especially variability, presence/absence of accelerations, and type and depth of decelerations.

This tracing shows the following features:

Baseline:

The fetal heart rate baseline is approximately 140–150 bpm, within the normal 110–160 bpm range.

Variability:

Moderate variability is present—approximately 6–25 bpm amplitude.

Per NCC and NICHD definitions, moderate variability is strongly associated with normal fetal oxygenation and normal fetal pH > 7.20–7.25.

Accelerations:

There are occasional small accelerations, another strong indicator of normal fetal acid–base status.

Decelerations:

The tracing shows occasional variable decelerations, shallow and brief, recovering rapidly, typical of intermittent cord compression.

NCC references emphasize that intermittent, non-recurrent variables with moderate variability do not correlate with acidemia.

Uterine activity:

Contractions are present but not excessive, and fetal response remains reassuring.

Correlating tracing features with fetal pH (per NCC, AWHONN, Simpson, Menihan):

Moderate variability is the strongest intrapartum indicator of normal fetal pH.

The NICHD/NCC consensus repeatedly states that:

“The presence of moderate variability reliably predicts adequate fetal oxygenation and a fetal pH above the threshold associated with metabolic acidemia.”

Fetal pH below 7.15 is associated with:

Absent variability

Recurrent late decelerations

Recurrent deep variable decelerations

Prolonged bradycardia

None are present in this tracing.

Because the tracing demonstrates moderate variability, intermittent uncomplicated variables, and no recurrent late decelerations, the physiologic expectation is that the fetal pH remains normal, significantly above 7.15.

Therefore, the correct answer is: A (above 7.15).