FSCP Exam Dumps - Forescout Certified Professional Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:

According to the Forescout Administration Guide - Device Information Properties documentation, the correct statements about the comments field are: Endpoints may have multiple comments assigned to them (A) and it can be edited manually by a right click administrator action, or it can be edited in policy by using the action "Run Script on CounterACT" (C).​

Comments Field Overview:

According to the Device Information Properties documentation:​

"(Right-click an endpoint in the Detections pane to add a comment. The comment is retained for the life of the endpoint in the Forescout Console.)"

Multiple Comments Support:

According to the ForeScout Administration Guide:​

Endpoints support multiple comments that can be added over time:

Manual Comments - Administrators can right-click an endpoint and add comments

Policy-Generated Comments - Policies can automatically add comments when conditions are met

Cumulative - Multiple comments are retained and displayed together

Persistent - Comments are retained for the life of the endpoint

Manual Comments via Right-Click:

According to the documentation:​

Administrators can manually edit the comments field by:

Right-clicking on an endpoint in the Detections pane

Selecting "Add comment" or "Edit comment" option

Entering the comment text

Saving the comment

This manual method is readily available and frequently used for operational notes.

Policy-Based Comments via "Run Script on CounterACT":

According to the Administration Guide:​

Policies can also edit the comments field using the "Run Script on CounterACT" action:

Create or edit a policy

Add the "Run Script on CounterACT" action

The script can modify the Comments host property

When the policy condition is met, the script runs and updates the comment field

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Cannot be edited manually...only via Run Script on CounterACT - Incorrect; manual right-click editing is explicitly supported

D. Endpoints may have exactly one comment - Incorrect; multiple comments are supported

E. Can be edited...by using action "Run Script on Windows" - Incorrect; the action is "Run Script on CounterACT," not "Run Script on Windows"

Comments Field Characteristics:

According to the documentation:​

The Comments field:

Supports Multiple Entries - More than one comment can be added

Manually Editable - Right-click administrative action available

Policy Editable - "Run Script on CounterACT" action can modify it

Persistent - Retained for the life of the endpoint

Searchable - Comments can be used in policy conditions

Audit Trail - Provides documentation of endpoint history

Usage Examples:

According to the Administration Guide:​

Manual Comments:

"Device moved to Building C - 2024-10-15"

"User reported software issue"

"Awaiting quarantine release approval"

Policy-Generated Comments:

Vulnerability compliance policy: "Failed patch compliance check"

Security policy: "Detected unauthorized application"

Remediation policy: "Scheduled for antivirus update"

Multiple such comments can accumulate on a single endpoint over time.

Referenced Documentation:

Forescout Administration Guide - Device Information Properties​

ForeScout CounterACT Administration Guide - Comments field section

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:

According to the Forescout Administration Guide - Policy Main Rule Advanced Options, the default recheck timer for a NAC policy is 8 hours.​

Default Policy Recheck Timer:

According to the official documentation:​

"By default, both matched endpoints and unmatched endpoints are rechecked every eight hours, and on any admission event."

This 8-hour default ensures that all endpoints are periodically re-evaluated against policy conditions, regardless of whether they currently match the policy.

Recheck Configuration:

According to the documentation:​

When you configure a policy's main rule advanced options:

Default Recheck Interval: 8 hours

Customizable Range: Can be configured from 1 hour to infinite (no recheck)

Applies to: All endpoints in the policy scope

Recheck Triggers:

According to the administration guide:​

Policies recheck when:

Recheck Timer Expires - Every 8 hours by default

Admission Event - When specific network events occur

SecureConnector Event - When SC status changes

Referenced Documentation:

Forescout Platform Policy Main Rule Advanced Options​

Main Rule Advanced Options​

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:

The Sponsor Group is the necessary User Directory server setting required to enable guest approval by sponsors. According to the Forescout User Directory Plugin Configuration Guide and Guest Management Portal documentation, Sponsor Groups must be created and configured to define the corporate employees (sponsors) who are authorized to approve or decline guest network access requests.​

Sponsor Group Configuration:

In the Guest Management pane, the Sponsors tab is used to define the corporate employees who are authorized to log into the Guest Management Portal to approve network access requests from guests. These employees are assigned to specific Sponsor Groups, which control which sponsors can approve guest access requests.​

How Sponsor Groups Enable Guest Approval:

Sponsor Definition - Corporate employees must be designated as sponsors and assigned to a Sponsor Group

Approval Authority - Sponsors in assigned groups can approve or decline guest network access requests

Authentication - When "Enable sponsor approval without authentication via emailed link" is selected, sponsors in the designated group can approve guests based on email link authorization​

Guest Registration - Guest registration options connect Sponsor Groups to the guest approval workflow

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Policy to control - While policies are used for guest control, they do not define which sponsors can approve guests

B. Guest Tags - Guest Tags are used to classify and organize guest accounts, not to enable sponsor approval

D. Guest password policy - This setting controls password requirements for guests, not sponsor approval authority

E. Authentication Server - Authentication servers verify credentials but do not establish sponsor approval groups

Referenced Documentation:

Forescout User Directory Plugin Configuration Guide - Create Sponsors section​

Guest Management Portal - Sponsor Configuration documentation​

"Create sponsors" - Forescout Administration Guide section

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:

According to the Forescout Administration Guide and RADIUS Plugin Configuration Guide, the best practice for ordering sub-rules is that the first rule should capture the lowest number of endpoints.​

Sub-Rule Evaluation Order:

According to the documentation:​

"Endpoints are inspected against each sub-rule in the order listed. When an endpoint matches a sub-rule, subsequent sub-rules are not evaluated for that endpoint."

This sequential evaluation means that sub-rule order is critical to policy behavior.

Best Practice - Specific to General:

According to the guidelines:​

The correct approach is to order sub-rules from most specific to least specific:

First Sub-Rules (Most Specific) - Should capture the lowest number of endpoints

Very specific criteria

Narrow scope

Handles edge cases and special conditions

Middle Sub-Rules - Broader criteria

More endpoints matched

General conditions

Last Sub-Rule (Most General) - Catch-all sub-rule

Lowest specificity

Highest number of endpoints

Handles remaining unmatched endpoints

Why Specific Rules First:

According to the documentation:​

"When an endpoint is found to match a sub-rule, no subsequent rules are evaluated for the endpoint."

This "first match wins" behavior requires:

Most specific rules first - Ensure special cases are handled correctly

General rules last - Catch remaining endpoints that don't match specific criteria

Avoid premature matches - If a general rule appears first, specific rules never execute

Example Sub-Rule Ordering:

According to the RADIUS documentation:​

text

Sub-Rule 1 (Most Specific, Lowest Count):

Condition: Windows 7 AND Antivirus NOT Running AND Not Encrypted

Lowest number of endpoints - specific conditions

Sub-Rule 2 (More General, Moderate Count):

Condition: Windows Endpoint AND Missing Patches

More endpoints - broader criteria

Sub-Rule 3 (Least Specific, Highest Count - Catch-All):

Condition: Windows Endpoint (Any)

Highest number - captures all remaining Windows endpoints

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Last rule should capture the highest number - While the last rule may capture many endpoints, the key best practice is about the FIRST rule capturing the LOWEST

C. Second rule should capture the highest number - Sub-rule order is specific to general, not based on position 2

D. Last rule should not use a catch-all - Best practice is that the LAST rule should be the catch-all

E. First rule should capture the highest number - This is the OPPOSITE of correct practice

Referenced Documentation:

Forescout RADIUS Plugin Configuration Guide v4.3 - Sub-Rules section​

Defining Forescout Platform Policy Sub-Rules​

Sub-Rule Advanced Options​