GH-900 Exam Dumps - Microsoft GitHub Administrator Questions and Answers

A Codespace is a cloud-hosted development environment provided by GitHub. It allows developers to code in a fully-configured environment that can be accessed from any device with an internet connection. Codespaces integrate with Visual Studio Code, either through the desktop app or directly in the browser, providing a consistent development experience without the need to manually set up a local environment.

Cloud-Hosted Development Environment:

Option C is correct because GitHub Codespaces are essentially cloud-based environments that are pre-configured with the tools and dependencies needed for development. This allows developers to start coding immediately without the overhead of setting up a local environment.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is partially correct in that Codespaces can be accessed and used in a browser, but the defining feature is that it's a full development environment, not just a lightweight editor.

Option B is incorrect because this describes GitHub Copilot, not Codespaces.

Option D is incorrect because Codespaces is not a Visual Studio Code plug-in; it is a cloud-based service that integrates with Visual Studio Code.

GitHub focuses on several key areas that align with its mission to support developers and foster collaboration:

Nurturing a Community That Supports Open Source Principles:

Option A is correct. GitHub is a major advocate for open-source software development, providing tools and platforms that enable open collaboration. GitHub hosts millions of open-source projects and supports a community-driven approach to software development.

Providing Access and Opportunities for Developers:

Option B is correct. GitHub provides a wide range of resources, such as GitHub Education, GitHub Actions, and GitHub Marketplace, to empower developers. These tools and opportunities help developers of all levels to learn, contribute, and improve their skills.

Building a Technology Platform for Secure Code Sharing and Collaboration:

Option D is correct. GitHub’s core function is to provide a platform where developers can securely share code and collaborate. Features like private repositories, branch protections, and GitHub Actions for CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) workflows highlight this focus.

Incorrect Options:

Option C is incorrect because GitHub is not a social media platform for project managers; it is a code hosting platform with social features primarily aimed at developers.

Option E is incorrect because GitHub does not focus on hosting video calls. While some integrations might allow for video conferencing, it is not a core focus of GitHub.

It is recommended to deploy from your feature branch before merging into the main branch to ensure the changes are verified and validated in a production environment. This practice helps in identifying any potential issues or bugs in a real-world scenario before the changes are permanently integrated into the main branch. By deploying from the feature branch, developers can catch and address issues early, reducing the risk of introducing bugs into the main branch, which is usually considered the stable branch.

=================

To locate an existing GitHub Action provided by a GitHub-approved vendor, you can use the following methods:

Verification Badge:

Option C is correct because actions provided by GitHub-approved vendors will typically have a verification badge. This badge indicates that the action is from a trusted source, giving users confidence in its security and reliability.

Search the GitHub Marketplace:

Option F is correct because GitHub Marketplace is the official location to find and install actions, including those provided by third-party vendors. You can search for actions by the vendor's name to find the specific one you need.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is not necessary to locate an existing action; creating a workflow file is for implementing the action, not locating it.

Option B is incorrect because searching the vendor’s website for a github.yaml index is not a standard practice for finding actions.

Option D is incorrect because installing a GitHub App is unrelated to finding an existing action.

Option E is incorrect because adding a vendor as an allowed Actions Source is a configuration step for using the action, not for locating it.

Forking a repository on GitHub is a common practice, especially when contributing to open-source projects or when you want to build on existing work. Here are the two main reasons for forking a repository:

B. To propose changes to the base repository:

One of the primary reasons for forking a repository is to make changes or improvements that you can later propose to the original repository (often called the "upstream" repository). This is typically done through a pull request. By forking the repository, you get your own copy of the project where you can freely experiment, make changes, and then propose those changes back to the original project.

C. To create a new repository based on an existing one:

Forking is also used to create a new repository that is a copy of an existing one. This allows you to work on the project independently of the original repository, effectively creating a new direction for the project or using it as a starting point for a different purpose. This is particularly useful for customization, experimentation, or when you want to build something different while still leveraging the existing codebase.

Explanation of Other Options:

A. To create an issue or open a discussion:

This is incorrect because creating an issue or opening a discussion can be done directly on the original repository without needing to fork it. Forking is unnecessary for these actions.

D. To create a new branch to develop a new feature:

While creating a new branch is related to development, it does not require a fork. Branches are typically created within the same repository to work on new features. Forking is used when you need an entirely separate copy of the repository.

Given this information, the correct answers are B and C.

From a discussion post on GitHub, a user can Create an issue from the discussion. This feature allows users to turn a discussion into an actionable item by creating an issue directly from the discussion thread. This is particularly useful when a conversation identifies a bug, task, or enhancement that needs to be tracked in the repository.

=================

Git is a widely-used version control system that has several defining features:

Distributed Version Control:

Git is a distributed version control system, meaning that every developer has a full copy of the entire repository, including its history, on their local machine. This enables greater flexibility, as work can be done offline and each user has access to the full project history.

Open Source Software:

Git is open-source, meaning its source code is freely available for use, modification, and distribution. This fosters a large community of users and contributors who continuously improve the software.

Efficiency with Large Projects:

Git is designed to handle projects of any size with speed and efficiency. It can manage large codebases and many contributors without significant performance degradation, making it suitable for everything from small personal projects to large, complex software systems.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because Git is not a sequential version control system, nor is it inherently tied to cloud-based services. GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms offer cloud hosting for Git repositories, but Git itself is a version control tool.

Option C is incorrect because Git is not limited to small projects; it is designed to scale efficiently, and the other features mentioned are only partial descriptions of Git's capabilities.

Option D is incorrect because Git is not a centralized version control system; it is distributed. Additionally, Git is open-source, not proprietary, and is used for projects of all sizes.

As mentioned in the answer to Question no. 66, GitHub Actions workflows can reference actions from a variety of sources:

Any Public Repository:

Option A is correct. Actions can be sourced from any public GitHub repository.

The Same Repository as Your Workflow File:

Option B is correct. Actions within the same repository as the workflow file can be referenced directly.

A Published Docker Container Image on Docker Hub:

Option E is correct. Workflows can also use actions provided as Docker container images from Docker Hub.

Incorrect Options:

Option C and D are not relevant for directly referencing actions in workflows.

On GitHub, you can choose to receive ongoing updates about specific activities by subscribing to notifications for all activity in a repository. This allows you to stay informed about all changes, discussions, and updates related to a particular project. Additionally, GitHub provides the ability to customize notifications to suit your preferences.

=================

In GitHub, issues and pull requests (PRs) are essential tools for managing work and collaboration in a project. Assigning individuals to these issues or PRs is a way to indicate responsibility for addressing the issue or completing the PR.

Anyone with write permissions to the repository:

Users who have write permissions to a repository can be assigned to issues and pull requests. Write permissions allow users to push changes to the repository, create branches, and modify issues and pull requests. Assigning them to an issue or PR ensures they are recognized as responsible for the task.

Anyone who has commented on the Issue or pull request:

GitHub allows you to assign issues or pull requests to users who have already engaged with the discussion by commenting on it. This feature is particularly useful for quickly assigning tasks to those who are already involved in the conversation.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because having an enterprise GitHub account alone does not necessarily grant the ability to be assigned to issues or PRs. Permission to assign is based on repository-specific roles and permissions.

Option C is incorrect because not all personal GitHub accounts can be assigned to issues or PRs. The user needs either write permissions to the repository or must have commented on the issue or PR.