HPE7-A08 Exam Dumps - HP Aruba Certified Switching Expert Questions and Answers

The troubleshooting methodology exemplified by comparing outputs or configurations to find discrepancies is called Spot the difference. It involves checking variations between working and non-working states or devices.

Follow the path: tracing packet flow step-by-step.

Top-down/Bottom-up: analyzing layers systematically.

Replace configuration: swapping configurations to isolate issues.

Here, comparing command outputs aligns with spot-the-difference.

When deploying a new Aruba CX 8325 switch to provide gateway and routing services, the L3-apg profile (Layer 3 Aggregation Profile) should be selected instead of the factory default. This profile is designed for switches acting as aggregation or core routers, enabling Layer 3 routing capabilities and optimized configurations for such roles.

The Spine profile (factory default) is optimized for leaf/spine architectures, but may not be ideal for aggregation gateways.

Leaf and L3-core profiles are targeted for different roles.

Using the L3-apg profile helps to ensure the switch is correctly optimized for Layer 3 gateway functions.

When a recent routing change causes an outage affecting all users, the recommended immediate action is to restore the last-known working configuration to quickly return the network to a stable state. This is critical to minimize downtime and impact.

Asking customers to send logs or explaining the issue takes time and delays remediation.

Collecting show tech and opening TAC cases can be done after restoring service.

Hence, the quickest way to mitigate the impact is to restore the last known good configuration.

To prevent rogue DHCP servers in a VLAN, DHCP snooping authorized-server commands are used to specify trusted DHCP servers allowed to respond.

Option A (dhcpv4-snooping trust 10.100.100.10) configures a trusted port, but it is not VLAN specific and not precise enough for this purpose.

Enabling DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN or interface (Options C and D) are prerequisites but do not prevent rogue servers unless authorized servers are defined.

Option B correctly enables an authorized DHCP server IP on VLAN 30, blocking unauthorized DHCP responses.

The question relates to configuring port 1/1/44 on an Aruba CX 8325 switch to connect to a 2930F switch (Aruba 2930F series). The key factor is interoperability between these two devices, especially regarding link aggregation and port channel settings.

The Aruba 2930F typically uses static or LACP link aggregation with standard settings. To connect an Aruba CX 8325 port to a 2930F port, the CX configuration must align with the 2930F settings, particularly regarding:

Enabling LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) on the port.

Correct VLAN tagging or trunk mode.

Matching speed and duplex settings.

From the options given, answer A corresponds to enabling LACP with appropriate trunk configuration that matches the 2930F. The other options either have mismatches in aggregation or trunking mode or missing LACP.

To keep the BGP routing table size manageable and below a specified threshold, the customer should consider enforcing routing policies with aggregation. Route aggregation reduces the number of individual routes advertised and stored by combining multiple routes into a summarized one.

Setting route metrics equal or advertising only a primary path does not reduce the number of routes as effectively.

Importing only the default route (0.0.0.0/0) is impractical for normal operations.

Thus, route aggregation is the best practice for controlling routing table size in merged BGP environments.

The question concerns an OSPF configuration where the interface does not come up as expected.

Common reasons for no OSPF adjacency or interface participation include:

Interfaces being passive (no adjacency formed)

Mismatched OSPF process IDs

Missing loopback interfaces (for router ID)

Layer-3 interfaces not associated with VRFs when VRFs are configured

Option D (a Layer-3 interface has not been associated with a VRF) is the root cause because in Aruba CX switches, when VRF is configured, all Layer-3 interfaces that participate in OSPF must be associated with the correct VRF instance to establish adjacency and participate correctly.

If an interface is not part of the VRF configured for OSPF, it will not appear in the OSPF interface list or form neighbors.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

VLAN 1 is often configured as the native VLAN on interfaces to support Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP). During ZTP, devices communicate over VLAN 1 by default to download their configuration and updates.

LLDP and UBT are unrelated to native VLAN configuration for provisioning.

MSTP relates to spanning tree but does not dictate native VLAN usage.

Thus, VLAN 1 as native VLAN facilitates ZTP processes.

The event message:

perl

Copy

2024-04-04T08:35:38.312254+00:00 ICX-Core-1 hpe-vaxd[2167]: Event[701|LOG_INFO|AMM1/1|VSX2 state local up, remote down]

indicates that the local VSX member is up, but the remote VSX member is down. In a VSX pair, both switches must be operational for full redundancy and synchronization.

This log means the secondary VSX switch (remote) is down or unreachable, causing loss of synchronization and possibly traffic failover issues.

Option B (keepalive detection) is related but the event specifically shows the state of the remote switch being down.

Options C and D refer to LAG or interface state, which are not what this log entry describes.

To determine which sites would benefit most from upgrading from 6200 to more powerful 6300 switches in Aruba Central, the best report to run is the Switch Capacity Planning report. It analyzes resource utilization and capacity to identify bottlenecks and potential upgrade candidates.

Infra Inventory lists devices but not capacity usage.

Resource Utilization gives raw usage but not in planning context.

Network report focuses on topology and status.

Hence, Switch Capacity Planning is the most relevant report for upgrade planning.