An administrator is trying toconfigure Metro Availabilitybetween NutanixESXi-based clusters. However, theCompatible Remote Sitesscreen does not list all required storage containers.
Which two reasons could be a cause for this issue? (Choose two.)
Options:
A.
Source and destination hardware are from different vendors.
B.
The remote site storage container has compression enabled.
Metro Availability in Nutanix requires that the primary and secondary storage containers be configured identicallyto ensuredata replication consistency.
Option C (The destination storage container is not empty) is correct:
Theremote storage container must be emptybefore Metro Availability can be enabled.
Existing data can cause conflictsand prevent it from appearing in the "Compatible Remote Sites" list.
Option D (Both storage containers must have the same name) is correct:
Metro Availability requires thatstorage containers have identical names across clusters.
If namesdo not match, thestorage container will not be listed as compatible.
Option A is incorrect: Metro Availability works regardless of hardware vendor differences.
Option B is incorrect:Compression does not affect compatibilitybut may impact performance.
[References:, Nutanix Metro Availability Deployment Guide, Nutanix Best Practices forConfiguring Remote Sites for Metro Availability, Nutanix KB →Troubleshooting Storage Container Issues in Metro Availability, , , , , , ]