PDI Exam Dumps - Salesforce Developers Questions and Answers

Lightning Web Components (LWC):

Fully responsive and designed to handle touch events.

Executes on stateful clients with high performance.

Aura Components:

Supports responsive designs and touch events but is slightly less efficient than LWC.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Visualforce Components: Not designed for responsiveness or touch event handling.

C. Visualforce Pages: Primarily server-rendered and not stateful for touch interactions.

Why Salesforce CLI?

The Salesforce CLI supports scripting for Continuous Integration (CI) pipelines, allowing automatic testing and deployment as part of the CI process.

Why Not Other Options?

B: Visual Studio Code is a development IDE, not a CI tool.

C: Force.com Toolkit is outdated and does not support CI processes.

D: Developer Console is for debugging and manual testing, not automation.

To notify the parent component when the child component’sNextbutton is clicked, the child component can dispatch a custom event. The parent component listens to this event and handles navigation accordingly.

Throwing Exceptions in Apex:

throw new ExceptionType();creates a new instance and throws it.

A: No argument constructor.

B: Constructor with a custom error message.

Why Not Other Options?

C and D: These create exception instances but do not throw them, which is not valid syntax for firing an exception.

Best practices in Apex development for triggers and service layers include:

Avoiding DML operations and queries in loops.

Handling bulk processing efficiently.

Option A ensures compliance by performing all updates at the end, reducing the risk of hitting governor limits.

ThedoWorkmethod inserts an account for every iteration of theforloop, which runs fromi = 0toi <= 200, inclusive.

This results in 201 iterations, and hence 201 accounts are inserted into the org.

Explanation of Code Behavior:

The loop conditioni <= 200runs 201 times (0 to 200).

Theinsert acct;statement is executed 201 times.

Apex Developer Guide - Loop Constructs

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine how a developer can use the OrderRequest class within the CustomerOrder class, we need to evaluate the options based on Apex syntax for inheritance, focusing on the fact that OrderRequest is a virtual class. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official Apex Developer Guide.

Understanding Virtual Classes and Inheritance in Apex:

Virtual Class: In Apex, a virtual class allows other classes to extend it and inherit its methods and properties. It can also define methods that can be overridden by subclasses. The Apex Developer Guide states: “A virtual class can be extended by another class, allowing the subclass to inherit its methods and properties, and override virtual methods if needed” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Classes).

Inheritance: Apex supports single inheritance using the extends keyword, where a subclass inherits from a single parent class. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “Use the extends keyword to create a subclass that inherits from a parent class” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Inheritance).

Virtual vs. Interface:

A virtual class can contain method implementations and is extended using extends.

An interface defines method signatures without implementations and is implemented using implements. The question specifies OrderRequest as a virtual class, not an interface.

Requirement: The CustomerOrder class needs to use OrderRequest, which likely means inheriting its functionality, as OrderRequest is a virtual class.

Evaluating the Options:

A. extends (class="OrderRequest")public class CustomerOrder

Syntax: This option attempts to use extends followed by (class="OrderRequest") and then public class CustomerOrder.

Analysis: The syntax is incorrect. In Apex, the extends keyword is followed directly by the name of the class to extend, with no parentheses or class= notation. The correct syntax would be public class CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest. The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “The extends keyword is followed by the name of the parent class, without additional attributes or parentheses” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Inheritance). The (class="OrderRequest") syntax resembles annotations or markup, but it’s not valid in Apex for inheritance.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to invalid syntax.

B. public class CustomerOrder implements Order

Syntax: Uses the implements keyword to implement an interface named Order.

Analysis: The implements keyword is used to implement an interface, not to extend a class. The question states that OrderRequest is a virtual class, not an interface, so implements is inappropriate. Additionally, the option references Order, not OrderRequest, which appears to be a mismatch with the class name provided in the question. The Apex Developer Guide clarifies: “The implements keyword is used for interfaces, while extends is used for classes, including virtual classes” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces). Even if Order were intended to be OrderRequest, implements would still be incorrect for a virtual class.

Conclusion: Incorrect, as implements is for interfaces, not virtual classes, and Order does not match OrderRequest.

C. public class CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest

Syntax: Declares CustomerOrder as a subclass of OrderRequest using the extends keyword.

Analysis: This is the correct syntax for inheritance in Apex. Since OrderRequest is a virtual class, CustomerOrder can extend it to inherit its methods and properties. The extends keyword allows CustomerOrder to use (inherit) the functionality of OrderRequest. The Apex Developer Guide confirms: “A class can extend a virtual class using the extends keyword, inheriting its methods and properties” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Inheritance). This matches the question’s intent of “using” OrderRequest within CustomerOrder, which typically means inheritance when dealing with a virtual class.

Conclusion: Correct, as it uses the proper extends keyword to inherit from the virtual OrderRequest class.

D. @Implements (class="OrderRequest")public class CustomerOrder

Syntax: Uses an @Implements annotation with (class="OrderRequest") before the class declaration.

Analysis: Apex does not have an @Implements annotation. The implements keyword (without @) is used for interfaces, and annotations in Apex (e.g., @AuraEnabled, @TestVisible) do not use this format for inheritance or interface implementation. The Apex Developer Guide does not define @Implements as a valid annotation (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Annotations). The correct way to extend a virtual class is with extends, as in option C.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to invalid syntax (@Implements is not a valid Apex annotation).

Why Option C is Correct:

Option C is correct because:

It uses the extends keyword to properly declare CustomerOrder as a subclass of OrderRequest, which is a virtual class.

This allows CustomerOrder to inherit and use the methods and properties defined in OrderRequest, fulfilling the requirement to “use” the OrderRequest class within CustomerOrder.

The syntax aligns with Apex best practices for inheritance as outlined in the Salesforce Apex Developer Guide.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s how the correct implementation (option C) would look:

apex

Copy

public virtual class OrderRequest {

public String getOrderDetails() {

return 'Order Details';

}

}

public class CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest {

public String getCustomerOrderInfo() {

// Inherit and use OrderRequest's method

String orderDetails = getOrderDetails();

return 'Customer Order: ' + orderDetails;

}

}

CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest, inheriting getOrderDetails().

The developer can use OrderRequest’s functionality (e.g., call its methods) within CustomerOrder.

Handling Typos:

The question’s code snippet and options are mostly clear, but option B references Order instead of OrderRequest, which appears to be a typo. The analysis assumes the intended class is OrderRequest, as stated in the question stem.

Option D has a typo in the class name: Customerorder should be CustomerOrder (capital O). This does not affect the analysis, as the syntax error (@Implements) is the primary issue.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine which Visualforce code snippet presents a security vulnerability, we need to evaluate each option for potential risks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS), based on Salesforce’s Visualforce security best practices. XSS vulnerabilities occur when user input is rendered on a page without proper sanitization, allowing malicious scripts to execute. Let’s analyze each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation, particularly the Visualforce Developer Guide and Secure Coding Guidelines.

Understanding Visualforce Security:

Visualforce Components: Components like and are used to display data on a Visualforce page. Their behavior regarding HTML escaping (sanitizing output to prevent script injection) is critical to security.

XSS Vulnerability: XSS occurs when untrusted user input (e.g., from URL parameters or controller variables) is rendered as HTML without escaping special characters (e.g., <, >, &). The Visualforce Developer Guide states: “To prevent XSS, Visualforce automatically escapes output unless explicitly disabled, but developers must be cautious with user input” (Salesforce Visualforce Developer Guide, Secure Coding for Visualforce).

Key Security Features:

: By default, escapes HTML characters unless escape="false" is set.

: Automatically escapes output and is designed for bound fields, reducing XSS risk.

User input (e.g., ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters()) must be sanitized to prevent injection of scripts like .

Evaluating the Options:

A. <apex:outputText value="{!ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('userInput')}" />

Component: Uses to display a URL parameter (userInput) accessed via ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('userInput').

Escaping: The escape attribute is not specified, so defaults to escape="true". The Visualforce Developer Guide confirms: “The apex:outputText component escapes HTML characters by default, converting characters like < to < to prevent script execution” (Salesforce Visualforce Developer Guide, apex:outputText).

Security: Even though userInput is untrusted (coming from a URL parameter), the default escaping ensures that any malicious content (e.g., ) is rendered as plain text (e.g., <script>alert('hack');</script>), preventing XSS.

Conclusion: Safe, as default escaping mitigates XSS risks.

Note on Typo: The question likely contains a typo in “SCurrentPage” (should be ApexPages.currentPage()). For analysis, we assume the correct syntax, as the intent is clear.

B. <apex:outputText escape="false" value="{!ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('userInput')}" />

Component: Uses to display the userInput URL parameter.

Escaping: Explicitly sets escape="false", disabling HTML escaping. The Visualforce Developer Guide warns: “Setting escape=’false’ on apex:outputText allows unescaped output, which can lead to XSS vulnerabilities if the data is not sanitized” (Salesforce Visualforce Developer Guide, Secure Coding for Visualforce).

Security: With escape="false", any malicious input in userInput (e.g., ) is rendered as executable HTML, enabling XSS. For example, a URL like ?userInput= would execute the script in the user’s browser. The Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines explicitly state: “Avoid setting escape=’false’ on apex:outputText when rendering untrusted input, such as URL parameters” (Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines, Cross-Site Scripting).

Conclusion: Presents a security vulnerability (XSS) due to disabled escaping with untrusted input.

Note on Typo: The question has a typo in “sCurrentPage” (should be ApexPages.currentPage()). We assume the correct syntax for analysis.

C. <apex:outputField value="{!ctrl.userInput}" rendered="{!isEditable}" />

Component: Uses to display a controller variable (ctrl.userInput), with a rendered attribute based on isEditable.

Escaping: is designed to display field values from sObjects and automatically escapes output to prevent XSS. The Visualforce Developer Guide states: “The apex:outputField component renders field data with automatic HTML escaping, ensuring safe output” (Salesforce Visualforce Developer Guide, apex:outputField). Even if ctrl.userInput contains malicious content, it’s rendered as plain text.

Security: The value attribute expects a field reference (e.g., {!object.FieldName}), but here it’s bound to a controller variable (ctrl.userInput). This is unconventional, as is typically used for sObject fields. However, even if ctrl.userInput is untrusted, the automatic escaping prevents XSS. The rendered attribute (isEditable) controls visibility and does not affect escaping.

Conclusion: Safe, as escapes output, though the usage is atypical.

Note on Typo: The question has a typo in the value attribute: “(!ctrl.userinput)” should be {!ctrl.userInput} (curly braces instead of parentheses), and “isfditable” should be isEditable. We assume the corrected syntax: .

D. <apex:outputField value="{!ctrl.userInput}" />

Component: Uses to display a controller variable (ctrl.userInput).

Escaping: As with option C, automatically escapes output, preventing XSS. The Visualforce Developer Guide confirms: “apex:outputField ensures safe rendering by escaping special characters” (Salesforce Visualforce Developer Guide, apex:outputField).

Security: Even if ctrl.userInput contains malicious content, it’s rendered as plain text, mitigating XSS risks. Like option C, using for a controller variable is unusual, but it does not introduce a vulnerability.

Conclusion: Safe, as escapes output.

Note on Typo: The question has a typo in the value attribute: “{'ctrl.userInput}” should be {!ctrl.userInput} (correct merge field syntax). We assume the corrected syntax: .

Why Option B is Correct:

Option B presents a security vulnerability because:

It uses with escape="false", disabling HTML escaping.

It renders untrusted user input (ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('userInput')) directly, allowing malicious scripts to execute, which is a classic XSS vulnerability.

The Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines explicitly warn against this practice: “Rendering unescaped user input, such as URL parameters, can allow attackers to inject scripts” (Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines, Cross-Site Scripting).

The other options (A, C, D) either use default escaping ( in A) or inherently safe components ( in C and D), preventing XSS.

Handling Typos:

The question contains several typos, which were corrected for analysis:

Option A: “SCurrentPage” → ApexPages.currentPage().

Option B: “sCurrentPage” → ApexPages.currentPage().

Option C: “(!ctrl.userinput)” → {!ctrl.userInput}, “isfditable” → isEditable.

Option D: “{'ctrl.userInput}” → {!ctrl.userInput}.These corrections align with standard Visualforce and Apex syntax, ensuring the analysis reflects the intended functionality.

Example of the Vulnerability (Option B):

Consider a Visualforce page with option B’s code:

If a user accesses the page with a URL like:

https://example.salesforce.com/apex/MyPage?userInput=

The script is rendered as executable HTML, displaying an alert in the user’s browser, demonstrating an XSS attack. In contrast, option A (with default escaping) would render the script as plain text, preventing execution.

Mitigating the Vulnerability:

To fix option B, either:

Remove escape="false" to enable default escaping:

Sanitize the input in the controller using methods like String.escapeHtml4():

public String getUserInput() {

String input = ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('userInput');

return input != null ? String.escapeHtml4(input) : '';

}

The Visualforce Developer Guide recommends: “Sanitize untrusted input or rely on Visualforce’s built-in escaping to prevent XSS” (Salesforce Visualforce Developer Guide, Secure Coding for Visualforce).

A: Declarative development does not require Apex test classes since it leverages built-in Salesforce features such as flows, process builders, and validation rules.

C: Declarative development can be done using the Setup menu, which includes point-and-click tools like page layouts, workflows, and Lightning App Builder.

Why not other options?

B: Declarative development has strict limits (e.g., process builders and flows have governor limits that are lower than programmatic approaches like Apex).

D: Declarative logic still requires maintenance, especially as business needs evolve.

Declarative vs Programmatic Development

Anonymous Apex allows developers to execute ad hoc code snippets without creating a permanent class or trigger. It is useful for tasks like bulk data manipulation or testing.

B. Deleting 15,000 inactive Accounts:

Anonymous Apex can perform ad hoc bulk operations to clean up data after a deployment.

Example:

Use Cases:List inactiveAccounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE IsActive__c = false LIMIT 15000];

delete inactiveAccounts;

C. Running a batch Apex class:

Anonymous Apex can execute batch jobs for data processing.

Example:

apex

Copy code

Database.executeBatch(new UpdateContactBatch());

A. Schedule an Apex class to run periodically: This requires a scheduled job, not Anonymous Apex.

D. Add unit test code coverage: Unit tests must be written in test classes and cannot be added using Anonymous Apex.