PEGACPRSA22V1 Exam Dumps - Pegasystems PCRSA Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the Credential Manager is designed to securely store user credentials (such as usernames and passwords) in an encrypted form within the user’s local profile. When properly configured, Pega Robotics can automatically log in to target applications without creating a separate automation.

From the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Application Configuration and Credential Management section):

“When an application requires credential-based authentication, developers can configure the application’s login controls during interrogation and assign the appropriate credential properties (Username and Password).

Once defined, credentials are stored securely in the user’s local profile and automatically retrieved and decrypted during runtime to perform the login without explicit automation logic.”

Detailed Reasoning:

During interrogation, the login controls (such as username and password fields) are identified and linked to the credential properties of the application object.

Pega Robotics automatically handles the retrieval and secure decryption of credentials stored in the local user profile at runtime.

This eliminates the need for any manual automation steps or scripts for logging in.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — Robot activities are server-executed tasks, not used for local application authentication.

B. Incorrect — Credentials must be configured after interrogating target controls to map them correctly.

C. Correct — Interrogating the login fields and setting the application credential properties allows Pega Robotics to securely manage and automate login automatically.

D. Incorrect — Creating a script defeats the purpose of using the built-in credential manager.

Thus, Option C is the correct method for configuring automatic login using encrypted credentials.

Application discovery is an early technical validation step that involves collecting the information about applications in scope of a potential robotics use case. During discovery you need to find out application types (and if they are on applications support matrix for Pega Robotics), how they are launched, how they are used, and check accessibility and functionality of the controls through interrogation. Application discovery is necessary to ensure that robotics use case is viable and it doesn't have any technical constraints... or, if constraints exist, then what kind of workarounds will be necessary to ensure the use case is successful. The rationale for having application discovery as a best practice is that you don't want to find out half-way through coding an automation that a key control is not available or not performing the desired action.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to Pega Robotics Studio – Matching and Interrogation Tools Documentation:

“Matching defines how a control is identified at runtime. When application hierarchies change or specific match rules fail, Robot Studio provides diagnostic tools to reestablish and verify the correct control associations.”

The guide specifies the following tools and their purpose:

Refresh Matching

“Refresh Matching updates the control’s properties and hierarchy information based on the current application structure without re-interrogating the control. This tool is useful when an application’s DOM or hierarchy has changed.”

Debug Matching

“Debug Matching opens the Match Rules Diagnostics window and evaluates each match rule in real-time to show which rules pass or fail. It assists in identifying which match rule must be corrected or replaced.”

By contrast:

Replace Matching – Recreates the match rules from scratch (not the preferred first step).

Replace Control – Reinterrogates the entire control and removes existing references (used only when the control is entirely invalid).

Debug Control – Analyzes properties but not matching logic.

Thus, the two correct tools to address the described issues are:

Refresh Matching (for hierarchy change)

Debug Matching (for failed rule troubleshooting)

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio – Matching Diagnostics and Interrogation Guide

Pega Robotics System Architect Training – Debugging and Refresh Matching Modules

Pega Robotics Help – Managing Match Rules in Chrome/Edge/Web Adapters

Final Verified Answer: A, C

Reference http://help.openspan.com/80/Platform_Configuration/RuntimeConfigXML.htm

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When building robotic automations intended for integration with Pega Platform (through Robotic Desktop Automation (RDA) or Robotic Process Automation (RPA)), Pega Systems outlines a set of best practices to ensure reliable execution, data consistency, and seamless communication between the automation and Pega case workflows.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Developing Robot Activities for Pega Integration”, the following recommendations are provided:

“When developing automations intended for execution by Pega applications, adhere to the following guidelines:

Always return a valid completion status from the automation to indicate success or failure to the calling Pega activity.

Ensure that the data exchanged between Pega Platform and the automation matches in both type and format to prevent runtime errors or data transformation issues.

The activity name in Pega Platform (as specified in the robotic automation name field) must exactly match the name defined in the Robot Activity component in Robot Studio to establish a valid invocation link.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Set valid completion status.

Correct. Each automation that is invoked from Pega must return a valid completion status (e.g., Success, Fail, Completed, Error). This status is sent back through the Robot Activity response data transform.

This ensures that the Pega case or data page correctly interprets the automation’s result and can take subsequent actions (e.g., proceed, retry, or raise an exception).

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application.

Correct. The data types and structure between Pega and the robotic automation must align (for example, string-to-string, integer-to-integer, JSON format consistency).

Mismatched or unstructured data results in serialization errors when passing data through the RDA bridge.

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name.

Correct. The Robotic Automation Name specified in the Pega data page or case configuration (e.g., FETCH_SCORE) must exactly match the ActivityName property defined in the Robot Studio’s Robot Activity component.

This linkage ensures that the correct automation is triggered when the case executes the RDA call.

Incorrect Options:

B. Design an automation to complete multiple tasks.

Not recommended. Pega advises building modular automations, where each automation performs a single defined task to simplify debugging and improve reuse.

C. Use an unlimited number of transferable data items.

Not recommended. The number of data items passed between Pega and Robotics should be limited to those necessary for the task, as excessive data transfers can degrade performance.

F. Run automations synchronously.

Not required. RDA automations typically run asynchronously, returning results through callback mechanisms to avoid blocking the user interface.

Therefore, the three recommended developer considerations are:

A. Set valid completion status

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega, when a data page is configured with a Robotic Desktop Automation (RDA) as its source, the automation must complete execution and return its response within a predefined timeout period. The default timeout value for data pages calling robotic automations is 60 seconds.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Data Page Integration with Robotic Desktop Automations”:

“When a Pega data page calls a robotic automation as its data source, the automation must complete and return its data within the timeout threshold.

If the automation’s execution time exceeds the timeout period (default 60 seconds), the data page fails to receive the response, resulting in an empty or incomplete data return to Pega Platform.”

Detailed Reasoning:

If the automation executes successfully but takes longer than the defined timeout, the Pega Platform assumes the call failed and releases the data page before the response arrives.

This causes the data page not to be populated, even though the Robot Studio logs show successful automation completion.

Increasing the timeout value or optimizing automation performance typically resolves this issue.

Option Analysis:

A. The automation runs longer than the default data page timeout of 60 seconds.

Correct. Exceeding the timeout prevents the data page from capturing the automation’s response.

B. The robot activity ClassName property value is incorrect.

Incorrect. This would prevent the automation from running entirely, not delay the response.

C. The automation runs faster than the data page can perform a data transform.

Incorrect. Pega manages data transforms synchronously after data retrieval, so this is not applicable.

D. The automation does not return the proper SetCompletionStatus.

Incorrect. If completion status were missing, the automation would fail altogether, not time out.

Therefore, the issue occurs because the automation execution exceeds the default 60-second data page timeout.