PMI-PBA Exam Dumps - PMI Professional in Business Analysis Questions and Answers

 A version control system is a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A version control system is a tool that allows the business analyst to manage and record changes to the requirements documentation throughout the project lifecycle. A version control system can help to ensure that the requirements documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date. A version control system can also help to facilitate collaboration and communication among the team members and stakeholders who work on or use the requirements documentation. A version control system can also help to identify and resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise from concurrent or conflicting changes to the requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is a technique that involves grouping similar or related ideas, issues, or data into categories based on their affinity or similarity. An affinity diagram can help to organize and analyze complex or diverse information, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A data dictionary is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes that are used or produced by a system or a solution. A data dictionary can help to standardize and clarify the meaning and usage of data elements, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is a tool that documents and organizes the business rules that govern or constrain a system or a solution. A business rules matrix can help to specify and communicate the logic and behavior of a system or a solution, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

 A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that shows the relationship between each requirement and other project elements, such as objectives, deliverables, test cases, design components, etc. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to determine the impact for the specific requirement change by showing how the change affects other related requirements and project elements. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to assess the feasibility, scope, value, and risk of the change request. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

The workflow trigger that the business analyst should incorporate is any change to the requirements matrix. This trigger would ensure that the appropriate stakeholders are notified of any updates, additions, deletions, or modifications to the requirements that affect the business analysis repository. Changes to test cases traced to requirements, change through project life cycle, and changes to stakeholder memberships are not relevant triggers for the notification workflow, as they do not directly affect the requirements matrix. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide

A requirements traceability tool is a tool that provides combined functionality for business analysis and quality assurance activities. It helps to document and track the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the sources of the requirements, and the project deliverables. It also helps to monitor the status, changes, and verification of the requirements throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability tool can also support the analysis, validation, and testing of the requirements, as well as the evaluation of the solution quality and performance12.

A functional specification tool is a tool that helps to define and document the functional requirements of a system or a solution. It describes the features, functions, behaviors, and inputs and outputs of the system or the solution. It also specifies the acceptance criteria and the expected results of the system or the solution. A functional specification tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities13.

A system use case modeling tool is a tool that helps to illustrate and communicate the interactions and scenarios between the users and the system or the solution. It uses diagrams, symbols, and text to represent the actors, use cases, relationships, and flows of events of the system or the solution. It also defines the preconditions, postconditions, and exceptions of each use case. A system use case modeling tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities14.

A solution quality assurance tool is a tool that helps to measure and evaluate the quality of the system or the solution. It uses various methods and techniques, such as testing, inspection, review, audit, and feedback, to check the quality of the system or the solution against the quality standards and criteria. It also identifies and reports any quality issues, defects, or errors of the system or the solution. A solution quality assurance tool is mainly used for quality assurance activities, but not for business analysis activities1 .

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 133; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 135; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125

One benefit of documenting the change control process is that stakeholders know how to request changes. The change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or requirements are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. Documenting the change control process helps to establish clear and consistent guidelines and procedures for managing changes and ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. Documenting the change control process also helps to inform the stakeholders about how to request changes, what information and justification are required, who is responsible for reviewing and approving changes, and what criteria and methods are used for assessing the impact and value of changes. Stakeholders are not shielded from how changes are assessed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they are excluded or unaware of the change evaluation and decision making process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to increase transparency, collaboration, and communication among the stakeholders regarding changes. Stakeholders do not have a schedule of changes to be deployed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a predetermined or fixed plan of when and how changes will be implemented. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to ensure that changes are implemented in a timely and effective manner based on their priority, feasibility, and dependency. Stakeholders do not understand the difficulty of managing requirements by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a negative or pessimistic view of the requirements management process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to improve the quality and stability of the requirements and reduce ambiguity, confusion, or conflicts among the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 163-164; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 20.

The business analyst would recommend formal signoff to the group if errors in the product could result in financial solvency. Formal signoff is a process that ensures that the stakeholders agree on and approve the requirements and deliverables of the project. Formal signoff can help to reduce ambiguity, confusion, or disputes among the stakeholders and increase their accountability and commitment to the project. Formal signoff is especially important when errors in the product could result in financial solvency, as it implies that there is a high level of risk, complexity, or regulation involved in the project and that any mistake or defect could have severe consequences for the organization or its customers. The industry being unregulated is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less need for compliance or verification of the product quality or performance. The project impact being contained within a small department of the company is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less stakeholder involvement or interest in the project outcome or value. The organization following an iterative project life cycle is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is more flexibility and adaptability in the project scope and deliverables and that feedback and validation are obtained frequently throughout the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process that should be done by the business analyst after the software developers have delivered a completed solution and the quality assurance team has passed it. User acceptance testing is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. User acceptance testing can help to ensure that the solution is fit for use, suitable for purpose, and aligned with business objectives. Evaluating the solution against the project charter is not necessary at this stage, as it does not involve testing or validation by the end users or stakeholders. Evaluating the solution with the sponsor(s) is not sufficient at this stage, as it does not capture the perspective of all relevant users or stakeholders who will use or benefit from the solution. Conducting performance testing is not relevant at this stage, as it is usually done by the quality assurance team before delivering the solution to ensure that it meets the non-functional requirements such as speed, reliability, scalability, etc. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

Tracing requirements is a technique that involves tracking the origin, dependencies, allocation, and status of each requirement throughout the project life cycle. Tracing requirements can help the business analyst to determine this issue before delivery by ensuring that each project objective is linked to one or more requirements, and that each requirement is verified and validated against the project objectives. Tracing requirements can also help to identify any missing, redundant, or conflicting requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

One of the main purposes for creating a requirements traceability matrix is to track how requirements can be connected to the solution. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to track the origin, allocation, dependencies, and status of the requirements throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure that the solution meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to manage changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the solution. A requirements traceability matrix can be created using various formats, such as a table, a spreadsheet, or a database12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.

Root cause analysis is a technique that involves identifying and analyzing the underlying causes of a problem or an issue. Root cause analysis can help the business analyst to determine how the selection criteria requirement was missed, and to prevent similar errors from occurring in the future. Root cause analysis can be done using various tools, such as fishbone diagram and the Five Whys. A fishbone diagram is a graphical tool that organizes the possible causes of a problem into categories, such as people, process, technology, environment, etc. A fishbone diagram can help the business analyst to visualize the relationships between the causes and the effects, and to identify the most likely root causes. The Five Whys is a questioning technique that involves asking “why” repeatedly until the root cause of a problem is revealed. The Five Whys can help the business analyst to drill down into the details of the problem, and to uncover the underlying factors and assumptions that led to the missed requirement. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.