PMI-PBA Exam Dumps - PMI Professional in Business Analysis Questions and Answers

 A requirements baseline document is the most valuable document for a business analyst to provide to the project sponsor to know which requirements will be implemented. A requirements baseline document is a version of the requirements specification that has been reviewed, approved, and formally established as the basis for further development and delivery of the solution. A requirements baseline document defines the scope of the project and the expected value of the solution. It also serves as a reference point for managing changes and measuring progress. A requirements traceability matrix is a document that shows the relationship between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design, test cases, or deliverables. A requirements traceability matrix can help to ensure completeness, consistency, and quality of the requirements, but it does not indicate which requirements will be implemented. A requirements management plan is a document that describes how requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. A requirements management plan can help to define the roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools for managing requirements, but it does not specify which requirements will be implemented. A reliability matrix is not a standard document in business analysis, but it may refer to a tool that measures the reliability or dependability of a system or a process. A reliability matrix can help to evaluate the performance or quality of a solution, but it does not determine which requirements will be implemented. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

 Quality function deployment (QFD) is a technique that involves translating customer needs or requirements into product features or specifications. QFD helps to relate the product features to customer value by using a matrix called a House of Quality, which shows how each feature satisfies a customer requirement, how important each requirement is to the customer, how well each feature performs compared to competitors, and how each feature affects other features. QFD can also help to identify gaps or opportunities for improvement in the product design. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

A functional requirement is a requirement that specifies what the system should do or how it should behave under certain conditions. A functional requirement describes the functionality, behavior, or performance of the system. An example of a functional requirement is the system is able to require passwords, which defines a security feature of the system that prevents unauthorized access. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Traceability and Monitoring is to “Track the status, priority, and disposition of requirements and issues, and communicate updates as necessary” (Task 1). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for ensuring that the requirements are delivered as stated and that any changes or issues are communicated to the relevant stakeholders. One of the techniques that can be used to perform this task is the traceability matrix, which is a table that shows the relationships between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design documents, test cases, or deliverables. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to verify that all the requirements are covered by the test cases and that the test output matches the expected results. Therefore, the technique that the business analyst could have used to ensure that requirements were delivered as stated is the traceability matrix.

Status is a critical field that is needed to ensure that the traceability matrix is usable. Status indicates the current state of each requirement, such as approved, deferred, implemented, tested, or verified. Status helps to track the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. It also helps to identify any gaps or discrepancies that may exist between the requirements and the project deliverables. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 Operational feasibility is the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking to understand how well a potential solution fits into the organization. Operational feasibility evaluates how the solution will affect the current operations, processes, culture, and people of the organization. It also considers how the solution will be accepted, adopted, and used by the stakeholders. Technical feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how the solution can be implemented using the available technology, infrastructure, and resources. Cost-effectiveness feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how the solution will provide benefits that outweigh its costs. Time feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how long it will take to implement the solution and whether it can meet the desired schedule. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 41-42 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 14 

To reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project, the business analyst plans to reuse requirements. Requirements are statements that describe the needs, expectations, or capabilities of the stakeholders or the solution. Requirements can be reused from previous or similar projects, as long as they are relevant, consistent, and compatible with the current project context and objectives. Reusing requirements can help to save time and effort, avoid duplication or redundancy, leverage best practices, and ensure quality and compliance. Quantitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Quantitative analysis is a technique that involves using numerical data and methods to measure, compare, or evaluate the feasibility, value, or impact of a solution or an alternative. Quantitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. Risk assessments are not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Risk assessments are techniques that involve identifying and analyzing potential threats or uncertainties that may affect the project or the solution. Risk assessments can help to prioritize, mitigate, or monitor risks, but they do not provide requirements for the product specification. Qualitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Qualitative analysis is a technique that involves using descriptive data and methods to understand, interpret, or evaluate the characteristics, behaviors, or perceptions of the stakeholders or the solution. Qualitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 114-115; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the possible causes of a problem or an effect. It can help the business analyst to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing. A fishbone diagram has a structure that resembles a fish skeleton, with a head, a spine, and several branches. The head represents the problem or the effect, the spine represents the main cause categories, and the branches represent the sub-causes or factors that contribute to the problem or the effect. By creating a fishbone diagram, the business analyst can brainstorm and organize the potential causes of the software flaw, and then investigate and verify the most likely root cause. A fishbone diagram can also help to communicate the findings and recommendations to the stakeholders and the development team. An interface analysis is a tool that helps to identify and describe the interactions and dependencies between different components or systems. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not focus on the causes and effects of the problem. A Delphi estimation is a tool that helps to obtain a consensus among a group of experts on a complex or uncertain issue. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not provide a systematic and structured way to identify and analyze the causes of the problem. A functional decomposition is a tool that helps to break down a complex system or process into smaller and simpler components or functions. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not show the relationships and influences between the components or functions. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, Root Cause Analysis: Definition, Examples & Methods | Tableau1

Before beginning requirements elicitation, the business analyst should document how the relevant systems interact. This is an important activity that helps to understand the current state of the systems, their interfaces, dependencies, and data flows. It also helps to identify the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement in the systems. Documenting how the systems interact can be done using various techniques, such as system context diagrams, data flow diagrams, or interface analysis12.

Preparing the requirements traceability matrix, defining how the solution will be evaluated, and drafting a high-level data model are not activities that should be initiated before beginning requirements elicitation. These activities are part of the analysis, validation, and management of the requirements, and they should be done after the requirements have been elicited12.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 131-132

Verification is the process of ensuring that the requirements meet a quality checklist and conform to the specified standards, rules, and criteria. Verification can help the business analyst to ensure that all requirements meet a quality checklist before the development and testing phase by checking the completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability of each requirement. Verification can also help to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or ambiguities in the requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.