SIE Exam Dumps - FINRA General Securities Representative Questions and Answers

Step by Step Explanation:

FINRA Rule 3150: Permits firms to hold customer mail only with written instructions specifying the duration, which cannot exceed three months unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Incorrect Options:

A: Holding mail is not prohibited if done in compliance with FINRA rules.

C & D: Oral instructions or RR discretion are not sufficient; written authorization is mandatory.

FINRA Rule 3150 (Holding of Customer Mail): FINRA Rule 3150.

A key characteristic of non-traded (non-exchange-listed) REITs is limited liquidity, making A correct. Unlike publicly traded REITs that trade on exchanges and can be sold during market hours, non-traded REIT shares do not have an active public secondary market. Investors often must rely on limited redemption programs (if offered) or wait for a liquidity event (such as listing, merger, or liquidation), which can take years. As a result, investors may face difficulty selling shares quickly or at a predictable price, which is the essence of liquidity risk.

Choice B is misleading because many non-traded REITs are still registered securities sold via broker-dealers; “non-traded” does not automatically mean “private.” Some non-traded REITs are registered but not exchange listed. Choice C is the opposite of non-traded: if it is listed on an exchange, it is a traded REIT. Choice D describes open-end funds that calculate a daily NAV for purchases/redemptions; non-traded REITs do not function like mutual funds with daily NAV transactions (even though some may provide periodic valuations, that is not the defining “strike daily NAV” feature tested on the SIE).

This question tests product knowledge and risk recognition: non-traded REITs may offer income potential and real estate exposure, but the trade-off is often reduced transparency, higher fees, and notably limited liquidity compared with exchange-traded REITs or ETFs.

Municipal securities regulation places a strong emphasis on transparency about the dealer’s role and regulatory status in the municipal market. Under MSRB customer disclosure expectations, municipal securities dealers are required to provide customers with certain written disclosures, and a commonly tested requirement is that customers receive written notice confirming that the dealer is registered with the MSRB (often tied to annual customer notifications and educational disclosures). Therefore, the correct answer is B.

Choice A is incorrect because dealers are not required to distribute their own year-end income statements to customers annually as an MSRB customer disclosure item. Financial statement delivery requirements generally relate to specific contexts (and are not a standard annual customer mailing requirement under MSRB rules for all customers). Choice C is not the best choice because while firms must have supervisory and compliance infrastructure and may provide contacts, an annual written requirement to provide the chief compliance officer’s contact information is not the standard MSRB annual disclosure item being tested here. Choice D is incorrect because dealers do not provide customers an annual count of complaints as a required MSRB disclosure; complaint reporting and recordkeeping are internal compliance matters and may be reportable to regulators, but not typically distributed as a required annual customer disclosure.

On the SIE, when you see “municipal securities dealer” + “annual written disclosure,” you should think MSRB-focused customer protection messaging—especially disclosures about the dealer’s municipal regulatory framework and how municipal customers can access educational resources and regulatory information. The cleanest match among the options is the dealer’s written statement of MSRB registration.

This arrangement is not permissible because it is a sales contest/incentive tied directly to the sale of a specific investment company’s products, and it is funded by the product sponsor (ABC). Even if described as “training and education,” the key facts make it a prohibited non-cash compensation practice: the reward is offered only to the top producers of ABC fund sales during the month, and the trip is to a beach resort—creating a strong incentive to recommend ABC funds to maximize eligibility for the reward. This type of incentive can improperly influence recommendations and creates a conflict of interest between the RR’s compensation motivations and the customer’s best interest. Therefore, B is the best answer.

Choice A is not the best reason. The issue is not merely that the incentive is offered by ABC instead of the BD; non-cash compensation rules restrict sales contests and special compensation arrangements regardless of who sponsors them when they are tied to the sale of specific securities. Choice C is incorrect because calling something “training and education” does not make it permissible when the eligibility is driven by production in that sponsor’s products. True training meetings may be permitted under tightly defined conditions, but they cannot be structured as a sales contest rewarding top sellers. Choice D is also incorrect because even strong supervision does not cure a prohibited compensation structure—supervision is required, but it does not override rules designed to prevent conflicted incentives.

The SIE tests recognition that product-specific sales contests and lavish non-cash incentives are problematic because they can lead to biased recommendations and undermine fair dealing and best interest obligations.

529 savings plans are state-sponsored education savings accounts that offer tax-advantaged growth. Key features include:

Contributions are not federally tax deductible (some states offer state-level deductions).

No income limitations for contributions.

The account owner, not the beneficiary, controls the plan.

Assets can be transferred tax-free to another family member’s 529 plan.

D is correct because tax-free rollovers are allowed for family members of the current beneficiary.

A is incorrect as contributions are not universally tax deductible.

B is incorrect as there are no income limitations for contributing.

C is incorrect because the account owner, not the beneficiary, controls the assets.

Step by Step Explanation:

SEC Registration Statements: The SEC reviews registration statements for completeness and compliance but does not judge the merits, approve, or endorse the securities being offered.

Other Options:

A, B, and C: Misrepresent the SEC’s role in the registration process.

SEC Bulletin on Registration Statements: SEC Registration Process.

Common stock typically provides the owner with voting rights on key corporate matters, making answer B correct. Common shareholders generally vote to elect the board of directors and may vote on significant corporate actions such as mergers, major reorganizations, or other proposals submitted for shareholder approval. Voting rights are a core distinguishing feature of common stock and are frequently tested on the SIE as part of understanding equity ownership and shareholder rights.

A warrant (choice A) is a derivative-like security that gives the holder the right to purchase the issuer’s stock at a specified price before expiration. Warrant holders do not have voting rights unless and until they exercise the warrant and become stockholders. Preferred stock (choice C) typically has characteristics closer to a hybrid: it pays a stated dividend and often has priority over common stock in dividends and liquidation, but it usually does not carry voting rights (though preferred may gain voting rights in special situations, such as when dividends are in arrears, depending on the issue terms). A corporate bond (choice D) is debt; bondholders are creditors, not owners, and generally do not vote on corporate governance matters (though bond covenants may provide protections and certain consent rights in specific restructuring situations).

The SIE emphasizes the relationship between security type and investor rights: equity ownership (common stock) comes with participation in corporate governance through voting, while debt instruments provide contractual cash flows and creditor protections but not ownership voting rights.

Step by Step Explanation:

Regulatory Element Requirement: Newly registered persons must complete the Continuing Education (CE) Regulatory Element on the second anniversary of their initial registration and every three years thereafter.

Incorrect Options:

A: The requirement begins on the second anniversary, not the following calendar year.

D: The cycle is every three years, not five.

FINRA Rule 1240 (Continuing Education): FINRA Rule 1240.

Step by Step Explanation:

Backing Away: Refers to the failure of a market maker to honor a firm quote when a customer attempts to trade at that price. It is a violation of market rules.

Incorrect Options:

Freeriding: Involves selling securities before paying for them in a cash account.

Interpositioning: Involves unnecessary intermediaries in trades, which can harm customers.

Market Manipulation: Covers a range of deceptive practices, such as wash trading or spoofing, not specific to honoring quotes.

FINRA Rule 5220 (Firm Quote Rule): FINRA Rule 5220.