712-50 Exam Dumps - ECCouncil CCISO Questions and Answers

 Explanation:

Evaluating a vendor’s security posture and compliance level prior to signing the agreement ensures that potential risks are identified and mitigated early in the process.

It also ensures that the vendor aligns with the organization's security policies and regulatory requirements before gaining access to sensitive systems or data.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. At the time the security services are being performed: By this stage, risks might already have been introduced.

B. Once the agreement has been signed: This exposes the organization to contractual obligations without ensuring proper security controls.

C. Once the vendor is on-premise: At this point, it may be too late to address security gaps or terminate the relationship without significant disruption.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:

Vendor risk management processes outlined in the curriculum emphasize pre-contractual due diligence as a best practice for reducing third-party risks.

 Explanation:

Deploying the IPS in monitor mode first allows the SOC to assess its behavior and ensure it does not block legitimate traffic, addressing IT’s concerns about network availability.

Configuring the IPS to fail open ensures that in the event of a failure, the network remains operational.

 Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

A. Simply assert no network impact: This approach does not provide tangible reassurance or evidence to address concerns.

B. Fail open alone: Focusing only on the fail-open capability does not address IT’s concerns about testing or monitoring.

C. Accept responsibility for failure: While demonstrating accountability, this approach does not mitigate risks proactively.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:

The curriculum emphasizes collaboration with IT teams and phased deployment strategies, such as using monitor mode, to ensure smooth implementation of new technologies without operational disruption.

 Explanation:

Upper management support is critical for removing obstacles, allocating necessary resources, and ensuring alignment with organizational priorities to bring delayed projects back on track.

Leadership buy-in often accelerates decision-making and reinforces project prioritization.

 Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

B. More milestone meetings: Increased frequency of meetings can track progress but does not directly address root causes of delays.

C. More training: While valuable, training is not a short-term solution for project delays.

D. Involve internal audit: Audit ensures compliance and quality but is not typically involved in speeding up schedules.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:

The curriculum highlights executive sponsorship as a pivotal factor in overcoming project challenges and ensuring timely completion.

 Ultimate Goal of IT Security Projects:

IT security projects aim to align security efforts with the overarching goals of the organization.

Supporting business requirements ensures that security enables rather than hinders business operations.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Increase stock value: A secondary outcome, not the primary goal of IT security projects.

B. Complete security: Impossible to achieve; security is about risk management, not elimination.

D. Implement information security policies: Policies are a means to an end, not the ultimate goal.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:

The program highlights that IT security must be a business enabler, focusing on integrating security measures to achieve strategic business objectives.

 Explanation:

The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) is a globally recognized standard for project management. It provides guidelines, best practices, and methodologies relevant to managing projects, including information security projects.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Security Systems Development Life Cycle: Focuses on system development rather than overall project management.

B. Security Project And Management Methodology: Not an industry-standard methodology.

C. Project Management System Methodology: Generic and lacks industry recognition compared to PMBOK.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:

The CISO program aligns security projects with established project management standards, such as PMBOK, to ensure effective execution and management.

 Collaborative Risk Management:

A collaborative approach ensures that security requirements are integrated into business operations while addressing the needs of all stakeholders.

 Key Considerations:

Involves engaging business units to identify risks and jointly develop mitigation strategies.

Fosters a sense of shared responsibility for security outcomes.

 Why Not Other Options:

Communication (A) is essential but does not ensure alignment.

Executive mandates (B) may create compliance but not collaboration.

Increased audits (D) do not foster alignment and may create friction.

 EC-Council CISO Guidance:

Collaborative approaches ensure that security programs are viewed as partners in achieving organizational goals.

 Definition of File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)

FIM is a security measure that detects unauthorized changes to files, configurations, or system settings. It logs and alerts administrators of anomalies, making it a key detective control.

 Why FIM is a Detective Control

It does not prevent changes but monitors and reports them for further investigation.

Enhances visibility and auditability of system changes.

 Comparison of Options

A. Network-based security preventative control: Preventative controls aim to block issues before they occur.

B. Software segmentation control: Refers to dividing software components, not monitoring.

D. User segmentation control: Focuses on access control policies for users, unrelated to file integrity.

 EC-Council References

FIM is emphasized as a critical part of continuous monitoring and detection mechanisms in security frameworks taught by EC-Council.

If the scalability issue impacts only a small number of network segments, the next logical step is to determine if sufficient mitigating controls can address the issue without replacing the entire solution.

Risk Assessment:

Identifies the extent of the issue and potential mitigation strategies.

Considers controls to reduce the impact on affected segments.

Risk Mitigation:

If feasible controls exist, they can minimize risk while retaining the original solution.

Other Options:

A: Use cases are secondary to resolving the core issue.

C: Risk acceptance should only occur after exploring mitigation options.

D: Reporting deficiencies to audit is procedural but does not address the risk.

Risk Mitigation Strategies: Prioritizes applying controls to reduce risks to acceptable levels.

Incident and Problem Management: Emphasizes minimizing operational impact through mitigation.

EC-Council CISO References:

Scenario8