C11 Exam Dumps - IIC Chartered Insurance Professional (CIP) Questions and Answers

The typical privacy-breach response sequence used in Canadian insurance organizations follows four steps:

Contain the breachand secure the data (stop further exposure).

Evaluate the risks— determine sensitivity of data, potential harm, affected individuals, and severity.

Notifythose who must be informed (affected clients, regulators, privacy commissioners, insurers, or law enforcement).

Prevent recurrence— investigate causes and implement corrective measures.

Since Step 1 is containment and Step 2 is risk evaluation, thethirdstep isnotification.

Therefore, the correct answer isC.

A stock insurance company operates with the same capital structure as other conventional for-profit corporations. Ownership is represented by shares of stock, held by shareholders who supply capital and expect a return on investment. Profits are distributed as dividends or reinvested into the company. This structure aligns closely with traditional corporate financial frameworks in Canadian commerce.

Option B, a captive company, is owned by a parent business to insure its own risks—not structured like a general capital corporation. Option C, a co-operative company, is owned by its policyholders or members, not shareholders. Option D (factory mutual company) refers to a mutual insurer owned by its policyholders and requiring high loss-prevention standards.

Thus, the only insurer type that mirrors the capital structure of typical Canadian corporate enterprises is the stock company, making A correct.

With a guaranteed replacement cost policy, the insurer agrees to pay the full cost of replacing the damaged or destroyed property (subject to conditions), even if that amount approaches or, in some forms, exceeds the stated limit. Here, the total replacement cost of the loss is $500,000.

However, some furniture is salvageable and valued at $4,000. Since Dominika elects to keep this salvage, she is effectively retaining part of the value of the damaged property. To maintain the principle of indemnity and avoid overpayment, the insurer deducts the salvage value from the total amount they would otherwise pay.

Step-by-step:

Replacement cost of loss: $500,000

Less salvage value retained by insured: $4,000

Subtotal: $496,000

Less deductible: $1,000

Net settlement: $495,000

Therefore, Dominika will recover $495,000, making Option A correct.

Liability insurance arises because individuals and businesses have legal obligations not to cause bodily injury or property damage to others. When someone is negligent, the law allows the injured party to seek compensation. These legal obligations can be substantial and financially devastating. Liability insurance provides protection by transferring the financial burden of compensating others to an insurer. It ensures that the insured can meet their legal responsibilities and that injured third parties receive compensation.

Option A is incorrect because liability insurance is not for protecting oneself from personal risk—it protects against obligations to others. Option C refers to social norms, which may influence behavior but do not impose enforceable financial duties. Option D refers to ethics, but ethical feelings alone do not create legal liability.

The key reason liability insurance exists is the legal requirement to compensate others when negligent, making B the correct answer.

The coinsurance clause requires the insured to carry insurance equal to a specified percentage (commonly 80%, 90%, or 100%) of the property's value. If the insured carries less than the required amount, they become a coinsurer and share in any partial loss. This prevents underinsurance and encourages insureds to maintain adequate coverage levels.

Here, Deanna insures a $1,000,000 property for only $500,000—50%. If the policy requires 80% coinsurance, she should be carrying at least $800,000. Because she does not, she will not be fully reimbursed for partial losses; her payment will be reduced proportionally based on the coinsurance formula.

Option A (forfeiture) applies to breaches of policy conditions. Option C (contribution) applies when multiple insurers cover the same risk. Option D (subscription) applies when several insurers share a single risk by percentage participation.

Thus, the clause that could reduce Deanna’s recovery is B: Coinsurance.

A contract becomes voidable when one party is induced to enter it through fraudulent misrepresentation. Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when a party knowingly makes a false statement, intending to mislead the other party, and the misled party relies on that statement when entering the contract. In this scenario, the seller knew the house had termites but intentionally misrepresented the truth when questioned by Karl. This is a deliberate falsehood, fulfilling all elements of fraud: false representation, knowledge of falsity, intent to induce reliance, actual reliance, and resulting detriment.

Undue influence involves pressure or dominance, which is not present. A mistake about assumptions only applies when both parties are mistaken in good faith about a fundamental fact—here the seller acted deliberately. Innocent misrepresentation involves an unintentional error, but the scenario explicitly describes intentional deception. Thus, the correct legal classification is fraudulent misrepresentation.

Insurers must ensure they collect enough premium to cover potential losses while remaining competitive. One of the most important methods is maintaining a good spread of risk—diversifying exposures across different geographical areas, classes of business, and types of insureds. This spreads the impact of losses, reducing the chance that a single catastrophic event or concentration of similar risks will threaten the insurer’s financial stability.

Option B, specialization, increases dependence on a narrow market segment and may elevate risk volatility. Option C is unrealistic because insurers cannot rely solely on “superior risks,” nor can they guarantee such a selection. Option D—concentrating business in one location—is dangerous because natural disasters, economic downturns, or localized events could cause severe aggregated losses.

Thus, insurers most effectively manage loss volatility through A: a good spread of risk.

Bothstaff adjustersandindependent adjusterswork on behalf of the insurer when handling claims. A staff adjuster is an employee of the insurance company, while an independent adjuster is contracted by an insurer to investigate and adjust claims. Regardless of their employment relationship, both types of adjusters operate under the insurer’s authority, follow the insurer’s procedures, and act in the insurer’s interests when assessing damages, determining coverage, and recommending settlement amounts.

Option A is incorrect because both adjustersdoperform investigations. Option C is incorrect—adjusters are licensed in most provinces, not only Quebec and New Brunswick. Option D is incorrect because both staff and independent adjusters have specific limitations on their settlement authority, which depend on the insurer’s internal guidelines. Therefore, the similarity that applies universally isB.

A mortgage clause is specifically designed to protect the financial institution (the mortgagee) that holds a registered interest in real property. Under this clause, the mortgagee receives certain rights independent of the insured. For example, even if the insured voids the policy through misrepresentation, material change, or failure to comply with policy conditions, the mortgagee may still retain coverage so long as they meet their obligations, such as paying premiums or notifying the insurer of increased hazards.

A bailee clause relates to goods in the custody of another party, not real property. A lienholder clause may apply to movable property like vehicles but does not grant the same broad, independent protection provided to mortgagees. An additional interest clause merely notifies the insurer of a party’s interest but does not extend full rights. Therefore, the clause that ensures robust contractual protection to an entity with a registered interest in real property is the mortgage clause.

Brokers are legally and ethically required to keep premiums in a trust account, separate from operating funds. These trust monies belong to insurers (or insureds, depending on the context) until remitted. Misusing trust funds—such as using them to pay operating expenses—is considered a serious breach of fiduciary duty and a violation of insurance regulatory requirements. Such conduct jeopardizes financial integrity and can lead to immediate termination of the broker contract, regulatory sanctions, or license revocation. Therefore, option D reflects a valid and serious reason for terminating the agreement.

Option A concerns underwriting rules, not broker misconduct. Option B actually reflects good insurer service, not grounds for termination. Option C is incorrect because brokers do not owe commissionstoinsurers—insurers pay commissionstobrokers. The broker’s responsibility is to remit collected premiums, not commissions.

Thus, the only option representing a breach serious enough to terminate an agency contract is D.