COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Exam Dumps - Isaca COBIT Questions and Answers

The role of the board when establishing where the enterprise wants to be is to set priorities, time scales, and expectations. This ensures that the strategic direction and goals are clearly defined and communicated across the organization.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM01 (Ensure Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance):This objective outlines the board's responsibilities in setting the strategic direction, including priorities, timeframes, and expectations.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter emphasizes the board's role in defining the enterprise's strategic goals and ensuring that these goals are aligned with governance and management practices.

By setting clear priorities, time scales, and expectations, the board ensures that the enterprise has a focused and coherent strategy for achieving its desired future state.

When adapting the goals cascade of the COBIT 2019 framework, an enterprise with a growth strategy is most likely to select the enterprise goal "Portfolio of competitive products and services." This goal aligns with the enterprise’s focus on growth through innovation and market competitiveness.

In COBIT 2019, the goals cascade is used to translate stakeholder needs into specific, actionable goals for IT governance and management. For an enterprise with a growth strategy, focusing on a competitive portfolio ensures that the organization is continually innovating and improving its products and services to capture market share and drive growth.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5:Describes the goals cascade and how it aligns enterprise goals with IT-related goals and enablers.

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:Discusses how to adapt the goals cascade based on the enterprise's strategic objectives, such as growth.

By selecting the goal "Portfolio of competitive products and services," the enterprise can ensure that its IT initiatives support and drive its growth strategy.

The COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide specifies:

"The change enablement component addresses behavioral and cultural aspects of the implementation or improvement initiative. It is key to achieving commitment and reducing resistance to change."

Therefore, change enablement is focused on culture and behavior, not organizational structures or technical implementation details.

When soliciting feedback on a business case associated with a new system upgrade to satisfy new regulations, the current IT service vendor would be identified as an external stakeholder. External stakeholders are those outside the organization who can influence or be influenced by the outcomes of the project.

In the context of COBIT 2019, external stakeholders are those who are not part of the enterprise but have a vested interest in the success of IT initiatives. The current IT service vendor plays a critical role in providing feedback on the feasibility, implementation challenges, and potential impact of the new system upgrade.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Highlights the importance of engaging external stakeholders, including vendors, to gain valuable insights and feedback.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives:Emphasizes the need for stakeholder engagement, including both internal and external parties, to ensure comprehensive feedback and alignment with requirements.

Engaging the current IT service vendor as an external stakeholder ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered, enhancing the quality and feasibility of the business case.

According to COBIT 2019 and general IT risk management principles:

"Risk mitigation is the most commonly used response strategy. It involves taking action to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk, often by implementing controls or other countermeasures."

This is supported in COBIT’s treatment of risk under governance objective EDM03.

I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage risks that could materialize. This proactive approach allows the enterprise to identify and mitigate potential risks before they occur, enhancing the overall resilience and effectiveness of the governance system.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter explains the importance of considering I&T-related issues as design factors to address potential risks that could impact the governance system.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective emphasizes the need to identify and manage risks that could affect IT and business processes.

By addressing potential risks through the design of the governance system, enterprises can better prepare for and mitigate adverse events, ensuring smoother and more effective IT operations.

The COBIT 2019 Design Guide states:

"Design factors and their descriptive values influence the prioritization of governance and management objectives, ensuring that the governance system aligns with the enterprise's context and goals."

Hence, these factors help determine which objectives are most important to implement or improve first.

As outlined in the COBIT 2019 Design Guide:

"The governance system design workflow supports the development of a governance system that is tailored to the specific needs, context, and priorities of the enterprise."

It is not limited to compliance or rigid frameworks.

In Phase 3 (Where do we want to be?) and Phase 4 (What needs to be done?) of the COBIT® 2019 implementation lifecycle, the Implementation Guide highlights gap analysis as a critical activity. A gap analysis compares the current state against the desired target state to identify missing capabilities, skills, processes, tools, and resources.

Defining improvement opportunities identifies areas for enhancement but does not quantify resource needs. SWOT analysis provides strategic insight but lacks operational specificity. Capability maturity models assess current capability levels but do not directly identify what additional resources are required to close gaps.

Gap analysis, however, explicitly reveals what is missing—people, skills, funding, tools, or organizational structures—allowing management to plan resource acquisition accurately.

Therefore, conducting a gap analysis is the most effective method for identifying additional resources needed to implement planned I&T changes.