Data-Architect Exam Dumps - Salesforce Data-Architect Questions and Answers

Implementing duplicate rules (option D) is the best solution to remediate the duplication issue, as it allows the data architect to identify and merge duplicate accounts in Salesforce using native features and tools. Developing an ETL process that utilizes the merge API to merge the duplicate records (option A) is not a good solution, as it may require more coding and testing effort, and it does not prevent duplicates from being created in Salesforce. Utilizing a data warehouse as the system of truth (option B) is also not a good solution, as it may introduce additional complexity and cost, and it does not address the duplication issue in Salesforce. Extracting the data using data loader and using excel to merge the duplicate records (option C) is also not a good solution, as it may be time-consuming and error-prone, and it does not prevent duplicates from being created in Salesforce.

The recommended approach to re-run the test is to refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test. A full copy sandbox is a replica of the production Org, including all data, metadata, and attachments. Refreshing a full copy sandbox means creating a new copy of the production Org and replacing the existing sandbox. This would ensure that the test is run on a clean and up-to-date environment, without any leftover data or configuration from previous tests. Truncating or hard deleting objects would not be sufficient, because they would not remove all the data or metadata from the sandbox, and they could also affect other dependent objects or processes.

A correct technique UC should use to solve the data inconsistency is to define a data taxonomy for product data and apply the taxonomy to the product data in the data warehouse. A data taxonomy is a hierarchical classification of data entities and attributes that defines their meaning, format, and relationships. A data taxonomy can help ensure consistency, accuracy, and completeness of product data across different systems and channels

Leveraging a “tier”-based approach to classify the record storage need is a true statement with respect to a data archiving strategy for UC. This approach involves defining different tiers of data based on their usage, value, and retention policies, and then applying appropriate storage and archiving solutions for each tier.

The Sforce-Enable-PKChunking header enables you to extract large data sets from Salesforce by using a technique called primary key (PK) chunking. PK chunking splits your query into multiple queries based on the record IDs of the queried object. This reduces the query time and avoids the query timeout issues that can occur with large data volumes

The recommended solution for Universal Containers (UC) to implement its new Internet of Things technology is to create a new Container Reading custom object with a master-detail relationship to Container which is created when a new measure is received for a specific container. Implement an archiving process that runs every hour. This solution would allow UC to store and access current and historical temperature and humidity data for each container on Salesforce, and use reports and dashboards to analyze it. However, since UC expects a large volume of data over time, they should implement an archiving process that moves data off-platform after a certain period of time to avoid hitting the Org data storage limit and maintain optimal performance. The other options are not recommended, as they would either not store the historical data on Salesforce, or create too many custom fields on the Container object that could impact performance and usability.

Both C and D are valid methods to automatically archive and delete inactive Account data that is older than 3 years1. You can use an ETL tool or the Data Loader to schedule jobs to export and delete data based on certain criteria3. Option A is not recommended because the Force.com Workbench is a web-based tool that does not support scheduling or automation. Option B is not suitable because the weekly export file from the Salesforce UI does not delete data from Salesforce.

Option B is correct because data model is a key artifact that an architect should use to document the data architecture for a multi-system, enterprise Salesforce implementation1. Data model describes the structure and relationship of data entities within an organization2. Option C is correct because integration specification is another key artifact that an architect should use to document the data architecture for a multi-system, enterprise Salesforce implementation1. Integration specification defines the scope, requirements, design, testing, and deployment of integration solutions between Salesforce and other systems3. Option A is not correct because user stories are not key artifacts for documenting the data architecture, but agile development tools that capture the features and functionalities that users want from a system4. Option D is not correct because non-functional requirements are not key artifacts for documenting the data architecture, but quality attributes that specify how well a system performs its functions.

 Setting Customer-Reference_c as an External ID (unique) is the recommended solution to ensure that support agents using global search and reports can quickly find shipment records. This is because external ID fields are indexed and can be used as filters in reports and list views4. Making the field unique also ensures that there are no duplicate values that could confuse the search results.

The recommended solution to address the requirements of Universal Containers (UC) is to roll-up discount request amount at the line-item-level and line-item-level summary discount at the opportunity level. This solution would allow UC to show all sums of discounts across line items at an opportunity level using standard roll-up summary fields. Since UC has a multi-level master-detail relationship for opportunities, a custom opportunity line item object, and a custom discount request object, they can use two levels of roll-up summary fields to aggregate the discount amounts from the child objects to the parent objects. For example, they can create a roll-up summary field on the custom line item object to sum up the discount request amounts from the custom discount request object. Then, they can create another roll-up summary field on the opportunity object to sum up the line-item-level summary discounts from the custom line item object.