JN0-664 Exam Dumps - Juniper JNCIP-SP Questions and Answers

EVPN is a technology that connects L2 network segments separated by an L3 network using a virtual Layer 2 network overlay over the Layer 3 network. EVPN uses BGP as its control protocol to exchange different types of routes for different purposes. Type 2 routes are used to advertise MAC address and IP address pairs learned using ARP snooping from the local CE devices. Type 3 routes are used to join a multicast tree to flood traffic such as broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast (BUM) traffic.

To summarize routes from the 203.0.113.128/25 IP block on R8 to AS 64500, you need to do the following:

• Add the set routing-options static route 203.0.113.128/25 discard command. This creates a static route for the summary prefix and discards any traffic destined to it. This is necessary because BGP can only advertise routes that are present in the routing table.
• Replace exact in the export policy with orlonger. This allows R8 to match and advertise any route that is equal or more specific than the summary prefix. The exact term only matches routes that are exactly equal to the summary prefix, which is not present in the routing table.

BGP GTSM is a technique that protects a BGP session by comparing the TTL value in the IP header of incoming BGP packets against a valid TTL range. If the TTL value is within the valid TTL range, the packet is accepted. If not, the packet is discarded. The valid TTL range is from 255 – the configured hop count + 1 to 255. When GTSM is configured, the BGP packets sent by the device have a TTL of 255. GTSM provides best protection for directly connected EBGP sessions, but not for multihop EBGP or IBGP sessions because the TTL of packets might be modified by intermediate devices.

In the exhibit, we can see that R2, R3, and R4 are in the same AS (AS 20) and R1 is in a different AS (AS 10). Based on this information, we can infer the following statements:

• You can implement BGP GTSM between R2, R3, and R4. This is not correct because R2, R3, and R4 are IBGP peers and GTSM does not provide effective protection for IBGP sessions. The TTL of packets between IBGP peers might be changed by intermediate devices or routing protocols.
• BGP GTSM requires a firewall filter to discard packets with incorrect TTL. This is not correct because BGP GTSM does not require a firewall filter to discard packets with incorrect TTL. BGP GTSM uses TCP option 19 to negotiate GTSM capability between peers and uses TCP option 20 to carry the expected TTL value in each packet. The receiver checks the expected TTL value against the actual TTL value and discards packets with incorrect TTL values.
• You can implement BGP GTSM between R2 and R1. This is correct because R2 and R1 are EBGP peers and GTSM provides effective protection for directly connected EBGP sessions. The TTL of packets between directly connected EBGP peers is not changed by intermediate devices or routing protocols.
• BGP GTSM requires a TTL of 1 to be configured between neighbors. This is not correct because BGP GTSM requires a TTL of 255 to be configured between neighbors. The sender sets the TTL of packets to 255 and the receiver expects the TTL of packets to be 255 minus the configured hop count.
• BGP GTSM requires a TTL of 255 to be configured between neighbors. This is correct because BGP GTSM requires a TTL of 255 to be configured between neighbors. The sender sets the TTL of packets to 255 and the receiver expects the TTL of packets to be 255 minus the configured hop count.

The problem in this scenario is that CE-1 is configured with an incorrect peer AS number for its BGP session with PE-1. The CLI output shows that CE-1 is using AS 65531 as its local AS number and AS 65530 as its peer AS number. However, PE-1 is using AS 65530 as its local AS number and AS 65531 as its peer AS number. This causes a mismatch in the BGP OPEN messages and prevents the BGP session from being established. To solve this problem, CE-1 should configure its peer AS number as 65530 under [edit protocols bgp group external] hierarchy level.