SPLK-5001 Exam Dumps - Splunk Cybersecurity Defense Analyst Questions and Answers

Abaselineis a representation or model of normal network activity, capturing expected patterns and behaviors over time. It serves as a reference point against which anomalies and deviations can be detected. By establishing a baseline, security analysts can identify unusual activities that might indicate security incidents.

Baselineinvolves statistical analysis of historical data to define normal ranges for metrics like traffic volume, connection rates, or login times.

Clusterrefers to grouping similar data points, often used in anomaly detection but not synonymous with a model of normal activity.

Time seriesis a sequence of data points indexed in time order, useful for monitoring trends but not specifically a model of normalcy.

Data modelrefers to an abstract schema for organizing data, such as Splunk’s CIM data models.

TheSplunk Cybersecurity Defense Analyst Study Guidehighlights baselining as a fundamental technique in anomaly detection and network security monitoring.

Theforeachcommand in Splunk is used to iterate over a list of fields that match a wildcard expression and apply a subsearch or function to each of them. This is particularly useful when you need to perform an operation across multiple fields dynamically identified by a wildcard pattern. None of the other options (rex,makeresults, ortransaction) are designed for this specific purpose. Theforeachcommand allows for flexible and efficient processing of multiple fields without having to explicitly name them all.

Thestatscommand is used to generate statistics, such as counts, over specific fields. In this case, the commandindex=security_logs eventtype=failed_login | stats count as failed_attempts by src_ip | sort -failed_attemptscreates a temporary table that counts the number of failed login attempts (failed_attempts) for each source IP (src_ip). Thesort -failed_attemptsensures the results are ordered by the number of failed attempts in descending order, making it easier for an analyst to identify problematic IPs.

The main difference between hypothesis-driven and data-driven threat hunting lies in the approach. Inhypothesis-drivenhunting, the hunter starts with a theory or hypothesis about what kind of malicious activity might be occurring and then searches the data to confirm or refute that hypothesis. On the other hand,data-drivenhunting involves sifting through existing datasets to uncover patterns, anomalies, or activities that were not initially suspected. Hypothesis-driven approaches are more focused and often guided by threat intelligence or knowledge of attacker behaviors, while data-driven approaches rely on broad data analysis to identify unexpected threats.

Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)measures the average time it takes for an analyst to investigate and disposition an incident after detection. Improvements in dashboard customization that provide quicker access to relevant data, better visualizations, or faster workflows can reduce MTTR by enhancing analyst efficiency.

Mean Time to Detectmeasures how quickly an incident is identified, not analyst efficiency after detection.

Recovery Timerefers to the time taken to restore systems to normal after an incident.

Dwell Timeis the time an adversary remains undetected within a network.

TheSplunk Cybersecurity Defense Analyst materialshighlight MTTR as a key SOC performance metric influenced by operational improvements, including better dashboards and automated workflows.

TheIdentity Centerdashboard in Splunk Enterprise Security is the primary interface for managing and reporting on user identities, including users currently on watchlists. This dashboard allows analysts to track user behavior, alerts, and notable events related to specific user identities, with the ability to view and manage watchlist membership.

Identity Centerprovides focused visibility into user-centric data and investigations.

Access Trackeris more general for access logs and authentication events but does not provide watchlist management.

Access CenterandIdentity Trackerare not standard dashboard names in Splunk ES.

TheSplunk Enterprise Security User Guiderecommends the Identity Center for watchlist monitoring and user-focused investigations.

Splunk SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) Playbooks are designed to automate repetitive and orchestratedresponse actions, such as containment or remediation on compromised systems. The use case oftaking containment action on a compromised hostfits perfectly, as playbooks execute sequences like isolating the host, killing processes, or blocking network communications automatically or with analyst approval.

Forming hypothesis for threat huntingis a manual, analytical process not suitable for automation via playbooks.

Creating persistent field extractionsis a data parsing task performed in Splunk searches or configurations, unrelated to SOAR playbooks.

Visualizing complex datasetsis a reporting and analytics task done with dashboards or apps, not SOAR workflows.

TheSplunk SOAR documentationexplicitly defines playbooks as automation workflows to accelerate incident response and reduce analyst workload on containment and investigation.

The log entry showing the same request repeated millions of times indicates aDenial of Service (DoS) Attack, where the server is overwhelmed by a flood of requests to a specific resource, in this case, the/login/page. This type of attack is aimed at making the server unavailable to legitimate users by exhausting its resources.

Denial of Service Attack:

A DoS attack involves a single attacker (or sometimes a small number of sources) sending a massive number of requests to a target server, overwhelming its ability to handle legitimate traffic.

The repetitive log entries reflect the server's inability to process legitimate requests due to the overwhelming number of identical requests.

Incorrect Options:

B. Distributed Denial of Service Attack:This involves multiple sources attacking simultaneously. The log provided does not indicate multiple sources, which would be characteristic of a DDoS attack.

C. Cross-Site Scripting Attack:This attack involves injecting malicious scripts into webpages viewed by other users, not overwhelming a server with traffic.

D. Database Injection Attack:This is an attack against a database via SQL injection or similar techniques, not overwhelming a server with traffic.

The Common Information Model (CIM) in Splunk is a crucial component that allows for the normalization and standardization of data across various sources. By using CIM, disparate data sources can be mapped to a common schema, which makes it significantly easier to correlate and analyze data across different logs and systems.

Purpose of CIM:CIM provides a standardized format for fields and event types across various data sources in Splunk. This normalization allows analysts to use consistent field names and structures when performing searches, regardless of the original data source's format.

Benefit of Easier Correlation:One of the primary challenges in security operations is correlating data from different sources—like firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), endpoint security solutions, and network logs—to identify potential security incidents. CIM facilitates this by ensuring that all relevant data adheres to a common schema, enabling seamless correlation and analysis. For example, CIM allows a security analyst to write a single query that can apply to data from multiple sources, simplifying the detection of complex threats.

How it Works:CIM is implemented through data models in Splunk, which act as a blueprint for mapping and transforming raw data into a structured format. These data models cover a wide range of security domains, such as authentication, network traffic, and malware, ensuring that data from different security tools can be easily integrated and analyzed together.

Use Cases:The primary use cases for CIM include:

Search and Reporting:Creating efficient and standardized searches that apply across multiple data sources.

Dashboards and Visualizations:Building dashboards that pull in data from various sources in a consistent manner.

Correlation Searches:Developing correlation searches that detect patterns or anomalies across different types of data, enhancing threat detection.

The scenario described is an example ofLeast Frequency of Occurrence Analysis. This threat-hunting technique focuses on identifying events or behaviors that occur infrequently, under the assumption that rare activities could indicate abnormal or suspicious behavior. By filtering out users who log in frequently and focusing on those with rare login attempts, the threat hunter aims to identify potentially suspicious activity that warrants further investigation. This technique is particularly effective in detecting stealthy attacks that might evade more common detection methods.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form