CFE-Financial-Transactions-and-Fraud-Schemes Exam Dumps - ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner Questions and Answers

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:In double-entry accounting, a debit increases assets and expenses while decreasing liabilities and equity. Debits are entries on the left side of an account.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Journal Entries – General record of transactions, not the specific effect.

C. Credit – Opposite effect: increases liabilities/equity, decreases assets/expenses.

D. None of all – Incorrect because “debit” is the recognized effect.

Key Concept:Debit rules in double-entry accounting.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: A draw request is used by construction developers to obtain loan funds for work completed. If lien releases are missing, it suggests subcontractors may not have been paid, and the developer might be misrepresenting completed work—an indicator of loan fraud.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A – Omission of personal account statements isn’t unusual for a draw request.

B – Change orders are common in construction projects.

D – Multiple inspection reports support validity, not fraud.

Key Concept: Loan fraud detection through supporting documentation review.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:One form of bid-rigging occurs when colluding vendors agree that one will submit a low bid and later withdraw it, allowing another conspirator to win the contract. This practice is sometimes referred to as “complementary bidding” or the withdrawal of low bids.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Bribery receipt – Refers to corrupt payments, not collusion.

B. Bid solicitation – The process of inviting bids, not collusion.

D. Contract acceptance – A legitimate procurement step, not fraud.

Key Concept:Bid-rigging through collusion — vendors withdrawing low bids to favor co-conspirators.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Baiting is a social engineering tactic where fraudsters leave infected flash drives or storage media in public areas, hoping victims will plug them in, unknowingly installing malware. This is an accurate description.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Pharming – Involves redirecting users from legitimate websites to fraudulent ones, not mail redirection.

B. Dumpster diving – Searching physical trash for sensitive information, not computers from resellers.

C. Shoulder surfing – Observing someone’s screen or keystrokes, not access exploitation.

Key Concept: Identity theft techniques.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From the ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual

Why the correct answer is Human Intelligence

The ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual, in the section on fraud examination tools and intelligence gathering, discusses methods of obtaining information from individuals. One of the recognized methods is Human Intelligence (HUMINT).

The Manual explains that human intelligence gathering involves:

Collecting information directly from people—often through conversation, elicitation, or interviews—sometimes while using a pretext to encourage the target to disclose information.

In this scenario:

Georgina poses as a customer (a pretext),

Contacts an employee of ERO Corp., and

Elicits sensitive information directly from that individual.

This aligns perfectly with the definition of human intelligence gathering—information obtained directly from human sources, often under false pretenses.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Scavenging – Incorrect

The Manual describes scavenging as:

Obtaining information by searching for discarded documents or materials, such as in trash or recycling bins.

Georgina is not going through discarded materials; she is speaking directly with an employee.

C. Baiting – Incorrect

Baiting typically refers to:

Enticing someone with something of value to trick them into taking an action, often involving malware-infected media or fraudulent offers.

Georgina is not offering anything or luring the employee with incentives.

D. Open-source intelligence – Incorrect

Open-source intelligence (OSINT) refers to gathering information from:

Publicly available sources such as websites, publications, databases, or social media.

Georgina is not using public sources; she is actively eliciting confidential information from a person under false pretenses.

ACFE Manual References

The concepts used in this answer derive from the Fraud Examiners Manual (2020 International Edition), including:

Human intelligence and data collection techniques

Scavenging as an investigative method

Baiting schemes

Open-source intelligence descriptions

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: A major red flag of a Ponzi scheme is when the promoter has custody and control over investor funds with little to no independent oversight. This centralization allows them to use new investor money to pay old investors while concealing losses.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A – Ponzi operators usually pressure investors to reinvest, not take payouts, to keep funds circulating.

C – Schemes often involve overly complex or secretive strategies, not simple ones.

D – Realistic fluctuations based on markets suggest legitimate investing, not a Ponzi scheme (which typically reports steady, unrealistic returns).

Key Concept: Ponzi schemes rely on lack of oversight, unrealistic returns, and control of funds by promoters.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:This is a Pass-through scheme, a type of Conflict of Interest under the corruption category. In this scheme, the employee sets up a shell company to act as a vendor. The shell purchases goods from legitimate suppliers and resells them to the employer at inflated prices. Pilar’s actions align perfectly with this definition.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Need recognition scheme – Involves manipulating an employer’s need to justify a purchase, not reselling via a shell.

B. Pay and return scheme – A fraudulent disbursement scheme where overpayments are made and refunds diverted. Not applicable here.

D. Cash larceny scheme – Involves theft of incoming cash, unrelated to vendor fraud.

Key Concept: Pass-through scheme (Conflict of Interest within Corruption).

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:The conservatism principle in accounting means that financial statements should not overstate assets or income and should anticipate possible losses. Thus, the amounts shown should be at least as much as reflected, if not more. This ensures users are not misled by overly optimistic figures.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Fraudulent statement – Involves intentional misrepresentation, not a principle of accounting.

B. Misappropriations – Theft of assets, unrelated to valuation principles.

D. Matching – Refers to aligning expenses with related revenues, not conservatism.

Key Concept:Conservatism principle — caution in financial reporting.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: An advance-fee scheme occurs when fraudsters request upfront payments (fees, commissions, or deposits) for services or opportunities that never materialize. The broker taking the fee without providing services is a classic case.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Bait and switch – Advertising one product/service but delivering another, not applicable here.

C. Split deposit scheme – Involves diversion of payroll or deposits, not loans.

D. Scavenger scheme – Charging for unnecessary services, often debt collection or foreclosure help, not applicable.

Key Concept: Advance-fee frauds as common financial scams.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Credits decrease assets and expenses while increasing liabilities and equity. They are recorded on the right-hand side of ledger accounts, forming the counterbalance to debits.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Journal Entries – Too general; not a directional effect.

B. Debit – Opposite effect of credits.

D. None of all – Incorrect because “credit” is the precise answer.

Key Concept:Credit rules in double-entry accounting.