Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Data Engineer Questions and Answers

AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) is a cloud service that makes it possible to migrate relational databases, data warehouses, NoSQL databases, and other types of data stores to AWS quickly, securely, and with minimal downtime and zero data loss1. AWS DMS supports migration between 20-plus database and analytics engines, such as Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon RDS for SQL Server2. AWS DMS takes over many of the difficult or tedious tasks involved in a migration project, such as capacity analysis, hardware and software procurement, installation and administration, testing and debugging, and ongoing replication and monitoring1. AWS DMS is a cost-effective solution, as you only pay for the compute resources and additional log storage used during the migration process2. AWS DMS is the best solution for the company to migrate the financial transaction data from the on-premises Microsoft SQL Server database to AWS, as it meets the requirements of minimal downtime, zero data loss, and low cost.

Option A is not the best solution, as AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers, but it does not provide any built-in features for database migration. You would have to write your own code to extract, transform, and load the data from the source to the target, which would increase the operational overhead and complexity.

Option C is not the best solution, as AWS Direct Connect is a service that establishes a dedicated network connection from your premises to AWS, but it does not provide any built-in features for database migration. You would still need to use another service or tool to perform the actual data transfer, which would increase the cost and complexity.

Option D is not the best solution, as AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to transfer data between on-premises storage systems and AWS storage services, such as Amazon S3, Amazon EFS, and Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, but it does not support Amazon RDS for SQL Server as a target. You would have to use another service or tool to migrate the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS for SQL Server, which would increase the latency and complexity. References:

Database Migration - AWS Database Migration Service - AWS

What is AWS Database Migration Service?

AWS Database Migration Service Documentation

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Option A is the best answer because AWS DMS documentation recommends that, when practical, you create the replication instance in the same Region as your target endpoint, and in the same VPC or subnet as your target endpoint. In this scenario, the target is the Amazon Redshift cluster in eu-west-1 in Account_B, so placing the replication instance there is the most appropriate design. AWS DMS uses the replication instance to connect to the source, read the source data, transform it as needed, and load it into the target.

This also makes architectural sense because the replication instance must have network connectivity to both endpoints, and colocating it with the Redshift target usually simplifies connectivity to the target warehouse and aligns with AWS guidance. A replication instance in Account_B, eu-west-1 can still connect to the PostgreSQL source in Account_A, eu-east-1, provided the required networking and permissions are configured. AWS DMS supports replication tasks by defining a replication instance plus source and target endpoints.

The study guide also identifies AWS DMS as the correct managed service for database migration and continuous replication scenarios, including full load and change data capture. That matches this cross-account, cross-Region migration use case.

For high-performance analytics in Athena and EMR Spark, the columnar storage formats Parquet and ORC deliver the shortest query times. These formats minimize I/O, enable predicate pushdown, and support efficient compression and parallel reads.

When integrated with the AWS Glue Data Catalog, schema evolution is automatically tracked and managed across queries.

This combination (Parquet/ORC + Glue Catalog) is explicitly recommended by AWS for analytical workloads on S3 data lakes.

“For analytical workloads using Amazon EMR and Athena, store data in columnar formats such as Parquet or ORC. These formats provide optimized compression and query performance.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate Certification – version 2 – apple.pdf

“Use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to manage table schemas and schema evolution for columnar data formats such as Parquet and ORC.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate Certification – version 2 – apple.pdf

Therefore, using ORC or Parquet along with the Glue Data Catalog achieves the shortest Athena query times and seamless schema management.

 Option C is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least effort because server-side encryption with AWS KMS keys (SSE-KMS) is a feature that allows you to encrypt data at rest in Amazon S3 using keys managed by AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). AWS KMS is a fully managed service that enables you to create and manage encryption keys for your AWS services and applications. AWS KMS also allows you to define granular access policies for your keys, such as who can use them to encrypt and decrypt data, and under what conditions. By using SSE-KMS, you can protect your S3 objects by using encryption keys that only specific employees can access, without having to manage the encryption and decryption process yourself.

Option A is not a good solution because it involves using AWS CloudHSM, which is a service that provides hardware security modules (HSMs) in the AWS Cloud. AWS CloudHSM allows you to generate and use your own encryption keys on dedicated hardware that is compliant with various standards and regulations. However, AWS CloudHSM is not a fully managed service and requires more effort to set up and maintain than AWS KMS. Moreover, AWS CloudHSM does not integrate with Amazon S3, so you have to configure the process that writes to S3 to make calls to CloudHSM to encrypt and decrypt the objects, which adds complexity and latency to the data protection process.

Option B is not a good solution because it involves using server-side encryption with customer-provided keys (SSE-C), which is a feature that allows you to encrypt data at rest in Amazon S3 using keys that you provide and manage yourself. SSE-C requires you to send your encryption key along with each request to upload or retrieve an object. However, SSE-C does not provide any mechanism to restrict access to the keys that encrypt the objects, so you have to implement your own key management and access control system, which adds more effort and risk to the data protection process.

Option D is not a good solution because it involves using server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3), which is a feature that allows you to encrypt data at rest in Amazon S3 using keys that are managed by Amazon S3. SSE-S3 automatically encrypts and decrypts your objects as they are uploaded and downloaded from S3. However, SSE-S3 does not allow you to control who can access the encryption keys or under what conditions. SSE-S3 uses a single encryption key for each S3 bucket, which is shared by all users who have access to the bucket. This means that you cannot restrict access to the keys that encrypt the objects by specific employees, which does not meet the requirements.

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with AWS KMS–Managed Encryption Keys (SSE-KMS) - Amazon Simple Storage Service

What is AWS Key Management Service? - AWS Key Management Service

What is AWS CloudHSM? - AWS CloudHSM

Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with Customer-Provided Encryption Keys (SSE-C) - Amazon Simple Storage Service

Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with Amazon S3-Managed Encryption Keys (SSE-S3) - Amazon Simple Storage Service

The company needs to ingest tables from an on-premises Oracle database into a data lake on Amazon S3 in Apache Parquet format. The most efficient solution, requiring the least manual effort, would be to use AWS Database Migration Service (DMS) for continuous data replication.

Option C: Create an AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) task for ongoing replication. Set the Oracle database as the source. Set Amazon S3 as the target. Configure the task to write the data in Parquet format.AWS DMS can continuously replicate data from the Oracle database into Amazon S3, transforming it into Parquet format as it ingests the data. DMS simplifies the process by providing ongoing replication with minimal setup, and it automatically handles the conversion to Parquet format without requiring manual transformations or separate jobs. This option is the least effort solution since it automates both the ingestion and transformation processes.

Other options:

Option A (Apache Sqoop on EMR) involves more manual configuration and management, including setting up EMR clusters and writing Sqoop jobs.

Option B (AWS Glue bookmark job) involves configuring Glue jobs, which adds complexity. While Glue supports data transformations, DMS offers a more seamless solution for database replication.

Option D (RDS and Lambda triggers) introduces unnecessary complexity by involving RDS and Lambda for a task that DMS can handle more efficiently.

Option B is the most operationally efficient because it checks the business requirement directly: whether the target table contains the most recent data, not merely whether a job failed. Monitoring only failures (Options C and D) can produce false positives (a job failure might not impact freshness) and false negatives (a job can succeed but still load stale or incomplete data). The study material emphasizes implementing data quality validation as part of the ETL process so data can be verified before or as it is stored, rather than relying only on pipeline execution status.

Using a data quality rule focused on freshness (for example, validating that a “max event timestamp” or “latest partition date” meets today’s expected value) lets the pipeline detect stale loads even when the workflow runs. Then, an EventBridge rule can route failures of that data quality check to SNS for immediate notification, keeping operations serverless and centralized. Macie (Option A) is designed for sensitive-data discovery/classification, not operational “freshness” checks on Redshift tables, so it adds unnecessary services and effort compared to a Glue-native data quality validation approach.

 Partitioning the data in the S3 bucket can improve the performance of AWS Glue jobs by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and processed. By organizing the data by year, month, and day, the AWS Glue job can use partition pruning to filter out irrelevant data and only read the data that matches the query criteria. This can speed up the data processing and reduce the cost of running the AWS Glue job. Increasing the AWS Glue instance size by scaling up the worker type can also improve the performance of AWS Glue jobs by providing more memory and CPU resources for the Spark execution engine. This can help the AWS Glue job handle larger data sets and complex transformations more efficiently. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant, as they do not affect the performance of the AWS Glue jobs. Converting the AWS Glue schema to the DynamicFrame schema class does not improve the performance, but rather provides additional functionality and flexibility for data manipulation. Adjusting the AWS Glue job scheduling frequency does not improve the performance, but rather reduces the frequency of data updates. Modifying the IAM role that grants access to AWS Glue does not improve the performance, but rather affects the security and permissions of the AWS Glue service. References:

Optimising Glue Scripts for Efficient Data Processing: Part 1 (Section: Partitioning Data in S3)

Best practices to optimize cost and performance for AWS Glue streaming ETL jobs (Section: Development tools)

Monitoring with AWS Glue job run insights (Section: Requirements)

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide (Chapter 5, page 133)

Option B is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because S3 Object Lambda is a feature that allows you to add your own code to process data retrieved from S3 before returning it to an application. S3 Object Lambda works with S3 GET requests and can modify both the object metadata and the object data. By using S3 Object Lambda, you can implement redaction logic within an S3 Object Lambda function to dynamically redact PII based on the needs of each application that accesses the data. This way, you can avoid creating and maintaining multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction.

Option A is not a good solution because it involves creating and managing multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction for each application. This option adds complexity and storage cost to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration. Moreover, S3 bucket policies cannot enforce fine-grained data access control at the row and column level, so they are not sufficient to redact PII.

Option C is not a good solution because it involves using AWS Glue to transform the data for each application. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that can extract, transform, and load (ETL) data from various sources to various destinations, including S3. AWS Glue can also convert data to different formats, such as Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics. However, in this scenario, using AWS Glue to redact PII is not the best option because it requires creating and maintaining multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction for each application. This option also adds extra time and cost to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration.

Option D is not a good solution because it involves creating and configuring an API Gateway endpoint that has custom authorizers. API Gateway is a service that allows you to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. API Gateway can also integrate with other AWS services, such as Lambda, to provide custom logic for processing requests. However, in this scenario, using API Gateway to redact PII is not the best option because it requires writing and maintaining custom code and configuration for the API endpoint, the custom authorizers, and the REST API call. This option also adds complexity and latency to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration.

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Introducing Amazon S3 Object Lambda – Use Your Code to Process Data as It Is Being Retrieved from S3

Using Bucket Policies and User Policies - Amazon Simple Storage Service

AWS Glue Documentation

What is Amazon API Gateway? - Amazon API Gateway

The requirement is to manage the size of an Amazon DynamoDB table by automatically deleting data older than 1 month without disrupting ongoing read or write operations. The simplest and most maintenance-free solution is to use DynamoDB Time-to-Live (TTL).

Option A: Use the DynamoDB TTL feature to automatically expire data based on timestamps.DynamoDB TTL allows you to specify an attribute (e.g., a timestamp) that defines when items in the table should expire. After the expiration time, DynamoDB automatically deletes the items, freeing up storage space and keeping the table size under control without manual intervention or disruptions to ongoing operations.

Other options involve higher maintenance and manual scheduling or scanning operations, which increase complexity unnecessarily compared to the native TTL feature.