DOP-C02 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Professional Questions and Answers

The correct answer is B. Creating a new AWS CodeBuild project and configuring a test stage in the AWS CodePipeline pipeline that uses the new CodeBuild project is the best way to integrate the unit tests into the existing pipeline. Creating a CodeBuild report group and uploading the test reports to the new CodeBuild report group will produce reports about the unit tests for the company to view. Using JUNITXML as the output format for the unit tests is supported by CodeBuild and will generate a valid report.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer is a service that provides automated code reviews and recommendations for improving code quality and performance. It is not a tool for running unit tests or producing test reports. Therefore, option A will not meet the requirements.

Option C is incorrect because AWS CodeArtifact is a service that provides secure, scalable, and cost-effective artifact management for software development. It is not a tool for running unit tests or producing test reports. Moreover, option C uses CUCUMBERJSON as the output format for the unit tests, which is not supported by CodeBuild and will not generate a valid report.

Option D is incorrect because uploading the test reports to an Amazon S3 bucket is not the best way to produce reports about the unit tests for the company to view. CodeBuild has a built-in feature to create and manage test reports, which is more convenient and efficient than using S3. Furthermore, option D uses HTML as the output format for the unit tests, which is not supported by CodeBuild and will not generate a valid report.

The most cost-effective solution to meet the RTO and RPO requirements is option B. This option involves copying the CloudFormation templates to an Amazon S3 bucket in the DR Region, configuring Aurora automated backup Cross-Region Replication, and configuring ECR Cross-Region Replication. In the event of a disaster, the CloudFormation template with the most recent Aurora snapshot and the Docker image from the local ECR repository can be used to launch a new CloudFormation stack in the DR Region. This approach avoids the need to build Docker images from the Dockerfile, which can sometimes take more than 2 hours, thus meeting the RTO requirement. Additionally, the use of automated backups and replication ensures that the RPO of 8 hours is met.

AWS Documentation on Disaster Recovery: Plan for Disaster Recovery (DR) - Reliability Pillar

AWS Blog on Establishing RPO and RTO Targets: Establishing RPO and RTO Targets for Cloud Applications

AWS Documentation on ECR Cross-Region Replication: Amazon ECR Cross-Region Replication

AWS Documentation on Aurora Cross-Region Replication: Replicating Amazon Aurora DB Clusters Across AWS Regions

Activate Amazon Macie on the Production S3 Bucket:

Macie can identify and protect sensitive data such as PII.

Create a Step Functions state machine to automate data discovery and redaction before copying it to the development environment.

Example Step Functions state machine:

{

"Comment": "Anonymize PII and copy data",

"StartAt": "MacieDiscoveryJob",

"States": {

"MacieDiscoveryJob": {

"Type": "Task",

"Resource": "arn:aws:states:::macie:startClassificationJob",

"End": true

}

}

}

Create a Development Environment from CloudFormation Template:

Deploy the development environment in a new account using the existing CloudFormation template.

Schedule an EventBridge rule to start the Step Functions state machine on a weekly basis.

EventBridge rule example:

{

"ScheduleExpression": "rate(7 days)",

"StateMachineArn": "arn:aws:states:::stateMachine:AnonymizeAndCopyData"

}

By using Macie for data anonymization and Step Functions for automation, you ensure PII is properly handled before data transfer between environments.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The requirement is to prevent any product files containing unannounced product IDs (prefixed with a specific UUID) from being stored in the production S3 bucket that users can access.

To achieve this, a best practice is to use astaging bucketas a control point before files go to production, combined with Amazon Macie’s data classification capabilities.

Creating acustom data identifierin Amazon Macie allows precise detection of product IDs starting with the specific UUID, which default managed identifiers will not detect.

By running aMacie sensitive data discovery jobon the staging bucket, you can identify files containing these sensitive product IDs.

Only fileswithout findings(i.e., files that do not contain unannounced product IDs) are copied to the production bucket, ensuring no sensitive information is exposed.This approach aligns with AWS best practices for data classification and staged deployment workflows, maximizing control and reducing risk.Using Macie on the production bucket directly (options B and D) risks exposing sensitive data before detection and deletion. Option C uses managed data identifiers, which will likely not detect the custom UUID prefix pattern.

Reference from AWS Official Documentation and Study Guide:

Amazon Macie Custom Data Identifiers:"You can create custom data identifiers in Amazon Macie to find sensitive data that is unique to your organization."(Amazon Macie User Guide)

Data Security Best Practices:"Use staging environments to inspect and sanitize data before moving it to production to reduce exposure risks."(AWS Security Best Practices)

 Create an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) File System with Targets in Multiple Availability Zones:

Amazon EFS provides a scalable and highly available network file system that supports the NFS protocol. EFS is ideal for Linux instances as it allows multiple instances to read and write data concurrently.

Setting up EFS with targets in multiple Availability Zones ensures high availability and durability.

The correct answer is C. Configuring AWS CloudTrail to send log data events to an Amazon CloudWatch Logs log group and creating a CloudWatch logs metric filter to match failed ConsoleLogin events is the simplest and most efficient way to monitor and alert on failed login attempts. Creating a CloudWatch alarm that is based on the metric filter and configuring an alarm action to send messages to the SNS topic will ensure that the security team is notified when multiple failed login attempts occur. This solution requires the least operational effort compared to the other options.

Option A is incorrect because it involves configuring AWS CloudTrail to send log management events instead of log data events. Log management events are used to track changes to CloudTrail configuration, such as creating, updating, or deleting a trail. Log data events are used to track API activity in AWS accounts, such as login attempts. Therefore, option A will not capture the failed ConsoleLogin events.

Option B is incorrect because it involves creating an Amazon Athena query and two Amazon EventBridge rules to monitor and alert on failed login attempts. This is a more complex and costly solution than using CloudWatch logs and alarms. Moreover, option B relies on the query returning a failure, which may not happen if the query is executed successfully but does not find any failed logins.

Option D is incorrect because it involves configuring AWS CloudTrail to send log data events to an Amazon S3 bucket and configuring an Amazon S3 event notification for the s3:ObjectCreated event type. This solution will not work because the s3:ObjectCreated event type does not allow filtering by ConsoleLogin failed events. The event notification will be triggered for any object created in the S3 bucket, regardless of the event type. Therefore, option D will generate a lot of false positives and unnecessary notifications.

AWS CloudTrail Log File Examples

Creating CloudWatch Alarms for CloudTrail Events: Examples

Monitoring CloudTrail Log Files with Amazon CloudWatch Logs

You can run custom recipes manually, but the best approach is usually to have AWS OpsWorks Stacks run them automatically. Every layer has a set of built-in recipes assigned each of five lifecycle events—Setup, Configure, Deploy, Undeploy, and Shutdown. Each time an event occurs for an instance, AWS OpsWorks Stacks runs the associated recipes for each of the instance's layers, which handle the corresponding tasks. For example, when an instance finishes booting, AWS OpsWorks Stacks triggers a Setup event. This event runs the associated layer's Setup recipes, which typically handle tasks such as installing and configuring packages

To implement a control that requires the use of IMDSv2 on all EC2 instances in the account, the DevOps engineer can use a permissions boundary. A permissions boundary is a policy that defines the maximum permissions that an IAM entity can have. The DevOps engineer can create a permissions boundary that prevents the ec2:RunInstance action if the ec2:MetadataHttpTokens condition key is not set to a value of required. This condition key enforces the use of IMDSv2 on EC2 instances. The DevOps engineer can attach the permissions boundary to the IAM role that was used to launch the instance. This way, any attempt to launch an EC2 instance without using IMDSv2 will be denied by the permissions boundary.

The correct answer is D. The scenario requires a solution that can migrate an application from on premises to AWS, run on specific versions of Apache Tomcat, HAProxy, and Varnish Cache, tune the operating system-level parameters, automate the deployment of new application versions, and scale and replace faulty servers automatically. Option D meets all these requirements by using AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeDeploy, AWS CodePipeline, and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling. AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that hosts Git repositories and works with Git-based tools. AWS CodeDeploy is a fully managed deployment service that automates software deployments to a variety of compute services, including Amazon EC2, AWS Fargate, AWS Lambda, and on-premises servers. AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps automate the release pipelines for fast and reliable application updates. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling helps maintain application availability and allows scaling of Amazon EC2 capacity up or down automatically according to the defined conditions. By using these services together, the DevOps engineer can migrate the application code to AWS, configure and install the necessary software using the appspec.yml file, automate the deployment process using the pipeline, and scale and replace the servers using the Auto Scaling group.

Option A is incorrect because AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that works with Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS. Fargate removes the need to provision and manage servers, but it also limits the ability to tune the operating system-level parameters, which is a requirement in the scenario. Moreover, Fargate does not support HAProxy and Varnish Cache as sidecar containers, which are needed to run the application properly.

Option B is incorrect because AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a fully managed service that automates the deployment and scaling of web applications and services using familiar servers such as Apache, Nginx, Passenger, and IIS. However, Elastic Beanstalk does not support HAProxy and Varnish Cache as part of the Tomcat solution stack, which are needed to run the application properly. Moreover, Elastic Beanstalk web server tier environments are designed to serve HTTP requests, not to process background tasks, which is the purpose of worker tier environments.

Option C is incorrect because AWS Elastic Beanstalk worker tier environments are designed to process background tasks using a daemon process that runs on each Amazon EC2 instance in the environment. Worker tier environments are not suitable for running web applications that serve HTTP requests, which is the case in the scenario. Moreover, Elastic Beanstalk does not support HAProxy and Varnish Cache as part of the Tomcat solution stack, which are needed to run the application properly.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodePipeline

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

AWS Fargate

AWS Elastic Beanstalk