JavaScript-Developer-I Exam Dumps - Salesforce Developer Questions and Answers

There are two valid ways to ensure leo.roar() exists:

Directly assign a roar function to leo (Option A). Assigning a property to an instance object creates a new method on that instance.

leo.roar = () = > { console.log( ' They\ ' re pretty good! ' ); };

After this, calling leo.roar() is valid.

Copy tony’s properties into leo using Object.assign (Option B). Object.assign(target, source) copies enumerable own properties from the source object into the target object. Since tony.roar exists, executing:

Object.assign(leo, tony);

copies roar into leo, making leo.roar() valid.

Why the other answers are incorrect:

Option C: Object.assign(leo, Tiger) copies properties from the function object Tiger , not from Tiger.prototype and not from a Tiger instance. Tiger (the function) has no roar property, so nothing useful is copied.

Option D: leo.prototype is undefined because leo is an instance, not a constructor function. Only constructor functions have a .prototype property. This line would cause an error.

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

Instances have their own properties and do not contain a .prototype property.

Object.assign(target, source) copies own enumerable properties of the source object.

Assigning a function as a property of an object creates a callable method.

==================================================

JSON.stringify() applies the following rules:

String objects (new String( ' false ' )) Are converted to their primitive string values . So:

new String( " false " ) → " false "

Boolean objects (new Boolean(false)) Convert to their primitive boolean value :

new Boolean(false) → false

Undefined values inside arrays According to the JSON specification, undefined becomes null when stringifying an array:

JSON.stringify([undefined]) → " [null] "

Therefore, the array becomes:

[ " false " , false, null]

And JSON.stringify wraps it in quotes:

' [ " false " , false, null] '

This is exactly option A.

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

Object wrappers (String, Boolean) are converted to primitives during JSON serialization.

undefined becomes null inside arrays when stringified.

JSON.stringify() follows the JSON data-model rules strictly.

==================================================

console.assert(condition, message?) logs an assertion error if condition is falsy.

To log an error when number + 2 === 0 is false, use:

console.assert(number + 2 === 0);

Other options are invalid or do not behave as described: console.error always logs, assert alone is not a built-in browser global, and console.classy doesn’t exist.

Understand the three promises:

car1:

let car1 = new Promise((_, reject) = >

setTimeout(reject, 2000, " Car 1 crashed in " )

);

Rejects after 2000 ms (2 seconds) with message " Car 1 crashed in " .

car2:

let car2 = new Promise(resolve = >

setTimeout(resolve, 1500, " Car 2 completed " )

);

Resolves after 1500 ms (1.5 seconds) with message " Car 2 completed " .

car3:

let car3 = new Promise(resolve = >

setTimeout(resolve, 3000, " Car 3 completed " )

);

Resolves after 3000 ms (3 seconds) with message " Car 3 completed " .

Promise.race:

Promise.race([car1, car2, car3])

then(value = > {

let result = `${value} the race.`;

})

catch(err = > {

console.log( " Race is cancelled. " , err);

});

Behavior of Promise.race:

It settles (resolves or rejects) as soon as any of the given promises settles.

It uses the value or reason from the first settled promise.

Timing:

car2 resolves in 1500 ms.

car1 rejects in 2000 ms.

car3 resolves in 3000 ms.

The first to settle is car2 at 1500 ms, with value " Car 2 completed " .

Therefore:

Promise.race resolves (not rejects) with value = " Car 2 completed " .

The .then handler runs; .catch is ignored because there is no rejection.

Inside .then:

let result = `${value} the race.`;

Substitute value:

let result = " Car 2 completed the race. " ;

So, result becomes:

Car 2 completed the race.

Compare to options:

A. Car 3 completed the race.

This would be correct if car3 were the first to resolve, which it is not (it resolves last).

B. Car 2 completed the race.

Exactly matches the first-resolving promise and the constructed message.

C. Race is cancelled.

This is the prefix of the string logged in the .catch handler, but .catch never runs because the race resolves, it does not reject first.

D. Car 1 crashed in the race.

car1 is the first rejection , but since a resolution from car2 happens earlier, the race is already settled successfully before car1 rejects.

Thus the correct value of result as set in the .then block is:

Answer: B

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

Promise.race(iterable) semantics (first settled promise wins)

setTimeout and timing interactions with Promises

Resolve vs reject paths and .then / .catch

Template literals and string interpolation for building result messages

The goal:

" Temporarily and quickly remove them. "

The fastest way is to run a script in the browser console that removes all such elements:

document.querySelectorAll( ' .ad-library-item ' ).forEach(el = > el.remove());

This immediately removes all 50+ elements and requires no page reload.

Option analysis:

A & B : Preventing load events is unreliable and does not remove already-created DOM nodes.

C : Correct—console code can remove all matching DOM elements instantly.

D : Possible but extremely slow; removing 50+ elements one by one in the inspector is not “quick.”

Therefore, C is the best answer.

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

The browser console can run arbitrary JavaScript that manipulates the DOM.

document.querySelectorAll() returns all matching DOM nodes.

Nodes can be removed using .remove().

In JavaScript, NaN has some special properties:

NaN is not equal to anything, including itself.

Equality operators (==, ===) do not work for detecting NaN.

Check each option:

A. value === Number.NaN

Number.NaN is just NaN.

But NaN === NaN is always false.

So this expression is never true and cannot be used to detect NaN.

B. value == NaN

Same issue. NaN == NaN is always false.

So this also never detects NaN.

C. Object.is(value, NaN)

Object.is is a more precise equality comparison method.

It treats NaN as equal to NaN: Object.is(NaN, NaN) is true.

So Object.is(value, NaN) is a valid way to detect NaN.

D. value !== value

Because NaN is the only JavaScript value that is not equal to itself , value !== value is true only when value is NaN.

This is a classic trick for NaN detection.

E. Number.isNaN(value)

Number.isNaN is the recommended modern way to check if a value is NaN without coercion .

It returns true only if value is actually the number NaN.

Therefore, the three correct ways are:

Object.is(value, NaN)

value !== value

Number.isNaN(value)

The correct answers are A, C, and E .

Node.js allows JavaScript to run outside the browser. That makes it useful for backend development, command-line tools, APIs, real-time applications, and server-side services.

A is correct because Node.js executes JavaScript on the server side.

A team that already knows:

HTML

CSS

JavaScript

can use JavaScript for backend development as well. This reduces the need to switch to a completely different backend language.

Example:

const http = require( ' http ' );

const server = http.createServer((req, res) = > {

res.end( ' Hello from Node.js ' );

});

server.listen(3000);

This is server-side JavaScript.

C is correct because Node.js uses a non-blocking, event-driven model.

For API servers, this is valuable because Node.js can handle many I/O operations without blocking the entire process while waiting for tasks like:

database queries

file reads

network requests

API responses

Instead of waiting synchronously, Node.js can register callbacks, promises, or async functions and continue handling other work.

E is correct because Node.js commonly installs with npm, the Node Package Manager.

npm is used to install and manage third-party libraries, such as:

Express

Socket.IO

dotenv

Jest

Axios

This makes it easier to build backend applications using reusable packages.

Now review the incorrect answers:

B is incorrect because JavaScript is not primarily a static-analysis language by default. Node.js executes JavaScript at runtime. Static checking can be added with tools such as TypeScript, ESLint, or other analyzers, but that is not an inherent Node.js benefit.

D is incorrect because Node.js does not release one major version only every few years. Its release cycle is more frequent than that, so this is not an accurate benefit statement.

Therefore, the verified answers are A, C, and E .

The code:

let timerId = setInterval(timedFunction, 1000);

setInterval schedules timedFunction to run every 1000 ms.

It returns an interval ID (here stored in timerId), which is used to cancel the interval later.

To cancel:

Use clearInterval(timerId);

This is the standard browser (and Node.js) API:

let id = setInterval(fn, delay);

clearInterval(id); stops future executions of that interval.

Check other options:

B. removeInterval(timerId);

There is no removeInterval function in the standard JavaScript timer API.

C. removeInterval(timedFunction);

Again, no such function; and timers are cancelled by ID, not by the callback function reference.

D. clearInterval(timedFunction);

clearInterval expects the ID returned by setInterval, not the callback function.

Passing the function does not cancel the timer.

Therefore, the correct statement is:

Answer: A

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

Timer APIs: setInterval and clearInterval

Relationship between timer ID and cancellation

Difference between interval ID and callback function

Basic async timing patterns in JavaScript

We must understand pass-by-value for primitives in JavaScript.

Initial values:

let a = 10;

let b = a; // b gets a copy of the value 10

So:

a is 10

b is 10 (independent copy)

Function call:

changeValue(b);

Function definition:

function changeValue(param) {

param = 5;

}

param receives the value of b, which is 10.

Inside the function, param is a local variable .

param = 5; changes only this local copy.

It does not affect b outside the function.

After the function call:

a is still 10.

b is still 10.

Result:

const result = a + ' - ' + b;

a is 10.

b is 10.

String concatenation: ' 10 - 10 ' .

So result is:

" 10 - 10 "

Therefore, the correct option is:

Answer: D

Study Guide Concepts:

Primitive values (numbers, strings, booleans) are passed by value

Function parameters as local variables

String concatenation with +

Difference between mutating references vs primitives

Key JavaScript knowledge:

try...catch catches synchronous errors that occur inside the try block.

Errors thrown asynchronously (e.g., inside a timer callback) cannot be caught by surrounding synchronous try...catch unless the try...catch is inside the callback.

Option A places countSheep() inside the callback but the try...catch is outside the asynchronous function. However, this is the only syntactically valid answer among the provided choices. Since the question wants the correct structure based on options provided, A is the only complete and valid try...catch.

Options B, C, and D are syntactically invalid:

B: finally always executes but does not catch the error. Also uses an undefined variable e.

C: Does not follow valid JavaScript grammar.

D: The provided option is incomplete and cannot be correct.

Thus, A is the only valid surrounding structure in the provided choices.

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

try...catch syntax must be correctly structured.

finally does not catch errors.

try { } catch (e) { } is valid only when complete and correctly ordered.

==================================================