JavaScript-Developer-I Exam Dumps - Salesforce Developer Questions and Answers

We want to guarantee that the result is of type string regardless of what var1 and var2 are (numbers, booleans, etc.).

Option A:

String(var1).concat(var2)

String(var1) converts var1 explicitly to a string.

.concat(var2) calls String.prototype.concat, which:

Converts var2 to string if needed.

Returns a new string that is the concatenation of the two.

Result is always a string. So A is valid.

Option B:

String.concat(var1 + var2)

String.concat (as a static method) does not exist. concat is an instance method on string objects, not on the String constructor.

var1 + var2 might be a number (if both numeric) and used incorrectly here. So B is invalid.

Option C:

var1 + var2

+ can mean:

String concatenation (if at least one operand is a string).

Numeric addition (if both operands are numbers).

If var1 and var2 are both numbers, var1 + var2 will be a number, not a string.

This does not ensure the result is always a string. So C is not guaranteed to satisfy the requirement.

Option D:

var1.toString() + var2.toString()

var1.toString() converts var1 to a string (for most primitive/object types).

var2.toString() does the same.

Now both operands of + are strings, so the result is string concatenation.

Result is guaranteed to be a string. So D is valid.

Therefore, the two valid ways are A and D.

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

String() conversion vs .toString()

String.prototype.concat

+ operator overload: numeric addition vs string concatenation

Type coercion rules for primitives

Semantic versioning: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

MAJOR: incompatible API changes.

MINOR: add functionality in a backward compatible manner.

PATCH: backward compatible bug fixes.

Here:

Bug fixes only, no breaking changes → increment PATCH.

From 2.1.1 to 2.1.2.

So the correct new version is 2.1.2.

ES Modules follow these rules:

Default exports are imported using:

import anyName from ' module '

The name chosen in the import does NOT need to match the exported name.

If a module exports:

export default function printDate() {}

then consuming code should import the function directly:

import printDate from ' /path/DatePrettyPrint.js ' ;

To execute it:

printDate();

Option analysis:

A incorrect: import DatePrettyPrint() is invalid syntax. Also calling printDate() without importing it is incorrect.

B incorrect: A default export imported as DatePrettyPrint gives the function itself, not an object containing methods. You cannot call DatePrettyPrint.printDate().

C incorrect: Imports printDate but then calls DatePrettyPrint.printDate(), which does not exist.

D correct: Correct import of a default-exported function. Correct direct invocation.

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

Default export → imported without braces.

Importing default functions gives a callable function, not an object.

Correct syntax: import identifier from " module " .

==================================================

Execution order:

Top-level code runs synchronously:

Line 14: console.log(4); → logs 4.

Line 15: callDelay(); is called.

Inside callDelay:

Line 9: console.log(2); → logs 2.

Line 10: await delay(1000);:

Calls delay(1000).

Inside delay(1000):

Line 3: console.log(1); → logs 1.

Line 4: setTimeout(resolve, delay); schedules resolve in 1000 ms.

delay returns a pending Promise. await pauses callDelay here and returns control to the event loop.

Back to top-level:

Line 16: console.log(5); → logs 5.

So synchronous log sequence is: 4, 2, 1, 5.

After ~1000 ms:

The setTimeout in delay resolves the Promise.

The await in callDelay resumes.

Line 11: console.log(3); → logs 3.

Final log order: 4 2 1 5 3.

Both A and B show the same sequence; one must be chosen, so A is correct.

Concepts: async/await flow, Promise resolution timing, event loop, and ordering of synchronous vs timer callbacks.

We want to select the first < li > under #main and change its content.

document.querySelector(selector) returns the first element matching the CSS selector.

In the DOM, the < li > elements under < ul > are children in order:

1st child: " Leo "

2nd child: " Tony "

3rd child: " Tiger "

li:nth-child(1) is the CSS pseudo-class that selects the first < li > inside its parent.

So:

document.querySelector( ' #main li:nth-child(1) ' ).innerHTML = ' The Lion ' ;

selects the first < li > ( " Leo " ) inside #main and sets its innerHTML to " The Lion " .

Why others are incorrect:

A. #main #Leo

There is no element with id " Leo " . id is not set on the < li > , so the selector matches nothing.

B. li:second-child

There is no :second-child pseudo-class. The valid pseudo-class is :nth-child(2); and that would select " Tony " , not " Leo " .

C. ' #main li,Leo '

This selector means “all #main li and all elements named < Leo > ”.

There is no < Leo > tag, and querySelectorAll returns a NodeList, which does not have a single innerHTML property.

Therefore, D is the correct statement.

Study Guide Concepts:

document.querySelector vs querySelectorAll

CSS selectors: nth-child()

DOM element innerHTML property

We want to convert the number 1982 to a string.

Check each option:

A. numValue.toText()

There is no standard toText() method on numbers.

This will result in TypeError: numValue.toText is not a function.

B. String(numValue);

String() as a function converts its argument to a string.

String(1982) returns " 1982 " .

This is correct.

C. ' ' + numValue;

' ' is a string; + with a string operand performs string concatenation.

' ' + 1982 → " 1982 " .

This is a common shorthand for number-to-string conversion.

D. numValue.toString();

Number.prototype.toString() converts the number to its string representation.

1982..toString() or (1982).toString() returns " 1982 " .

For the variable, numValue.toString() is valid: " 1982 " .

E. (String)numValue;

This is not valid JavaScript casting syntax; it is more like a C/Java-style cast.

In JavaScript, that is parsed as a grouping expression (String) and then numValue; it does not convert numValue to a string.

Thus the correct answers are:

B. String(numValue);

C. ' ' + numValue;

D. numValue.toString();

Relevant concepts: primitive type conversion, String() casting, .toString(), coercion via + with strings.

The correct answer is A .

This object uses a getter :

get fullName() {

return this.firstName + ' ' + this.lastName;

}

A getter looks like a method when it is defined, but it is accessed like a normal property.

So the correct access syntax is:

dog.fullName

That returns:

" Beau Boo "

The important distinction is:

dog.fullName

not:

dog.fullName()

Because fullName is a getter property, not a regular function property.

Option B is incorrect because calling dog.fullName() tries to call the returned string as a function. Since " Beau Boo " is not a function, that would cause a TypeError.

Option C is incorrect because there is no get object inside dog.

Option D is incorrect because there is no function object inside dog, and getters are not accessed that way.

Therefore, the verified answer is A .

At line 03, the developer assigns:

Item.prototype.description = function() { return ' This is a ' + this.name; }

This affects all objects whose prototype chain includes Item.prototype .

regItem inherits from Item → gets this method.

saleItem, as an instance of SaleItem, also inherits Item.prototype (since SaleItem uses prototype inheritance from Item), so it also has this method at this moment.

Outputs at lines 04 and 05:

regItem.description() → " This is a Scarf "

saleItem.description() → " This is a Shirt "

At line 07, the developer overrides the method on SaleItem.prototype :

SaleItem.prototype.description = function() {

return ' This is a discounted ' + this.name;

}

From this point:

regItem still uses the Item.prototype version

saleItem uses the overridden SaleItem.prototype version

Outputs at lines 08 and 09:

regItem.description() → " This is a Scarf "

saleItem.description() → " This is a discounted Shirt "

Combining all results:

This is a Scarf

This is a Shirt

This is a Scarf

This is a discounted Shirt

This matches option B .

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

Objects created from constructor functions use prototype chaining.

Overriding a subclass prototype method does not affect the parent class prototype.

Instances inherit the most specific version of the method on their prototype chain.

==================================================

We need to track the value of counter and the timing of each call to logCounter.

Initial state:

Line 01: counter = 0;

Line 02–04: logCounter logs the current value of counter.

Execution order and timing:

Line 05: logCounter();

Called immediately at time t = 0 ms.

counter is 0.

First log: 0.

Line 06: setTimeout(logCounter, 2100);

Schedules logCounter to run once after 2100 ms.

No log yet at this line.

Line 07–10: setInterval(() = > { counter++; logCounter(); }, 1000);

Schedules a repeating callback every 1000 ms (1 second).

First interval callback runs at t ≈ 1000 ms.

Now follow the timeline:

t = 0 ms:

logCounter(); from line 05

Logs: 0

t = 1000 ms (first interval execution):

counter++; → counter goes from 0 to 1.

logCounter(); logs 1.

t = 2000 ms (second interval execution):

counter++; → counter goes from 1 to 2.

logCounter(); logs 2.

t = 2100 ms (timeout from line 06):

logCounter(); runs again.

counter is still 2 (next setInterval will be at t = 3000 ms).

Logs 2.

So the first four logs are:

0

1

2

2

Concatenated as in the options: 0122.

Therefore, the correct choice is:

Answer: A

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

setTimeout and setInterval timing behavior

Order of execution in the event loop

Closures capturing variables (here, logCounter using counter)

Understanding asynchronous scheduling in JavaScript

A subclass created by:

Console16bit.prototype = Object.create(GameConsole.prototype);

inherits all prototype methods from GameConsole, including load.

To override the inherited method, the correct syntax is to assign a new function to the method name on the prototype:

Console16bit.prototype.load = function(gamename) {

console.log(`${this.name} is loading a cartridge game: ${gamename}....`);

};

Why the other options are wrong:

A assigns something to the constructor function itself, not to the prototype method. Invalid.

B attempts to call a function in the left-hand side of an assignment; invalid syntax.

C also uses invalid syntax—prototype methods cannot be defined this way.

D is the correct definition of a prototype method override.

JavaScript Knowledge References (text-only)

Methods are overridden by assigning functions to Subclass.prototype.methodName.

Object.create() establishes prototype inheritance.

Constructor functions require prototype method attachment using assignment syntax.

==================================================