PT0-003 Exam Dumps - CompTIA PenTest+ Questions and Answers

The unauthorized reprinting of ID badges suggests the penetration tester is attempting physical security penetration testing to gain long-term access.

Option A (Obtain long-term, valid access) ✅: Correct. Cloning or reprinting badges allows persistent access past security checks.

Option B (Disrupt availability) ❌: There is no indication of a denial-of-service attack.

Option C (Change access for valid users) ❌: The goal is not modifying user access, but rather gaining unauthorized access.

Option D (Revoke access for valid users) ❌: The logs show new badges being printed, not revocation.

???? Reference: CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-003 Official Guide – Physical Security Testing

The tester is attempting to register a malicious DLL as a server-level plugin to escalate privileges.

Privilege escalation (Option B):

The command uses dnscmd.exe, a legitimate Windows tool for managing DNS servers.

By setting a malicious DLL (adduser.dll) as a server-level plugin, attackers can gain SYSTEM-level privileges.

This technique is a DLL hijacking attack.

Using shikata_ga_nai:

This encoder obfuscates the payload, making it harder for antimalware to detect.

The command specifies a bind shell (windows/bind_tcp) payload, targeting Windows with architecture x86-64.

Why Not Other Options?

B, C: These commands generate payloads but do not use an encoder, increasing the likelihood of detection by antimalware.

D: This command is unrelated to generating shellcode; it appears to be an attempt to manipulate accounts.

CompTIA Pentest+ References:

Domain 3.0 (Attacks and Exploits)

When a penetration tester obtains an NTLM hash from a legacy Windows machine, they need to use a tool that can leverage this hash for further attacks, such as pass-the-hash attacks, or for cracking the hash. Here’s a breakdown of the options:

Option A: Responder

Responder is primarily used for poisoning LLMNR, NBT-NS, and MDNS to capture hashes, but not for leveraging NTLM hashes obtained post-exploitation.

Option B: Hydra

Hydra is a password-cracking tool but not specifically designed for NTLM hashes or pass-the-hash attacks.

Option C: BloodHound

BloodHound is used for mapping out Active Directory relationships and identifying potential attack paths but not for using NTLM hashes directly.

Option D: CrackMapExec

CrackMapExec is a versatile tool that can perform pass-the-hash attacks, execute commands, and more using NTLM hashes. It is designed for post-exploitation scenarios involving NTLM hashes.

References from Pentest:

Forge HTB: Demonstrates the use of CrackMapExec for leveraging NTLM hashes to gain further access within a network​​.

Horizontall HTB: Shows how CrackMapExec can be used for various post-exploitation activities, including using NTLM hashes to authenticate and execute commands​​.

Conclusion:

Option D, CrackMapExec, is the most suitable tool for continuing the attack using an NTLM hash. It supports pass-the-hash techniques and other operations that can leverage NTLM hashes effectively.

=================

At the end of a penetration test, handling sensitive data properly ensures compliance with legal, regulatory, and ethical guidelines.

Securely destroy or remove all engagement-related data (Option B):

Ensures confidentiality of test results.

Prevents unauthorized access to client information.

Methods include secure wiping tools (shred, sdelete), and encrypted storage deletion.

The tester’s activity involves analyzing the contents of a JAR file to identify potentially vulnerable components. This process is known as Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Here’s why:

Understanding SCA:

Definition: SCA involves analyzing software to identify third-party and open-source components, checking for known vulnerabilities, and ensuring license compliance.

Purpose: To detect and manage risks associated with third-party software components.

Comparison with Other Terms:

SAST (A): Static Application Security Testing involves analyzing source code for security vulnerabilities without executing the code.

SBOM (B): Software Bill of Materials is a detailed list of all components in a software product, often used in SCA but not the analysis itself.

ICS (C): Industrial Control Systems, not relevant to the context of software analysis.

The tester’s activity of examining a JAR file for vulnerable components aligns with SCA, making it the correct answer.

=================

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is an attack that involves injecting malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. Here’s why option C is correct:

XSS (Cross-Site Scripting): This attack involves injecting JavaScript into a web application, which is then executed by the user’s browser. The scenario describes injecting a JavaScript prompt, which is a typical XSS payload.

SQL Injection: This involves injecting SQL commands to manipulate the database and does not relate to JavaScript injection.

SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery): This attack tricks the server into making requests to unintended locations, which is not related to client-side JavaScript execution.

Server-Side Template Injection: This involves injecting code into server-side templates, not JavaScript that executes in the user’s browser.

References from Pentest:

Horizontall HTB: Demonstrates identifying and exploiting XSS vulnerabilities in web applications​​.

Luke HTB: Highlights the process of testing for XSS by injecting scripts and observing their execution in the browser​​.

=================

An external attack surface review focuses on identifying publicly accessible assets that an attacker could exploit. The first step in this process is information gathering, which involves enumerating domains, subdomains, public IPs, DNS records, and other internet-facing resources. This is done using passive reconnaissance tools such as Whois, Shodan, Google Dorking, and OSINT techniques.

Option A is correct because it aligns with the assessment goal—finding public-facing systems and their vulnerabilities before an attacker does.

Option B (phishing assessment) is incorrect because it involves social engineering, which is not part of an external attack surface review.

Option C (physical security review) is incorrect as it pertains to physical penetration testing, not an external attack analysis.

Option D (vulnerability assessment) is incorrect because a vulnerability assessment is a later step after reconnaissance. The first step is identifying assets through information gathering.

Client Concern:

Availability: The client is specifically concerned about the availability of their consumer-facing production application. Ensuring this application is secure and available is crucial to the business.

Server Analysis:

Server 1 (Development sandbox server): Typically not a production server; vulnerabilities here are less likely to impact the consumer-facing application.

Server 2 (Back office file transfer server): Important but generally more internal-facing and less likely to directly affect the consumer-facing application.

Server 3 (Perimeter network web server): Likely hosts the consumer-facing application or critical services related to it. High-severity vulnerabilities here could directly impact availability.

Server 4 (Developer QA server): Similar to Server 1, more likely to be used for testing rather than production, making it less critical for immediate manual testing.

Pentest References:

Risk Prioritization: Focus on assets that have the most significant impact on business operations, especially those directly facing consumers.

Critical Infrastructure: Ensuring the security and availability of web servers exposed to the internet as they are prime targets for attacks.

By selecting Server 3 (the perimeter network web server) for additional manual testing, the penetration tester addresses the client's primary concern about the availability and security of the consumer-facing production application.

=================

Importance of a Clear Executive Summary:

The executive summary is essential because it provides decision-makers with a concise overview of the findings, risks, and recommendations without requiring deep technical knowledge.

Clarity in objectives ensures that all stakeholders understand the purpose, scope, and outcomes of the test.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Keeping video and audio records is helpful during testing but not typically included in the final report for handling purposes.

B: Limiting the report to 5–10 pages may compromise its comprehensiveness and omit critical details.

C: Recommendations based solely on the risk score may not address the broader context or organizational priorities.

CompTIA Pentest+ References:

Domain 5.0 (Reporting and Communication)