SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Associate Questions and Answers

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to optimize costs and reduce operational overhead for an RDS for PostgreSQL database that only needs to be active during business hours on weekdays.

Analysis of Options:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: Allows for automated start and stop schedules based on specified times, ideal for resources only needed during certain hours. This directly optimizes costs by running the database only when needed.

Turn off automatic backups and create weekly snapshots: Does not address the requirement of reducing operational overhead and optimizing runtime costs.

Custom Lambda function: This could work but adds unnecessary complexity compared to using the Instance Scheduler.

All Upfront Reserved DB Instances: While this reduces costs, it does not optimize for usage patterns that require the database only during specific hours.

Best Solution:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: This option effectively manages the database runtime based on the specified schedule, reducing costs and operational overhead.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs to scale throughput for uploading large files to S3 and downloading them to EC2 instances.

S3 Multipart Uploads: This method allows for the parallel upload of parts of a file, improving upload efficiency and reliability.

Parallel Fetching: Fetching multiple byte-ranges in parallel from S3 improves download performance.

Implementation:

For uploads, use the S3 multipart upload API to upload files in parallel.

For downloads, use the S3 API to request multiple byte-ranges concurrently.

Conclusion: These solutions effectively scale throughput and improve the performance of both uploads and downloads.

References

S3 Multipart Upload:Amazon S3 Multipart Upload

Parallel Fetching:S3 Byte-Range Fetches

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it enables the company to migrate its on-premises NFS data store to AWS without changing the existing applications or workflows. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides seamless and secure integration between on-premises and AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a file interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. By setting up an Amazon S3 File Gateway, the company can store and retrieve files as objects in Amazon S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS. The company can also use an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to automatically transition the data to the appropriate storage class based on the frequency of access and the cost of storage. For example, the company can use S3 Standard for frequently accessed data, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) or S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) for less frequently accessed data, and S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term archival data.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a block interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. Volume Gateway is not suitable for migrating an NFS data store, as it requires attaching the volumes to EC2 instances or on-premises servers using the iSCSI protocol. Option C is not a valid solution because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed elastic NFS file system that is designed for workloads that require high availability, scalability, and performance. Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files, with a lower price per GB and a higher price per access. Using Amazon EFS Standard-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. Option D is not a valid solution because Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that isoptimized for infrequently accessed files that do not require the availability and durability of Amazon EFS Standard or Standard-IA. Amazon EFS One Zone-IA stores data in a single Availability Zone, which reduces the cost by 47% compared to Amazon EFS Standard-IA, but also increases the risk of data loss in the event of an Availability Zone failure. Using Amazon EFS One Zone-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. It would also compromise the availability and durability of the data.

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/waf-block-common-attacks/#:~:text=To%20protect%20your%20applications%20against,%2C%20query%20string%2C%20or%20URI. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect against SQL injection and cross-site scripting To protect your applications against SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, use the built-in SQL injection and cross-site scripting engines. Remember that attacks can be performed ondifferent parts of the HTTP request, such as the HTTP header, query string, or URI. Configure the AWS WAF rules to inspect different parts of the HTTP request against the built-in mitigation engines.

AWS Shield Advanced provides expanded DDoS attack protection for your Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, CloudFront distributions, Route 53 hosted zones, and AWS Global Accelerator standard accelerators.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/what-is-aws-waf.html

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to improve caching to enhance website performance while ensuring that stale content is not served for more than a few minutes after a deployment.

Analysis of Options:

Set CloudFront TTL: Setting a short TTL (e.g., 2 minutes) ensures that cached content is refreshed frequently, reducing the risk of serving stale content.

S3 Bucket TTL: This would not control the cache duration for the CloudFront distribution.

Cache-Control Private: This directive is for controlling caching by private caches (e.g., browsers) and is not applicable for CloudFront.

Lambda@Edge: While this can add headers dynamically, it adds complexity and operational overhead.

Cache-Control max-age and CloudFront Invalidation: Setting a longer max-age for objects ensures they are cached longer, reducing load on the origin. Invalidation ensures that updated content is refreshed immediately after deployment.

Best Combination of Caching Methods:

Set the CloudFront default TTL to 2 minutes: This balances caching and freshness of content.

Add a Cache-Control max-age directive of 24 hours and use CloudFront invalidation: This ensures efficient caching while providing a mechanism to clear outdated content immediately after a deployment.

Understanding the Requirement: The company anticipates a spike in traffic during a holiday and wants to ensure the Auto Scaling group can handle the increased load without impacting performance.

Analysis of Options:

CloudWatch Alarm: This reacts to spikes based on metrics like CPU utilization but does not proactively scale before the anticipated demand.

Recurring Scheduled Action: This allows the Auto Scaling group to scale up based on a known schedule, ensuring additional capacity is available before the expected spike.

Increase Min/Max Instances: This could result in unnecessary costs by maintaining higher capacity even when not needed.

SNS Notification: Alerts on scaling events but does not proactively manage scaling to prevent performance issues.

Best Solution for Proactive Scaling:

Create a recurring scheduled action: This approach ensures that the Auto Scaling group scales up before the peak demand, providing the necessary capacity proactively without manual intervention.

Requirement Analysis: The company wants to identify cost optimizations for EC2 instances, the Auto Scaling group, and EBS volumes with high operational efficiency.

AWS Compute Optimizer: This service provides actionable recommendations to help optimize your AWS resources, including EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Cost Recommendations: Compute Optimizer analyzes the utilization of resources and provides specific recommendations for rightsizing or optimizing the configurations.

Operational Efficiency: Using Compute Optimizer automates the process of identifying cost-saving opportunities, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Implementation:

Enable AWS Compute Optimizer for your AWS account.

Review the recommendations provided for EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Conclusion: This solution provides a comprehensive, automated approach to identifying cost optimizations with minimal operational effort.

References

AWS Compute Optimizer:AWS Compute Optimizer Documentation

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows you to run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can create Lambda functions using various languages, including Java, and specify the amount of memory and CPU allocated to your function. Lambda charges you only for the compute time you consume, which is calculated based on the number of requests and the duration of your code execution. You can use Amazon EventBridge to trigger your Lambda function on a schedule, such as every hour, using cron or rate expressions. This solution will optimize the costs to run the job, as you will not payfor any idle time or unused resources, unlike running the job on an EC2 instance. References: 1: AWS Lambda - FAQs2, General Information section2: Tutorial:Schedule AWS Lambda functions using EventBridge3, Introduction section3: Schedule expressions using rate or cron - AWS Lambda4, Introduction section.

The combination of these solutions provides an efficient and automated way to migrate data while preserving metadata and ensuring cleanup:

Create a new S3 bucket with versioning enabled(Option A) to preserve object metadata like version IDs during migration.

UseS3 batch operations(Option B) to efficiently copy data from specific prefixes in the source bucket to the destination bucket, ensuring minimal overhead.

Use an S3 Lifecycle policy(Option F) to automatically delete the data from the source bucket after it has been migrated, reducing manual intervention.

Option C (CopyObject API): This approach would require more manual scripting and effort.

Option D (Same-Region Replication): SRR is designed for ongoing replication, not for one-time migrations.

Option E (DataSync): DataSync adds more complexity than necessary for this task.

AWS References:

S3 Batch Operations

S3 Lifecycle Policies

Requirement Analysis: The database experiences peak traffic multiple times a day but has wasted capacity during non-peak hours. The goal is to reduce costs with minimal operational effort.

Aurora Serverless Overview: Aurora Serverless automatically adjusts database capacity based on current demand, scaling up during peak times and scaling down during non-peak times.

Cost Efficiency: Aurora Serverless charges only for the capacity used, which is more cost-effective than provisioning for peak traffic.

Operational Efficiency: Aurora Serverless eliminates the need for manual scaling or scheduling Lambda functions for capacity management.

Implementation: Migrate the database from the provisioned Aurora PostgreSQL cluster to an Aurora Serverless cluster.

References

Amazon Aurora Serverless:Aurora Serverless Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The application experiences slow performance at the start of peak hours, but normalizes after a few hours. The goal is to ensure proper performance at the beginning of peak hours.

Analysis of Options:

Application Load Balancer: Ensures proper traffic distribution but does not address the need to have sufficient instances running at the start of peak hours.

Dynamic Scaling Policy Based on Memory or CPU Utilization: While dynamic scaling reacts to usage metrics, it may not preemptively scale in anticipation of peak hours, leading to delays as new instances are launched and become available.

Scheduled Scaling Policy: This allows the Auto Scaling group to launch instances ahead of time, ensuring that enough instances are available and ready to handle the increased load right at the start of peak hours.

Best Solution:

Scheduled Scaling Policy: This approach ensures that new instances are launched and ready before peak hours begin, addressing the slow performance issue at the start of peak periods.

https://aws.amazon.com/certificate-manager/:

"With AWS Certificate Manager, you can quickly request a certificate, deploy it on ACM-integrated AWS resources, such as Elastic Load Balancers, Amazon CloudFront distributions, and APIs on API Gateway, and let AWS Certificate Manager handle certificate renewals. It also enables you to create private certificates for your internal resources and manage the certificate lifecycle centrally."

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a container solution that can scale across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, with a load balancer for HTTP traffic.

Analysis of Options:

Fargate Launch Type and ECS Anywhere: Using Fargate for cloud-based containers and ECS Anywhere for on-premises containers provides a unified management experience across environments without needing to manage infrastructure.

Application Load Balancer: Suitable for HTTP traffic and can distribute requests to the ECS services, ensuring scalability and performance.

Network Load Balancer: Typically used for TCP/UDP traffic, not specifically optimized for HTTP traffic.

EC2 Launch Type for ECS and ECS Anywhere with Fargate: Involves managing infrastructure for EC2 instances, increasing operational overhead.

Best Combination of Solutions:

ECS with Fargate Launch Type and ECS Anywhere: This provides flexibility and scalability across hybrid environments with minimal operational overhead.

Application Load Balancer: Optimized for HTTP traffic, ensuring efficient load distribution and scaling for the ECS services.

Amazon S3 Standard-IA: This storage class is designed for data that is accessed less frequently but requires rapid access when needed. It offers lower storage costs compared to S3 Standard while still providing high availability and durability.

Access Patterns: Since the files are frequently accessed in the first 30 days and rarely accessed afterward, transitioning them to S3 Standard-IA after 30 days aligns with their access patterns and reduces storage costs significantly.

Lifecycle Policy: Implementing a lifecycle policy to transition the files to S3 Standard-IA ensures automatic management of the data lifecycle, moving files to a lower-cost storage class without manual intervention. Deleting the files after 4 years further optimizes costs by removing data that is no longer needed.

Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora MySQL - this will let the DB scale on it's own; it'll scale automatically without needing adjustment. Create AMI of the web app and using a launch template - this will make the creating of any future instances of the app seamless. They can then be added to the auto scaling group which will save them money as it will scale up and down based on demand. Using a spot fleet to launch instances- This solves the "MOST cost-effective" portion of the question as spot instances come at a huge discount at the cost of being terminated at any time Amazon deems fit. I think this is why there's a bit of disagreement on this. While it's the most cost effective, it would be a terrible choice if amazon were to terminate that spot instance during a busy period.

Understanding the Requirement: The data science team needs to securely share selective data with the engineering team across multiple AWS accounts with minimal operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

Copy data to a common account: Involves data duplication and increased storage costs, and requires managing additional permissions.

Lake Formation permissions Grant command: This method can be effective but may involve significant operational overhead if managing permissions across multiple accounts and datasets manually.

AWS Data Exchange: Designed for sharing data externally or between organizations, which adds unnecessary complexity for internal sharing within the same organization.

Lake Formation tag-based access control: Provides a scalable and efficient way to manage access permissions based on tags, allowing fine-grained control and simplified management across accounts.

Best Solution:

Lake Formation tag-based access control: This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead, allowing efficient management of cross-account permissions and secure data sharing.

The company is looking for a solution that provides single sign-on (SSO) across multiple AWS accounts while continuing to manage users and groups in their on-premises Active Directory (AD). AWS IAM Identity Center (formerly AWS SSO) is the recommended solution for this type of requirement.

AWS IAM Identity Centerprovides a centralized identity management solution, enabling single sign-on across multiple AWS accounts and other cloud applications. It can integrate with on-premises Active Directory to leverage existing users and groups.

By configuring a two-way forest trust relationship between AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory and the company's on-premises Active Directory, users can be authenticated by their on-premises AD and still access AWS resources through IAM Identity Center. This solution allows centralized management of AWS accounts within AWS Organizations.

The two-way trust allows mutual access between the on-premises AD and the AWS Directory Service. This means that users and groups in the on-premises AD can be used for authentication in AWS IAM Identity Center while maintaining the existing identity management system.

AWS References:

AWS IAM Identity Center Documentation

AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory Trust Relationships

AWS Directory Service Integration with IAM Identity Center

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Create an Enterprise Edition Active Directory in AWS Directory Service: This would require setting up a new directory and managing it in AWS, which adds unnecessary overhead. The requirement is to continue using the existing on-premises AD, making this option unsuitable.

C. Use AWS Directory Service and create a two-way trust relationship: While this approach establishes a trust between on-premises AD and AWS Directory Service, it does not address the single sign-on (SSO) requirements across multiple AWS accounts through IAM Identity Center.

D. Deploy an identity provider (IdP) on Amazon EC2: This is more complex than necessary and introduces more management overhead. AWS IAM Identity Center natively supports integration with on-premises Active Directory without requiring a custom IdP.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/private-content-restricting-access-to-s3.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/distribution-web-awswaf.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-ecs-taskdefinition.html