SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Associate Questions and Answers

This solution offers the most scalable and cost-effective approach with minimal changes to the existing web portal and no code modifications.

Amazon EC2 On-Demand Instances in an Auto Scaling Group: Running the web portal on EC2 On-Demand instances ensures 100% uptime and scalability. The Auto Scaling group will maintain the desired number of instances, automatically scaling up or down as needed, ensuring high availability for the employee web portal.

AWS Lambda for Document Extraction: Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows you to run code in response to events without provisioning or managing servers. By using Lambda to run the document extraction program, you can trigger the function whenever an employee uploads a document. This approach is cost-effective since you only pay for the compute time used by the Lambda function.

No Code Changes Required: This solution integrates with the existing infrastructure with minimal implementation effort and does not require any modifications to the web portal's code.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option B (Spot Instances): Spot Instances are not suitable for workloads requiring 100% uptime, as they can be terminated by AWS with short notice.

Option C (Savings Plan): A Savings Plan could reduce costs but does not address the requirement for running the document extraction program efficiently or without code changes.

Option D (S3 with API Gateway and Lambda): This would require significant changes to the existing web portal setup, including moving the portal to S3 and reconfiguring its architecture, which contradicts the requirement of minimal implementation effort and no code changes.

AWS References:

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling- Information on how to use Auto Scaling for EC2 instances.

AWS Lambda- Overview of AWS Lambda and its use cases.

To provide the most high-performing experience for the users of the application, a solutions architect should use a latency routing policy for the Route 53 A record. This policy allows Route 53 to route traffic to the AWS Region that provides the lowest possible latency for the users1. A latency routing policy can also improve the availability of the application, as Route 53 can automatically route traffic to another Region if the primary Region becomes unavailable2.

S3 One Zone-IA:

Suitable for infrequently accessed data that doesn't require multiple Availability Zone resilience.

Cost-effective for storing user-uploaded images that are only used for AI model training twice a year.

S3 Standard:

Ideal for frequently accessed data with high durability and availability.

Store premium user-generated AI images here to ensure they are readily available for download at any time.

S3 Standard-IA:

Cost-effective storage for data that is accessed less frequently but still requires rapid retrieval.

Store non-premium user-generated AI images here, as these images are only downloaded once every 6 hours, making it a good balance between cost and accessibility.

Cost-Effectiveness: This solution optimizes storage costs by categorizing data based on access patterns and durability requirements, ensuring that each type of data is stored in the most cost-effective manner.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

IAM Roles for Service Accounts (IRSA): IRSA allows you to associate an IAM role with a Kubernetes service account. This enables pods to assume the IAM role and access AWS resources securely.

Annotating Service Accounts: By annotating Kubernetes service accounts with the ARN of the IAM role, you establish the association required for IRSA.

OIDC Identity Provider: EKS clusters use OpenID Connect (OIDC) to authenticate service accounts. Setting up a trust relationship between the IAM role and the OIDC provider allows the Kubernetes service account to assume the IAM role.

Amazon FSx for Lustre: Lustre is a high-performance file system designed for workloads that require fast storage with sustained high throughput and low latency. It integrates with Amazon S3, making it suitable for HPC environments.

Persistent File Systems:

Persistent Storage: Suitable for long-term storage and recurrent use, providing durability and availability.

High Throughput and Low Latency: Persistent Lustre file systems can handle large amounts of data with sub-millisecond latency, meeting the needs of high-performance computing workloads.

Simultaneous Access: FSx for Lustre allows thousands of compute instances to access and process large datasets concurrently, ensuring that the high volume of data is handled efficiently.

Highly Available: FSx for Lustre is designed to provide high availability and is managed by AWS, reducing the operational burden.

EBS gp3 volumes allow you to independently configure IOPS and throughput, up to 16,000 IOPS, regardless of the volume size, and at a lower cost compared to io1/io2 provisioned IOPS volumes. This meets the requirement for cost-effective, predictable IOPS performance for Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL.

AWS Documentation Extract:

"With gp3 volumes, you can provision performance independent of storage capacity, up to 16,000 IOPS. This allows for cost-effective scaling for applications that require high performance at a lower price point compared to io1."

(Source: Amazon EBS documentation, gp3 Volumes)

A: gp2 ties IOPS to volume size; 5 TiB is wasteful if only 15,000 IOPS are needed.

B: io1 works but is significantly more expensive than gp3 for most workloads.

D: Magnetic volumes do not support high IOPS.

Why Option B is Correct:

AWS WAF: Provides a simple way to create geographic match rules to block or allow traffic based on country IP ranges.

Least Operational Overhead: Attaching the WAF rule to the ALB ensures centralized control without modifying ACLs or instance firewalls.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A: Network ACLs operate at the subnet level and can become complex to manage for dynamic or evolving IP ranges.

Option C: Managing IP-based rules in security groups and ACLs lacks scalability and does not provide country-based filtering.

Option D: Configuring host-based firewalls increases operational overhead and does not leverage AWS-managed solutions.

AWS References:

AWS WAF Geomatch:AWS Documentation - WAF Geomatch

This option is the only solution that meets the requirements because it allows the company to encrypt the data with its own encryption keys and tools outside the AWS Cloud. By encrypting the data at the company’s data center before storing the data in the S3 bucket, the company can ensure that the data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and that the company has full control over the encryption keys and processes. This option also avoids the need to use any AWS encryption services or features, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

A. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with server-side encryption (SSE) that uses an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed key. This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. Although the company can create and use its own customer managed key in AWSKMS, the key is still stored and managed by AWS KMS, which is a service within the AWS Cloud. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

B. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with server-side encryption (SSE) that uses an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) AWS managed key. This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. In this option, the company uses the default AWS managed key in AWS KMS, which is created and managed by AWS on behalf of the company. The company has no control over the key rotation, deletion, or recovery policies. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

C. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with the default server-side encryption (SSE). This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. In this option, the company uses the default server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3), which is applied to every bucket in Amazon S3. The company has no visibility or control over the encryption keys, which are managed by Amazon S3. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

The most suitable solution for the company’s requirements is to enable Default Host Configuration Management in Systems Manager to manage the EC2 instances. This solution will allow the company to patch the EC2 instances without disrupting the running applications and without manually creating or modifying IAM roles or users.

Default Host Configuration Management is a feature of AWS Systems Manager that enables Systems Manager to manage EC2 instances automatically as managed instances. A managed instance is an EC2 instance that is configured for use with Systems Manager. The benefits of managing instances with Systems Manager include the following:

Connect to EC2 instances securely using Session Manager.

Perform automated patch scans using Patch Manager.

View detailed information about instances using Systems Manager Inventory.

Track and manage instances using Fleet Manager.

Keep SSM Agent up to date automatically.

Default Host Configuration Management makes it possible to manage EC2 instances without having to manually create an IAM instance profile. Instead, Default Host Configuration Management creates and applies a default IAM role to ensure that Systems Manager has permissions to manage all instances in the Region and account where it is activated.If thepermissions provided are not sufficient for the use case, the default IAM role can be modified or replaced with a custom role1.

The other options are not correct because they either have more operational overhead or do not meet the requirements. Creating a new IAM role, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the new IAM role, and attaching the new IAM role and the existing IAM role to the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM roles, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.The AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy is a managed policy that grants permissions for Systems Manager core functionality2. Creating an IAM user, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the IAM user, and configuring Systems Manager to use the IAM user to manage the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM users, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.An IAM user is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a single person or application3. Removing the existing policies from the existing IAM role and adding the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the existing IAM role is not correct because this solution may disrupt the running applications that rely on the existing policies for accessing RDS databases.An IAM role is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a service or entity4.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is operationally efficient, as it only requires one transit gateway and one transit VIF to connect the Direct Connect connection to all the VPCs in the same AWS Region. The transit gateway acts as a regional network hub that simplifies the network management and reduces the number of VIFs and gateways needed.

It is scalable, as it can support up to 5000 attachments per transit gateway, which can include VPCs, VPNs, Direct Connect gateways, and peering connections. The transit gateway can also be connected to other transit gateways in different Regions or accounts using peering connections, enabling cross-Region and cross-account connectivity.

It is flexible, as it allows each VPC to communicate with all other VPCs and on-premises networks using dynamic routing protocols such as Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The transit gateway’s route propagation feature automatically propagates the routes from the attached VPCs and VPNs to the transit gateway route table, eliminating the need to manually update the route tables.

A Network Load Balancer can be assigned one Elastic IP address for each Availability Zone it uses1. This allows the clients to reach the load balancer using a static IP address that can be authorized on their firewalls. An Application Load Balancer cannot be assigned an Elastic IP address2. An A record in an Amazon Route 53 hosted zone pointing to an Elastic IP address would not work because the load balancer would still use its own IP address as the source of the forwarded requests to the web service. An EC2 instance with a public IP address running as a proxy in front of the load balancer would add unnecessary complexity and cost, and would not provide the same scalability and availability as a Network Load Balancer. References: 1: Network Load Balancers - Elastic Load Balancing3, IP address type section2: How to assign Elastic IP to Application Load Balancer in AWS?4, answer section.

To ensure that the shopping cart data is preserved at all times, a solutions architect should configure Amazon ElastiCache for Redis to cache catalog data from Amazon DynamoDB and shopping cart data from the user’s session. This solution has the following benefits:

It offers the lowest possible latency from the application, as ElastiCache for Redis is a blazing fast in-memory data store that provides sub-millisecond latency to power internet-scale real-time applications1.

It scales with traffic volume, as ElastiCache for Redis supports horizontal scaling by adding more nodes or shards to the cluster, and vertical scaling by changing the node type2.

It ishighly available, as ElastiCache for Redis supports replication across multiple Availability Zones and automatic failover in case of a primary node failure3.

It preserves user session data even if the user is disconnected and reconnects, as ElastiCache for Redis can store session data, such as user login information and shopping cart contents, in a persistent and durable manner using snapshots or AOF (append-only file) persistence4.

Amazon Cognito user pools provide a secure and scalable user directory for user authentication and management. User pools support various authentication methods, such as username and password, email and password, phone number and password, and social identity providers. User pools also support multi-factor authentication (MFA), which adds an extra layer of security by requiring users to provide a verification code or a biometric factor in addition to their credentials. User pools can also enable risk-based adaptive authentication, which dynamically adjusts the authentication challenge based on the risk level of the sign-in attempt. For example, if a user tries to sign in from an unfamiliar device or location, the user pool can require a stronger authentication factor, such as SMS or email verification code. This feature helps to protect user accounts from unauthorized access and reduce the friction for legitimate users. User pools can scale up to millions of users and integrate with other AWS services, such as Amazon SNS, Amazon SES, AWS Lambda, and AWS KMS.

Amazon Cognito identity pools provide a way to federate identities from multiple identity providers, such as user pools, social identity providers, and corporate identity providers. Identity pools allow users to access AWS resources with temporary, limited-privilege credentials. Identity pools do not provide user authentication or management features, such as MFA or adaptive authentication. Therefore, option B is not correct.

AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a service that helps to manage access to AWS resources. IAM users are entities that represent people or applications that need to interact with AWS. IAM users can be authenticated with a password or an access key. IAM users can also enable MFA for their own accounts, by using the AllowManageOwnUserMFA action in an IAM policy. However, IAM users are not suitable for user authentication for web or mobile applications, as they are intended for administrative purposes. IAM users also do not support adaptive authentication based on risk factors. Therefore, option C is not correct.

AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS Single Sign-On) is a service that enables users to sign in to multiple AWS accounts and applications with a single set of credentials. AWS SSO supports various identity sources, such as AWS SSO directory, AWS Managed Microsoft AD, and external identity providers. AWS SSO also supports MFA for user authentication, which can be configured in the permission sets that define the level of access for each user. However, AWSSSO does not support adaptive authentication based on risk factors. Therefore, option D is not correct.

The least outstanding requests (LOR) algorithm is a load balancing algorithm that distributes incoming requests to the target with the fewest outstanding requests. This helps to avoid overloading any single target and improves the overall performance and availability of the web application. The LOR algorithmcan use the RequestCount and TargetResponseTime CloudWatch metrics to determine the number of outstanding requests and the response time of each target. These metrics measure the number of requests processed by each target and the time elapsed after the request leaves the load balancer until a response from the target is received by the load balancer, respectively. By using these metrics, the LOR algorithm can route new requests to the targets that are less busy and more responsive, and avoid sending requests to the targets that are already overloaded or slow. This solution meets the requirements of the company.

AWS Outposts is a fully managed service that delivers AWS infrastructure and services to virtually any on-premises or edge location for a consistent hybrid experience. AWS Outposts supports Amazon EKS, which is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS and on-premises. By installing an AWS Outposts rack in the company’s data center, the company can run containers in a Kubernetes environment using Amazon EKS and other AWS managed services, while keeping the data locally in the company’s data center and meeting the compliance requirements. AWS Outposts also provides a seamless connection to the local AWS Region for access to a broad range of AWS services.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Local Zones are not deployed in the company’s data center, but in large metropolitan areas closer to end users. AWS Local Zones are owned, managed, and operated by AWS, and they provide low-latency access to the public internet and the local AWS Region. Option B is not a valid solution because AWS Snowmobile is a service that transports exabytes of data to AWS using a 45-foot long ruggedized shipping container pulled by a semi-trailer truck. AWS Snowmobile is not designed for running containers or AWS managed services on-premises, but for large-scale data migration. Option D is not a valid solution because AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized is a device that provides 80 TB of HDD or 210 TB of NVMe storage capacity for data transfer and edge computing. AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized does not support Amazon EKS or other AWS managed services, and it is not suitable for running containers in a Kubernetes environment.

To restrict inbound traffic from the ALB to the EC2 instances, the security group for the EC2 instances should only allow traffic that comes from the security group for the ALB. This way, the EC2 instances can only receive requests from the ALB and not from any other source inside or outside the private subnet.

The solution that will improve the performance of the data tier is to deploy an Amazon ElastiCache for Redis cluster in front of the existing DB instance and modify the game to use Redis. This solution will enable the game to store and retrieve the location data of the players in a fast and scalable way, as Redis is an in-memory data store that supports geospatial data typesand commands. By using ElastiCache for Redis, the game can reduce the load on the RDS for PostgreSQL DB instance, which is not optimized for high-frequency updates and queries of location data. ElastiCache for Redis also supports replication, sharding, and auto scaling to handle the increasing user base of the game.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not improve the performance, do not support geospatial data, or do not leverage caching. Taking a snapshot of the existing DB instance and restoring it with Multi-AZ enabled will not improve the performance of the data tier, as it only provides high availability and durability, but not scalability or low latency. Migrating from Amazon RDS to Amazon OpenSearch Service with OpenSearch Dashboards will not improve the performance of the data tier, as OpenSearch Service is mainly designed for full-text search and analytics, not for real-time location tracking. OpenSearch Service also does not support geospatial data types and commands natively, unlike Redis. Deploying Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) in front of the existing DB instance and modifying the game to use DAX will not improve the performance of the data tier, as DAX is only compatible with DynamoDB, not with RDS for PostgreSQL. DAX also does not support geospatial data types and commands.

This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead because it leverages the features of IAM Identity Center and AWS Control Tower to centrally manage multiple user permissions across all the accounts. By creating new groups and permission sets, the company can assign fine-grained permissions to the developer and administrator teams based on their roles and responsibilities. The permission sets are applied to the groups at the organization level, so they are automatically inherited by all the accounts in the organization. When new users are hired, the company only needs to add them to the appropriate group in IAM Identity Center, and they will automatically get the permissions assigned to that group. This simplifies the user management and reduces the manual effort of assigning permissions to each user individually.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs highly available, scalable storage for a document management application without modifying the application during migration.

EFS Overview: Amazon EFS provides scalable file storage that can be mounted concurrently on multiple EC2 instances across different Availability Zones.

EFS Standard-IA: Using the Standard-IA storage class helps reduce costs for infrequently accessed data while maintaining high availability and scalability.

Implementation:

Create an EFS file system.

Configure mount targets in multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability.

Mount the EFS file system on EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group.

Conclusion: This solution meets the high availability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness requirements without needing application modifications.

References

Amazon EFS:Amazon EFS Documentation

EFS Storage Classes:Amazon EFS Storage Classes

When designing a microservice architecture where each microservice interacts with different AWS services, it's essential to follow the principle of least privilege. This means granting each microservice only the permissions it needs to perform its tasks, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or accidental actions.

The recommended approach is to create individualIAM roleswith policies that grant each microservice the specific permissions it requires. Then, these roles should be associated with the EC2 instances that run the corresponding microservice. By doing so, each EC2 instance will assume its specific IAM role, and permissions will be automatically managed by AWS.

IAM roles provide temporary credentials via the instance metadata service, eliminating the need to hard-code credentials in your application code, which enhances security.

AWS References:

IAM Roles for Amazon EC2explains how EC2 instances can use IAM roles to securely access AWS services without managing long-term credentials.

Best Practices for IAMincludes recommendations for implementing the least privilege principle and using IAM roles effectively.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Assign an IAM user to each microservice: This requires managing long-term credentials (access keys), which should be avoided. Storing keys in application code is insecure and creates a maintenance burden.

B. Create a single IAM role: This violates the principle of least privilege, as a single role with broad permissions across all services is less secure.

C. Use AWS Organizations: This approach adds unnecessary complexity. Managing permissions at the account level for each microservice is excessive for this use case and doesn't adhere to the principle of least privilege.