SAP-C02 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Professional Questions and Answers

Question # 49

A company has an application that runs on Amazon EC2 instances. A solutions architect is designing VPC infrastructure in an AWS Region where the application needs to access an Amazon Aurora DB cluster. The EC2 instances are all associated with the same security group. The DB cluster is associated with its own security group.

The solutions architect needs to add rules to the security groups to provide the application with least privilege access to the DB cluster.

Which combination of steps will meet these requirements? (Select TWO.)

Options:

Add an inbound rule to the EC2 instances' security group. Specify the DB cluster's security group as the source over the default Aurora port.

Add an outbound rule to the EC2 instances' security group. Specify the DB cluster's security group as the destination over the default Aurora port.

Add an inbound rule to the DB cluster's security group. Specify the EC2 instances' security group as the source over the default Aurora port.

Add an outbound rule to the DB cluster's security group. Specify the EC2 instances' security group as the destination over the default Aurora port.

Add an outbound rule to the DB cluster's security group. Specify the EC2 instances' security group as the destination over the ephemeral ports.

Buy Now

Question # 50

A company is running an application on Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. The application is using a MongoDB database with a replica set as its data tier. The MongoDB database is installed on systems in the company's on-premises data center and is accessible through an AWS Direct Connect connection to the data center environment.

A solutions architect must migrate the on-premises MongoDB database to Amazon DocumentDB (with MongoDB compatibility).

Which strategy should the solutions architect choose to perform this migration?

Options:

Create a fleet of EC2 instances. Install MongoDB Community Edition on the EC2 instances, and create a database. Configure continuous synchronous replication with the database that is running in the on-premises data center.

Create an AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) replication instance. Create a source endpoint for the on-premises MongoDB database by using change data capture (CDC). Create a target endpoint for the Amazon DocumentDB database. Create and run a DMS migration task.

Create a data migration pipeline by using AWS Data Pipeline. Define data nodes for the on-premises MongoDB database and the Amazon DocumentDB database. Create a scheduled task to run the data pipeline.

Create a source endpoint for the on-premises MongoDB database by using AWS Glue crawlers. Configure continuous asynchronous replication between the MongoDB database and the Amazon DocumentDB database.

Buy Now

Question # 51

A company plans to refactor a monolithic application into a modern application designed deployed or AWS. The CLCD pipeline needs to be upgraded to support the modem design for the application with the following requirements

• It should allow changes to be released several times every hour.

* It should be able to roll back the changes as quickly as possible.

Which design will meet these requirements?

Options:

Deploy a Cl-CD pipeline that incorporates AMIs to contain the application and their configurations Deploy the application by replacing Amazon EC2 instances

Specify AWS Elastic Beanstak to sage in a secondary environment as the deployment target for the CI/CD pipeline of the application. To deploy swap the staging and production environment URLs.

Use AWS Systems Manager to re-provision the infrastructure for each deployment Update the Amazon EC2 user data to pull the latest code art-fact from Amazon S3 and use Amazon Route 53 weighted routing to point to the new environment

Roll out the application updates as pan of an Auto Scaling event using prebuilt AMIs. Use new versions of the AMIs to add instances, and phase out all instances that use the previous AMI version with the configured termination policy during a deployment event.

Buy Now

Question # 52

A company has VPC flow logs enabled for its NAT gateway. The company is seeing Action = ACCEPT for inbound traffic that comes from public IP address

198.51.100.2 destined for a private Amazon EC2 instance.

A solutions architect must determine whether the traffic represents unsolicited inbound connections from the internet. The first two octets of the VPC CIDR block are 203.0.

Which set of steps should the solutions architect take to meet these requirements?

Options:

Open the AWS CloudTrail console. Select the log group that contains the NAT gateway's elastic network interface and the private instance's elastic network interface. Run a query to filter with the destination address set as "like 203.0" and the source address set as "like 198.51.100.2". Run the stats command to filter the sum of bytes transferred by the source address and the destination address.

Open the Amazon CloudWatch console. Select the log group that contains the NAT gateway's elastic network interface and the private instance's elastic network interface. Run a query to filter with the destination address set as "like 203.0" and the source address set as "like 198.51.100.2". Run the stats command to filter the sum of bytes transferred by the source address and the destination address.

Open the AWS CloudTrail console. Select the log group that contains the NAT gateway's elastic network interface and the private instance's elastic network interface. Run a query to filter with the destination address set as "like 198.51.100.2" and the source address set as "like 203.0". Run the stats command to filter the sum of bytes transferred by the source address and the destination address.

Open the Amazon CloudWatch console. Select the log group that contains the NAT gateway's elastic network interface and the private instance's elastic network interface. Run a query to filter with the destination address set as "like 198.51.100.2" and the source address set as "like 203.0". Run the stats command to filter the sum of bytes transferred by the source address and the destination address.

Buy Now

Question # 53

A company's public API runs as tasks on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS). The tasks run on AWS Fargate behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and are configured with Service Auto Scaling for the tasks based on CPU utilization. This service has been running well for several months.

Recently, API performance slowed down and made the application unusable. The company discovered that a significant number of SQL injection attacks had occurred against the API and that the API service had scaled to its maximum amount.

A solutions architect needs to implement a solution that prevents SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. The solution must allow legitimate traffic through and must maximize operational efficiency.

Which solution meets these requirements?

Options:

Create a new AWS WAF web ACL to monitor the HTTP requests and HTTPS requests that are forwarded to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Create a new AWS WAF Bot Control implementation. Add a rule in the AWS WAF Bot Control managed rule group to monitor traffic and allow only legitimate traffic to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Create a new AWS WAF web ACL. Add a new rule that blocks requests that match the SQL database rule group. Set the web ACL to allow all other traffic that does not match those rules. Attach the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Create a new AWS WAF web ACL. Create a new empty IP set in AWS WAF. Add a new rule to the web ACL to block requests that originate from IP addresses in the new IP set. Create an AWS Lambda function that scrapes the API logs for IP addresses that send SQL injection attacks, and add those IP addresses to the IP set. Attach the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Buy Now

Answer:

Explanation:

The company should create a new AWS WAF web ACL. The company should add a new rule that blocks requests that match the SQL database rule group. The company should set the web ACL to allow all other traffic that does not match those rules. The company should attach the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks. This solution will meet the requirements because AWS WAF is a web application firewall that lets you monitor and control web requests that are forwarded to your web applications. You can use AWS WAF to define customizable web security rules that control which traffic can access your web applications and which traffic should be blocked1. By creating a new AWS WAF web ACL, the company can create a collection of rules that define the conditions for allowing or blocking web requests. By adding a new rule that blocks requests that match the SQL database rule group, the company can prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. The SQL database rule group is a managed rule group provided by AWS that contains rules to protect against common SQL injection attack patterns2. By setting the web ACL to allow all other traffic that does not match those rules, the company can ensure that legitimate traffic can access the API service. By attaching the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks, the company can apply the web security rules to all requests that are forwarded by the load balancer.

The other options are not correct because:

Creating a new AWS WAF Bot Control implementation would not prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. AWS WAF Bot Control is a feature that gives you visibility and control over common and pervasive bot traffic that can consume excess resources, skew metrics, cause downtime, or perform other undesired activities. However, it does not protect against SQL injection attacks, which are malicious attempts to execute unauthorized SQL statements against your database3.

Creating a new AWS WAF web ACL to monitor the HTTP requests and HTTPS requests that are forwarded to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks would not prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. Monitoring mode is a feature that enables you to evaluate how your rules would perform without actually blocking any requests. However, this mode does not provide any protection against attacks, as it only logs and counts requests that match your rules4.

Creating a new AWS WAF web ACL and creating a new empty IP set in AWS WAF would not prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. An IP set is a feature that enables you to specify a list of IP addresses or CIDR blocks that you want to allow or block based on their source IP address. However, this approach would not be effective or efficient against SQL injection attacks, as it would require constantly updating the IP set with new IP addresses of attackers, and it would not block attackers who use proxies or VPNs.

[References:, https://aws.amazon.com/waf/, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/aws-managed-rule-groups-list.html#sql-injection-rule-group, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/waf-bot-control.html, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/web-acl-monitoring-mode.html, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/waf-ip-sets.html, , , , , ]

Question # 54

A solutions architect is designing a solution to process events. The solution must have the ability to scale in and out based on the number of events that the solution receives. If a processing error occurs, the event must move into a separate queue for review.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Send event details to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic. Configure an AWS Lambda function as a subscriber to the SNS topic to process the events. Add an on-failure destination to the function. Set an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as the target.

Publish events to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue. Create an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group. Configure the Auto Scaling group to scale in and out based on the ApproximateAgeOfOldestMessage metric of the queue. Configure the application to write failed messages to a dead-letter queue.

Write events to an Amazon DynamoDB table. Configure a DynamoDB stream for the table. Configure the stream to invoke an AWS Lambda function. Configure the Lambda function to process the events.

Publish events to an Amazon EventBridge event bus. Create and run an application on an Amazon EC2 instance with an Auto Scaling group that isbehind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). Set the ALB as the event bus target. Configure the event bus to retry events. Write messages to a dead-letter queue if the application cannot process the messages.

Buy Now

Answer:

Explanation:

Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) is a fully managed pub/sub messaging service that enables users to send messages to multiple subscribers1. Users can sendevent details to an Amazon SNS topic and configure an AWS Lambda function as a subscriber to the SNS topic to process the events. Lambda is a serverless compute service that runs code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources2. Users can add an on-failure destination to the function and set an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as the target. Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that enables users to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications3. This way, if a processing error occurs, the event will move into the separate queue for review.

Option B is incorrect because publishing events to an Amazon SQS queue and creating an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group will not have the ability to scale in and out based on the number of events that the solution receives. Amazon EC2 is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. Auto Scaling is a feature that helps users maintain application availability and allows them to scale their EC2 capacity up or down automatically according to conditions they define. However, for this use case, using SQS and EC2 will not take advantage of the serverless capabilities of Lambda and SNS.

Option C is incorrect because writing events to an Amazon DynamoDB table and configuring a DynamoDB stream for the table will not have the ability to move events into a separate queue for review if a processing error occurs. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed key-value and document database that delivers single-digit millisecond performance at any scale. DynamoDB Streams is a feature that captures data modification events in DynamoDB tables. Users can configure the stream to invoke a Lambda function, but they cannot configure an on-failure destination for the function.

Option D is incorrect because publishing events to an Amazon EventBridge event bus and setting an Application Load Balancer (ALB) as the event bus target will not have the ability to move events into a separate queue for review if a processing error occurs. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus service that makes it easy to connect applications with data from a variety of sources. An ALB is a load balancer that distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, Lambda functions, and virtual appliances. Users can configure EventBridge to retry events, but they cannot configure an on-failure destination for the ALB.

Question # 55

A company wants to manage the costs associated with a group of 20 applications that are infrequently used, but are still business-critical, by migrating to AWS. The applications are a mix of Java and Node.js spread across different instance clusters. The company wants to minimize costs while standardizing by using a single deployment methodology.

Most of the applications are part of month-end processing routines with a small number of concurrent users, but they are occasionally run at other times Average application memory consumption is less than 1 GB. though some applications use as much as 2.5 GB of memory during peak processing. The most important application in the group is a billing report written in Java that accesses multiple data sources and often runs for several hours.

Which is the MOST cost-effective solution?

Options:

Deploy a separate AWS Lambda function tor each application. Use AWS CloudTrail logs and Amazon CloudWatch alarms to verify completion of critical jobs.

Deploy Amazon ECS containers on Amazon EC2 with Auto Scaling configured for memory utilization of 75%. Deploy an ECS task for each application being migrated with ECS task scaling. Monitor services and hosts by using Amazon CloudWatch.

Deploy AWS Elastic Beanstalk for each application with Auto Scaling to ensure that all requests have sufficient resources. Monitor each AWS Elastic Beanstalk deployment by using CloudWatch alarms.

Deploy a new Amazon EC2 instance cluster that co-hosts all applications by using EC2 Auto Scaling and Application Load Balancers. Scale cluster size based on a custom metric set on instance memory utilization. Purchase 3-year Reserved Instance reservations equal to the GroupMaxSize parameter of the Auto Scaling group.

Buy Now

Question # 56

A company wants to retire its Oracle Solaris NFS storage arrays. The company requires rapid data migration over its internet network connection to a combination of destinations for Amazon S3, Amazon EFS, and Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. The company also requires a full initial copy, as well as incremental transfers of changes until the retirement of the storage arrays. All data must be encrypted and checked for integrity.

What should a solutions architect recommend to meet these requirements?

Options:

Configure AWS Application Migration Service. Create a project and deploy the AWS Replication Agent and token to the storage array. Run the migration plan to start the transfer.

Configure AWS DataSync. Configure the DataSync agent and deploy it to the local network. Create a transfer task and start the transfer.

Configure the aws S3 sync command. Configure the AWS client on the client side with credentials. Run the sync command to start the transfer.

Configure AWS Transfer for FTP. Configure the FTP client with credentials. Script the client to connect and sync to start the transfer.

Buy Now

Question # 57

A software as a service (SaaS) based company provides a case management solution to customers A3 part of the solution. The company uses a standalone Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) server to send email messages from an application. The application also stores an email template for acknowledgement email messages that populate customer data before the application sends the email message to the customer.

The company plans to migrate this messaging functionality to the AWS Cloud and needs to minimize operational overhead.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Options:

Set up an SMTP server on Amazon EC2 instances by using an AMI from the AWS Marketplace. Store the email template in an Amazon S3 bucket. Create an AWS Lambda function to retrieve the template from the S3 bucket and to merge the customer data from the application with the template. Use an SDK in the Lambda function to send the email message.

Set up Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) to send email messages. Store the email template in an Amazon S3 bucket. Create an AWS Lambda function to retrieve the template from the S3 bucket and to merge the customer data from the application with the template. Use an SDK in the Lambda function to send the email message.

Set up an SMTP server on Amazon EC2 instances by using an AMI from the AWS Marketplace. Store the email template in Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) with parameters for the customer data.Create an AWS Lambda function to call the SES template and to pass customer data to replace the parameters. Use the AWS Marketplace SMTP server to send the email message.

Set up Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) to send email messages. Store the email template on Amazon SES with parameters for the customer data. Create an AWS Lambda function to call the SendTemplatedEmail API operation and to pass customer data to replace the parameters and the email destination.

Buy Now

Question # 58

A company is changing the way that it handles patching of Amazon EC2 instances in its application account. The company currently patches instances over the internet by using a NAT gateway in a VPC in the application account. The company has EC2 instances set up as a patch source repository in a dedicated private VPC in a core account. The company wants to use AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager and the patch source repository in the core account to patch the EC2 instances in the application account. The company must prevent all EC2 instances in the application account from accessing the internet. The EC2 instances in the application account need to access Amazon S3, where the application data is stored. These EC2 instances need connectivity to Systems Manager and to the patch source repository in the private VPC in the core account. Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create a network ACL that blocks outbound traffic on port 80. Associate the network ACL with all subnets in the application account. In the application account and the core account, deploy one EC2 instance that runs a custom VPN server. Create a VPN tunnel to access the private VPC. Update the route table in the application account.

Create private VIFs for Systems Manager and Amazon S3. Delete the NAT gateway from the VPC in the application account. Create a transit gateway to access the patch source repository EC2 instances in the core account. Update the route table in the core account.

Create VPC endpoints for Systems Manager and Amazon S3. Delete the NAT gateway from the VPC in the application account. Create a VPC peering connection to access the patch source repository EC2 instances in the core account. Update the route tables in both accounts.

Create a network ACL that blocks inbound traffic on port 80. Associate the network ACL with all subnets in the application account. Create a transit gateway to access the patch source repository EC2 instances in the core account. Update the route tables in both accounts.

Buy Now

Answer:

Explanation:

Option C is the correct and most efficient solution, aligning with AWS best practices for secure and private connectivity:

Create VPC Endpoints for Systems Manager and Amazon S3:

Systems Manager VPC Endpoints: By creating interface VPC endpoints for Systems Manager (com.amazonaws.region.ssm, com.amazonaws.region.ec2messages, and com.amazonaws.region.ssmmessages), the EC2 instances can communicate with Systems Manager services without requiring internet access. This setup ensures that patching operations can be conducted securely within the AWS network.

Amazon S3 VPC Endpoint: A gateway VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 (com.amazonaws.region.s3) allows EC2 instances to access S3 buckets privately. This is essential for accessing application data stored in S3 without traversing the public internet.

[Reference: docs.aws.amazon.com, Delete the NAT Gateway:, Removing the NAT gateway ensures that EC2 instances in the application account cannot access the internet, satisfying the requirement to prevent internet access. This action enhances the security posture by eliminating a potential vector for unauthorized outbound traffic., Create a VPC Peering Connection:, Establishing a VPC peering connection between the application account's VPC and the core account's private VPC enables direct, private communication between the EC2 instances in both accounts. This setup allows the application account's EC2 instances to access the patch source repository hosted in the core account securely., Reference: docs.aws.amazon.com, Update Route Tables in Both Accounts:, After setting up the VPC peering connection, it's crucial to update the route tables in both VPCs to allow traffic to flow between them. This configuration ensures that the EC2 instances in the application account can reach the patch source repository in the core account and vice versa., Why Other Options Are Incorrect:, Option A: Implementing a custom VPN solution introduces unnecessary complexity and operational overhead. Additionally, merely blocking outbound traffic on port 80 does not comprehensively prevent internet access, as other ports (e.g., 443 for HTTPS) remain open., Option B: Creating private virtual interfaces (VIFs) is typically associated with AWS Direct Connect, which is not applicable in this scenario. Moreover, using a transit gateway, while feasible, is more complex and may be unnecessary for this use case., Option D: Blocking inbound traffic on port 80 does not prevent outbound internet access. Furthermore, employing a transit gateway adds complexity and cost, which may not be justified given the requirements., Conclusion:, Option C provides a secure, efficient, and cost-effective solution that meets all the specified requirements:, Prevents EC2 instances from accessing the internet., Enables access to Amazon S3 and Systems Manager services via VPC endpoints., Facilitates secure communication with the patch source repository in the core account through VPC peering., This approach leverages AWS's native networking features to maintain a secure and private environment for patch management operations., ]

Question # 59

A company has deployed its database on an Amazon RDS for MySQL DB instance in the us-east-1 Region. The company needs to make its data available to customers in Europe. The customers in Europe must have access to the same data as customers in the United States (US) and will not tolerate high application latency or stale data. The customers in Europe and the customers in the USneed to write to the database. Both groups of customers need to see updates from the other group in real time.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create an Amazon Aurora MySQL replica of the RDS for MySQL DB instance. Pause application writes to the RDS DB instance. Promote the Aurora Replica to a standalone DB cluster. Reconfigure the application to use the Aurora database and resume writes. Add eu-west-1 as a secondary Region to the 06 cluster. Enable write forwarding on the DB cluster. Deploy the application in eu-west-1. Configure the application to use the Aurora MySQL endpoint

Add a cross-Region replica in eu-west-1 for the RDS for MySQL DB instance. Configure the replica to replicate write queries back to the primary DB instance. Deploy the application in eu-west-1. Configure the application to use the RDS for MySQL endpoint in eu-west-1.

Copy the most recent snapshot from the RDS for MySQL DB instance to eu-west-1. Create a new RDS for MySQL DB instance in eu-west-1 from the snapshot. Configure MySQL logical replication from us-east-1 to eu-west-1. Enable write forwarding on the DB cluster. Deploy the application in eu-west-1. Configure the application to use the RDS for MySQL endpoint in eu-west-1.

Convert the RDS for MySQL DB instance to an Amazon Aurora MySQL DB cluster. Add eu-west-1 as a secondary Region to the DB cluster. Enable write forwarding on the DB cluster. Deploy the application in eu-west-1. Configure the application to use the Aurora MySQL endpoint in eu-west-1.

Buy Now

Answer:

Explanation:

The company should use AWS Amplify to create a static website for uploads of media files. The company should use Amplify Hosting to serve the website through Amazon CloudFront. The company should use Amazon S3 to store the uploaded media files. The company should use Amazon Cognito to authenticate users. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because AWS Amplify is a complete solution that lets frontend web and mobile developers easily build, ship, and host full-stack applications on AWS, with the flexibility to leverage the breadth of AWS services as use cases evolve. No cloud expertise needed1. By using AWS Amplify, the company can refactor the application to a serverless architecture that reduces operational complexity and costs. AWS Amplify offers the following features and benefits:

Amplify Studio: A visual interface that enables you to build and deploy a full-stack app quickly, including frontend UI and backend.

Amplify CLI: A local toolchain that enables you to configure and manage an app backend with just a few commands.

Amplify Libraries: Open-source client libraries that enable you to build cloud-powered mobile and web apps.

Amplify UI Components: Open-source design system with cloud-connected components for building feature-rich apps fast.

Amplify Hosting: Fully managed CI/CD and hosting for fast, secure, and reliable static and server-side rendered apps.

By using AWS Amplify to create a static website for uploads of media files, the company can leverage Amplify Studio to visually build a pixel-perfect UI and connect it to a cloud backend in clicks. By using Amplify Hosting to serve the website through Amazon CloudFront, the company can easily deploy its web app or website to the fast, secure, and reliable AWS content delivery network (CDN), with hundreds of points of presence globally. Byusing Amazon S3 to store the uploaded media files, the company can benefit from a highly scalable, durable, and cost-effective object storage service that can handle any amount of data2. By using Amazon Cognito to authenticate users, the company can add user sign-up, sign-in, and access control to its web app with a fully managed service that scales to support millions of users3.

The other options are not correct because:

Using AWS Application Migration Service to migrate the application server to Amazon EC2 instances would not refactor the application or accelerate development. AWS Application Migration Service (AWS MGN) is a service that enables you to migrate physical servers, virtual machines (VMs), or cloud servers from any source infrastructure to AWS without requiring agents or specialized tools. However, this would not address the challenges of overutilization and data uploads failures. It would also not reduce operational overhead or costs compared to a serverless architecture.

Creating a static website for uploads of media files and using AWS AppSync to create an API would not be as simple or fast as using AWS Amplify. AWS AppSync is a service that enables you to create flexible APIs for securely accessing, manipulating, and combining data from one or more data sources. However, this would require more configuration and management than using Amplify Studio and Amplify Hosting. It would also not provide authentication features like Amazon Cognito.

Setting up AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS Single Sign-On) to give users the ability to sign in to the application would not be as suitable as using Amazon Cognito. AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO) is a service that enables you to centrally manage SSO access and user permissions across multiple AWS accounts and business applications. However, this service is designed for enterprise customers who need to manage access for employees or partners across multiple resources. It is not intended for authenticating end users of web or mobile apps.

[References:, https://aws.amazon.com/amplify/, https://aws.amazon.com/s3/, https://aws.amazon.com/cognito/, https://aws.amazon.com/mgn/, https://aws.amazon.com/appsync/, https://aws.amazon.com/single-sign-on/, , , , , ]

Question # 60

A company is developing a new service that will be accessed using TCP on a static port A solutions architect must ensure that the service is highly available, has redundancy across Availability Zones, and is accessible using the DNS name myservice.com, which is publicly accessible The service must use fixed address assignments so other companies can add the addresses to their allow lists.

Assuming that resources are deployed in multiple Availability Zones in a single Region, which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create Amazon EC2 instances with an Elastic IP address for each instance Create a Network Load Balancer (NLB) and expose the static TCP port Register EC2instances with the NLB Create a new name server record set named my service com, and assign the Elastic IP addresses of the EC2 instances to the record set Provide the Elastic IP addresses of the EC2 instances to the other companies to add to their allow lists

Create an Amazon ECS cluster and a service definition for the application Create and assign public IP addresses for the ECS cluster Create a Network Load Balancer (NLB) and expose the TCP port Create a target group and assign the ECS cluster name to the NLB Create a new A record set named my service com and assign the public IP addresses of the ECS cluster to the record set Provide the public IP addresses of the ECS cluster to the other com

Create Amazon EC2 instances for the service Create one Elastic IP address for each Availability Zone Create a Network Load Balancer (NLB) and expose the assigned TCP port Assign the Elastic IP addresses to the NLB for each Availability Zone Create a target group and register the EC2 instances with the NLB Create a new A (alias) record set named my service com, and assign the NLB DNS name to the record set.

Create an Amazon ECS cluster and a service definition for the application Create and assign public IP address for each host in the cluster Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and expose the static TCP port Create a target group and assign the ECS service definition name to the ALB Create a new CNAME record set and associate the public IP addresses to the record set Provide the Elastic IP addresses of the Amazon EC2 instances to the ot

Buy Now

Question # 61

Question:

A company is replicating an application in asecondary Region. The application usesDynamoDBandRDS for MySQL. The secondary Region must function independently during adisaster.

Options:

Use DynamoDB global tables and an RDS read replica.

Use DAX and a read replica.

Use global tables and RDS Multi-AZ with standby in secondary Region.

Use Streams and Lambda to copy data. Use read replica.

Buy Now

Question # 62

A company is using Amazon API Gateway to deploy a private REST API that will provide access to sensitive data. The API must be accessible only from an application that is deployed in a VPC. The company deploys the API successfully. However, the API is not accessible from an Amazon EC2 instance that is deployed in the VPC.

Which solution will provide connectivity between the EC2 instance and the API?

Options:

Create an interface VPC endpoint for API Gateway. Attach an endpoint policy that allows apigateway:* actions. Disable private DNS naming for the VPC endpoint. Configure an API resource policy that allows access from the VPC. Use the VPC endpoint's DNS name to access the API.

Create an interface VPC endpoint for API Gateway. Attach an endpoint policy that allows the execute-api:lnvoke action. Enable private DNS naming for the VPC endpoint. Configure an API resource policy that allows access from the VPC endpoint. Use the API endpoint's DNS names to access the API. Most Voted

Create a Network Load Balancer (NLB) and a VPC link. Configure private integration between API Gateway and the NLB. Use the API endpoint's DNS names to access the API.

Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and a VPC Link. Configure private integration between API Gateway and the ALB. Use the ALB endpoint's DNS name to access the API.

Buy Now

Question # 63

A company is deploying AWS Lambda functions that access an Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL database. The company needs to launch the Lambda functions in a QA

environment and in a production environment.

The company must not expose credentials within application code and must rotate passwords automatically.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Store the database credentials for both environments in AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store. Encrypt the credentials by using an AWS Key ManagementService (AWS KMS) key. Within the application code of the Lambda functions, pull the credentials from the Parameter Store parameter by using the AWS SDKfor Python (Bot03). Add a role to the Lambda functions to provide access to the Parameter Store parameter.

Store the database credentials for both environments in AWS Secrets Manager with distinct key entry for the QA environment and the production environment.Turn on rotation. Provide a reference to the Secrets Manager key as an environment variable for the Lambda functions.

Store the database credentials for both environments in AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). Turn on rotation. Provide a reference to the credentialsthat are stored in AWS KMS as an environment variable for the Lambda functions.

Create separate S3 buckets for the QA environment and the production environment. Turn on server-side encryption with AWS KMS keys (SSE-KMS) for theS3 buckets. Use an object naming pattern that gives each Lambda function's application code the ability to pull the correct credentials for the function'scorresponding environment. Grant each Lambda function's execution role access to Amazon S3.

Buy Now

Exam Code: SAP-C02

Exam Name: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Last Update: Dec 15, 2025

Questions: 587

SAP-C02 PDF

$25.5 ~~$84.99~~

Add to Cart

SAP-C02 Testing Engine

$28.5 ~~$94.99~~

Add to Cart

SAP-C02 PDF + Testing Engine

$40.5 ~~$134.99~~

Add to Cart

New Year Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: Board70

certsboard certification exams

Navigation:

SAP-C02 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Professional Questions and Answers

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

SAP-C02 PDF

SAP-C02 Testing Engine

SAP-C02 PDF + Testing Engine

Quick Links

Recently New Released Certification Exams

Site Secure