If it is possible to provide a rationale for a specific output of an Al system, that system can best be described as?
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
XYZ Corp., a premier payroll services company that employs thousands of people globally, is embarking on a new hiring campaign and wants to implement policies and procedures to identify and retain the best talent. The new talent will help the company ' s product team expand its payroll offerings to companies in the healthcare and transportation sectors, including in Asia.
It has become time consuming and expensive for HR to review all resumes, and they are concerned that human reviewers might be susceptible to bias.
Address these concerns, the company is considering using a third-party Al tool to screen resumes and assist with hiring. They have been talking to several vendors about possibly obtaining a third-party Al-enabled hiring solution, as long as it would achieve its goals and comply with all applicable laws.
The organization has a large procurement team that is responsible for the contracting of technology solutions. One of the procurement team ' s goals is to reduce costs, and it often prefers lower-cost solutions. Others within the company are responsible for integrating and deploying technology solutions into the organization ' s operations in a responsible, cost-effective manner.
The organization is aware of the risks presented by Al hiring tools and wants to mitigate them. It also questions how best to organize and train its existing personnel to use the Al hiring tool responsibly. Their concerns are heightened by the fact that relevant laws vary across jurisdictions and continue to change.
Which other stakeholder groups should be involved in the selection and implementation of the Al hiring tool?
Which type of existing assessment could best be leveraged to create an Al impact assessment?
Which of the following compliance related controls within an organization is most easily adapted to identify AI risks?
Which model is best for efficiency and agility, and tailored for lower-resource settings?
CASE STUDY
A global marketing agency is adapting a large language model ( " LLM " ) to generate content for an upcoming marketing campaign for a client ' s new product: a hard hat designed for construction workers of any gender to better protect them from head injuries.
The marketing agency is accessing the LLM through an application programming interface ( " API " )developed by a third-party technology company. They want to generate text to be used for targeted advertising communications that highlight the benefits of the hard hat to potential purchasers. Both the marketing agency and the technology company have taken reasonable steps to address Al governance.
The marketing company has:
• Entered into a contract with the technology company with suitable representations and warranties.
• Completed an impact assessment on the LLM for this intended use.
• Built technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.
• Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.
• Followed applicable regulatory requirements.
• Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the use of the Al on its client ' s advertising.
The technology company has:
• Provided guidance and resources to developers to address environmental concerns.
• Build technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.
• Provided tools and resources to measure bias specific to the LLM.
• Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.
• Mapped and mitigated potential societal harms and large-scale impacts.
• Followed applicable regulatory requirements and industry standards.
• Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the LLM. including with respect to IP and rights to data.
The agency has taken governance actions such as:
Conducting an impact assessment
Providing legal disclosures
Enabling bias mitigation and explainability
Complying with regulatory requirements
Which of the following should be included in the marketing company’s disclosures about the use of the LLM EXCEPT?
CASE STUDY
A global marketing agency is adapting a large language model ( " LLM " ) to generate content for an upcoming marketing campaign for a client ' s new product: a hard hat designed for construction workers of any gender to better protect them from head injuries.
The marketing agency is accessing the LLM through an application programming interface ( " API " ) developed by a third-party technology company. They want to generate text to be used for targeted advertising communications that highlight the benefits of the hard hat to potential purchasers. Both the marketing agency and the technology company have taken reasonable steps to address Al governance.
The marketing company has:
• Entered into a contract with the technology company with suitable representations and warranties.
• Completed an impact assessment on the LLM for this intended use.
• Built technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.
• Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.
• Followed applicable regulatory requirements.
• Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the use of the Al on its client ' s advertising.
The technology company has:
• Provided guidance and resources to developers to address environmental concerns.
• Build technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.
• Provided tools and resources to measure bias specific to the LLM.
• Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.
• Mapped and mitigated potential societal harms and large-scale impacts.
• Followed applicable regulatory requirements and industry standards.
• Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the LLM. including with respect to IP and rights to data.
The marketing company and its tech provider have taken reasonable steps to govern the AI’s use, including legal disclosures, impact assessments, and bias mitigation. However, the company wants to takeone more stepto improve governance and reduce risks related to ongoing oversight and accountability.
While the marketing agency took steps to mitigate its risks, the best additional step would be to:
A company deploys an AI model for fraud detection in online transactions. During its operation, the model begins to exhibit high rates of false positives, flagging legitimate transactions as fraudulent.
Which is the best step the company should take to address this development?