C_S4TM_2023 Exam Dumps - SAP Certified Associate Questions and Answers

To configure a scenario in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management where a single trailer is hauled by multiple trucks (e.g., in a multi-leg transport), specific customizations are required:

Transportation unit type (A): According to the SAP documentation, the transportation unit type must be configured to allow a trailer to be defined as a separate entity that can be attached to different trucks during various stages of transport. This ensures the trailer is treated as a distinct resource.

Freight order type (D): The freight order type must be customized to support multi-leg scenarios, including settings for stage-specific assignments of trucks to the same trailer, enabling the system to manage the trailer across multiple freight orders.

The other options are incorrect:

Forwarding order type (B)is used for logistics service provider scenarios and does not directly manage trailer-truck assignments.

Freight booking type (C)is relevant for ocean or air transport, not for road-based multi-truck scenarios.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management without geographical services (e.g., GIS integration), geographical coordinates for locations cannot be automatically determined with high precision. According to the SAP documentation:

The location coordinates are determined at region or country level (A): The system can assign approximate coordinates based on predefined region or country data in the location master data, providing a basic level of geographical information.

The location coordinates are determined based on manual entry (D): Users can manually enter coordinates in the location master data to specify the exact position of a location.

The other options are incorrect:

The location coordinates cannot be determined (B)is incorrect because coordinates can be assigned manually or at a region/country level.

The location coordinates are determined at street level (C)requires geographical services for precise geocoding, which is not available in this scenario.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, event-based charges (e.g., for delays or additional services) are calculated based on transportation events captured in the system. For rail transport, thefreight bookingis the document type used to manage transportation execution, including event tracking. According to the SAP documentation, the event profile, which defines how events trigger charges, is assigned to the freight booking type to calculate event-based charges, such as detention or demurrage, specific to rail or ocean transport scenarios.

The other options are incorrect:

Transportation unit (A)represents physical transport units (e.g., containers) but is not used for event-based charge calculations.

Freight unit (C)is used for planning and tracking goods but does not manage events for charge calculations.

Freight order (D)is used for road transport and does not typically handle event-based charges for rail transport.

In a side-by-side scenario integrating SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management with sales orders and outbound deliveries, the process is as follows:

Initially, 30 freight units are created from one sales order (1 freight unit per item).

During planning, these are assigned to 3 trucks (10 freight units per truck).

Delivery creation is triggered based on the planning result, and during packaging, up to 3 items can be packed into 1 case. Since each freight unit corresponds to one sales order item, 3 items per case means 3 freight units can be consolidated into 1 freight unit (representing the case).

With 30 freight units, consolidating 3 freight units per case results in:

30 ÷ 3 = 10 freight units (each representing one case).

Thus, the minimum number of freight units in transportation management after packaging is10. According to the SAP documentation, freight units can be consolidated during the packaging process in integration scenarios, reducing the number of freight units while maintaining the planning result (assignment to trucks).

The other options are incorrect:

A (12)andD (6)do not align with the consolidation math (30 ÷ 3 = 10).

C (3)assumes one freight unit per truck, which ignores the packaging consolidation.