CMMC-CCP Exam Dumps - Cyber AB CMMC Questions and Answers

CMMC Level 2 Readiness and Certification Requirements

CMMCLevel 2is required forOrganizations Seeking Certification (OSCs) that handle Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)and aligns withNIST SP 800-171's 110 security controls.

Key Readiness Indicators for a Level 2 Assessment:

The OSC must have implemented all 110 security practices from NIST SP 800-171.

Documented and validated cybersecurity policies and procedures must exist.

The OSC must be prepared to provide objective evidence (artifacts) proving compliance.

Why the OSC in the Question is Not Ready:

They have not won a DoD contract yet→ This means they do not yet have a contractually definedCUI environment, which is the foundation for defining their security scope.

They have only provided FCI-related artifacts(e.g., visitor logs, workstation policies, FedRAMP configurations).

Lack of full documentation of CMMC Level 2 controls→ The assessment requiresevidence for all 110 security practices(e.g., system security plans, incident response records, security awareness training documentation).

Clarification of Incorrect Options:

A. "Ready because there is no need to certify this company until after they win a DoD contract."

Incorrect→ Some organizationsseek certification proactivelybefore winning contracts. However, readiness depends on implementingall 110 required controls, not contract status alone.

B. "Not ready because the OSC is not on contract because they do not know the scope of FCI protection required by the contract."

Incorrect→ CMMC Level 2focuses on CUI, not just FCI. While FCI protection is important, the assessment’s focus is onCUI security requirements, which arenot fully addressed by the provided artifacts.

D. "Ready because all DoD contractors are required to achieve CMMC Level 2; therefore, they are being proactive in seeking certification."

Incorrect→ While it is commendable that the OSC is being proactive,readiness is based on full compliance with NIST SP 800-171, not just intent.

The best match is Penetration test team because penetration testing is an authorized, structured security evaluation intended to find vulnerabilities in systems or networks and produce results that enable remediation/mitigation .

Authoritatively, NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) is a primary federal reference for technical security testing. It describes the purpose of technical testing as helping organizations plan and conduct tests , analyze findings , and develop mitigation strategies —which aligns directly with “vulnerability evaluations” and “providing mitigation techniques.” The DoD also points its Components to NIST SP 800-115 as guidance for penetration testing activities.

By contrast, a Red Team is typically framed as an “ethical adversary” that emulates attackers to test detection/response and overall readiness; it is often broader, scenario-driven, and focused on demonstrating what a capable adversary can accomplish rather than performing a scoped vulnerability evaluation with remediation-oriented outputs. A Blue Team is primarily defensive operations (monitoring, detection, response), not the group defined by conducting vulnerability evaluations for customers. “ White hat hackers ” is a general label for ethical hackers, but it is less specific than the established service construct of a penetration test team .

Because the question emphasizes operational network vulnerability evaluations plus mitigation techniques , the most precise and standard term is D: Penetration test team , supported by NIST’s testing-and-mitigation framing.

Understanding RA.L2-3.11.2: Vulnerability Scanning

TheRA.L2-3.11.2practice requires organizations to:

✔Regularly scan for vulnerabilitiesin systems and applications.

✔Perform scans when new vulnerabilities are identified.

✔Use vulnerability scanning tools or servicesto proactively detect security weaknesses.

Why Is an Incident Monitoring Report Irrelevant?

Anincident monitoring reporttrackssecurity incidents, notvulnerability scanning activities.

Vulnerability scanning reportsshould include:

✔A list of vulnerabilities detected.

✔Remediation actions taken.

✔Scan frequency and schedule.

Theabsence of reported security incidentsdoesnotconfirm that vulnerability scans were performed.

Why is the Correct Answer "A. Inadequate because it is irrelevant to the practice"?

A. Inadequate because it is irrelevant to the practice → Correct

Alack of reported security incidents does not confirm that vulnerability scanning was performed.

B. Adequate because it fits well for expected artifacts → Incorrect

Incident monitoring reportsare not expected artifactsfor this control.Vulnerability scan reportsare required instead.

C. Adequate because no security incidents were reported → Incorrect

The absence of incidents does not mean the OSC is performing vulnerability scanning. This isnot valid evidence.

D. Inadequate because the OSC's service provider should be interviewed → Incorrect

While interviewing the provider may be useful, themain issue is that the provided evidence is irrelevant. Thecorrect evidence (vulnerability scan reports) is missing.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.11.2 – Vulnerability Scanning)

Defines the requirement toscan for vulnerabilities periodically and when new threats emerge.

CMMC Assessment Guide for Level 2

Specifies that evidence for RA.L2-3.11.2 should includevulnerability scan reports, not incident monitoring reports.

CMMC 2.0 Model Overview

Confirms that organizationsmust proactively identify vulnerabilities through scanning, not just rely on incident detection.

Understanding SI.L1-3.14.2: Provide Protection from Malicious Code

The CMMC Level 1 practiceSI.L1-3.14.2is based onNIST SP 800-171 Requirement 3.14.2, which requires organizations to:

Implement malicious code protection(e.g., antivirus, endpoint security software).

Ensure coverage across all appropriate locations(e.g., workstations, servers, network entry points).

Keep protection mechanisms updated(e.g., regular signature updates, policy enforcement).

Assessment Criteria for a "MET" Rating:

To determine whether the practice isMET, the Lead Assessor must confirm that:

✔Antivirus or endpoint protection software is installedon all workstations and servers.

✔The solution is centrally managed, ensuring consistent policy enforcement.

✔Signature updates are current, meaning systems are protected against new threats.

✔Logs or reports demonstrate active monitoring and updates.

Why is the Correct Answer "A. It is sufficient, and the audit finding can be rated as MET"?

The provided evidenceconfirms all necessary requirementsfor SI.L1-3.14.2:

✔All workstations and servers have antivirus installed→Meets installation requirement.

✔A centralized management console is in place→Ensures consistent enforcement.

✔Records show antivirus signatures are up to date→Confirms system protection is current.

Because the evidencemeets the requirement, the practice should berated as MET.

Why Are the Other Answers Incorrect?

B. It is insufficient, and the audit finding can be rated NOT MET → Incorrect

The evidence providedmeets all necessary requirements, so the practiceshould not be rated as NOT MET.

C. It is sufficient, and the Lead Assessor should seek more evidence → Incorrect

Ifadequate evidence already exists,additional evidence is unnecessary.

D. It is insufficient, and the Lead Assessor should seek more evidence → Incorrect

The evidence providedmeets the control requirements, making itsufficient.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that a practice can be marked asMET if sufficient evidence is provided.

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.14.2)

Defines the standard formalicious code protection, which ismet by antivirus with active updates.

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 (Foundational) Requirements

Clarifies that basic cybersecurity measures likeantivirus installation and updatesmeet compliance forSI.L1-3.14.2.

Final Answer:

✔A. It is sufficient, and the audit finding can be rated as MET.

TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0is primarily based on two key National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publications:

NIST SP 800-171– "Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations"

NIST SP 800-172– "Enhanced Security Requirements for Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information: A Supplement to NIST Special Publication 800-171"

Reference and Breakdown:

NIST SP 800-171

This document is thecore foundationof CMMC 2.0 and establishes the security requirements for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)in non-federal systems.

The 110 security controls fromNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2are mapped directly toCMMC Level 2.

NIST SP 800-172

This supplement includesenhanced security requirementsfor organizations handlinghigh-value CUIthat faces advanced persistent threats (APTs).

These enhanced requirements apply toCMMC Level 3under the 2.0 model.

Eliminating Incorrect Answer Choices:

B. DFARS, FIPS 100, and NIST SP 800-171→Incorrect

WhileDFARS 252.204-7012mandates compliance withNIST SP 800-171,FIPS 100 does not existas a relevant cybersecurity standard.

C. DFARS, NIST, and Carnegie Mellon University→Incorrect

CMMC is aligned with DFARS and NIST but isnot developed or directly influenced by Carnegie Mellon University.

D. DFARS, FIPS 100, NIST SP 800-171, and Carnegie Mellon University→Incorrect

Again,FIPS 100 is not relevant, andCarnegie Mellon Universityis not a defining entity in the CMMC framework.

Official CMMC 2.0 References Supporting the Answer:

CMMC 2.0 Scoping Guide (2023)confirms thatCMMC Level 2 is entirely based on NIST SP 800-171.

CMMC 2.0 Level 3 Draft Documentationexplicitly referencesNIST SP 800-172for enhanced security requirements.

DoD Interim Rule (DFARS 252.204-7021)mandates that organizations meetNIST SP 800-171 for CUI protection.

Final Conclusion:

The CMMC 2.0 model is derivedsolely from NIST SP 800-171 and NIST SP 800-172, makingAnswer A the only correct choice.

The correct answer is B , 3 Levels. The official CMMC 2.0 Model Overview states that there are three levels within CMMC: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 . It explains that the model measures implementation of cybersecurity requirements at three levels, with each level containing a defined set of CMMC practices. Level 1 is focused on basic safeguarding of Federal Contract Information, Level 2 is focused on protection of Controlled Unclassified Information using requirements aligned to NIST SP 800-171, and Level 3 is intended for higher-risk programs requiring enhanced protection.

This is a major difference between CMMC 2.0 and the earlier CMMC 1.0 structure. CMMC 1.0 used five maturity levels, but CMMC 2.0 simplified the model to three cybersecurity levels. Therefore, option C , 5 Levels, reflects the older CMMC 1.0 structure and is not correct for CMMC 2.0. Option A , 2 Levels, is incorrect because it omits one of the three official levels. Option D , 4 Levels, is also incorrect because the official CMMC 2.0 model does not contain four levels. The bottom line is that CMMC 2.0 contains three cybersecurity levels: Level 1 Foundational, Level 2 Advanced, and Level 3 Expert .

Understanding DFARS Clause 252.204-7012

TheDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) clause 252.204-7012is a mandatory cybersecurity clause required inall DoD contracts and solicitationsthat involveControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Key Requirements of DFARS 252.204-7012

✅Implements NIST SP 800-171security controls for contractors handlingCUI.

✅Requirescyber incident reportingto theDoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3)within72 hours.

✅Mandatesadequate security measuresto protectDoD information systems.

✅Applies toall DoD contracts, except for those exclusively acquiring COTS items.

Why "All DoD Solicitations and Contracts" is Correct?

Option A (Correct):DFARS 252.204-7012must be included in all DoD contracts and solicitationswhen CUI is involved.

Option B (Incorrect):FAR Part 12 procedures apply tocommercial item acquisitions, but DFARS 7012 appliesregardless of procurement procedures.

Option C (Incorrect):Contractssolely for COTS (Commercial Off-the-Shelf) productsare exemptfrom DFARS 7012.

Option D (Incorrect):COTS itemssold without modificationsarenot requiredto include DFARS 7012.

Official References from DoD and DFARS Documentation

DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 (Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting)

NIST SP 800-171– The required cybersecurity standard for contractors under DFARS 7012.

Final Verification and Conclusion

When preparing forCMMC compliance, organizations must ensure that theirnetwork configurations align with required cybersecurity controls. Ifnetwork administratorsdisagree on certain configurations, the mostobjective and accurateway to resolve the disagreement is by referencingofficial CMMC guidanceandNIST SP 800-171 requirements, which form the foundation of CMMC Level 2.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

CMMC Assessment Guides as the Primary Reference

TheCMMC Assessment Guides (Level 1 & Level 2)provide clearinterpretationsof security practices.

Theyexplain how each practice should be implemented and assessedduring certification.

NIST SP 800-171 as the Compliance Baseline

CMMC Level 2is based directly onNIST SP 800-171, which outlines the110 security controlsrequired for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Network configurations must complywith NIST-defined security requirements, including:

Access Control (AC) – Ensuring least privilege principles.

Audit and Accountability (AU) – Logging and monitoring network activity.

System and Communications Protection (SC) – Secure network design and encryption.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Consult with the CEO of the company:

ACEO is not necessarily a cybersecurity expertand may not be familiar with CMMC technical requirements.

Technical compliance decisions should be based onCMMC and NISTframeworks, not executive opinions.

(C) Go with the network administrator's ideas with the least stringent controls:

Choosingless stringent controls increases security riskand could lead toCMMC non-compliance.

(D) Go with the network administrator's ideas with the most stringent controls:

While security is important,more stringent controlsmay introduceoperational inefficienciesorunnecessary coststhat are not required for compliance.

The correct approach is to implement what is required by CMMC and NIST SP 800-171, no more and no less.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

TheCMMC Assessment GuidesandNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2areofficial sourcesthat provide the most reliable guidance on compliance.

CMMC Level 2 is entirely based on NIST SP 800-171, making it the definitive source for resolving security disagreements.

Thus, the correct answer is:

B. Consult the CMMC Assessment Guides and NIST SP 800-171.

ThePhysical Protection (PE) domaininCMMC 2.0 Level 1includes the requirementPE.L1-3.10.3, which mandates that organizationsescort visitors and monitor their activity.

Breaking Down the Scenario:

TheCMMC Assessment Teamarrives at the OSC.

Thereceptionist acknowledges their arrival but does not verify credentials or escort themto the appropriate location.

Failing to verify visitor identity and failing to escort them is a violation of PE.L1-3.10.3.

Analysis of the Given Options:

A. PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity→✅Correct

This requirement ensures that visitorsdo not have unsupervised access to sensitive areas.

The receptionistshould have checked credentials and escorted the assessment team.

B. PE.L1-3.10.5: Control and manage physical access devices→❌Incorrect

This requirement refers to managingkeys, access badges, and security devices, which isnot the issue in this scenario.

C. PS.L2-3.9.1: Screen individuals prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI→❌Incorrect

This control applies to personnel screeningsbefore granting access to CUI systems, not physical visitor access.

D. PS.L2-3.9.2: Ensure that organizational systems containing CUI are protected during and after personnel actions such as terminations and transfers→❌Incorrect

This requirement deals withoffboarding employees and ensuring they no longer have system access. It isnot relevant to visitor escorting.

Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 - PE.L1-3.10.3 (Physical Protection)

Requires organizations toescort visitors and monitor visitor activityat facilities containingFCI or CUI.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, Control 3.10.3

States thatvisitors must be escorted and monitored at all timesto prevent unauthorized access.

Conclusion:

Since the receptionist failed to verify credentials and escort the visitors, this violatesPE.L1-3.10.3.

✅Correct Answer: A. PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)consists offour phases, each with specific tasks and objectives.

Phase 1: Plan and Prepare Assessment– Planning, scheduling, and preparing for the assessment.

Phase 2: Conduct Assessment–Gathering and verifying evidence, conducting interviews, and evaluating compliance.

Phase 3: Report Recommended Assessment Results– Documenting findings and reporting results.

Phase 4: Remediation of Outstanding Assessment Issues– Allowing the organization to address any deficiencies.

Why "Phase 2: Conduct Assessment" is Correct?

DuringPhase 2: Conduct Assessment, theAssessment Teamperforms key activities, including:

✅Identifying required evidencefor compliance verification.

✅Obtaining and reviewing artifacts(e.g., security policies, configurations, logs).

✅Verifying the sufficiency of evidenceagainst CMMC practice requirements.

✅Interviewing key personneland observing cybersecurity implementations.

Since the question specifically mentions"identify, obtain inventory, and verify evidence,"this task directly falls underPhase 2: Conduct Assessment.

Breakdown of Answer Choices

Option

Description

Correct?

A. Phase 1: Plan and Prepare Assessment

❌Incorrect–This phase focuses onscheduling, logistics, and planning, not evidence collection.

B. Phase 2: Conduct Assessment

✅Correct – This phase involves gathering, verifying, and reviewing evidence.

C. Phase 3: Report Recommended Assessment Results

❌Incorrect–This phasedocumentsresults but doesnotcollect evidence.

D. Phase 4: Remediation of Outstanding Assessment Issues

❌Incorrect–This phase focuses oncorrective actions, not evidence collection.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 Documentation

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)–Phase 2: Conduct Assessmentexplicitly includes tasks such asgathering and verifying evidence.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isB. Phase 2: Conduct Assessment, as this phase includesidentifying, obtaining, and verifying evidence, which is critical for determining CMMC compliance.