CMMC-CCP Exam Dumps - Cyber AB CMMC Questions and Answers

Understanding SC.L2-3.13.14 – Control and Monitor the Use of VoIP Technologies

TheCMMC 2.0 Level 2requirementSC.L2-3.13.14comes fromNIST SP 800-171, Security Requirement 3.13.14, which mandates that organizations mustcontrol and monitor the use of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technologiesif used within their system boundary.

If a systemdoes not use VoIP technology, then this control isNot Applicable (N/A)because there is nothing to assess.

Why Option D is Correct

When a requirement is marked as Not Applicable (N/A), it means the OSC does not use the technology or process covered by that controlwithin its assessment boundary.

No assessment procedures are neededsince there is no VoIP system to evaluate.

Option A (Existing telephone system in scope)is incorrect becausetraditional (non-VoIP) telephone systems are not covered by SC.L2-3.13.14—only VoIP is within scope.

Option B (Error, contact the Lead Assessor)is incorrect because markingSC.L2-3.13.14 as N/A is valid if VoIP is not used. This is not an error.

Option C (VoIP in scope but using FIPS-validated encryption, so it doesn’t need to be assessed)is incorrect becauseeven if VoIP uses FIPS-validated encryption, the control would still need to be assessed to ensure monitoring and usage control are in place.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment Guide – SC.L2-3.13.14

NIST SP 800-171, Security Requirement 3.13.14

CMMC Scoping Guidance – Determining Not Applicable (N/A) Practices

Final Verification

IfVoIP is not used within the OSC’s system boundary, the control does not require assessment, making Option D the correct answer.

Understanding "Adequate Evidence" in the CMMC Assessment Process

In aCMMC assessment,adequate evidencerefers to the proof required to demonstrate that a specific cybersecurity practice has been implemented correctly. Evidence can come from:

Artifacts(e.g., security policies, system configurations, logs).

Interview responses(e.g., verbal confirmation from personnel about their responsibilities).

Demonstrations(e.g., showing how a security control is implemented in real time).

Testing(e.g., verifying technical security mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication).

Thegoalof evidence collection is to determinewhether a CMMC practice is met—not just whether the organization operates within the assessment scope.

Why is the Correct Answer "Determine if a given artifact, interview response, demonstration, or test meets the CMMC practice" (D)?

A. Verify, based on an assessment and organizational scope → Incorrect

Theassessment scopedefineswhat is evaluated, but adequacy of evidence is based oncompliance with specific CMMC practices.

B. Verify, based on an assessment and organizational practice → Incorrect

CMMC assessments focus on cybersecurity practices defined in the CMMC framework, not just general organizational practices.

C. Determine if a given artifact, interview response, demonstration, or test meets the CMMC scope → Incorrect

Thescopedefines the assessment boundaries, but theassessment team's job is to confirm whether CMMC practices are satisfied.

D. Determine if a given artifact, interview response, demonstration, or test meets the CMMC practice → Correct

TheCMMC assessment process focuses on ensuring that required practices are implemented, making this the correct answer.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Defines "adequate evidence" asproof that a CMMC practice has been correctly implemented.

CMMC 2.0 Assessment Criteria

Specifies that evidence must beevaluated against specific cybersecurity practices.

NIST SP 800-171A (Assessment Procedures for NIST SP 800-171)

Provides guidance on evaluating artifacts, interviews, demonstrations, and testing to confirm compliance with required practices.

Final Answer:

✔D. Determine if a given artifact, interview response, demonstration, or test meets the CMMC practice.

Understanding FAR Clause 52.204-21

TheFederal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.204-21is titled"Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems."This clause establishesminimum cybersecurity requirementsforfederal contractorsthat handleFederal Contract Information (FCI).

Key Purpose of FAR Clause 52.204-21

Theprimary objectiveof FAR 52.204-21 is to ensure that contractors applybasic cybersecurity protectionsto theirinformation systemsthat process, store, or transmitFCI. Theseminimum safeguarding requirementsserve as abaseline security standardfor contractors doing business with theU.S. government.

Why "Minimum Standard of Care" is Correct?

FAR 52.204-21 doesnotrequire contractors to install specific cybersecurity tools (eliminating option A).

Itoutlines only the minimum safeguards, notallcybersecurity controls needed for complete security (eliminating option B).

CMMC certification isnotmandated by this clause alone (eliminating option D).

Instead, it establishesa baseline "standard of care"that all federal contractorsmust followto protectFCI(making option C correct).

Breakdown of Answer Choices

Option

Description

Correct?

A. It directs all covered contractors to install the cybersecurity systems listed in that clause.

❌Incorrect–The clause doesnotspecify tools or require specific cybersecurity systems.

B. It describes all of the safeguards that contractors must take to secure covered contractor IS.

❌Incorrect–It only setsminimumrequirements, notall possiblesecurity measures.

C. It describes the minimum standard of care that contractors must take to secure covered contractor IS.

✅Correct – The clause defines basic safeguards as a minimum security standard.

D. It directs covered contractors to obtain CMMC Certification at the level equal to the lowest requirement of their contracts.

❌Incorrect–FAR 52.204-21 doesnot mandateCMMC certification; that requirement comes from DFARS 252.204-7012 and 7021.

Minimum Safeguarding Requirements Under FAR 52.204-21

The clause defines15 basic security controls, which align withCMMC Level 1. Some examples include:

✅Access Control– Limit access to authorized users.

✅Identification & Authentication– Authenticate system users.

✅Media Protection– Sanitize media before disposal.

✅System & Communications Protection– Monitor and control network connections.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 and FAR Documentation

FAR 52.204-21– Establishes thebasic safeguarding requirementsfor FCI.

CMMC 2.0 Level 1– Directly aligns withFAR 52.204-21 controls.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isC. It describes the minimum standard of care that contractors must take to secure covered contractor IS.This aligns withFAR 52.204-21 requirementsas abaseline security standard for FCI.

Level 1 only addresses the protection of Federal Contract Information (FCI) and does not include requirements for safeguarding Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Level 2 is explicitly designed to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It requires implementation of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, which directly support the safeguarding of CUI and help prevent its unauthorized disclosure or exfiltration.

Level 3 builds on Level 2 by including a subset of requirements from NIST SP 800-172. These additional practices are designed to enhance the protection of CUI against advanced persistent threats (APTs), further strengthening defenses against exfiltration.

Therefore, the levels that focus on protecting CUI from exfiltration are Levels 2 and 3.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Model v2.0 Overview (DoD, December 2021)

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2,Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations

NIST SP 800-172,Enhanced Security Requirements for Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information

According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0, assessors are required to conduct Daily Checkpoint Meetings at the end of each day to summarize progress with the OSC (Organization Seeking Certification). The final Daily Checkpoint is where preliminary practice ratings are shared, before the quality assurance review and Out-Brief. The Out-Brief is reserved for the presentation of final results. Additionally, Department of Defense regulations (32 CFR §170.17(c)(2)) provide a 10-business-day re-evaluation window for requirements marked NOT MET before the final report is delivered, which necessitates that the OSC see preliminary ratings during the assessment process itself.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CAP v2.0, §2.23: “The assessment team shall host a Daily Checkpoint Meeting with the OSC at the end of each assessment day to summarize progress.”

CAP v2.0, §3.7: “The C3PAO shall conduct the quality assurance review… prior to the conduct of the Out-Brief Meeting.”

CAP v2.0, §3.10: “The purpose of the Out-Brief Meeting is to convey the results of the assessment to the OSC.”

32 CFR §170.17(c)(2): “A security requirement assessed as NOT MET may be re-evaluated… for 10 business days… if the CMMC Assessment Findings Report has not been delivered.”

Why Option A is Correct:

The CAP specifies that Daily Checkpoint Meetings are the formal, structured mechanism for assessors to communicate progress and preliminary findings to the OSC.

The final Daily Checkpoint provides the OSC with visibility into the preliminary practice ratings before they are finalized, ensuring transparency and alignment.

The Out-Brief is explicitly for conveying the final assessment results after the C3PAO has completed QA.

Federal regulation (32 CFR §170.17(c)(2)) requires the OSC to have access to preliminary results so they can provide additional evidence for re-evaluation before the report is locked, further confirming that this exchange must occur at the final Daily Checkpoint.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0: Sections 2.23 (Daily Checkpoints), 3.7–3.10 (QA and Out-Brief).

32 CFR §170.17(c)(2): Security Requirement Re-evaluation Window.

DoD CMMC Assessment Guide – Level 2 (v2.13): Guidance on MET/NOT MET determinations and findings.

Under the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, a Plan of Action (POA) is a critical document that outlines the specific actions a contractor needs to take to remediate cybersecurity deficiencies. While POAs serve as a roadmap for achieving compliance with required controls, the inclusion of certain elements is standardized.

Key Elements of a Plan of Action (POA)

According to the CMMC guidelines and NIST SP 800-171, which underpins many CMMC requirements, a POA typically includes:

Completion Dates: Identifies target deadlines for resolving deficiencies.

Milestones to Measure Progress: Includes interim steps or markers to ensure progress is monitored over time.

Ownership or Accountability: Clearly assigns responsibility for each action item to specific personnel or teams.

What is Generally NOT Part of a POA?

Budget requirements to implement the plan's remediation actions (Option D) are generally not included in a POA. While budgeting is critical for ensuring the plan's success, it is considered a part of the broaderproject management or resource planning process, not the POA itself. This distinction is intentional to keep the POA focused on actionable items rather than resource allocation.

Supporting Reference

NIST SP 800-171A, Appendix D: Provides an overview of POA components, emphasizing the prioritization of corrective actions, responsibility, and measurable outcomes.

CMMC Level 2 Practices (Aligned with NIST SP 800-171): Specifically, the focus is on actions, timelines, and accountability rather than financial planning.

By excluding budget details, the POA remains a tactical document that supports immediate action and compliance tracking, separate from financial considerations.

Understanding the Role of CAICO in the CMMC Ecosystem

TheCMMC Ecosystemconsists of multiple organizations that manage, implement, and oversee different aspects of theCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)program.

One of the key organizations is theCMMC Assessors and Instructors Certification Organization (CAICO), which is responsible for:

Training and certifying assessors and instructors.

Managing testing, authorization, and certificationfor CMMC professionals.

Ensuring assessors meet qualification and compliance standards.

Why Option D (CAICO) is Correct

TheCAICO is explicitly taskedwith thetraining, testing, authorization, and certification of candidate assessors and instructors.

Option A (DoD OUSD)is incorrect because theDoD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense(OUSD) provides policy oversight butdoes not handle certification of assessors.

Option B (DIB Collaborative Information Sharing Environment)is incorrect because theDIB CISfocuses on information sharing within the Defense Industrial Base, not assessor certification.

Option C (Committee on National Security Systems Instructions)is incorrect because CNSSI provides security standards butdoes not manage assessor training or certification.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC Ecosystem Overview – Role of the CAICO

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Assessor Certification and Training

Final Verification

SinceCAICO is responsible for training, testing, and certifying CMMC assessors and instructors, the correct answer isOption D: CMMC Assessors and Instructors Certification Organization.

The CMMC Code of Professional Conduct applies to all CMMC assessors, practitioners, and ecosystem participants. Its guiding principles are: Objectivity, Information Integrity, and Higher Accountability.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct: “Guiding principles… include Objectivity, Information Integrity, and Higher Accountability.”

Why Option A is Correct:

These three principles are the official guiding values documented in the Code of Professional Conduct.

Options B, C, and D insert terms (“proper use of methods”) that are not part of the official guiding principles.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct.

===========

Last Step in Developing an Assessment Plan for an OSC

Developing anassessment planinvolves:

Defining the assessment scope(e.g., systems, networks, locations).

Planning test activities(e.g., interviews, evidence review, technical testing).

Verifying the OSC’s readiness(e.g., ensuring required documents are available).

Updating the assessment plan and schedule as needed.

Final Step: Obtaining and recording the OSC’s commitment to the assessment plan.

Why is obtaining commitment the last step?

✔Theassessment cannot proceed unless the OSC agrees to the finalized plan.

✔This ensuresOSC leadership understands the scope, timeline, and responsibilities.

✔TheC3PAO must document this commitmentto formalize the agreement.

Why is the Correct Answer "D. Obtain and record commitment to the assessment plan"?

A. Verify the readiness to conduct the assessment → Incorrect

Readiness verification happens earlierin the planning process, not as the last step.

B. Perform certification assessment readiness review → Incorrect

Areadiness review is conducted before finalizing the plan, not at the very end.

C. Update the assessment plan and schedule as needed → Incorrect

Updating the plan happens before commitment is obtained; it is not the final step.

D. Obtain and record commitment to the assessment plan → Correct

This is the final step before conducting the assessment. The OSC must formally agree to the plan.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

States that theOSC must confirm agreement to the assessment plan before execution.

CMMC-AB Guidelines for C3PAOs

Specifies thatfinalizing the assessment plan requires documented commitment from the OSC.

CMMC Assessment Guide

Outlines thatassessments cannot begin without formal approval of the plan.

Final Answer:

✔D. Obtain and record commitment to the assessment plan.

In the context of a CMMC Level 2 Assessment, assessors must evaluate the "Institutionalization" of practices, which includes the review of Policies. The validity of a policy document depends on the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC)'s internal governance and administrative procedures.

Internal Governance (The "Why"): CMMC does not dictate exactlyhowa company must authorize its policies (e.g., whether a signature must be refreshed immediately upon a personnel change). Instead, the assessor must verify if the document is considered "active" and "authoritative" by the OSC’s own standards.

The Role of the Assessor: As per the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and CCP training materials, an assessor cannot unilaterally declare a policy invalid simply because a signatory has left. The assessor must perform "more research" (typically through Interviews or examining Supplemental Documents) to determine the OSC's internal rules for policy management.

If the OSC's "Policy on Policies" states that a signature is tied to the individual, the document may be expired.

If the OSC's rules state that the authority is tied to the role/position (which is common in most corporate governance), the policy remains in effect until it is formally rescinded or updated.

Distinction from other options:

Option A is too restrictive; it assumes a universal rule that doesn't exist in the CMMC framework.

Option C is incorrect because a signatory (or formal approval)isoften what gives a policy its "authoritative" status in an audit; ignoring it would be a failure of the Examine method.

Option D is a common business assumption, but an assessor must verify this via the OSC's own procedures rather than assuming it is true for every company.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section on "Examine" methods and evaluating evidence integrity.

NIST SP 800-171A: Discussion on "Organizational Policies" as assessment objects and the requirement for policies to be "established and maintained."

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide: Clarifies that policies must be "formally documented" and "representative of organizational requirements."