New Release PT0-002 PenTest+ Questions

ARP poisoning is a technique that exploits the weakness of the ARP protocol to redirect network traffic to a malicious host. Ettercap is a tool that can perform ARP poisoning and other network attacks, such as DNS spoofing, SSL stripping, and password sniffing. Wireshark, Netcat, and Nmap are not designed for ARP poisoning, although they can be used for other purposes, such as packet analysis, network communication, and port scanning. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Student Guide (Exam PT0-002) eBook, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1: ARP Poisoning; Best PenTest+ certification study resources and training materials, Section 2: ARP Poisoning.

The output shows multiple login attempts with different passwords for the same username “root” on the IP address 192.168.1.112. This is indicative of a brute force attack, where an attacker systematically tries various password combinations to gain unauthorized access. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 4: Conducting Passive Reconnaissance; The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Student Guide (Exam PT0-002), Lesson 4: Conducting Active Reconnaissance.

An application security assessment report aimed at developers typically includes information critical to understanding and improving the security and stability of the application. Poor input sanitization and null pointer dereferences are two such issues that are directly related to application security and can lead to significant vulnerabilities such as injection attacks or crashes. Poor input sanitization exposes the application to various forms of injection attacks, where an attacker could supply malicious input to gain unauthorized access or disrupt application services. Null pointer dereferences, on the other hand, can lead to application crashes or unexpected behavior, which can be exploited to compromise application security or availability. Highlighting these issues helps developers focus on areas that need immediate attention to enhance the application's security posture.

The action of shifting the focus of a penetration test to a specific critical network segment based on the findings during the engagement best aligns with B. Reprioritizing the goals/objectives. because as the client is choosing to change the focus of the testing to a particular area based on the findings. It reflects an adjustment of the original plan or goals to better suit the current understanding of the system's security posture.