L4M5 Exam Dumps - CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

Dynamic pricing is the practice of dynamically calculating the price of a product or service in order to incorporate real-time market conditions, input costs, and/or competitive perspectives. Dynamic pricing which is based on marginal costing, is used by airlines and many other organisations.

Marginal cost is the cost of producing an additional unit of output. Marginal Costing is a costing technique wherein the marginal cost, i.e. variable cost is charged to units of cost, while the fixed cost for the period is completely written off against the contribution.

Understanding where and with whom your supplier spends their money, or understanding the 'cost breakdowns' or 'price build-up' of the goods and services you purchase from the supplier, will help you know

where and when they can offer price concessions.

Cost information can be expressed with more impact through graphs that can be created using Excel and PowerPoint or other softwares. There are two commonly used models known as 'spend waterfall'

and 'spend tree'. Spend waterfall shows the build-up of costs, while the spend tree shows all the spends that an organisation makes.

There is no graph known as 'spend candlesticks'. Candlestick chart is a style of financial chart used to describe price movements of a security, derivative, or currency.

The aggregate expenditure model is a method of calculating GDP. The aggregate expenditure model focuses on the relationships between production (GDP) and planned spending: GDP = planned

spending = consumption + investment + government purchases + net exports.

Finding a middle ground, also known ascompromise or convergence, is a hallmark of collaborative or integrative negotiation. It allows both parties to secure partial wins, supports longer-term relationships, and promotes ongoing goodwill for future dealings.

“Negotiators must balance assertiveness with cooperation. Meeting halfway can lead to agreements that meet minimum needs of both parties while preserving the relationship.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Collaborative Approaches to Negotiation)

In the context of aninternal IT project, the relevant stakeholders would be thosedirectly involved in decision-making and implementation.Senior managementoversees funding and strategic fit, whilesoftware developersensure technical support. The general public and pharmaceutical suppliers are external and not primary stakeholders in this scenario.

“Stakeholder identification must focus on individuals or groups directly involved or affected by the procurement. This includes internal sponsors, end-users, and technical staff responsible for delivery.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Internal and External Stakeholders)

According to the book 'Influencing: Skills and techniques for business success' by Fiona Dent and Mike Brent, there are two major influencing styles. Push tends to be directive. It tells, and is clear and resolute, but needs to be employed in situations where firmness is required because of difficulties that exist or weakness is evident. Pull is more participatory and collaborative. It seeks to incorporate everyone’s perspective. It can appear wishy-washy if not skilfully employed. Thatapproach should be followed which is most likely to secure commitment and not mere compliance.

The two divisions can be further divided into four style categories: directive; persuasive reasoning; collaborative – team oriented, people oriented to inspire them with a vision. The directive style relies on your expertise and reputation being respected by others, and where there really does seem to be one answer. It is "I" driven whereas persuasive reasoning is more "we" and issue driven. Directive styles can make the user appear as "a bull in a china shop"; persuasive reasoning can be portrayed as tough guy.

Collaborative influencing takes the "we" element further and seeks to mobilise everyone’s ideas in a journey of discovery. It may have the flavour of "I’m your best friend", which may not go down too well. Visioning style is concerned to stir people’s emotions in support of achieving an objective. This last one has been used by demagogues to stir people’s hearts and minds for evil purposes as well as good.

A useful table offers the benefits, problems, words and body language associated with each style along with advice on when to use and when to avoid each. Cases and exercises illustrate these styles.

Empathy comes in for extended treatment with the definition of "standing in the other's shoes". This does not necessarily happen just intuitively, and therefore before a specific influencing effort there should be an intense effort to think about the other person or persons and to sense what it might feel like to be them – their hopes, fears, concerns, what turns them on, what turns them off, where are they coming from.

“Expanding the pie” is a strategy used in integrative negotiations where both parties collaborate to increase the total value available before dividing it. This leads to mutual gains and supports long-term, strategic relationships.

In 1983, Peter Kraljic devised a means to segment the supplier base in the article in HBR. In this, he argued that supply items should be mapped against two key dimensions: risk and profitability.

Risk relates to the likelihood for an unexpected event in the supply chains to disrupt operations. For instance, in important areas of spend, such as tire suppliers for an automotive are business critical, and should a disruption occur, the auto company is likely itself to face substantial problems.

Profitability describes the impact of a supply item upon the bottom line. For certain areas of spend, such as stationery, supplies have only a negligible effect on profits. In other categories, a single source of supply can make or break a business.

Putting these two dimensions together yields a classic two-by-two matrix.

Source: Peter Kraljic, HBR

Bargaining is the negotiation stage where tradeables are typically introduced and discussed. During this phase, both parties exchange offers and concessions, using tradeables such as lead times and order quantities to find a mutually acceptable agreement. This aligns with CIPS's guidance on the stages of negotiation.

Inbreak-even analysis,contributionrefers to the amount from sales revenue that exceedsvariable costs, which then contributes to coveringfixed costsand ultimately generating profit. Understanding this concept enables buyers to better analyze supplier pricing and negotiate more effectively. For example, if a product is priced significantly above its variable cost, there may be room fordiscounts or added value, as the supplier is still contributing toward fixed costs.