L4M5 Exam Dumps - CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

In contracts which have major commodity input, the price is determined by market forces with no individual supplier or buyer able to influence it significantly. Prices are much more variable even within long term contracts and seeking a fixed price would create financial risks for both the buyers and the suppliers. It is often intelligent to agree a contract price adjustment mechanism to allow for market price changes so both sides share risk.

According to Thomas-Kilmann conflict model instrument, there are 5 conflict management styles:

In this scenario, the buyer's bargaining power is stronger than suppliers', and the relationship is transactional. Therefore, to get the most preferable outcome, the procurement professional can take an assertive approach, while he doesn't need to co-operate closely with these suppliers. Competing will be the most appropriate approach to negotiation in this scenario so that the buying organisation can get a better deal.

In the context of aninternal IT project, the relevant stakeholders would be thosedirectly involved in decision-making and implementation.Senior managementoversees funding and strategic fit, whilesoftware developersensure technical support. The general public and pharmaceutical suppliers are external and not primary stakeholders in this scenario.

“Stakeholder identification must focus on individuals or groups directly involved or affected by the procurement. This includes internal sponsors, end-users, and technical staff responsible for delivery.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Internal and External Stakeholders)

Coercive powerstems from the ability to apply pressure or sanctions, whilereferent powercomes from reputation, charisma, or respect. These are both recognised power sources in negotiations. “Intruded” and “tactical” power are not classified within the standard power framework used in CIPS materials.

“Sources of power include coercive (based on threats or penalties), referent (based on personal appeal or influence), and others such as reward, expert, and legitimate power.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Power in Negotiation)

Whenmany supplierscompete forfew buyers, buyers gain leverage. This competition can drive prices down and increase the buyer’s ability to negotiate favorable terms. Conversely, if the buyer is dependent on a supplier (as in A), the buyer’s power diminishes.

“Buyer power increases when there are many suppliers and few buyers. The buyer has multiple options and can negotiate from a position of strength.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.3 - Relative Bargaining Power and Market Dynamics)

Afixed price agreementprovides stability and predictability. The supplier bears the risk of cost fluctuations, which is especially advantageous in volatile markets. Moreover, it simplifies administrative processes for the buyer over the contract duration.

“Fixed price agreements transfer cost risk to the supplier and enable simplified contract management. This can reduce overhead for buyers and support budgeting accuracy.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models in Negotiation)

Adversarial (win–lose) negotiation is viable when buyers can leverage abundant alternatives and substitutes, reducing supplier power. In such cases, buyers can adopt tough tactics, knowing they can switch suppliers if necessary. By contrast, limited supply, single sourcing, or monopolist suppliers constrain buyer power, making adversarial strategies risky and often ineffective. CIPS stresses that negotiation style must be matched to market conditions and the power balance.

Late paymentsdamage trust and strain supplier cash flow, becoming a direct source of conflict. Similarly, when gains, risks, or costs arenot equitably shared, perceptions of unfairness can destabilize the relationship.

“Persistent late payments not only threaten supplier cash flows but can significantly erode trust. Additionally, disproportionate sharing of risks or benefits can create resentment and hinder collaboration.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.3 - Causes and Management of Conflict in Procurement)

Becoming a preferred customer to supplier's perspective can increase the purchaser's leverage in negotiation. Beside the size of buying organisation or its spend, the following may be sufficient to differentiate the buyer from other buying organisations:

Simple procurement processes: Using SRM technology may help to simplify the process

Simple contracting processes

Clear and concise documentation: Reduced paperwork helps both supplier and buyer save their time and resources.

Absence of onerous supplier terms and conditions

On-time payment

Transparent processes: Unclear tender award criteria can be seen as opaque. Suppliers who attended the tendering processes cannot know the reasons why their bids are rejected and hesitate to attend other tendering.

Ethical behaviour: Suppliers may prefer a buyer who adopts CSR policy because they can predict potential customer's behaviour. Demands for kickback are unethical behaviours.