L4M5 Exam Dumps - CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

An adversarial style is appropriate when issues are non-negotiable, such as health and safety commitments (D). In these scenarios, compliance is required without compromise, and a firm stance may be necessary. This aligns with CIPS guidance, where adversarial tactics are used in non-negotiable contexts to enforce strict standards.

Trust may create value as following:

LO 1, AC 1.4

According to Paul Steele's 'The Seller's Perspective', customer can be classified into 4 categories as below:

To increase the leverage in negotiation, buyer may increase its attractiveness and/or increase spend value. In this scenario, the buyer is already attractive to supplier as it always pays on-time, but the spend is still low. So to have greater leverage, the buyer has to increase its spend volume by spend concentration. Spend concentration may take many forms as following:

- Vendor base reduction

- Volume pooling

- Volume redistribution

- Volume consolidation across categories

- Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications

- Forming purchasing consortia

LO 1, AC 1.3

Coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish other for non-compliance, and can be considered as the flip side of reward power. Coercive power rests in the individual's ability to change other people's behaviour through threat, intimidation, use of guilt, ability to embarrass or shame, or withdrawal of benefits,...

A key consideration when seeking to negotiate prices is to establish what proportion of the spend is addressable by procurement action such as negotiation. Addressability of spend is influenceable through negotiations or application of other saving effort or leverage with suppliers.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Essentially, for trained negotiators under most circumstances, the physical locations of negotiations and the room layout should not make much difference to the outcomes of the meeting. It is reasonable to assume that most commercial negotiations are based at least initially on a principled- or pragmatic-type approach. It is arguable also that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

Framing and re-framing (C) and Anchoring (E) are powerful influencing techniques:

Framing and re-framing (C): This technique shapes how information is presented to make specific aspects more compelling or relevant.

Anchoring (E): Anchoring sets an initial reference point, which influences how subsequent information is perceived.

These techniques help negotiators control the flow and focus of discussions, aligning with CIPS recommendations for strategic influence in negotiations.

Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. When collaborating, an individual attempts to work with the other person to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of both. It involves digging into an issue to identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an alternative that meets both sets of concerns. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other’s insights, resolving some condition that would otherwise have them competing for resources, or confronting and trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem.