L4M5 Exam Dumps - CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

A collaborative relationship is characterized by mutual commitment, which enhances risk management and strategic planning between buyer and supplier. High levels of trust and commitment enable both parties to work closely to achieve shared objectives, creating a beneficial negotiation environment. This approach aligns with CIPS’s principles of collaborative procurement relationships.

In 1983, Peter Kraljic devised a means to segment the supplier base in the article in HBR. In this, he argued that supply items should be mapped against two key dimensions: risk and profitability.

Risk relates to the likelihood for an unexpected event in the supply chains to disrupt operations. For instance, in important areas of spend, such as tire suppliers for an automotive are business critical, and should a disruption occur, the auto company is likely itself to face substantial problems.

Profitability describes the impact of a supply item upon the bottom line. For certain areas of spend, such as stationery, supplies have only a negligible effect on profits. In other categories, a single source of supply can make or break a business.

Putting these two dimensions together yields a classic two-by-two matrix.

Source: Peter Kraljic, HBR

The coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish others for non-compliance. It can be considered as opposite to reward power, which results from one person's ability to compensate or reward another for compliance.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Involving an appropriate cross-functional team is beneficial for effective commercial negotiation because it brings together diverse perspectives and expertise relevant to the negotiation context. According to CIPS, a cross-functional team ensures that all aspects, such as technical, financial, and operational inputs, are considered, leading to more balanced and informed decision-making. This approach also helps in addressing complex negotiation elements effectively.

Indirect costs are those cost that are not directly attributable to production. Examples of indirect costs including the following:

Indirect labour: This covers every person in the factory who does not directly perform a production operation such as managers, supervisors, engineers, store personnel, clerks, maintenance staff, porters, canteen staff, security and cleaners etc.

Expenses: Included in this element is every fixed and variable expenses incurred in operating the factory, such as rent, rates, utilities, insurance, depreciation, maintenance, air conditioning and the various types of energy generation required by a clothing factory.

Indirect materials: Also known as consumables, this element contains all the materials not directly connected to the makeup of a garment. Some of the typical items involved are office materials, spare parts, marker paper, maintenance materials, chalk & pins.

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production. Examples of direct costs including the following:

Direct Materials: Direct materials are all the materials and trimmings which go into the construction and finish of the garment. Typically, these materials would include cloth, lining, fusible, zips pads, tapes, labels, tickets, hangers and packaging materials.

Direct Labour: This cover the cost of all the labor directly involved in producing the garment and could include cutting, fusing, regular sewing, special machine operations, pressing, finishing, inspection and packing. Labor of all types and grade has a direct overhead which include holiday pay, sick pay, fringe benefits etc and the statutory payments made by the employer for each employee. This is usually expressed as a percentage of salary and when this percentage is added to the employee’s wage, it becomes the basis for calculating direct labor costs.

Rebuilding trust requires acknowledgement of the issue and supplier commitment to improvement. Cosmetic gestures such as hospitality or price reductions do not address the core problem. Nor should KPIs be artificially lowered, as this masks underperformance. Trust is restored when accountability is accepted and corrective actions are implemented transparently. This aligns with CIPS’ emphasis on trust-building behaviours: honesty, responsibility, and consistent performance.

As negotiations near closure, skilled negotiators carefully observe for buying signals—verbal cues (“That sounds reasonable…”) and non-verbal cues (nodding, smiling, leaning forward). These indicate readiness to agree and confirm whether it is the right time to close. At this stage, both sides usually stop gathering data or building rapport, as the focus is on confirming alignment and avoiding last-minute derailments. Closing too early may risk missing concessions, but delaying risks cooling momentum. Recognising buying signals ensures closure occurs at the optimal point, aligning with preparation and tactical awareness.