AICP Exam Dumps - APA American Planning Association Questions and Answers

Evaluating a historic preservation district focuses on preservation outcomes. Option I (increase in square footage of rehabilitated properties) measures physical preservation efforts, a direct indicator of success. Option III (increase in property values) reflects economic benefits, often tied to preservation’s impact on desirability. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam ContentOutline(2022), under “Plan Implementation,” states, “Success of historic preservation districts is often measured by the extent of rehabilitated properties and increases in property values.” Option II (low- and moderate-income housing) is unrelated to preservation goals. Option IV (traffic flow) is not a primary measure of preservation success. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Key metrics for historic preservation districts include rehabilitated square footage and property value increases,” supporting option B (I and III).

Landscape Urbanism, a theory emerging in the late 20th century, prioritizes landscape as the primary organizing element of urban form, over buildings or infrastructure. Option C (organizing city form through the design of the city’s landscape) is correct. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” defines Landscape Urbanism as “a design approach that organizes urban form through landscape systems, rather than architectural structures.” Option A (site-specific requirements) is too narrow. Option B (tree planting) is a specific action, not a theory. Option D (garden cities) refers to Ebenezer Howard’s earlier concept. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Landscape Urbanism focuses on using landscape to structure city form, prioritizing natural systems,” supporting option C.

Brownfield reuse assessments evaluate the feasibility of redeveloping contaminated sites, focusing on practical and economic factors. I (market receptiveness) assesses demand for the sitepost-remediation. III (surrounding uses) ensures compatibility with nearby development. IV (funding and partnerships) identifies resources for cleanup and redevelopment. II (architectural standards) is not a primary concern, as it pertains to design, not feasibility. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” states, “Brownfield assessments should evaluate market demand, compatibility with surrounding uses, and funding opportunities.” TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Key considerations for brownfield reuse include market receptiveness, surrounding uses, and funding/partnerships, but not architectural standards,” supporting option D (I, III, and IV).

The location quotient (LQ) measures the concentration of an industry in a local area compared to a larger reference area (e.g., the nation). It is calculated as:

LQ = (Local industry share / National industry share).

Here, the town’s education sector share is 25% (0.25), and the national share is 10% (0.10).

LQ = 0.25 / 0.10 = 2.5.

Option B (2.5) is correct, indicating the town has 2.5 times the national concentration of education jobs. Option A (0.25) inverts the ratio. Options C (15) and D (35) are incorrect calculations. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Research and Assessment Methods,” defines the location quotient as “the ratio of a local industry’s share to the national share, used to measure industry concentration.” TheCPC Study Manual(2024) provides an example: “If a town has 25% of jobs in a sector and the nation has 10%, the LQ is 2.5,” supporting option B.

TheAICP Code of Ethics(2022), Section B, Rule 5, states, “We shall not fail to disclose a conflict of interest or even the appearance of improper influence.” The planner’s role on the conservation society board, which opposes growth, creates a potential conflict with their public duty on the reservoir committee. Option C (inform the city planning director) is the first step to disclose the potential conflict, ensuring transparency. Option A (resign) or B (abstain from votes) may be subsequent actions but aren’t the first step. Option D (participate in the society’s decisions) exacerbates the conflict. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Planners must first disclose potential conflicts, such as board memberships, to their supervisor to maintain transparency,” supporting option C.

Creative placemaking involves collaboration between public, private, and non-profit sectors to leverage a community’s arts and cultural assets for physical improvements, enhancing community identity and vitality. Option A (creative placemaking) matches this description. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” defines creative placemaking as “a process that partners with multiple sectors to use arts and culture for community development and physical improvements.” Option B (public realm activation) focuses on activating public spaces but not specifically through arts. Option C (design charrette) is a participatory design process, not necessarily arts-focused. Option D (scenario planning) is a strategic tool, not a development process. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Creative placemaking uses arts and culture through multi-sector partnerships to create physical improvements,” supporting option A.

TheAICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct(2022) outlines specific conditions under which membership must be revoked. Section E, Rule of Conduct 25 states, “A planner’s certification shall be revoked if the planner is convicted of a serious crime, as defined in the AICP Ethics Code.” A serious crime includes felonies or crimes involving moral turpitude (e.g., fraud, bribery), which directly impact professional integrity. Option A aligns with this rule. Option B (accused of violating an aspirational principle) does not mandate revocation—violations of aspirational principles are not enforceable, unlike rules of conduct, and accusations alone do not trigger revocation. Option C (not completing certification maintenance credits) may result in suspension, but revocation requires a formal process and is not automatic. Option D (revoked state license) does not automatically revoke AICP membership, as AICP certification is independent of state licensure. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “AICP membership must be revoked upon conviction of a serious crime, as it undermines the profession’s integrity,” supporting option A.

Fiscal impact analysis evaluates a development’s financial impact on a municipality, often using the average cost method (assigning average costs per unit, e.g., per resident) or the case study marginal approach (assessing incremental costs based on similar cases). Option A (fiscal impact) matches this description. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan Implementation,” states, “Fiscal impact analysis commonly uses the average cost method and case study marginal approach to estimate costs and revenues.” Option B (economic impact) focuses on broader economic effects, not municipal finances. Option C (multi-variate statistical) is a statistical method, not specific to cost analysis. Option D (development pro-forma) assesses project profitability, not municipal impact. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Fiscal impact analysis uses methods like average cost and case study marginal approaches,” supporting option A.

Form-based codes (FBCs) prioritize the physical form and character of buildings over their use, distinguishing them from traditional Euclidean zoning, which focuses on land use separation. Option C (regulate the character of buildings) reflects this focus, as FBCs define building types, heights, and placements to shape the urban environment. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” notes, “Form-based codes regulate the character and form of buildings rather than their use, focusing on design elements like scale and placement.” Option A (apply to the entire city) is incorrect, as FBCs are often applied to specific districts. Option B (emphasis on land use) is characteristic of Euclidean zoning, not FBCs. Option D (emphasis on the private realm) is incorrect, as FBCs focus on the public realm, such as streetscapes. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Form-based codes primarily regulate building character to create cohesive urban forms,” supporting option C.

Sustainable development integrates social, economic, and environmental goals to create resilientcommunities. All four outcomes align with this framework: I (expanding choice and opportunity) supports social sustainability; II (local economies meeting resident needs) reflects economic sustainability; III (harmony between nature and social climate) addresses environmental sustainability; and IV (responsiveness to disadvantaged populations) ensures equity, a core sustainability principle. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” defines sustainable development outcomes as including “expanded opportunities, economic vitality, environmental harmony, and equity for disadvantaged groups.” The APA’sPolicy Guide on Sustainability(2015) states, “Sustainable development strategies should enhance choice, support local economies, balance nature and society, and prioritize the disadvantaged,” encompassing all four outcomes. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Successful sustainable development includes all these outcomes to achieve holistic community benefits,” supporting option D.