Fortinet Certification NSE7_PBC-7.2 Syllabus Exam Questions Answers

The error message indicates that the Connect attachment is already associated with another transit gateway route table. You cannot associate the same attachment with more than one route table. However, you can propagate the same attachment to multiple route tables. Therefore, to fulfill your requirement of configuring a second route table for east-west traffic inspection between two VPCs, you need to create a propagation with the Connect attachment in the second route table. This will allow the second route table to learn the routes from the Connect attachment and forward the traffic to the securityVPC1. You also need to associate the second route table with the Transport attachment, which is the transit gateway attachment for the security VPC1.

References:

• Transit gateway route tables - Amazon VPC | AWS Documentation
• Getting started with transit gateways - Amazon VPC | AWS Documentation
• Configuring TGW route tables | FortiGate Public Cloud 7.4.0 | Fortinet Document Library

When an administrator decides to use the 'Use managed identity' option for the FortiGate SDN connector with Microsoft Azure and faces a connection failure, the correct action to take is:

C.Make sure to enable the system assigned managed identity on Azure.

• Managed Identity Configuration:The system assigned managed identity is a feature in Azure that provides an identity for the Azure service instance (in this case, the FortiGate SDN connector) within Azure Active Directory and eliminates the need for credentials to be stored in the configuration.
• Troubleshooting Connection Issues:If the SDN connector is failing to connect, it could be because the system assigned managed identity has not been enabled or configured properly in Azure for the FortiGate service.

References:Azure documentation on managed identities explains the need to enable and configure this feature for services to authenticate and interact securely with Azure resources.

A. Use the terraform destroy command. This command is used to remove all the resources that were created using the Terraform configuration1. It is the opposite of the terraform apply command, which is used to create resources. The terraform destroy command will first show a plan of what resources will be destroyed, and then ask for confirmation before proceeding. The command will also update the state file to reflect the changes. D. The administrator must manually delete the Linux server. This is because the Linux server was not deployed using Terraform, but using AWS Marketplace2. Therefore, Terraform does not have any information about the Linux server in its state file, and cannot manage or destroy it. The administrator will have to use the AWS console or CLI to delete the Linux server manually.

The other options are incorrect because:

• There is no terraform validate command. The correct command is terraform plan, which is used to show a plan of what changes will be made by applying the configuration3. However, this command does not delete any resources, it only shows what will happen if terraform apply or terraform destroy is run.
• There is no terraform destroy all command. The correct command is terraform destroy, which will destroy all the resources in the current configuration by default1. There is no need to add an all argument to the command.

The correct answer is C and D. FortiGate NGFW can inspect north-south container traffic with label aware policies and FortiGate NGFW and FortiSandbox can be used to secure container traffic.

According to the Fortinet documentation for container security1, FortiGate NGFW can provide the following benefits for securing container infrastructure:

• It can inspect north-south traffic between containers and external networks using label aware policies, which allow for dynamic policy enforcement based on Kubernetes labels and metadata.
• It can integrate with FortiSandbox to provide advanced threat protection for container traffic, by sending suspicious files or URLs to a cloud-based sandbox for analysis and detection.
• It can leverage FortiGuard Security Services to provide real-time threat intelligence and updates for container traffic, such as antivirus, web filtering, IPS, and application control.

The other options are incorrect because:

• FortiGate NGFW cannot be placed between each application container for north-south traffic inspection, as this would create unnecessary complexity and overhead. Instead, FortiGate NGFW can be deployed at the edge of the container network or as a sidecar proxy to inspect traffic at the ingress and egress points.
• FortiGate NGFW cannot connect to the worker node and protect the container, as this would not provide sufficient visibility and control over the container traffic. Instead, FortiGate NGFW can leverage the native Kubernetes APIs and services to monitor and secure the container traffic.

1:Fortinet Documentation Library - Container Security