PMP Exam Dumps - PMI Project-Management-Professional Questions and Answers

The servant leader project manager should explore a training program that is within the project budget for the team members. This is the best option because it shows the project manager’s commitment to developing the team’s skills and capabilities, as well as addressing the project’s needs. A training program can help the team members acquire the technical skills required for the upcoming tasks, as well as increase their motivation and confidence. This option also aligns with the servant leadership principle of "commitment to the growth of people"1.

The other options are not as effective as option D. Option A is not supportive and may demoralize the team members. Option B is not collaborative and may disrupt the team dynamics. Option C is not proactive and may damage the project manager’s credibility. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 63

According to the PMBOK Guide, change requests are inevitable in any project and should be managed through an integrated change control process. This process involves analyzing the impact of the change on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and other factors, and then deciding whether to approve or reject the change. If the change is approved, the project manager should update the project management plan and other relevant documents accordingly. The project manager should also communicate and negotiate with the stakeholders, especially the client, about the impact of the change and the possible trade-offs or alternatives. The project manager should not instruct the team to accommodate the changes without proper analysis and approval, as this would violate the project management plan and the agreed scope. The project manager should not review the project charter to identify the agreed scope, as this would not address the issue of the change requests and their impact on the project. The project charter is a high-level document that authorizes the project and defines its objectives, scope, and key stakeholders, but it does not provide the details of how the scope will be managed and controlled. The project manager should not escalate the issue to senior management, as this would imply that the project manager is unable to handle the change requests and their impact on the project. The project manager should only escalate the issue if the change requests are beyond the project manager’s authority or responsibility, or if the client is unreasonable or uncooperative. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 112-113, 118-119, 122-123; Project and Process Tailoring for the PMP® Exam

The RFP is a document that solicits proposals from potential suppliers by describing the project scope, requirements, and evaluation criteria. It is important to ensure that the RFP is clear, accurate, and legally sound to avoid misunderstandings, conflicts, and disputes with the suppliers. Asking the legal team to review the RFP can help the project manager mitigate this risk by ensuring that the RFP complies with the relevant laws, regulations, and contractual terms, and that it protects the interests and rights of both parties12.

The other options are not as effective or relevant for mitigating this risk:

B. Ask the project team to submit the RFP: The project team may not have the necessary expertise or authority to prepare or approve the RFP. Asking the project team to submit the RFP may result in delays, errors, or inconsistencies in the RFP, which could increase the risk of disputes with the suppliers3.

C. Request approval of the RFP from the project sponsor: The project sponsor is the person or group who provides the financial resources and support for the project. The project sponsor may not be directly involved in the procurement process or have the legal knowledge to review the RFP. Requesting approval of the RFP from the project sponsor may not address the risk of disputes with the suppliers, and may also create unnecessary bureaucracy or dependency.

D. Request approval of the RFP from management: Management is the group of individuals who direct and control the organization. Management may not have the time, interest, or expertise to review the RFP. Requesting approval of the RFP from management may not mitigate the risk of disputes with the suppliers, and may also cause delays, conflicts, or micromanagement.

 Cross-training is a technique that allows team members to share and learn skills from each other. It can enhance team performance, increase flexibility, and reduce risks related to staff turnover or unavailability. It can also improve team cohesion and collaboration. In this scenario, the project manager should allow the engineer and designer to cross-train with each other, as this would benefit both the project and the individuals. The engineer would learn a new skill that is required for the tasks, and the designer would reinforce their existing skill by teaching it. This would also save time and money compared to external training options. Escalating the situation to the engineer’s manager, requesting external training for the engineer, or requesting external training for both the engineer and the designer are not the best choices, as they would not leverage the existing resources and expertise within the team. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 339; Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, page 16.

The project manager should schedule a session with the team to discuss the issues and work with them to define a plan to manage the sprints going forward. This will help to address the team’s concerns, resolve the conflicts, and improve the team’s morale and performance. The project manager should also communicate with the product owner and other stakeholders to align the expectations and priorities for the project and the support items. The project manager should also use agile principles and practices to adapt to the changing requirements and deliver value to the customer. Requesting a replacement, scheduling a session with the product owner, or asking HR to send the team members to a workshop are not the best ways to proceed, as they may not solve the root cause of the problem, damage the team’s trust and cohesion, or delay the project delivery. References:

PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 5: Support team members and stakeholders to meet project objectives and stakeholder expectations.

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Seventh Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.2: Team Performance, Page 77.

Professional in Business Analysis (PBA) Certification Exam Outline, Domain III: Analysis, Task 5: Validate Requirements, Page 14.

 In a hybrid project life cycle, which combines elements of both traditional (predictive) and agile (adaptive) methodologies, empowering the team to self-organize and make their own decisions is often the most effective approach. This is particularly true in situations where requirements are continuously changing, as it allows the team to adapt more quickly and effectively. In this scenario, the project manager should empower the team to advance the stones without waiting for his or her approval, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of the testing process. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Section 3.1.3 - Life Cycle Description: Predictive, Iterative, Incremental, and Agile

 The project manager should reinforce the value of documenting and approving all change requests and ask the customer to issue these through the agreed channels. This is because change requests are formal proposals to modify any aspect of the project and should follow the change management plan, which defines how changes will be monitored, controlled, and approved. The project manager should also communicate with the project team member and remind them of the change management process and their roles and responsibilities. This will help prevent unauthorized changes that could impact the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risk. The project manager should also update the issue log and the lessons learned register to document the incident and the actions taken. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.1, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Inputs”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.3.1, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Outputs - Change Requests”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.3.2, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Outputs - Project Management Plan Updates”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.6.3.3, “Perform Integrated Change Control: Outputs - Project Documents Updates”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.3.1, “Trace Requirements: Inputs”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.3.2, “Trace Requirements: Tools and Techniques”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.3.3, “Trace Requirements: Outputs”

The project manager should use the alignment of the project with the benefits management plan as an indicator that the project is actually delivering value because this is the best way to measure the project’s contribution to the organization’s strategic objectives and expected outcomes. The benefits management plan defines the benefits that the project is expected to deliver, the metrics and targets to evaluate them, the roles and responsibilities for benefits realization, and the timeline and process for benefits review and transition. By comparing the project’s performance and deliverables with the benefits management plan, the project manager can assess the value of the project and identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed. The other options are not the best choices because they do not necessarily reflect the value of the project. Stakeholders’ satisfaction with the current status (option A) may be subjective and biased, and may not consider the long-term benefits of the project. The project being under budget and on schedule (option B) may indicate the project’s efficiency and adherence to the plan, but it does not guarantee the project’s effectiveness and alignment with the business needs. The project being aligned with the project charter (option C) may show the project’s compliance with the initial scope, objectives, and assumptions, but it does not account for any changes or updates that may affect the project’s value proposition. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 33-34, 75-76, 129-130. PMP Questions page 457. PMP Practice Exam | Free PMP Practice Questions.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.2.4, the project manager should use procurement documentation to define and manage the contractual relationships with the suppliers. Procurement documentation includes the contract, the statement of work, the procurement management plan, and the source selection criteria. The project manager should ensure that the project team, including the business analyst, is aware of the terms and conditions of the contract and the scope of work that the supplier is expected to deliver. Any changes or additions to the scope should be formally requested and approved through the change control process, as described in section 4.6. The PMI-PBA Guide, section 6.3.3.1, also supports this approach, as it states that the business analyst should follow the change management plan and the requirements management plan to manage changes to the requirements and to communicate them to the relevant stakeholders, including the suppliers. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.2.4 and 4.6

PMI-PBA Guide, section 6.3.3.1

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.2.4, the project manager should use procurement documentation to define and manage the contractual relationships with the suppliers. Procurement documentation includes the contract, the statement of work, the procurement management plan, and the source selection criteria. The project manager should ensure that the project team, including the business analyst, is aware of the terms and conditions of the contract and the scope of work that the supplier is expected to deliver. Any changes or additions to the scope should be formally requested and approved through the change control process, as described in section 4.6. The PMI-PBA Guide, section 6.3.3.1, also supports this approach, as it states that the business analyst should follow the change management plan and the requirements management plan to manage changes to the requirements and to communicate them to the relevant stakeholders, including the suppliers. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.2.4 and 4.6

PMI-PBA Guide, section 6.3.3.1

On day four of a 15-day sprint, the team should continue with the sprint work as planned and keep monitoring the burndown chart. The burndown chart is a visual representation of the work left versus the time remaining in the sprint. If the “Actual” line closely follows the “Planned” line, it indicates that the team is on track. Making adjustments or changing the sprint scope at this stage is premature unless there are significant deviations or impediments1. The team should maintain their current pace and monitor progress, making adjustments only if necessary as the sprint progresses2. References: “Burndown Chart: What it is, How to Use it, Example [2024]” by Asana; “Scrum Sprint Burndown Chart [Everything you Need to Know]” by KnowledgeHut12.

In a hybrid project management approach, which combines elements of both predictive (waterfall) and adaptive (agile) methodologies, it’s important to involve key stakeholders at appropriate stages. In this case, the dentist is a major investor and has raised questions about the concept and expected performance of the equipment. Inviting the investor to a design review meeting allows for a focused discussion on these aspects. This meeting can include a Q&A session to address the investor’s doubts and concerns, providing clarity and ensuring alignment with the project’s objectives.

Hybrid project management methodologies allow for flexibility while ensuring that essential project documentation, such as project plans, requirements, and technical specifications, is maintained and updated as needed1. It’s also important to regularly review the project management process and make adjustments if necessary2. Incorporating hybrid components in the areas that were previously identified, and closely analyzing the effectiveness of the blended strategy is also recommended3.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the portfolio management office (PMO) is responsible for ensuring that the projects and programs within the portfolio are aligned with the organizational strategy and objectives. The project manager should demonstrate the project alignment to the organizational strategy by showing how the project delivers value and benefits to the organization and its stakeholders. This may include presenting the project business case, benefits management plan, stakeholder analysis, and other relevant documents that justify the project’s existence and contribution. Demonstrating the project alignment to the organizational strategy is the best way to continue the project and avoid suspension by the PMO. Meeting with the project team and revising the project goals (A) may not be effective if the project is already in alignment with the organizational strategy and the PMO is not aware of it. Updating the project charter to make it align with organizational strategy (B) may not be feasible or ethical if the project charter has already been approved and authorized by the project sponsor and other key stakeholders. Escalating the issue with the project sponsor to request support (D) may be a possible action, but not the best one, as it may create conflict or resentment between the project sponsor and the PMO. The project manager should first try to resolve the issue with the PMO directly by demonstrating the project alignment to the organizational strategy. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 33-34, 75-76, 129-130.

According to the PMBOK guide, a hybrid approach is a combination of predictive and adaptive (agile) methodologies that suits the project context and stakeholder needs1. A retrospective is a meeting held at the end of each iteration in agile projects, where the team reflects on what went well and what can be improved2. The PMI-PBA guide also states that retrospectives are a valuable tool for business analysts to identify and address issues, risks, and opportunities for improvement3. Therefore, the best way for the project manager to deal with the decline in productivity is to discuss the issue in the next retrospective with the team and collaboratively find solutions to enhance their performance. References:

1: PMBOK guide, page 19

2: PMBOK guide, page 207

3: PMI-PBA guide, page 129

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should manage stakeholder expectations and communicate any changes that affect the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality. The project manager should also collaborate with the product owner, who is responsible for defining and prioritizing the product backlog, to ensure that the stakeholder’s needs are met. The product owner can assess the value and urgency of the new requirement and decide whether it should be added to the current sprint or deferred to a later release. The other options are either too passive, too risky, or too disruptive for the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 49-50, section 2.1.3; page 135-136, section 4.2.3.1; page 540-541, section 13.3.2.4.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project management plan is a formal, approved document that defines how the project is executed, monitored, and controlled1. It integrates and consolidates all of the subsidiary plans and baselines from the project management processes1. One of the inputs to the process of developing the project management plan is the project charter, which provides the high-level description of the project and its boundaries, as well as the high-level requirements, risks, assumptions, and constraints2. Therefore, the project manager should clarify the high-level business requirements with the event organizer as a basis for forming the deliverables list, which is part of the project scope management plan, a component of the project management plan3. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to complete the task of developing the project management plan. Benchmarking other similar exhibitions’ deliverable lists and final outcomes is a technique that can be used to collect requirements, but it is not sufficient to form the deliverables list without clarifying the high-level business requirements first. Initiating a survey to solicit end-customer opinions and prioritize exhibition contents is also a technique to collect requirements, but it is not the first step in developing the project management plan. Initiating an additional services agreement in case the key deliverables list was not clearly stated in the contract is a risk response strategy that can be used to deal with potential scope changes, but it is not a necessary action to develop the project management plan. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 89

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 77

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 131

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 148

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 443

According to the PMBOK Guide, when using an agile approach, the project manager needs to have a clear understanding of the product vision, the product roadmap, and the product backlog1. The product vision is a brief statement that describes the desired outcome of the project and the value it will deliver to the customers and stakeholders2. The product roadmap is a high-level overview of the product features and deliverables, along with the planned timeline and milestones3. The product backlog is a prioritized list of the product requirements, user stories, and other work items that need to be completed by the project team. These three factors help the project manager to align the project objectives with the customer needs, plan and execute the project iteratively and incrementally, and deliver value early and often1. The other options are not relevant for an agile approach, as they are more suitable for a predictive or waterfall approach. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics that measure the performance of the project against the project objectives. Schedule performance index (SPI) is a ratio of the earned value to the planned value, indicating how well the project is progressing according to the schedule. These factors are not essential for delivering a product using an agile approach, as they focus more on the adherence to the plan rather than the delivery of value. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 156

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 157

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 158

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 267

 According to the PMBOK Guide, a hybrid delivery approach is a combination of predictive, iterative, incremental, and agile methods that best suit the project context and objectives. A hybrid delivery approach may require a phased structure, where each phase has a review gate to ensure alignment and quality. To ensure consistency for this hybrid delivery, the project manager should get agreement from stakeholders on high-level deliverables and requirements. This will help to define the scope and objectives of each phase, as well as the acceptance criteria and success factors. The project manager should also involve the stakeholders in the planning and execution of each phase, and solicit their feedback and approval at the review gates. The project manager should not ask SMEs to provide a detailed plan for each phase, as this may not reflect the stakeholder needs and expectations. The project manager should not commit to a detailed global plan from the initiation phase, as this may not accommodate changes and uncertainties in a hybrid environment. The project manager should not request the PMO to review the initial plan, as this may not ensure the stakeholder buy-in and satisfaction. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53…

PMI-PBA Guide, pages 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53…

The project manager should evaluate the impact to the users and create a plan to address it, as this is part of identifying stakeholders. Identifying stakeholders involves identifying the people, groups, or organizations that could impact or be impacted by the project, and analyzing their expectations, interests, and influence. By evaluating the impact to the users, the project manager can determine their needs, requirements, and potential issues, and create a plan to engage them effectively and manage their expectations. The other options are not the best ways to handle this situation, as they either ignore, assume, or delegate the stakeholder identification process. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.1

PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, Domain I, Task 2

PMP Sample Test Questions, Question 382

When stakeholders’ feedback indicates that they saw more technical features than business ones, it’s important for the project manager to review this topic with the product owner before the next iteration planning12. The product owner is responsible for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the development team2. They are the ones who understand the needs of the stakeholders and can prioritize the features accordingly2. By discussing the feedback with the product owner, the project manager can ensure that the next iteration focuses more on the business features that the stakeholders want to see12. References: How to Collect Feedback from Stakeholders Effectively | Mural, 11 Effective Stakeholder Management Strategies - Float

The project manager should coordinate with the stakeholders to ensure the benefits management plan is in alignment with the goals. This is because the stakeholders are the ones who will ultimately realize the benefits of the project, and their understanding of how the project will provide value is crucial for its success. By coordinating with the stakeholders, the project manager can ensure that the benefits management plan is understood and agreed upon, and that it aligns with the organization’s goals1.

When changes to the project scope are identified, it’s important for the project manager to review these changes with the project stakeholders. This allows for a collective understanding of the impact of the scope reduction on the project’s objectives, deliverables, and schedule. It also ensures that all stakeholders are aligned and in agreement with the proposed changes. This approach is in line with the PMBOK® Guide’s emphasis on integrated change control, which involves reviewing all change requests, approving changes, and managing changes to deliverables, organizational process assets, project documents, and the project management plan. References: PMBOK® Guide – Sixth Edition, Section 4.6: Perform Integrated Change Control

According to the AI & SOCIETY article1, legal structures may form barriers to, or enablers of, adoption of precision agriculture management with small autonomous agricultural robots. The article develops a conceptual regulatory framework for small autonomous agricultural robots, from a practical, self-contained engineering guide perspective, sufficient to get working research and commercial agricultural roboticists quickly and easily up and running within the law. The article examines the liability framework, or rather lack of it, for agricultural robotics in EU, and their transpositions to UK law, as a case study illustrating general international legal concepts and issues. It examines how the law may provide mitigating effects on the liability regime, and how contracts can be developed between agents within it to enable smooth operation. It covers other legal aspects of operation such as the use of shared communications resources and privacy in the reuse of robot-collected data. Where there are some grey areas in current law, it argues that new proposals could be developed to reform these to promote further innovation and investment in agricultural robots. Therefore, the lack of a proper legal framework in place for the automation project may be the reason why the elected officials warned the project manager that the project cannot proceed, as they may face legal uncertainties, risks, or challenges that could affect the project’s feasibility, legitimacy, or acceptability. References: AI & SOCIETY article1

The best way to address the complaint is to involve the operations director or a representative from the operations team in the agile process. By inviting them to the validation and sprint meetings, they can provide feedback, clarify requirements, and validate the product increments. This will help to ensure that the product meets the performance indicators and the expectations of the operations department. It will also foster collaboration and transparency among the stakeholders and the project team. References:

What is a Sprint Review? | Scrum.org

What Is a Sprint Review? Goals and Tips for Running This Scrum Event

What is a sprint review? 3 steps to better sprint reviews - Atlassian

What is Stakeholder Management? - ProjectManager

What is Stakeholder Management? | A Step-by-Step Guide - Creately

According to the PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, chapter 8, page 179, incremental budgeting is a technique that allows agile teams to estimate and allocate funds for each iteration or release of a product. This technique enables the teams to respond to changing requirements and priorities, and to deliver value to the customer faster. Incremental budgeting also reduces the risk of over- or under-budgeting, as the teams can adjust their estimates based on the actual costs and benefits of each increment. The other options are not suitable for agile teams, as they do not support the agile principles of flexibility, collaboration, and customer satisfaction. Requesting the finance team to allocate a budget based on historical data may not reflect the current or future needs of the product. Providing the budget to the finance team for only the planned increments may not account for the changes that may occur during the product development. Extrapolating the budget based on the current cost performance index (CPI) may not be accurate or reliable, as the CPI may vary depending on the scope, schedule, and quality of each increment. References:

PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, chapter 8, page 179

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 8.1.3, page 269

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 341, cross-training and mentoring are two of the techniques for developing the project team. Cross-training allows team members to acquire new skills and knowledge from other team members, while mentoring provides guidance and support from experienced team members. These techniques can help the new team member to integrate into the project team, learn the project processes and procedures, and improve their performance and productivity. They can also reduce the impact of the loss of the highly skilled team resource and maintain the project performance. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 341; Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions

The project manager should have assessed the organizational culture at the beginning of the project to understand the readiness and willingness of the functional groups to adopt agile approaches. Organizational culture is the set of shared values, beliefs, and norms that influence the way people think, feel, and behave in an organization. It affects the project management style, communication, stakeholder engagement, and change management. By assessing the organizational culture, the project manager can identify the potential barriers and enablers for agile transformation, and plan appropriate strategies to address them. For example, the project manager can provide training, coaching, mentoring, and feedback to the functional groups to help them understand and embrace the agile values and principles. Circulating the project charter (option A) is a good practice, but it does not ensure that the functional groups are prepared and supportive of the agile approaches. Determining the level of maturity of the employees (option C) is a useful input, but it does not capture the whole picture of the organizational culture. Communicating the project schedule (option D) is also important, but it does not address the underlying reasons for the pushback from the functional groups. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 30-31, section 2.2.2 Organizational Culture

[Agile Practice Guide], page 16-17, section 2.1.2 Organizational Culture

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 435, question 435, answer and explanation

According to the PMBOK Guide, a servant leader is a leadership style that focuses on serving the needs of the team, empowering them, and creating a culture of trust, collaboration, and ownership. A servant leader should also motivate and inspire the team, especially when they face challenges or fatigue. If some team members are starting to complain about the length of the project, creating a risk for lack of performance at this critical stage, the project manager should schedule a team event with the project sponsor to highlight the importance of the project and recognize the work of the team. This will help the project manager to mitigate the risk by showing appreciation and gratitude to the team, reinforcing the project vision and value, and boosting the team morale and engagement. Scheduling a team event with the project sponsor is also a way of celebrating the team’s achievements and rewarding them for their efforts. Meeting with the team to reinforce their responsibilities and the consequences if the project deliverables are not completed on time is not a servant leader approach, as it may demotivate and pressure the team, and create a negative atmosphere. Applying additional controls to the project deliverables to ensure that all milestones are achieved on time is not a servant leader approach, as it may micromanage and constrain the team, and reduce their autonomy and creativity. Contacting the functional manager to ensure that team motivation remains high until the end of the project is not a servant leader approach, as it may delegate the responsibility and authority of the project manager, and undermine the relationship and trust between the project manager and the team. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 56-57, 686-687, 723-724.

According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the key principles of agile project management is to deliver value to the customer early and often1. This can be achieved by using an iterative and incremental approach, where the project team delivers working increments of the product at the end of each iteration or sprint2. The project team should also demonstrate the built portion of the product to the stakeholders and obtain their feedback and acceptance3. Therefore, the best option is to include demonstrations of the built portion of the product at the end of every sprint. Option A is incorrect because preparing performance value reports for the business on an ongoing basis may not be the most effective way to illustrate the project business value, as it may not reflect the actual functionality and usability of the product. Option C is incorrect because preparing a project report for the stakeholders and distributing it weekly may not be sufficient or timely to show the progress and value of the product, as it may not include the stakeholder input and validation. Option D is incorrect because confirming the minimum viable product (MVP) and demonstrating it to the business when it is ready may not be consistent with the agile principle of delivering value early and often, as it may delay the stakeholder feedback and satisfaction. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.3, p. 8 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.2.2.1, p. 177 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.2.2.4, p. 178

The project management team should review the project plan to evaluate if any updates should be made in response to the news that a competitor has released the latest version of a program. The project plan is a document that describes how the project will be executed, monitored, and controlled. It includes the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, communications, risks, procurements, and stakeholder management plans. The project management team should assess the impact of the competitor’s release on the project’s objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, and risks. The project management team should also consult with the project sponsor, customer, and other key stakeholders to determine their expectations and preferences regarding the project’s scope and quality. The project management team should then decide if any changes or updates are needed to the project plan to ensure the project’s success and value. The project management team should follow the change management process to request, analyze, approve, and implement any changes to the project plan.

The other options are not the best actions for the project management team to take in this situation. Crashing the existing schedule with additional resources to deliver more features may not be feasible or effective, as it may increase the project’s cost, complexity, and risk. It may also not address the customer’s needs or the market’s demand, as the features may not be relevant or valuable. The project management team should not rush to add more features without validating their necessity and feasibility. Stopping the project immediately as the market opportunity has already been missed may be premature and wasteful, as it may disregard the project’s benefits and potential. It may also damage the project’s reputation and stakeholder’s trust. The project management team should not abandon the project without evaluating its viability and value. Continuing with the project plan and target delivery date as expected may be unrealistic and risky, as it may ignore the competitor’s influence and the customer’s feedback. It may also result in delivering a product that is outdated or inferior. The project management team should not proceed with the project plan without reviewing its alignment and suitability. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2, “Develop Project Management Plan”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.6, “Perform Integrated Change Control”

PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2, “Developing the Project Management Plan” 1

The project manager should analyze both projects to determine the most effective use of common resources, such as human, material, equipment, or facilities1. This will help the project manager to allocate and balance the resources across the two projects, and to identify and resolve any resource conflicts or shortages2. This may also help to reduce the duration of the critical project by ensuring that the required resources are available when needed. The other options are not appropriate or feasible in this situation. Applying fast-tracking techniques to compress the schedule of the critical project is not possible, as the question states that the schedule does not have activities that can be overlapped3. Using resource optimization to justify requesting more resources for the critical project may not be realistic, as the question implies that the project manager does not have access to additional resources4. Providing schedule optimization training to the project teams to improve their skills may not have an immediate impact on the duration of the critical project, and may also consume more time and resources. References: 1: PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 201. 2: PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 202. 3: PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 211. 4: PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 203. : PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 212.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3, the project manager should use conflict management techniques to resolve conflicts among team members and stakeholders.3

Some of the conflict management techniques are: problem solving, compromising, smoothing, forcing, and withdrawing.3

In this scenario, the project manager has tried problem solving (holding a meeting to work out a permanent solution) and compromising (asking them to find a way to resolve the issues), but these techniques were unsuccessful.4

The project manager should not use smoothing (emphasizing areas of agreement and avoiding areas of disagreement), forcing (imposing a solution), or withdrawing (avoiding or postponing the conflict), as these techniques may not address the root cause of the conflict or may worsen the situation.4

Therefore, the project manager should escalate the issue to a higher authority, such as the functional manager, the sponsor, or the steering committee, who have more power and influence in a weak matrix environment.4

Escalating the issue to a higher authority may help to resolve the conflict, protect the project objectives, and maintain the team performance and morale.4

The references for this answer are:

1: PMP Exam Questions | 100% Free PMP Example Questions 2: PMP Practice Exam 1 | Free PMP Exam Questions 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Project Management Institute, 2017, pp. 349-350. 4: [Conflict Management Techniques for the PMP Exam - PM Study Circle] : [PMP Exam Prep: Project Human Resource Management - Simplilearn]

 In this situation, the project manager should communicate with the client about the third-party supplier’s situation and request payment. This is because the agreement was that payment would be made after the organization receives payment from the client. By explaining the situation to the client, the project manager can potentially expedite the payment process and prevent the withdrawal of team members from the project, thereby minimizing project disruption. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 12.1: Plan Procurement Management, and Section 12.3: Control Procurements.

 The product backlog is the primary source of requirements for changes to be made to the product and serves as a communication tool between the Product Owner and the Development Team1. It is also a tool for transparency where stakeholders can see the progress of the product and understand what’s planned for future development1. Therefore, it is essential to involve the stakeholders in the product backlog discussions, as they can provide valuable feedback, insights, and expectations that can shape the product vision and goal. Rescheduling the meeting to ensure the majority of stakeholders are present is the best option, as it shows respect for their input and ensures their engagement and alignment with the product development process. The project manager should also communicate the importance and benefits of stakeholder involvement in the product backlog discussions and seek their commitment and availability for the rescheduled meeting.

The other options are not as effective as option C. Option A is not feasible, as meeting with each stakeholder individually would be time-consuming and inefficient. It would also create inconsistency and confusion in the product backlog, as different stakeholders may have conflicting or overlapping requirements. Option B is not desirable, as proceeding with prioritization of the product backlog based on previous lessons learned would ignore the current needs and expectations of the stakeholders. It would also risk losing their trust and support, as they may feel excluded or disregarded in the product development process. Option D is not appropriate, as proceeding with the meeting with only one executive manager would not represent the diverse perspectives and interests of the stakeholders. It would also create a power imbalance and potential bias in the product backlog, as the executive manager may have more influence or authority over the product decisions. References: 1 How to Manage Product Backlog (Strategies, Tips & Tricks)

According to the PMP Exam Content Outline, one of the tasks of a project manager in the leading domain is to “Empower team members and stakeholders by providing them with the level of authority to complete the assigned activities and resolve issues in order to enhance project performance.” This implies that the project manager should empower team members to participate in decision-making and take ownership of actions, especially in megaprojects that involve multiple stakeholders from different geographical areas and cultural backgrounds. Empowering team members can improve team productivity by increasing their motivation, commitment, creativity, and accountability. It can also foster a culture of collaboration, trust, and respect among the diverse team members and stakeholders. Empowering team members can also help the project manager to cope with the complexity and uncertainty of megaprojects, as team members can act more autonomously and responsively to the changing project environment. References:

: PMP Exam Content Outline

: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.4.2.3 and 9.4.3.1

: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 4.5.1 and 4.5.2

: Megaprojects – Concepts, Strategies, and Practices for Success1

: The Three Secrets of Megaproject Success: Clear Strategic Vision, Total Alignment, and Adapting to Complexity2

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, an agile team is a cross-functional group of people that is self-organized and empowered to deliver the project objectives. The agile team should have the following characteristics1:

They are collaborative and work together as a cohesive unit

They have generalizing specialists who can perform multiple roles and tasks

They are co-located or use effective communication tools to overcome geographic barriers

They are adaptive and responsive to changing requirements and feedback

They are empowered and accountable for their work and decisions Therefore, the best option for the project leader is to choose a team whose members have more general aptitudes and can collaborate on different tasks, as this aligns with the agile principles and values. References: 1 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 21.

The project manager should not compare the velocity of two agile teams as teams can size items differently. Velocity is a measure of the amount of work a team can complete in a given time period. It is not a measure of the quality or value of the work. Comparing the velocity of two teams can lead to inaccurate conclusions and unhealthy competition. Instead, the project manager should use the velocity of each team to help them plan and forecast their own work, and focus on other metrics that reflect the outcomes and benefits of the project. References: Agile Practice Guide, page 48; PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 97.

According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the tools and techniques for the Plan Risk Management process is the review of lessons learned from previous projects. This helps the project manager to identify potential risks, causes, and responses for the current project. By studying and applying the lessons learned from the failed project, the project manager can avoid repeating the same mistakes and improve the project performance. This is also consistent with the principle of continuous improvement and organizational learning. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 397-398. PMP Sample Test Questions, question 3. Free PMP Exam Practice Questions, question 3. PMP Questions page 485, question 485.

The definition of done (DoD) is a clear and concise list of requirements that a deliverable must meet to be considered complete and acceptable by the main stakeholder. The DoD helps to ensure that the quality standards are met and that the deliverables are aligned with the stakeholder’s expectations. The project manager should reinforce the DoD during sprint planning so that the team has a common understanding of what needs to be done and how to do it. This will help to prevent the deliverables from being rejected during the next iteration. Submitting a change request to prioritize resolutions for the quality issue (option A) may be necessary, but it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of clarity and agreement on the DoD. Assuring that the product backlog is properly prioritized to avoid dependencies that cause rejection (option C) is a good practice, but it does not ensure that the deliverables will meet the quality specifications. Creating a dedicated sprint to complete all of the pending specifications from previous sprints (option D) may be a viable option, but it may also delay the project and increase the cost. The best option is to reinforce the DoD and ensure that the team delivers what the stakeholder expects. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 176, section 5.4.2.1 Definition of Done

[Agile Practice Guide], page 54, section 4.2.2.1 Definition of Done

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 425, question 425, answer and explanation

The stakeholder engagement plan and communication strategy are two key documents that guide the project manager in managing stakeholder expectations and interactions. The project manager should review these documents to identify the level of interest and influence of the stakeholder from the legal department, and determine the best way to communicate and involve them in the project. Escalating the issue to the project sponsor may not be necessary or appropriate at this stage, as the stakeholder may not be critical for the project success. Engaging the stakeholder and ensuring all requirements are captured may not be feasible or effective, as the stakeholder may not have any input or interest in the product design. Reviewing the product requirements and updating the stakeholder register may not address the root cause of the stakeholder’s lack of participation, as these documents do not specify how to engage and communicate with the stakeholder. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 13: Stakeholder Engagement, Section 13.2: Plan Stakeholder Engagement, Section 13.3: Manage Stakeholder Engagement, Section 13.4: Monitor Stakeholder Engagement

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 2: Planning, Task 5: Plan Stakeholder Engagement

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 2: Planning, Task 5: Plan Stakeholder Engagement

 In a situation where a team member has made disrespectful remarks about another team member, it is the project manager’s responsibility to address the issue directly with the offending team member. This can be done by coordinating a video conference to discuss the issue, understand the reasons behind the behavior, and find a resolution. This approach aligns with the principles of conflict management in project management, where the project manager is expected to handle conflicts within the team directly and professionally1. It’s important to note that disrespect in the workplace is toxic and can affect the entire team and organization2. Therefore, it’s crucial for the project manager to address such issues promptly and effectively. References: 2

https://www.getcampfire.com/blog/dealing-with-disrespect

The project manager should have established ground rules before the discussion started. Ground rules are essential in any meeting to ensure that everyone understands the expectations and guidelines for the meeting. They help to manage the behavior of the participants and prevent personal arguments. Ground rules could include respecting others’ opinions, avoiding personal attacks, and focusing on the issue at hand. By setting these rules, the project manager could have prevented the situation where stakeholders were in constant disagreement and using personal arguments to support their position1234. References:

https://www.apm.org.uk/blog/secrets-of-successful-stakeholder-management-as-a-project-manager/

https://www.teamgantt.com/guide/stakeholder-management

In project management, it’s crucial to address performance issues promptly and constructively. Providing feedback and coaching the team member during the iterative design stage can help improve their performance12. This approach aligns with the principles of continuous improvement and learning, which are key aspects of iterative design stages. Coaching involves helping the team member understand their areas of improvement, providing guidance on how to enhance their skills, and offering support as they work towards improving their performance34. This not only helps the individual team member but also contributes to the overall performance and success of the project12.

According to the PMBOK Guide, scope management in agile projects is different from scope management in predictive life cycle projects. In agile projects, the scope is not fixed or detailed at the beginning of the project, but rather it is progressively elaborated and refined throughout the project. Agile projects use an adaptive and iterative approach to deliver value to the customer in short and frequent increments, called sprints or iterations. Agile projects use techniques such as user stories, product backlog, story mapping, story points, and minimum viable product (MVP) to define, prioritize, estimate, and validate the scope. Therefore, the project manager should spend a short amount of time defining the scope and building prototypes to refine the requirements, rather than creating a detailed scope baseline or a rigid plan. By doing so, the project manager can:

Involve the customer and the team in defining and clarifying the scope

Incorporate feedback and changes quickly and easily

Deliver the most valuable features and functionalities first

Reduce waste and rework

Increase customer satisfaction and trust

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Creating a scope baseline and putting the rest as backlog activities would limit the flexibility and responsiveness of the project, and would not allow the scope to evolve based on customer needs and feedback.

Estimating the work the team can complete and defining story sizes to keep the project under control would be part of the scope management process, but not the only or the best way to manage and control the scope. The project manager should also prioritize, validate, and adjust the scope as the project progresses.

Developing a plan to complete more work in less time would not be realistic or sustainable, and would compromise the quality and value of the project. The project manager should focus on delivering the right work, not more work. References:

Scope Management | PMI

Agile Scope Management: Refactor Your PMP - LeadingAgile

Considerations for Agile/Adaptive Projects | PMP - GreyCampus

The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) suggests that risks associated with resources should be addressed in the resource management plan. In this case, the risk is that the materials may not be printed on time due to other higher priority projects. Therefore, the project manager should include a risk response in the resource management plan to mitigate this risk. This could involve strategies such as contingency planning, alternative scheduling, or negotiating priority with the printing services. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Section 9.5.2.2: Plan Risk Responses.

 In a situation where a contractor has not yet confirmed that they can meet the required schedule, the project manager should take proactive steps to manage the potential risk. This includes planning the task delivery with the contractor or vendor, and highlighting the criticality of the current situation1. This approach aligns with the principles of effective project management, which emphasize the importance of communication, risk management, and proactive problem-solving. References: NEC Contract

When a new risk is identified and communicated directly to management, the project manager should first discuss with the consultant to understand why the risk was escalated. This will help the project manager to understand the severity of the risk and why it was not brought to the attention of the team first. Based on this understanding, the project manager can then decide the next steps, which could include including the risk in the risk assessment, entering it into the risk register, or escalating it further. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 11.1: Plan Risk Management, and Section 11.5: Plan Risk Responses.

When there are changes in the project requirements, such as changes in the government’s cybersecurity requirements, it is important to manage these changes through a formal change control process1. This process usually involves documenting the change, estimating the effort required to implement the change, modifying the project schedule to include the change, and getting approval from the customer or project sponsor1. In this case, since the design changes can be made at no additional cost, the project manager should direct the team to request a change through the change control process to manage the new cybersecurity requirements1.

During the development of a product, when multiple identified risks have now become issues, it is important to prioritize these issues and have the team resolve them. This approach aligns with the principles of agile project management, which emphasize the importance of addressing issues as they arise and adjusting plans accordingly. By prioritizing the user stories with issues, the project manager ensures that the most critical issues are addressed first, thereby minimizing their impact on the team’s velocity and the overall project timeline. References:

https://www.coursera.org/gb/articles/how-to-manage-project-risk

https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-product-development-11194

 In a project team, it’s crucial to ensure effective communication and active participation from all team members1. If only a few team members are actively participating during meetings, it can lead to misunderstandings and hinder the project’s progress1. One way to address this issue is to use round-robin check-ins during meetings1. This technique ensures that each team member has an opportunity to speak, share updates, and express their views1. It can help to improve communication, foster collaboration, and reduce misunderstandings1. References: 1 The secrets to running project status meetings that work.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the first step in conflict resolution is to understand the root cause of the conflict. In this case, the project manager should first have a direct conversation with the functional manager to understand their perspective and the reasons behind their reluctance to release the staff. This approach aligns with the PMI’s emphasis on communication and stakeholder engagement as key aspects of project management. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management, Section 9.5: Manage Team

The correct way to put an organization on the proper path to changing their mindset to an agile approach involves a shift in the way the company views, reviews, and assesses employees. This is because an agile mindset is about being flexible and adaptable. It’s about individuals or even entire companies having an agile understanding of values and, as a result, acting in an agile manner1. It’s not just about hiring employees who specialize in agile approaches or assigning employees to agile projects. It’s about changing the culture of the organization, which includes how employees are viewed, reviewed, and assessed2. References: Mooncamp, Forbes