PMP Exam Dumps - PMI Project-Management-Professional Questions and Answers

 The project manager should share the organization’s decision with the team and make plans to adopt an agile approach in the upcoming project because this is the best way to align the team with the new direction and prepare them for the change. Agile approaches are based on values and principles that emphasize collaboration, flexibility, and customer satisfaction, which may differ from the traditional predictive methods that the team is used to. Therefore, the project manager should communicate the rationale and benefits of the agile approach, and involve the team in planning and executing the project using agile practices and tools. The other options are not the best choices because they do not support the organization’s decision or the project sponsor’s preference. Preparing a risk report that captures the probability and impact of risks, and then sharing it with the project sponsor (option A) may imply that the project manager is resistant or skeptical about the agile approach, and may not address the team’s readiness or capability. Making a request to human resources for new team members who have agile experience (option C) may undermine the existing team’s skills and motivation, and may not be feasible or necessary. Asking the project sponsor to change the approach back to predictive as that is the team’s strength (option D) may contradict the organization’s strategy and the project sponsor’s authority, and may not reflect the project manager’s willingness to learn and adapt. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 686-687. Exam PMP topic 1 question 434 discussion. Episode 434: The PMP® Exam is Changing on 1 July 2020.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the product owner is the person responsible for defining and prioritizing the product backlog, and ensuring that the product delivers value to the customer and stakeholders1. The product owner also collaborates with the project team and the project manager to review the work in progress and provide feedback2. Therefore, if a stakeholder has a new requirement or a change request, the correct procedure is to provide it directly to the product owner, who will evaluate it and decide whether to add it to the product backlog or not. The other options are not the correct procedures for new requirements in a hybrid project. The change control board (CCB) is a group of stakeholders who review and approve change requests in a traditional project, but not in a hybrid project that follows agile principles3. The project sponsor is the person or group who provides the financial resources and support for the project, but not the owner of the product requirements or scope. The project manager is the person who leads the project team and manages the project work, but not the person who defines or prioritizes the product backlog. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 49

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 50

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 115

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 51

In project management, the Finish to Start (FS) dependency is the most common type of dependency. This is a mandatory dependency where one task must be finished before the next task can start. In the context of the question, the product must be tested (finish testing) before it can be released to the customer (start releasing). This aligns with the principles outlined in the PMBOK® Guide, which specifies that certain tasks have logical relationships that dictate their order of execution12.

 In the context of Agile methodologies, such as Scrum, which is often used in conjunction with PMP practices, the daily standup meeting serves as a platform for team members to communicate progress and identify impediments to the sprint goal. When a delay is reported, especially one that involves an external vendor, it is crucial for the project manager to facilitate a resolution that does not disrupt the team’s workflow. The project manager should gather all necessary details from the team member to understand the issue fully and then work directly with the vendor to resolve it. This approach aligns with the principles of effective communication and vendor management, ensuring that the project manager has the information needed to address the problem without overburdening the team member with responsibilities that fall outside their scope.

The answer is supported by best practices in vendor management and communication as outlined in the PMBOK® Guide and Agile methodologies, which emphasize the importance of the project manager’s role in addressing issues with external vendors and maintaining the flow of the sprint. Additionally, the approach of engaging with the vendor directly is consistent with the guidance provided in the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) reference materials, which advocate for clear communication and negotiation to resolve vendor-related issues and conflicts.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.1.3.1, the stakeholder register is a project document that identifies the stakeholders who have an interest in the project or may be affected by the project. The stakeholder register should be updated whenever there is a change in the stakeholder community, such as when a new stakeholder is identified or an existing stakeholder leaves the project. The new business unit manager is a new stakeholder who has authority and influence over the project, and therefore should be added to the stakeholder register. The stakeholder engagement plan, which is a subsidiary plan of the project management plan, describes the strategies and actions to engage the stakeholders and manage their expectations throughout the project life cycle. The stakeholder engagement plan should also be updated to reflect the new stakeholder’s current and desired level of engagement, as well as the communication and engagement activities planned for the new stakeholder. The other options are not the best next steps for the project manager, because they do not address the need to formally identify and document the new stakeholder and plan for their engagement. Contacting the previous business unit manager may be helpful, but it is not a formal project document. Sending the new manager a copy of the project charter may be informative, but it does not capture the new stakeholder’s needs and expectations. Scheduling a meeting with the new manager may be beneficial, but it should be done after updating the stakeholder register and the stakeholder engagement plan. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.1.3.1, page 513

PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, chapter 2, page 30

Budget at Completion (BAC) is the total planned value of the project. It is calculated by multiplying the number of work units by the cost per unit.

BAC = Total miles × Cost per mile

= 10 miles × US$15,000

= US$150,000

The percentage of work completed (80%) is irrelevant for this specific calculation, which only asks for the original planned total budget (BAC).

If the client has already approved a change through a formal project order amendment, the project manager must initiate re-planning with the new scope. This aligns with adaptive and traditional approaches where major scope changes require updates to planning documents.

Option A delays necessary rework.

Option C addresses risk mitigation, but re-planning must begin first.

Option D is unnecessary because the client has already accepted the amendment.

Conflict management begins with understanding the source and stage of the disagreement. Only then can the appropriate resolution technique (collaborating, compromising, accommodating, etc.) be selected. The PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition advocates using emotional intelligence and analysis to manage team dynamics effectively.

Option A escalates before analysis.

Option C assumes a resolution technique without understanding the problem.

Option D bypasses the Agile team’s empowerment and problem-solving structure.

 In an agile project, it’s crucial to ensure that all requirements, including compliance standards, are met. The project manager should meet with the compliance team to understand their requirements and ensure they are included in the Definition of Done (DoD) for each story. The DoD is a clear and concise list of requirements that a software increment must meet to be considered complete. By including the compliance requirements in the DoD, the project manager can ensure that each increment of the project meets the organization’s compliance standards, thereby mitigating the risk of non-compliance. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials.

 The project manager should call for a team meeting to identify the root cause for the declining performance, as this is part of managing project team. Managing project team involves tracking team member performance, providing feedback, resolving issues, and managing team changes. By calling for a team meeting, the project manager can engage the team members in problem-solving, address any conflicts or misunderstandings, and motivate them to improve their performance. The other options are not the best ways to improve the situation, as they either ignore, delay, or bypass the team involvement. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.4

PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, Domain III, Task 10

PMP Sample Test Questions, Question 175

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

When managing stakeholder conflict, the most effective method is collaboration—bringing the parties together to jointly explore options and find mutually agreeable solutions. Option A supports this by fostering creative problem solving and collaboration.

* B might escalate tension by involving unrelated parties.

* C and D focus on history and personal matters rather than resolution.

In Scrum, the product owner is the sole person responsible for managing the product backlog. When a customer requests new features mid-sprint, it is inappropriate to add them directly to the sprint. The correct procedure is to have the Scrum Master direct the customer to the product owner, who will evaluate the request and decide whether to include it in the product backlog for future prioritization.

According to the Agile Practice Guide and the Scrum Guide, only the product owner has the authority to accept or reject items in the product backlog. The Scrum Master facilitates communication and protects the team from scope creep during the sprint.

Option A (Definition of Done) is useful for clarifying quality, not for managing scope changes.

Option C (Acceptance criteria) applies to existing backlog items, not new feature requests.

Option D (Backlog prioritization) is the product owner’s job and only happens after the sprint, not mid-sprint.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In agile planning, a story estimated at 100 points indicates it is too large to be actionable. The best practice is to break it down into smaller, more manageable stories that fit within a sprint or iteration. This enables incremental progress and continuous delivery.

* A delays addressing the problem.

* B misunderstands the purpose of story points.

* C uses negotiation inappropriately—estimates should reflect effort, not negotiation.

Before taking any action, the project manager should gather more context and engage the team to assess feasibility. This includes evaluating schedule impacts, resource constraints, regulatory implications, and whether scope trade-offs are required. This approach aligns with the PMBOK® Guide’s recommendation to evaluate change impacts before making decisions.

Option A is misaligned; root cause analysis is more appropriate for problem resolution, not for scope acceleration.

Option B assumes approval and feasibility without review.

Option C applies to Agile backlog reprioritization but this is a regulatory milestone, likely not in a product backlog.

In Agile, the Product Owner is responsible for prioritizing the product backlog, which includes both features and technical work (such as reducing technical debt). If the technical debt is critical for performance, it must be addressed even at the expense of delivering new features. Once the team and Product Owner agree, these tasks should be pulled into the sprint backlog during sprint planning.

Per the Agile Practice Guide, “The product backlog may include technical work, bug fixes, and other items necessary for product health—not just features.” Adding technical debt items to the sprint backlog is an accepted and necessary practice for long-term product sustainability.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

When stakeholders are misaligned in expectations or outcomes, the best approach is to facilitate a collaborative discussion, such as a workshop. This helps reach consensus on project goals, aligns expectations early, and ensures shared ownership moving forward.

A may be helpful, but stakeholder alignment is the project manager's responsibility.

B may come too late without first ensuring alignment.

C provides one-way communication rather than engagement.

D is correct as it fosters collaboration and clarity.

In government-funded projects during political transitions, proactive stakeholder engagement is essential to maintain continuity. The project sponsor has the political influence and position to communicate with the incoming administration to highlight the project's progress, strategic value, and alignment with national/international goals.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition, managing stakeholder relationships and ensuring continuous support is critical in such scenarios.

Option A delays progress unnecessarily.

Option C supports documentation but not continuity.

Option D is passive and ignores risk mitigation.

 In an agile environment, a servant leader’s role includes removing barriers that prevent the team from progressing. When a deliverable is completed but not taken up by the certifying team for an extended period, it becomes an impediment to the project’s progress. The servant leader should review the process to understand why the delay is occurring and take action to remove this impediment. This may involve discussions with the second team to expedite certification or adjusting the process to prevent such delays in the future. The goal is to eliminate the bottleneck and facilitate a smooth workflow.

The approach is consistent with the principles outlined in the PMBOK® Guide and the Agile Practice Guide, which advocate for proactive impediment removal by the project manager or Scrum Master123456. Additionally, the Professional in Business Analysis materials support the concept of addressing process-related issues to optimize project outcomes78.

When future performance is expected to continue at the same cost efficiency (CPI), the formula to calculate Estimate at Completion (EAC) is:

EAC = BAC / CPI

Step 1:

CPI = EV / AC = 145 / 170 ≈ 0.8529

Step 2:

EAC = 285 / 0.8529 ≈ 334 person/day

Thus, the correct estimate at completion is approximately 334 person/day.

Option B is the original BAC and does not reflect cost inefficiency.

Options C and D are incorrect based on the formula and data provided.

When conflict arises between team members, especially around assumptions or decisions, the project manager should address the root cause while reminding the team of the project’s priorities. Discussing the schedule impact emphasizes collaboration over personal preference.

The PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition encourages timely conflict resolution and prioritization of project objectives over individual views.

Option A is not a collaborative or long-term solution.

Option B is extreme and not the first course of action.

Option C may overlook critical input and reduce team trust.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should be involved in the procurement process to ensure that the project requirements are clearly defined and communicated to the potential suppliers1. The project manager should also verify that the project objectives are aligned with the business needs and the expectations of the stakeholders before approving an agreement2. Therefore, the best option is to ensure that the requirements for the project are understood and that the objectives are verified before approval of an agreement. Option B is incorrect because informing the project sponsor that there cannot be any changes to the scope of the project is unrealistic and may not account for the possible risks and uncertainties that may arise during the project execution3. Option C is incorrect because notifying the project sponsor that the project manager cannot be involved in the agreement negotiation process is not a proactive or collaborative approach, and may result in a poor or unsuitable agreement for the project. Option D is incorrect because asking the project sponsor to involve the legal department in the negotiation for the project agreement is not the responsibility of the project manager, and may not address the issue of the project manager’s participation in the procurement process. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.1.3.1, p. 465 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.1.3.1, p. 89 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 5.6.3.1, p. 161 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.3.1, p. 473 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.3.2, p. 474

A statement of work (SOW) is a formal document that outlines the specific tasks, deliverables, and requirements of a project. It serves as a contractual agreement between a vendor and a client, providing a comprehensive description of the work to be performed. A SOW is used to document the project deliverables when outsourcing work to external parties, as it defines the scope, schedule, quality, and payment terms of the project. A SOW can also include a work breakdown structure (WBS), which is a hierarchical decomposition of the project deliverables into smaller, manageable components. References:

What Is a Statement of Work (SOW)? - Coursera

Statement Of Work Ultimate Guide: Simple Definition & Template

What Is a Statement of Work? Definition & Examples - ProjectManager

When the project manager identifies that the delay on the critical path was caused by the client, it is essential to formally document this and then seek a discussion with the client. This supports transparency, allows for resolution, and protects the contractor from inappropriate penalties.

Per the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition and PMI's Contract Management standards, documenting the root cause and opening a dialogue is the first proper step in addressing contractual disputes.

Option B is a valid legal step, but only after engagement and documentation.

Option C refers to an internal party (sponsor) who may not be relevant here.

Option D may support analysis but does not immediately address the contractual issue.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

When a new compliance policy is introduced, the project manager must evaluate how it may impact the project. Addressing blockers (obstacles that arise due to the new policy) ensures the project can continue progressing while maintaining compliance. This is a proactive approach to risk and issue management.

* A ignores a potential external constraint (noncompliance risk).

* B is vague and does not focus on risk response.

* D may be useful but is not immediately action-oriented.

* C aligns with risk management best practices.

During execution, any addition to scope must go through the formal change control process. The project manager should initiate a change request for proper evaluation and approval. This ensures that scope, budget, and schedule impacts are assessed before proceeding.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition, any changes to the baseline during execution must follow the change control procedures defined in the governance structure.

Option A risks scope creep.

Option B is helpful but not sufficient as a next step.

Option C closes the door without considering the critical nature of the request.