PMP Exam Dumps - PMI Project-Management-Professional Questions and Answers

 The project manager should encourage frequent small team meetings with two or three team members to overcome the challenge of finding a suitable time for the daily standup. This is because the daily standup is an important agile practice that helps the team to coordinate their work, share progress, identify impediments, and plan the next steps. However, when the team members are located in different time zones, it can be difficult to schedule a common time that is convenient for everyone. Therefore, the project manager should facilitate smaller and more frequent meetings among the team members who are in the same or adjacent time zones, and ensure that the information is communicated and documented across the whole team. This way, the project manager can maintain the benefits of the daily standup while respecting the team members’ availability and preferences.

The other options are not correct because they do not address the issue of coordination and communication among the team members. Giving up the daily standup and replacing it with a daily report would reduce the interaction and collaboration among the team members, and might lead to delays, misunderstandings, and conflicts. Letting the team members decide themselves if they want to join the meeting would create inconsistency and confusion, and might result in some team members being left out or uninformed. Requiring all team members to join the daily standup regardless of the meeting time would impose an unfair and unrealistic burden on some team members, and might affect their motivation, productivity, and quality of work. References: Agile Practice Guide, section 4.2.1, page 47, PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 100

This option reflects the agile mindset of inspecting and adapting to the current situation, and finding the best way to deliver value to the customer. The other options are either too rigid (B and C) or too risky (D) for an agile project.

However, this is only a suggestion based on one source of reference. You may find other sources that support a different answer, or have a different interpretation of the question. Therefore, you should always check the validity and reliability of the information you find online, and compare it with your own knowledge and experience.

I hope this helps you with your question. If you need more information, you can use the links below to access the web search results. Thank you for using Bing.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project work according to the project management plan and implementing approved changes1. If the project manager discovers that the blueprints received from the client appear incomplete, the first thing to do is to consult with the client to determine if project execution should be continued or if changes are needed. The client is the source of the project requirements and the ultimate authority on the project scope2. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to do first. Rescheduling the project execution date is a change that requires a formal change request and approval from the change control board3. Continuing project execution using the current blueprints from the client may result in rework, waste, or defects if the blueprints are not accurate or complete4. Escalating this issue to the project sponsor is not the first step, as the project sponsor is not the owner of the project requirements or scope. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 95

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 141

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 115

4: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 149

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33

The project manager plays the role of a mediator in this situation, as this is part of managing stakeholder engagement. Managing stakeholder engagement involves communicating and working with stakeholders to meet their needs and expectations, address issues, and foster appropriate stakeholder involvement. By scheduling a meeting with the two stakeholders, the project manager acts as a neutral third party who facilitates the discussion and helps them reach a mutually acceptable solution. The other options are not the best ways to describe the project manager’s role, as they either imply a biased, authoritative, or passive approach to conflict resolution. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.3.2.4

PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, Domain II, Task 9

PMP Sample Test Questions, Question 393

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.4.2.6, the Monte Carlo method is a simulation technique that uses probability distributions and random sampling to compute possible outcomes of cost or schedule estimates.3

The Monte Carlo method can produce different results each time it is run, depending on the input data and the random numbers generated.4

Therefore, the project manager and the stakeholder may have used different input data, assumptions, or scenarios when applying the Monte Carlo method, resulting in different estimations for the budget.4

The project manager and the stakeholder should compare and validate their estimations, and agree on a common baseline for the budget.

The references for this answer are:

1: PMP Exam Questions | 100% Free PMP Example Questions 2: PMP Practice Exam 1 | Free PMP Exam Questions 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Project Management Institute, 2017, pp. 200-201. 4: [Monte Carlo Simulation: What Is It and How Does It Work? - Palisade] : [Project Cost Management: The Ultimate Guide - ProjectManager.com]

The agile project lead should invite the senior manager to the next planning meeting to ensure that the senior manager’s expectations are aligned with the product vision and backlog. This is consistent with the agile principle of customer collaboration over contract negotiation1. The agile project lead should also explain how the product backlog is prioritized and refined based on the value and feedback from the stakeholders2. Assuring the senior manager that these features will be queued up in the next sprint (A) is not a good option since it may create unrealistic expectations and compromise the quality and scope of the product. Meeting with the team to understand why the senior manager’s features were not included (B) is not relevant since the team is not responsible for defining the product features, but for delivering them. Sending the product roadmap to the senior manager (D) is not sufficient since it may not address the senior manager’s concerns or questions. References:

1: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.1

2: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.2.1

 The project manager should refer to the requirements traceability matrix to verify whether the customer’s claims are valid or not. The requirements traceability matrix is a grid that links product requirements from their origin to the deliverables that satisfy them1. It helps to ensure that each requirement adds business value by linking it to the business and project objectives2. It also provides a means to track requirements throughout the project life cycle, helping to ensure that requirements approved in the project scope statement are delivered at the end of the project3. Revising the project scope baseline (B) is not a good option since it would imply accepting the change requests without verifying their validity. Escalating the change request to the project sponsor © is also not advisable since the project manager should first analyze the situation and propose a solution. Reviewing the approved project charter (D) is not relevant since the project charter does not contain the detailed product requirements. References:

1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Glossary, page 717

2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.3.1

3: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.6.3.1

According to the PMBOK Guide1, project communication management includes the processes of planning, managing, and monitoring project communications. The first process, plan communications management, involves determining the information and communication needs of the project stakeholders, such as the sponsor. The project manager should have analyzed the sponsor’s communication requirements, such as the type, format, frequency, and level of detail of the information they need, as well as their preferred communication channels and methods. By doing so, the project manager could have designed and implemented a communication system that meets the sponsor’s expectations and needs, and avoids any dissatisfaction or complaints. The other options are not the best preventive actions, as they are either reactive or irrelevant. Confirming that the portal is providing adequate information, verifying that the project team is following the communications management plan, and ensuring the sponsor had the necessary skills to use the portal are all actions that could be taken after the situation has occurred, but they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of alignment between the communication system and the sponsor’s requirements. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition

Project Communication Management - Five Steps | PMI

ProjectManagement.com - Project Communication Management

According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the tools and techniques for developing the project management plan is expert judgement1. This involves obtaining guidance and advice from knowledgeable and experienced individuals or groups, such as subject matter experts, consultants, industry associations, or professional and technical organizations. By consulting a senior project manager within the organization, the project manager can leverage their expert judgement to understand the interdependencies of the work items, the industry standards and best practices, and the organizational processes and policies that may affect the project planning. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not address the issue of the project manager’s lack of familiarity with the industry and the work items. Consulting the project sponsor, the product owner, or the senior developer may provide some useful information, but they are not the best sources of expert judgement for the project manager in this situation. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 89

The project manager should implement a project management information system (PMIS) to avoid this situation in the future. A PMIS is a system that provides the tools and techniques to gather, integrate, and disseminate the outputs of project management processes. A PMIS can help the project manager and the team to manage the project documents, such as the requirements document, and ensure that they are updated, controlled, and shared in a timely and consistent manner. A PMIS can also facilitate collaboration and communication among the project team and other stakeholders, and reduce the risk of errors, conflicts, and rework. Encouraging better team communication by positioning team members closer together may not be enough, as it does not address the issue of document management and version control. Updating the communications management plan to ensure correct delivery of the latest version may not be effective, as it does not provide the tools and techniques to implement the plan. Restricting team members from sending the requirements documents via email may not be feasible or appropriate, as it may limit the flexibility and accessibility of the project information. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4: Integration, Section 4.4: Manage Project Knowledge, Section 4.5: Monitor and Control Project Work

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 2: Planning, Task 6: Plan Business Analysis Information Management

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 2: Planning, Task 6: Plan Business Analysis Information Management

The project manager should schedule a kick-off session to explain the problems of the project and gain approval and support from the stakeholders. This will help to align the expectations, clarify the objectives, and address the concerns of the stakeholders. A kick-off session is a tool and technique of the Develop Project Charter process, which is the first process in the project integration management knowledge area. Sending communications for clarification, demonstrating the performance indexes and recommending corrective actions, or speaking with the sponsor and explaining the situation are all possible actions that the project manager can take after the kick-off session, but they are not the first action that the project manager should take to alleviate the stakeholders’ concerns. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 49; Agile Practice Guide, page 26.

The project manager should request the project sponsor prioritize and if necessary, allocate additional budget so the team can work on a single project. This is because working on multiple projects at the same time can reduce the team’s focus, productivity, quality, and morale. It can also increase the risk of delays, errors, conflicts, and rework. Agile approaches require dedicated and cross-functional teams that can deliver value in short iterations. Therefore, the project manager should seek the support of the project sponsor to ensure that the team has the necessary resources and time to work on one project at a time. Providing an incentive plan so the team members will work more unaccounted hours on multiple projects (option B) is not a good solution, as it may lead to burnout, stress, and dissatisfaction among the team members. It may also violate the labor laws and ethical standards. Brainstorming with the team members on how they can deliver on multiple projects within the given budget (option C) is a possible option, but it may not be realistic or feasible, as it may compromise the quality and scope of the projects. Instructing the team members to spread evenly across projects so mistakes will not occur within the current budget (option D) is not a good option, as it may create confusion, duplication, and inconsistency among the team members. It may also prevent the team from forming, storming, norming, and performing as a cohesive unit. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 52-53, section 2.4.2 Project Team

[Agile Practice Guide], page 26-27, section 3.1.1 Team Composition

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 455, question 455, answer and explanation

In a fixed time and budget project, the project manager needs to balance the customer’s expectations and the project’s profitability. If the customer wants the development of a core component to be based on agile practices, the project manager should use a hybrid contract that combines both fixed and agile elements. This way, the project manager can accommodate the customer’s changing requirements while maintaining control over the project scope, schedule, and cost. A tiered contract for fixed and agile components allows the project manager to define the fixed deliverables and the agile deliverables separately, and assign different payment terms and conditions for each. For example, the fixed deliverables can be paid based on milestones, while the agile deliverables can be paid based on iterations or value delivered. This also helps the project manager to manage the risks and uncertainties associated with the agile component. Providing alternatives to scope change at specific project phases within the contract is another way to control the development costs and ensure the profitability of the project. The project manager can specify the criteria and process for requesting and approving scope changes, and offer different options for the customer to choose from, such as adding or removing features, adjusting the quality standards, or modifying the schedule or budget. This way, the project manager can negotiate with the customer and reach a mutually beneficial agreement that satisfies both parties’ needs and expectations. Limiting the number of iterations for development in the contract is not a good control, as it may compromise the quality and value of the agile component. Establishing a governance committee to review the contract delivery is not a specific control for the development of the core component, but a general practice for any project. Requiring that only internal resources be utilized for this project is not a relevant control, as it does not address the customer’s requirement or the project’s profitability. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 704-705, 718-719.

The team should ask the product owner to prioritize the item with the customer, as the product owner is responsible for managing the product backlog and ensuring that it reflects the customer’s needs and expectations. The product owner should collaborate with the customer to understand the value and urgency of the enhancement, and decide whether to add it to the product backlog, modify an existing item, or defer it to a later time. The team should not refine and estimate the enhancement, add it to the product backlog, or start working on it without the product owner’s approval, as this may violate the agile principle of customer collaboration and the role of the product owner as the sole authority for the product backlog. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 14: Team, Section 14.2: Enable Team Performance, Section 14.3: Lead the Team

Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2: Life Cycle Selection, Section 2.2: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 2.3: Implementing Agile: Delivering in an Agile Environment

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 4: Analysis, Task 9: Validate Requirements

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 4: Analysis, Task 9: Validate Requirements

A statement of work (SOW) is a formal document that outlines the specific tasks, deliverables, and requirements of a project. It serves as a contractual agreement between a vendor and a client, providing a comprehensive description of the work to be performed. A SOW is used to document the project deliverables when outsourcing work to external parties, as it defines the scope, schedule, quality, and payment terms of the project. A SOW can also include a work breakdown structure (WBS), which is a hierarchical decomposition of the project deliverables into smaller, manageable components. References:

What Is a Statement of Work (SOW)? - Coursera

Statement Of Work Ultimate Guide: Simple Definition & Template

What Is a Statement of Work? Definition & Examples - ProjectManager

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project budget is the authorized amount of funds allocated to the project. The project budget is derived from the cost baseline, which is the aggregation of the estimated costs of individual activities or work packages. The project budget should reflect the project scope, schedule, resources, risks, and quality requirements. A project manager should review the base budget model with the team leaders in each country to establish an independent budget for each phase when delivering a highly customizable software solution in multiple countries with significantly different cultures. This will help to account for the variations in the project requirements, constraints, assumptions, and risks in each country and phase, and to ensure the accuracy and adequacy of the project budget. Reviewing the base budget model with the team leaders in each country to establish an independent budget for each phase is the best action that the project manager should do next in this situation. Overestimating costs and underestimating revenues to include the impacts of different cultural elements (B) may not be realistic or reliable, as it may create a false sense of security, waste resources, or reduce profitability. Applying the company’s operational budgeting model © may not be suitable or applicable, as it may not capture the specific characteristics and challenges of the project. Asking the project management office (PMO) to review the draft budget (D) may be a possible action, but not the next one, as it may be premature or ineffective without reviewing the base budget model with the team leaders in each country first. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 235-236, 260-261.

 In a hybrid project, the project manager needs to balance the different approaches and expectations of the stakeholders and the teams. The customer’s change request may have been approved based on the assumption that the software team can deliver the software in a timely manner using an agile approach. However, the software team leader’s refusal to commit to a delivery date indicates a lack of alignment and collaboration between the teams and the customer. This creates a risk of schedule and scope deviations, as well as potential conflicts and dissatisfaction among the stakeholders. Therefore, the project manager should add this risk to the risk register and monitor it according to the risk management plan. The project manager should also communicate with the software team leader and the customer to clarify the expectations and the rationale behind the change request, and to explore possible ways to mitigate the risk and deliver the software that meets the customer’s needs and the hardware team’s dependencies. The project manager should not escalate the issue to higher management without trying to resolve it first, as this may undermine the trust and autonomy of the teams. The project manager should not impose the delivery dates on the software team leader, as this may violate the agile principles and demotivate the team. The project manager should not ask the software team leader to use a predictive approach, as this may not be feasible or suitable for the software development process and the customer’s requirements. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 1.2.4, p. 19

PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain III: Analysis, Task 5, p. 11

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Section 2.4.2, p. 36

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 13.1.1, “Stakeholder identification is the process of identifying the people, groups, or organizations that could impact or be impacted by a decision, activity, or outcome of the project, and analyzing and documenting relevant information regarding their interests, involvement, interdependencies, influence, and potential impact on project success.” Therefore, the project manager should conduct stakeholder identification and a project objectives review session, as this will help to ensure that the new key stakeholder is properly engaged and informed about the project scope and deliverables. Creating a change request and updating the scope management plan (option A) may not be necessary or appropriate, as the issue may not be related to the scope, but to the stakeholder’s expectations or understanding. Updating the stakeholder list and fixing the deliverables (option C) may not address the root cause of the issue, and may introduce unnecessary changes or rework. Updating the project management plan and lessons learned (option D) may be done later, after the issue is resolved and the stakeholder is satisfied. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 13.1.1

PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, page 180, question 14

This answer is based on the PMBOK® Guide, which is one of the reference materials for the PMP exam1, and the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, which is one of the reference materials for the PMI-PBA exam2. According to the guides, the project manager is responsible for managing the project team, which includes developing, leading, and motivating the team members, as well as resolving any conflicts or issues that may arise among them12. The project manager should also establish and enforce the ground rules for the project team, which are the agreed-upon standards of behavior and expectations for the team members, such as communication protocols, decision-making processes, meeting guidelines, and conflict resolution methods12. When the project manager observes that two team members have been arguing with each other openly at meetings and bypassing the project manager to influence the sponsor, this indicates a serious breach of the ground rules and a potential threat to the project performance and harmony. The project manager should take the following two actions to address this situation:

Reiterate ground rules at the next meeting and ensure that all team members are clear about these rules. This action will remind the team members of their roles and responsibilities, and the expected norms of conduct for the project team. It will also reinforce the authority and accountability of the project manager, and the importance of following the agreed-upon procedures for communication and decision-making. This action will help to prevent further escalation of the conflict and restore trust and respect among the team members12.

Address the behavioral issue with each team member. This action will allow the project manager to understand the root cause of the conflict, and the perspectives and interests of each team member. It will also enable the project manager to provide constructive feedback, coaching, or counseling to each team member, and to facilitate a collaborative resolution that satisfies both parties and aligns with the project objectives. This action will help to improve the performance and morale of the team members, and to foster a positive and productive team culture12.

The other options are not appropriate because they do not address the problem effectively or ethically. Asking the team members to work it out themselves is not a responsible or proactive approach, as it may lead to further deterioration of the relationship and the project outcomes. Discussing this situation with other project managers and asking for advice is not a confidential or respectful way to handle the issue, as it may expose the team members to gossip or criticism, and undermine their trust and credibility. Discussing the behavior directly with their managers and requesting them to correct the behavior is not a fair or empowering way to deal with the issue, as it may create a perception of blame or punishment, and damage the rapport and autonomy of the team members. References:

PMBOK® Guide

PMI Guide to Business Analysis

 According to the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of planning is to “Identify and engage stakeholders to establish and maintain relationships and to ensure continuous and appropriate stakeholder involvement throughout the project life cycle” 1. This implies that the project manager should communicate effectively with the stakeholders, especially the senior managers, to address their concerns and expectations about the project approach and deliverables. In this case, the project manager should send documentation to the senior manager about the advantages of the new framework, such as increased flexibility, faster feedback, improved quality, and reduced risk. The documentation should also explain how the new framework aligns with the project objectives, scope, and constraints. The project manager should also invite the senior manager to provide feedback and suggestions on the documentation and the framework.

The other options are not the first steps that the project manager should take. Organizing individual sessions with the stakeholders to build awareness and trust in the new framework (A) is a good practice, but it should be done after sending the documentation and getting the senior manager’s approval. Looking for external training on the new framework to eliminate the risk of low engagement from stakeholders (B) is not necessary, as the project manager should leverage the PMO’s resources and expertise on the new framework. Escalating the senior manager’s concern to the project sponsor and distributing the status to the team (D) is not appropriate, as it could create unnecessary conflict and confusion. The project manager should try to resolve the concern directly with the senior manager first, before involving other parties. References: 1 Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, June 2018, p. 92 How To Address Management Issues at Work: 6 Steps To Take 3 15 Effective Ways To Strengthen Senior Leadership’s Management Skills 4 How To Write a Letter to Your Boss About Concerns (With Template)

 Working with the stakeholders to determine which measurable benefits can be tracked and assigning an accountable person to monitor and report them is the first step to ensure that the value delivered by the hybrid framework is aligned with the business objectives and expectations. The project manager should collaborate with the stakeholders to identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics that reflect the value of the project outcomes and outputs. The project manager should also assign a responsible person to collect, analyze, and report the data on the benefits realization. Creating a report based on the work breakdown structure (WBS) and updating it on a regular basis is not a sufficient way to track the value delivered by the hybrid framework, as the WBS only shows the scope of the project, not the benefits. Using the same benefits tracking process from the last predictive project and adding this to the monthly status report is not a suitable option, as the hybrid framework may require different methods and measures to track the value delivered. Researching which templates of reports were used the most for this framework and incorporating them into the project is not a proactive approach, as it does not involve the stakeholders’ input and feedback on the value delivered by the hybrid framework. References: Project Management Professional Sample Questions, page 13, question 109. [A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)], Sixth Edition, page 33, section 1.2.3. [Agile Practice Guide], page 25, section 3.1.1.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the schedule performance index (SPI) and the cost performance index (CPI) are two key indicators of the project performance measurement1. The SPI measures how efficiently the project team is using the time allocated for the project, while the CPI measures how efficiently the project team is using the resources allocated for the project1. An SPI or CPI value greater than 1 indicates that the project is ahead of schedule or under budget, respectively. An SPI or CPI value less than 1 indicates that the project is behind schedule or over budget, respectively1. In this question, the project manager notices that the SPI is 1.8 and the CPI is 0.1, which means that the project is ahead of schedule but over budget. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed as soon as possible, as it may jeopardize the project viability and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager should not ignore the project sponsor’s concern, as the project sponsor is the person who provides the financial resources and support for the project2. The project manager should also not assume that it is normal to spend more money in the design phase of a project, as this may indicate poor planning, estimation, or control of the project costs3. The project manager should not stop crashing the schedule, as this may affect the project scope, quality, or risk. The project manager should not use a resource-levelling technique, as this may delay the project completion and increase the project costs. The best option for the project manager is to manage the project sponsor closely and revise the project’s resource management plan to improve indicators. This means that the project manager should communicate frequently and transparently with the project sponsor, explain the reasons for the cost overrun, and seek their input and approval for any corrective actions. The project manager should also review and update the project’s resource management plan, which is the document that describes how the project resources will be estimated, acquired, managed, and controlled. The project manager should identify and implement strategies to reduce the project costs, such as optimizing the resource allocation, negotiating better rates, or eliminating unnecessary activities or resources. By managing the project sponsor closely and revising the project’s resource management plan, the project manager can improve the project performance indicators and increase the chances of delivering the project within the approved budget. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 7, Section 7.4.2.1, Page 267

2: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 13, Section 13.1.2.1, Page 518

3: 5 Essential Tips for Schedule Control in Project Management

: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.6.2.5, Page 215

: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.4.2.5, Page 201

: Guide to Project Budgeting & Scheduling

: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 9, Section 9.1.3.1, Page 313

: How to Make a Project Budget: Project Budgeting Basics

The stakeholder engagement plan is a component of the project management plan that identifies the strategies and actions required to promote productive involvement of stakeholders in project decisions and activities1. The project manager should review and update the stakeholder engagement plan to address the needs and expectations of the newly appointed technical manager, who is a key stakeholder for the project. The project manager should also communicate with the technical manager to understand the information gaps and provide the necessary updates on the project deliverables. Updating the issue log and escalating to the project sponsor (option A) may not be the best first action, as it could create unnecessary conflict and damage the relationship with the client. Identifying the lack of information as a risk and updating the risk register (option B) is not appropriate, as the situation is not a potential uncertain event that could affect the project objectives, but rather a current issue that needs to be resolved. Scheduling more frequent meetings with the technical manager (option C) may help to improve the communication, but it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the inadequate stakeholder engagement plan. References:

1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017, p. 518.

The project manager should follow the project escalation policy and communications management plan to address the situation of reduced cost and shortened schedule due to changes in EEFs. EEFs are external factors that can influence the project performance and outcomes, such as market conditions, government regulations, organizational culture, etc. When EEFs change, the project manager should assess the impact of the change on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and stakeholder expectations. The project manager should then communicate the change and its implications to the appropriate stakeholders, such as the sponsor, customer, senior management, team members, etc., following the project escalation policy and communications management plan. The project escalation policy defines the process and criteria for escalating issues and decisions to higher levels of authority within the organization. The communications management plan describes how, when, and by whom information will be distributed, received, and stored throughout the project. By following these plans, the project manager can ensure that the change is properly reported, documented, approved, and implemented, and that the project stakeholders are kept informed and engaged. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 2.1.4; PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 111

Awarding certificates of appreciation to encourage the team is an action that the project manager can take to motivate the team’s performance, because it shows that the project manager recognizes and values the team’s efforts and achievements. Certificates of appreciation are a form of positive reinforcement, which is a technique that uses rewards or recognition to increase the likelihood of a desired behavior. Positive reinforcement can motivate and inspire the team to continue working hard and delivering quality results, as well as to increase their satisfaction and loyalty. The other options are not actions that the project manager can take to motivate the team’s performance, because they may not address the team’s needs or expectations, or they may have negative consequences. Sending a formal notice to team members instructing them to maintain performance may not be effective, because it may imply a lack of trust, respect, or autonomy for the team. Hiring a few temporary team members to help with the additional work may not be beneficial, because it may create confusion, conflict, or resentment among the team members, as well as increase the complexity and risk of the project. Informing the team about the delivery pressure from the project sponsor may not be helpful, because it may increase the stress and anxiety of the team, and it may not provide any guidance or support for the team to cope with the pressure. References: Positive Reinforcement | PMI - Project Management Institute, The Mindful Project Manager’s Guide To Team Motivation: 11 … - Planio

According to the PMBOK® Guide, one of the key skills of a project manager is to apply appropriate leadership styles to the needs and demands of various situations1. Leadership styles can range from directive to supportive, depending on the level of authority and involvement of the project manager1. Micromanagement is a type of directive leadership style that involves close supervision and control over the work of the team members2. While micromanagement may be suitable for some situations, such as when the team is new or inexperienced, it can be detrimental for others, such as when the team is senior or skilled2. Micromanagement can cause frustration, demotivation, and resentment among the team members, and hinder their performance and creativity23. Therefore, the project manager should adjust their management style to better fit senior team members, who may prefer more autonomy, trust, and feedback23. The project manager can use various techniques to adapt their management style, such as situational leadership, emotional intelligence, and coaching1 . References:

1: PMBOK® Guide – 4th Edition, Chapter 3: The Role of the Project Manager

2: Micromanager Definition: 25 Signs and How To Deal With One

3: What is micromanaging? 6 warning signs

: 4 Signs You’re a Micromanager in Your Projects

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should facilitate the removal of impediments that may hinder the team’s progress and performance. The project manager should also encourage the team to collaborate and self-organize to find the best solutions for the project issues. Therefore, the project manager should conduct a brainstorming session with the team to identify the root cause of the technical issue, generate possible alternatives, and select the most suitable one. The project manager should then add the solution to the current sprint backlog and monitor its implementation and effectiveness. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 37, 273, 287.

The communications management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how project communications will be planned, structured, implemented, and monitored for effectiveness. It also defines the communication requirements, methods, and channels for different stakeholders, as well as the confidentiality and security levels of the information to be shared. The project manager should have reviewed the communications management plan before inviting an external client representative to the meeting, to ensure that the information presented was appropriate and authorized for external disclosure. The project manager should also have obtained the approval of the project sponsor and the CEO before sharing any sensitive or confidential information with the external client representative. By not reviewing the communications management plan, the project manager may have violated the communication policies and protocols of the organization, and potentially compromised the project’s budget, scope, quality, or schedule. This could have caused the CEO to end the meeting abruptly, to avoid further disclosure of information that could harm the project or the organization. The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the root cause of the situation, which is the lack of review of the communications management plan. Reviewing the cost management plan with internal participants and CEO prior to inviting an external client representative to the meeting (option B) may be a good practice, but it does not ensure that the information shared with the external client representative is appropriate and authorized. Performing a root cause analysis with the external client representative and documenting the findings in the lessons learned register (option C) may be useful after the situation has occurred, but it does not prevent the situation from happening in the first place. Sending the presentation slides to internal participants first and then to the external client representative prior to the meeting (option D) may also be a good practice, but it does not guarantee that the information in the slides is suitable and approved for external communication. References:

Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition, Chapter 10: Project Communications Management, pp. 361-411

Project Communication Management According to the PMBOK

Professional in Business Analysis (PBA) Reference Materials:

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 4: Planning Business Analysis Work, pp. 59-60

Effective Project Communication Plan Template: TeamGantt

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project lead should manage stakeholder expectations and engagement throughout the project life cycle. The project lead should also support the agile team’s decisions and authority regarding the product scope and releases. The agile team is responsible for delivering valuable and functional products to the customer in short iterations. Therefore, the project lead should work with the stakeholder to understand what the concerns are while at the same time conveying the benefits of incremental deliveries. The project lead should also communicate the value proposition and the vision of the product to the stakeholder and seek their feedback and collaboration. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 37, 51-52, 286-287.

The project manager should coach the product owner on how to create a product backlog, as this is a key artifact in Scrum and Kanban methodologies. The product backlog is a prioritized list of features, user stories, or requirements that the product owner wants to deliver in the project. The product backlog is dynamic and evolving, and it reflects the value and vision of the product. The product owner is responsible for creating, maintaining, and refining the product backlog, as well as communicating it to the development team and the stakeholders1. The project manager can assist the product owner by providing guidance, feedback, and tools on how to create a product backlog that is clear, concise, and aligned with the project goals and scope. The project manager can also help the product owner to use agile techniques, such as user story mapping, story splitting, and backlog grooming, to break down the functionalities into manageable and testable chunks, and to prioritize them based on value, risk, and dependencies2.

The other options, encouraging the team to subdivide the project tasks, creating a work breakdown structure (WBS), or discussing the product owner’s responsibilities within the project team, are not the best ways to assist the product owner. Encouraging the team to subdivide the project tasks may help the team to plan and execute the work, but it does not address the product owner’s confusion on how to start delivering the functionalities. Creating a WBS may help the project manager to define and organize the project deliverables, but it is not a suitable artifact for agile methodologies, as it is static and rigid, and does not reflect the changing needs and expectations of the customers and stakeholders3. Discussing the product owner’s responsibilities within the project team may help the product owner to understand their role and expectations, but it does not provide practical guidance on how to create a product backlog.

The project manager should submit a change request to update the scope of work, the schedule, and the budget to accommodate the missing deliverable. A change request is a formal proposal to modify any aspect of the project, such as the scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, or risks. A change request must be documented, reviewed, approved, and communicated by following the change control process. The change control process is part of the perform integrated change control process, which is one of the processes in the project integration management knowledge area. By submitting a change request, the project manager can ensure that the missing deliverable is properly identified, analyzed, and integrated into the project plan, and that the impact on the project objectives and constraints is minimized. The other options are not correct. Adding additional resources to the project may not solve the problem of the missing deliverable, and it may also introduce new risks, costs, and communication issues. Updating the scope of work without submitting a change request may lead to scope creep, which is the uncontrolled expansion of the project scope without proper authorization and approval. Reviewing the risk management plan may help to identify and mitigate any potential risks related to the missing deliverable, but it does not address the root cause of the problem or the impact on the project plan. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 4.6, 5.6, How to Manage Change Requests on a Project - PMI

According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the key activities in the closing process group is to obtain feedback from the project stakeholders, including the project users, to measure their satisfaction and identify any improvement opportunities1. This feedback can be collected using various methods, such as questionnaires, surveys, interviews, focus groups, or workshops2. The project manager should also deliver the project materials, such as the final product, service, or result, to the project users and confirm that they meet the acceptance criteria and the quality standards3. By delivering the project materials and seeking feedback, the project manager can ensure that the project users are satisfied with the project outcome and the project performance, and also capture any lessons learned or best practices for future projects. Preparing the lessons learned from the project phase is also an important activity, but it is not directly related to measuring the project user satisfaction. Obtaining official approval on the new process from the various countries may be a requirement for some projects, but it is not a general action that the project manager should take to assess the project user satisfaction. Referring to the communications management plan is a useful practice throughout the project, but it is not a specific action that the project manager should take after completing the project with the project users. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 4.7, p. 123

User Feedback: What is it, Importance, Metrics & How to collect, Section “How to collect user feedback”

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 5.6, p. 176

[Project customer satisfaction: 5 tips for dealing with it in the best possible way], Section “How to measure customer satisfaction”

 The project manager should evaluate the consequences and meet with the client to explain the possible scenarios. This is because the project manager needs to balance the competing demands of scope, time, cost, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager should not hire the resource without the client’s approval, as this would violate the terms of the contract and the trust relationship. The project manager should not ask the client for a meeting and explain that the task will not be performed, as this would compromise the project objectives and quality standards. The project manager should not try to accomplish the task internally by leveling resources from other projects, as this would create risks and dependencies for both projects and potentially affect their performance. The project manager should evaluate the consequences of not hiring the external resource, such as the impact on the project schedule, quality, scope, and risks. The project manager should also identify alternative solutions, such as negotiating with the client, finding another resource, or modifying the project plan. The project manager should then meet with the client and explain the possible scenarios, highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of each option. The project manager should seek the client’s input and feedback and try to reach a mutually agreeable solution that satisfies the project requirements and the client’s expectations. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.2, page 89, PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 106

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the project manager’s responsibilities is to develop the project team, which includes enhancing their competencies and interactions1. This can be done through various methods, such as training, coaching, mentoring, knowledge sharing, and feedback1. In this scenario, the project manager notices that only one team member has a technical skill that is essential for the product quality and schedule. This creates a risk of dependency, delay, and error. To prevent the team from being unqualified, the project manager should take two actions:

Encourage working in pairs and knowledge sharing: This is a form of informal training that allows the team members to learn from each other and transfer the technical skill. It also fosters collaboration, communication, and trust among the team members12.

Facilitate a training event with an external trainer: This is a form of formal training that provides the team members with a structured and standardized learning experience. It also ensures that the team members acquire the technical skill from a qualified and experienced source13.

These two actions will help the project manager develop the project team’s competencies and performance, as well as mitigate the risk of quality and schedule issues.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should collect requirements from all stakeholders, using various techniques such as interviews, focus groups, surveys, etc. The project manager should also document the stakeholder requirements, expectations, and assumptions in the requirements traceability matrix. If some stakeholders are not available for a meeting, the project manager should use other communication methods to reach out to them and gather their input. This will ensure that the project requirements are complete, accurate, and aligned with the stakeholder needs and expectations. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 140-141, 152-153.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 11.6, the project manager should monitor and control risks throughout the project life cycle, and update the risk register and other project documents as needed. The project manager should not assume that low-level risks are insignificant or that high-level risks are resolved permanently. The project manager should reevaluate the identified risks periodically and in response to triggering events, and reassess their probability, impact, priority, and response strategies. The project manager should also identify new risks, close risks that are no longer applicable, and communicate the risk status to stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 11.6; PMP Practice Exam, question 68.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager should identify the source of the disagreement among the project stakeholders as the first step to facilitate the approval of project requirements. This is because identifying the source of the disagreement can help the project manager understand the root cause of the conflict, the interests and needs of the stakeholders, and the potential impact of the disagreement on the project objectives and deliverables. By identifying the source of the disagreement, the project manager can then choose an appropriate conflict resolution technique, such as compromising, collaborating, smoothing, forcing, or withdrawing, to resolve the issue and obtain the approval of the project requirements1. The other options are not the first steps to facilitate the approval of project requirements, because:

Reviewing the project charter may help the project manager clarify the project scope, objectives, and high-level requirements, but it does not address the specific source of the disagreement among the stakeholders2.

Performing a stakeholder analysis may help the project manager identify the stakeholders, their roles, expectations, influence, and communication needs, but it does not address the specific source of the disagreement among the stakeholders3.

Holding a team-building event may help the project manager improve the team morale, trust, and collaboration, but it does not address the specific source of the disagreement among the stakeholders4. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.5.2.1, Conflict Management 2: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 4.1.3.1, Project Charter 3: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 13.1.3.1, Stakeholder Analysis 4: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.4.2.4, Team-Building Activities

Expert judgment is a technique that uses the knowledge and experience of experts to identify risks in a project. Experts can be internal or external to the project team, and they can provide insights on the sources, causes, and effects of potential risks. Expert judgment can also help to assess the probability and impact of risks, as well as the appropriate responses to them. According to the PMBOK Guide, expert judgment is one of the tools and techniques for the Identify Risks process, which is part of the Project Risk Management knowledge area. The other tools and techniques are data gathering, data analysis, interpersonal and team skills, and prompt lists. The other options are not tools and techniques for the Identify Risks process, although they may be used in other risk management processes or activities. An analysis of shared risks between parties is a way of identifying common risks that affect multiple stakeholders or projects. A SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project or organization. A risk value assessment is a method of prioritizing risks based on their expected value, which is the product of their probability and impact. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 397-398, 419-420

Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification Handbook, page 9

Risk Identification in Project Management, section “PMP® Risk Identification Lifecycle”

Contingency control in the project and rebaseline is a process that involves adjusting the project baseline to account for the impact of unforeseen risks. This allows the project manager to update the project scope, schedule, and cost baselines to reflect the current situation and avoid further deviations. Integrated change control in the project is a process that ensures that any changes to the project are reviewed, approved, and communicated to all stakeholders. This helps the project manager to manage the expectations of the project sponsors, customers, and team members, and to maintain the alignment of the project objectives with the business needs. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition, Section 4.5.3, “Contingency Control”

PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition, Section 4.6.3, “Integrated Change Control”

The project manager should ask an experienced team member to coach the new team member, as this is a strategy for developing the skills and performance of the new team member. According to the PMI website, coaching is one of the interpersonal and team skills that a project manager should have. Coaching is a process of providing guidance, feedback, and support to help someone improve their abilities and achieve their goals. By asking an experienced team member to coach the new team member, the project manager can leverage the knowledge and expertise of the existing team, and foster a culture of learning and collaboration. The project manager can also monitor the progress and results of the coaching, and provide recognition and rewards to both the coach and the coachee.

The other options, asking the new team member to follow the team ground rules, asking an experienced team member to identify a replacement, or asking the new team member to reassess their own capabilities, are not the best ways to deal with a new team member who is not making the expected progress on an assigned task. Asking the new team member to follow the team ground rules may help the new team member to understand the expectations and norms of the team, but it does not address the specific issues or challenges that the new team member is facing. Asking an experienced team member to identify a replacement may be a drastic and demotivating measure, that may not be feasible or fair to the new team member. Asking the new team member to reassess their own capabilities may be a constructive feedback, but it does not provide any support or assistance to the new team member.

The project manager can use alternatives analysis and cost-benefit analysis to influence the client’s decision to keep the project active. These are two tools or techniques that can help the project manager present different options and their implications to the client, and demonstrate the value and feasibility of the project.

Alternatives analysis is a technique that involves generating, comparing, and evaluating different possible courses of action in order to select the best one1. The project manager can use this technique to show the client the pros and cons of continuing or closing the project, and the impact of each option on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager can also propose alternative solutions or approaches that can address the client’s concerns or issues, and explain how they can be implemented.

Cost-benefit analysis is a technique that involves comparing the expected costs and benefits of a project or an option to determine its economic viability and attractiveness2. The project manager can use this technique to show the client the return on investment (ROI) of the project, and how the benefits outweigh the costs. The project manager can also quantify the costs and benefits of different alternatives, and compare them to the baseline or the status quo. The project manager can also highlight the intangible or qualitative benefits of the project, such as customer satisfaction, reputation, social impact, or strategic alignment.

By using these two tools or techniques, the project manager can influence the client’s decision to keep the project active by providing factual and rational information, appealing to the client’s interests and values, and offering choices and flexibility.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for creating a project charter that defines the project purpose, objectives, scope, and high-level risks. The project charter also establishes the project vision, which is a clear and concise description of the desired outcome of the project. The project vision provides a common understanding of the project goals and benefits among the project stakeholders, including the product owner and the agile team. The project manager should share the project vision with the agile team at the beginning of the project and ensure that it aligns with the product owner’s expectations. The project manager should also facilitate the definition of the team ground rules, which are the agreed-upon norms of behavior and expectations for the agile team. The team ground rules help to create a collaborative and respectful team culture, foster effective communication, and resolve conflicts. The project manager should ensure that the team ground rules are consistent with the project vision and the agile principles and values. By defining the team ground rules and sharing the project vision, the project manager can help the agile team to understand the product owner’s expectations, deliver value to the customer, and improve their performance. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 77-78, 541-542.

The project manager should review the historical information and lessons learned from last year’s project to justify the new budget estimate. This is because the project manager used an analogous estimating technique, which is based on the costs of similar projects in the past. By reviewing the historical information and lessons learned, the project manager can explain to the project sponsor how the costs of the new project were derived, what assumptions and risks were considered, and how the three-point estimating technique was applied. This can help the project sponsor understand the rationale behind the budget estimate and increase their confidence in its accuracy and validity. The project manager can also use this opportunity to discuss the benefits and value of the new project and how it aligns with the organizational strategy and objectives. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 7.2.2.4, page 262, Free PMP® Exam Sample Question 04 (Earned Value)

The project manager should take the action of delivering business value as soon as possible as a priority. This is because the project is aimed at increasing the commercial value of the product in a highly competitive market, which means that the project needs to deliver a viable solution that meets the customer needs and expectations quickly and effectively. By delivering business value as soon as possible, the project manager can also obtain early feedback, validate the assumptions and requirements, and make adjustments as needed. This will help to improve the quality, performance, and satisfaction of the product, and to reduce the risk of waste, rework, and delays. The other options are not as important or relevant as delivering business value as soon as possible. Emphasizing the use of Kanban methodology may be helpful, but it is not a priority action, as it is a tool or technique, not a goal or outcome. Kanban is a visual system that helps to manage the flow of work and limit the work in progress, but it does not guarantee the delivery of business value. Ensuring the project sponsor is aware of the go-to market date is a good practice, but it is not a priority action, as it is a communication or reporting activity, not a delivery or execution activity. The go-to market date may also change depending on the feedback and changes in the market. Implementing a plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle is a useful approach, but it is not a priority action, as it is a process or framework, not a result or benefit. The PDCA cycle is a method for continuous improvement that involves planning, doing, checking, and acting on the results, but it does not specify what business value to deliver or how to deliver it. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 1.2.6, 4.1.3, 5.1.3, Agile Practice Guide, 1st edition, Chapter 2.2.1, 2.3.1

The benefits realization plan is a document that describes how the benefits of the project will be delivered, measured, and sustained. It includes the benefits identification, analysis, planning, realization, and transition activities. By monitoring and updating the benefits realization plan, the project manager can ensure that the work carried out and the product being created do not deviate from the prescribed business value. Monitoring and updating the benefits realization plan helps to track the progress and performance of the project and the benefits realization process, and to identify and address any gaps or issues that may arise. Monitoring and updating the benefits realization plan also helps to communicate and report the value of the project to the stakeholders and the senior management. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.5.3.1, p. 123

PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain IV: Traceability and Monitoring, Task 2, p. 13

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Section 5.3.1, p. 113

The project manager should perform a qualitative risk analysis to assess the probability and impact of the resource availability problem on the project objectives. The project manager should also identify the triggers and warning signs of the risk, and assign a risk rating or priority to the risk. This will help the project manager to determine the appropriate risk response strategy and plan accordingly. Updating the issue log may not be sufficient, as it does not address the uncertainty and potential impact of the risk. Performing a root cause analysis may not be necessary or feasible, as the resource availability problem may be beyond the project manager’s control or influence. Implementing a risk response plan may be premature, as the project manager should first analyze the risk before taking any action. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 11: Risk, Section 11.3: Assess Risks

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 5: Evaluation, Task 6: Assess Solution Limitations

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 5: Evaluation, Task 6: Assess Solution Limitations

The project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its objectives, scope, stakeholders, and high-level risks. It also includes the project management approach and the roles and responsibilities of the project team. The project charter should be distributed to all team members and other key stakeholders to ensure their awareness and alignment with the project vision and expectations. The project charter also contains the project ground rules, which are the agreed-upon norms and behaviors that guide the team’s interactions and collaboration. The ground rules should be clear, specific, measurable, and enforceable. They should also be reviewed and updated periodically to reflect any changes in the project environment or team dynamics. By distributing the project charter to all team members, the project manager can avoid misunderstandings, conflicts, and disagreements regarding the project ground rules and the consequences of violating them. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.1.3.1; PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 93