PMP Exam Dumps - PMI Project-Management-Professional Questions and Answers

The project manager should use Monitor Communications techniques to ensure that the communication needs of the project and its stakeholders are met. This involves collecting and analyzing feedback from stakeholders, reviewing the effectiveness and quality of the communication activities, and identifying and resolving communication issues. By doing so, the project manager may discover the reasons why some stakeholders are not fully comprehending the status of the project based on the reports that are being circulated, and may initiate changes to the communications management plan to address them. For example, the project manager may decide to use a different report format, frequency, or distribution method that suits the needs and preferences of the new stakeholders. Adding the issue to the issue log and determining the corrective action (option A) is a possible outcome of Monitor Communications, but not the best answer. Creating a fishbone diagram to determine the root cause for the misunderstanding (option B) is a tool that can be used in Monitor Communications, but not the only one. Sharing the communications management plan and reminding all stakeholders of the agreed-upon reporting templates (option D) is not likely to solve the problem, as it may imply that the new stakeholders are at fault for not understanding the reports, rather than acknowledging that the communication needs may have changed. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 386-387, section 10.2 Manage Communications

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 415, question 415, answer and explanation

According to the PMBOK Guide, a context diagram is a visual representation of the product scope, showing a business system (process, equipment, computer system, etc.), and how people and other systems (actors) interact with it. A context diagram can help the project manager and the key stakeholder to understand the project’s key performance indicators (KPIs) and how they relate to the project objectives, scope, and deliverables. A context diagram can also help to identify the sources of data for the KPIs, the frequency of measurement, and the reporting format. A context diagram can facilitate communication and collaboration between the project manager and the key stakeholder, and help to resolve any issues or disagreements regarding the project’s KPIs. Autocratic decision making, expert judgment, and change control tools are not appropriate tools or techniques for this situation, as they do not address the root cause of the stakeholder’s dissatisfaction with the project’s KPIs, and may create more conflict or resistance. References: PMBOK Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 154-155, 176; PMI-PBA Guide, First Edition, pages 97-98, 102.

 The project manager should prioritize the product backlog looking for high business value and low effort, and adjust the project budget and staffing to account for those items, as this is a strategy that aligns with the agile principles of delivering value early and often, and responding to change over following a plan1. By focusing on the most valuable and feasible features, the project manager can maximize the return on investment and customer satisfaction, while minimizing the waste and risk. The project manager should also collaborate with the product owner, the team, and the stakeholders to review and reprioritize the product backlog regularly, and to adapt to the changing requirements and constraints. Reducing the project staff and adjusting the scope and timelines accordingly in support of the budget reduction (option A) may not be a viable strategy, as it could compromise the quality and functionality of the product, and create dissatisfaction and demotivation among the team and the customers. Balancing the project team in order to accommodate the budget challenges, and providing training to mitigate the risk of low performance (option B) may not be a feasible strategy, as it could incur additional costs and time, and disrupt the team dynamics and productivity. Restricting the project scope only to basic critical features and running the project with the current staffing level until all of the budget is consumed (option D) may not be an effective strategy, as it could ignore the feedback and expectations of the customers, and miss the opportunities to deliver incremental value and improve the product. References:

1: Agile Practice Guide, Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017, p. 8.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the communications management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how project communications will be planned, structured, implemented, and monitored for effectiveness. It includes information such as the communication requirements, methods, formats, frequency, roles, and responsibilities of the project stakeholders. When a company’s new communication system introduces online dashboard reporting, this is a change that affects the communication methods and formats of the project. Therefore, the project manager should update the communications management plan to reflect this change and ensure that the project communications are aligned with the new system and the stakeholder expectations. Updating the communications management plan will also help the project manager to identify and address any potential risks, issues, or challenges that may arise from the change, such as compatibility, security, or training needs. References: PMBOK Guide, Tools for managing projects : digital dashboards to report performance

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should initiate the project by developing the project charter with the key stakeholders. The project charter should define the project objectives, scope, deliverables, success criteria, and high-level risks. The project charter should also establish the project vision, value proposition, and definition of done (DoD) for the agile project. The project charter should provide clarity and alignment among the project stakeholders and enable the agile team to deliver value to the customer in short iterations. Therefore, the project manager should schedule meetings with key stakeholders to build the agile project charter and set clear expectations for the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 37, 75-76, 286-287.

The project manager should arrange a meeting with the functional managers of the two teams and try to reach an agreement that will resolve the conflict and enable the teams to complete their tasks. This is the best option because it addresses the issue directly, involves the parties who have the authority and responsibility to make decisions, and seeks a collaborative and constructive solution. The project manager should act as a facilitator and mediator in the meeting, and help the functional managers to identify the sources of the conflict, the interests and needs of each party, and the possible options for agreement. The project manager should also ensure that the meeting is conducted in a respectful and professional manner, and that the outcome is documented and communicated to the relevant stakeholders. References:

People in Projects, Chapter 13, Section 5: Project Manager/Functional Manager Conflict

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Chapter 13, Section 4.2.3: Conflict Management

7 Big Project Management Conflicts & Ways to Solve Them All, Section 2: Conflicting Interests of Stakeholders

According to the Scrum Guide, an impediment is any factor that blocks or slows down the Developers in their creation of a valuable piece of software in a Sprint, or that restricts the team in achieving its intrinsic level of progress1. Therefore, the scenarios that are impediments are:

A team member talking about a user story that is not on the Scrum board: This indicates that the team is not focused on the Sprint Goal and the Sprint Backlog, which are the sources of alignment and commitment for the Developers. Talking about a user story that is not on the Scrum board can also cause confusion, distraction, and waste of time for the team2.

A technology that blocks agile capabilities: This implies that the team is facing a technical issue that prevents them from delivering a potentially releasable Increment of value at the end of the Sprint, or from collaborating effectively with the Product Owner and other stakeholders. A technology that blocks agile capabilities can also hinder the team’s ability to inspect and adapt their work and process3.

A lack of team empowerment and an inability to self-organize: This suggests that the team is not able to make decisions and take actions that are best suited for achieving the Sprint Goal and delivering value to the customer. A lack of team empowerment and an inability to self-organize can also affect the team’s motivation, creativity, and productivity.

The scenarios that are not impediments are:

A team member talking about a user story that is on the Scrum board: This indicates that the team is engaged in the Sprint work and is discussing the details and progress of a user story that is part of the Sprint Backlog. Talking about a user story that is on the Scrum board can also foster communication, collaboration, and transparency within the team.

A review of the backlog at daily standup meetings: This implies that the team is using the daily standup meetings as an opportunity to inspect the Sprint Backlog and adapt their plan accordingly. A review of the backlog at daily standup meetings can also help the team identify any impediments or risks that may affect their Sprint work.

This is because reviewing the set of responsibilities with the team member can help clarify the expectations, roles, and accountabilities of both parties and reduce the potential for conflict1. Reviewing the set of responsibilities can also help identify any gaps, overlaps, or misunderstandings that may cause friction or confusion in the project team2. Reviewing the set of responsibilities can also provide an opportunity for constructive feedback, mutual respect, and problem-solving3.

Some of the other options are not appropriate because:

B. Avoid the team member to prevent further conflicts. This option is not a good conflict resolution technique, as it may worsen the situation by creating resentment, distrust, or isolation4. Avoiding the team member may also hinder the communication, collaboration, and performance of the project team5. The project manager should not avoid the team member, but rather engage them in a respectful and professional manner to resolve the conflict.

C. Escalate the situation to the project sponsor. This option may be too drastic and premature, as the conflict may not be a serious or irreconcilable issue that requires escalation. Escalation should be used as a last resort, when the project manager cannot resolve the conflict by themselves or with the team member. Escalation may also damage the relationship and trust between the project manager and the team member, as it may imply that the project manager is unable to handle the situation or respect the team member’s perspective.

D. Review the personnel skill documents. This option may not be relevant or helpful, as the conflict may not be related to the skills or competencies of the team member. Reviewing the personnel skill documents may not address the root cause or the nature of the conflict, which may be due to personality, communication, or expectation differences. Reviewing the personnel skill documents may also be perceived as a threat or a criticism by the team member, which may escalate the conflict or lower their morale.

I hope this information helps you with your query. However, I suggest that you consult the official PMP and PBA reference materials and guides for more accurate and reliable information. Thank you for using Bing. ????

According to the Agile Practice Guide, one of the principles of agile project management is to “respond to change over following a plan” 1. This means that agile teams should be able to adapt to changing requirements and market conditions, and deliver value to the customer as quickly as possible. Adding the competitor’s functionalities to the product backlog (option A) may not be the best way to respond to change, as it may increase the scope and complexity of the project, and delay the delivery of the product. Asking the sponsor to add more people to the team (option B) may also not be effective, as it may disrupt the team dynamics and communication, and cause the Brooks’ law effect, which states that “adding manpower to a late software project makes it later”. Asking the team to increase the velocity to launch the product as soon as possible (option D) may compromise the quality and sustainability of the product, and put undue pressure on the team. Therefore, the best option is to help the team to find a new approach to launch the product as soon as possible (option C), which may involve prioritizing the most valuable features, reducing the technical debt, applying lean principles, and collaborating with the customer and other stakeholders. References: 1: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2: An Introduction to Agile, page 13 2: The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, by Frederick P. Brooks Jr., page 25

According to the PBA Guide, one of the competencies for business analysis is emotional intelligence, which is the ability to perceive, understand, and manage one’s own and others’ emotions1. A servant leader is someone who focuses on the needs and development of others, rather than on their own authority or power2. Applying emotional intelligence to leverage this situation to benefit the project would involve recognizing the team member’s frustration, acknowledging their achievement, and encouraging them to share their knowledge with the rest of the team. Asking the team member to use their recently acquired knowledge to develop and provide training to the team is an example of this approach, as it would foster collaboration, learning, and trust among the team members. Requesting budget to reward the team member (choice A) may not be feasible or effective, as it may create resentment or competition among the team members. Promoting the team member to product owner (choice B) may not be appropriate or relevant, as it may not match the team member’s skills, interests, or responsibilities. Providing an incentive to team members who begin using the new tool on this project (choice C) may not be sufficient or sustainable, as it may not address the root cause of the team’s reluctance or lack of knowledge. References:

1: PBA Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1 Emotional Intelligence

2: PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: People, Task 9: Support team development and team members through feedback and recognition.

According to the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, a minimum viable product (MVP) is a version of a product that has enough features to satisfy early customers and provide feedback for future development. A MVP is a way of delivering value to customers quickly and iteratively, while minimizing waste and risk. In this scenario, the project manager is faced with a drastic reduction in the project timeline, from 18 months to six months. This means that the original scope and schedule are no longer feasible, and the project manager needs to find a way to deliver a product that meets the customer’s needs and expectations within the new constraints. Reviewing the project backlog and prioritizing the high-value items that can be delivered in six months is a sensible approach to achieve this goal. The project manager can then work with the stakeholders to define and agree on the MVP that will provide the most value to the customer and the business. This option also allows for flexibility and feedback, as the MVP can be refined and improved based on customer feedback and changing requirements. Planning for overtime, applying crashing and fast tracking, and sharing the risk of failure are options that try to compress the schedule without reducing the scope. These options may increase the cost, quality, and resource risks, and may not be acceptable to the stakeholders or the customer. Seeking approval to triple the project budget and hiring more people is an option that tries to increase the resources without reducing the scope. This option may not be feasible or realistic, as it assumes that the sponsor is willing and able to provide the additional funds, and that the project can benefit from adding more people in a short time. This option may also introduce communication, coordination, and integration challenges, and may not guarantee the delivery of the product in six months. Going over the critical path with stakeholders and explaining why it is not possible to deliver all the scope in the expected timeline is an option that tries to justify the original plan without considering alternatives. This option may not be satisfactory to the stakeholders or the customer, as it does not offer any solution or value proposition. This option may also damage the relationship and trust between the project manager and the stakeholders, and may result in the cancellation or termination of the project. Conclusion: Given the options, Option B stands out as the most viable and effective action. Reviewing the project backlog and coming up with a MVP that fits the expected timeline addresses the customer’s needs and expectations, delivers value quickly and iteratively, and minimizes waste and risk. Among the presented choices, Option B emerges as the optimal solution. PMP Exam Content Outline Mapping Domain Task Process Task 2: Execute the project Topics Covered Minimum Viable Product (MVP) Project Backlog Prioritization Value Delivery References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, Chapter 5, Section 5.3.1.2

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.2.2

The Standard for Project Management – Seventh Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2.2

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the principles of project management is to collaborate with stakeholders. This means that the project manager should maintain effective communication and engagement with the project stakeholders throughout the project life cycle, especially during changes and transitions. When the customer’s project manager changes during the final stage of a project, the project manager should review the latest project status report and update the stakeholders, including the new customer’s project manager, on the project progress, deliverables, issues, risks, and closure activities. This will help to ensure a smooth handover, alignment of expectations, and timely completion of the project closure process. The project manager should also seek feedback and confirmation from the stakeholders on the project outcomes and satisfaction. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 9, Principle 2: Collaborate with Stakeholders; page 31, Section 2.3.1, Project Stakeholders; page 41, Section 2.5.2.1, Project Status Report.

A change request is a formal document that proposes a modification to some aspect of the project, such as the user requirements, the deliverables, the schedule, the budget, or the quality standards123. Change requests can originate from various sources, such as the stakeholders, the project team, the customer, or the environment12. Change requests need to be evaluated and approved before they can be implemented, as they may have significant impacts on the project performance, scope, cost, time, quality, and risk123.

The project scope statement is a document that defines and documents the project objectives, deliverables, requirements, assumptions, constraints, and acceptance criteria12. The project scope statement is the basis for making project decisions and controlling changes12. Therefore, the project manager should evaluate the change request against the project scope statement to determine if the change is necessary, feasible, and beneficial for the project123. The project manager should also consider the impact of the change on the other project components, such as the schedule, the budget, the quality, and the risk123.

The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to take next. Discussing approval of the change request in the next project meeting (A) may delay the decision-making process and cause confusion among the project team and stakeholders. Performing a risk assessment on the required change request (B) is an important step, but it should be done after evaluating the change request against the project scope statement, as the risk assessment may depend on the scope implications of the change. Asking the sponsor for more funds to cover the change request (D) is not appropriate, as the project manager should first determine if the change is justified and aligned with the project scope statement, and then explore alternative ways to accommodate the change within the existing budget or negotiate a trade-off with the sponsor. References: 123

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should get commitment from the team to include all of the required regulations in the MVP when there is no consensus to do so. This is because the MVP is the version of the product that delivers the most value to the customer while meeting the minimum requirements and constraints1. If the project manager identifies some mandatory regulations that are essential for the product to be viable, compliant, and safe, then they should be included in the MVP, regardless of the impact on the project duration2. The project manager should explain the importance and rationale of the regulations to the team and stakeholders, and seek their agreement and support to incorporate them in the MVP3. The other options, A, C, and D, are not appropriate actions for the project manager to take. Training the team on the new regulations as requested by management may not resolve the lack of consensus or commitment from the team and stakeholders, and may delay the MVP definition process. Asking the project sponsor to add more time to the project may not be feasible or necessary, and may not address the root cause of the disagreement. Sharing with participants the need to focus only on product functionality may ignore the regulatory requirements and risks, and may compromise the quality and value of the product. References: 1: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 4.1.2, "Minimum Viable Product". 2: How to Define a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) - ProjectManager.com, Section "What Is a Minimum Viable Product?". 3: How to use Consensus Decision-Making for Project Management, Section "The 6 Stages of Consensus Decision-Making".

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key activities of the project manager is to implement risk responses to address the issues and opportunities that may affect the project objectives and outcomes. This includes executing contingency plans, which are predefined actions or strategies that are triggered by the occurrence of a risk event. In this scenario, the missing input from the vendor is a risk event that has extended the critical path of the project, which means that the project schedule is at risk of being delayed. Therefore, the project manager should execute a contingency plan to address the issue with the vendor and recover the lost time. Option D is the best answer for this question.

Option A is not the best answer because starting an audit of the vendor’s processes and procedures is not the next thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take to identify the root cause of the miscommunication and prevent it from happening again, but it is not a timely or effective action to resolve the current issue. Moreover, starting an audit may not always be feasible or desirable, as it may increase the project costs and risks, and may damage the relationship with the vendor.

Option B is not the best answer because reviewing lessons learned from previous projects with this vendor is not the next thing that the project manager should do. It is a good practice to learn from past experiences and apply them to current projects, but it is not a relevant or helpful action to deal with the current issue. Reviewing lessons learned may not always be accurate or reliable, as the vendor may have changed their processes or procedures since the previous projects.

Option C is not the best answer because making a detailed analysis on vendor issues during the project is not the next thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take to monitor and evaluate the vendor’s performance and identify any gaps or improvements, but it is not a proactive or adaptive action to address the current issue. Making a detailed analysis may not always be necessary or appropriate, as it may delay the project delivery and may not reflect the current or future state of the vendor’s situation. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 9-10, 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, 49-50, 59-60.

Fast-tracking is a schedule compression technique that involves performing activities in parallel that were originally planned to be done sequentially. This can reduce the overall project duration by overlapping the start and finish of different activities, but it also increases the risk of rework and errors due to dependencies and uncertainties. Fast-tracking is one of the tools and techniques for the Develop Schedule process, which is part of the Project Schedule Management knowledge area. The other tools and techniques are schedule network analysis, critical path method, critical chain method, resource optimization, data analysis, leads and lags, schedule compression, and project management information system. The other options are not schedule compression techniques, although they may be used in other project management processes or activities. Analyzing both projects to determine the most effective use of common resources is a way of managing multiple projects and optimizing resource allocation. Using resource optimization to justify requesting more resources for the critical project is a way of balancing the demand and supply of resources and resolving resource conflicts. Providing schedule optimization training to the project teams to improve their skills is a way of enhancing the team’s competencies and performance. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 201-202, 215-216, 718

Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification Handbook, page 9

5 Methods for Shortening A Project Schedule, section “Fast Tracking”

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the key competencies of a business analyst is to facilitate collaboration and teamwork among stakeholders. This includes building trust, rapport, and respect among team members, as well as fostering a positive and supportive work environment. The guide also states that “team morale is influenced by the business analyst’s ability to communicate effectively, manage conflict, and motivate others” (p. 41).

One of the ways to build team connections and emotional bonds is to use emotional intelligence, which is defined as “the ability to perceive, understand, and manage one’s own emotions and the emotions of others” (p. 42). Emotional intelligence can help the business analyst to:

Recognize and acknowledge the feelings and perspectives of team members, especially when they are affected by a change or a loss

Express appreciation and gratitude for the contributions and achievements of team members

Provide constructive feedback and coaching to help team members improve their performance and skills

Encourage team members to share their ideas, opinions, and concerns, and listen actively and empathetically

Resolve conflicts and disagreements in a respectful and collaborative manner

Celebrate successes and milestones, and recognize the efforts and challenges of the team

By building team connections and emotional bonds, the business analyst can help to improve team morale and teamwork, as well as increase team engagement, commitment, and productivity.

 Perform Integrated Change Control is the process of reviewing all change requests, approving changes and managing changes to deliverables, organizational process assets, project documents, and the Project Management Plan, and communicating the decisions1. This process is important to ensure that only approved changes are implemented and that the project remains aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. In this scenario, the project manager should perform Integrated Change Control to evaluate the impact of the proposed alternative solution on the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and other aspects. The project manager should also consult with the project sponsor, customer, and other key stakeholders to obtain their approval or rejection of the change request. The project manager should document the change request and its status in the change log and update the project management plan and other relevant documents accordingly. The project manager should also communicate the change and its implications to the project team and other affected parties. By performing Integrated Change Control, the project manager can ensure that the project is managed in a controlled and consistent manner, and that the project deliverables meet the agreed requirements and expectations. References:

How To Successfully Perform Integrated Change Control

6 Steps for an Integrated Change Control Project Management Strategy

Performing Integrated Change Control: PMP Tips

According to the Agile Testing: A Practical Guide For Testers And Agile Teams1, security and performance testing are two types of nonfunctional testing that are important for agile teams. Security testing ensures that the system is protected from unauthorized access, data loss, or corruption. Performance testing measures how the system responds to different levels of load, stress, and concurrency. These types of testing can be done at different levels of granularity, from unit testing to system testing, and can use tools such as JMeter, LoadRunner, or Selenium.

Story testing is a type of functional testing that verifies that the system meets the acceptance criteria of each user story. User stories are short descriptions of the features or functionalities that the customer wants from the system. Story testing can be done by the developers, testers, or customers, and can use tools such as FitNesse, Cucumber, or SpecFlow.

Tests based on behavior and test-driven development are two approaches that support agile testing practices. Behavior-driven development (BDD) is a technique that uses natural language to describe the expected behavior of the system in different scenarios. Test-driven development (TDD) is a technique that involves writing the tests before the code, and then refactoring the code to make the tests pass. Both BDD and TDD help to clarify the requirements, design the system, and ensure the quality of the code. They can use tools such as JUnit, NUnit, or RSpec.

A project manager who has team members around the world in different time zones should plan and schedule the tasks and work packages in a way that minimizes the dependency and communication gaps between the offices. This can be done by using techniques such as rolling wave planning, agile methods, or critical chain method, which allow for more flexibility and adaptability in the project schedule. The project manager should also consider the cultural differences, working hours, holidays, and availability of the team members when planning and scheduling the project work. This way, the project manager can avoid delays, conflicts, and misunderstandings caused by the geographical and time zone challenges. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.2: Schedule Performance, pp. 55-56

Project Management Professional (PMP) Handbook, Section 2.2: PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 2: Plan and manage project schedule, pp. 15-16

Managing Projects Across Time Zones, by ProjectManager.com, published on July 9, 2019

 Design thinking is a human-centered approach to problem-solving that involves empathy, ideation, prototyping, and testing. It helps project managers and teams to understand the needs, preferences, and pain points of the end users and stakeholders, and to create solutions that are desirable, feasible, and viable. By incorporating design thinking practices into the project life cycle, the project manager can avoid missing the mark on many features and deliver a product that meets or exceeds the stakeholder’s expectations. Some of the design thinking practices that can be applied in the project life cycle are:

Stakeholder mapping: This is a technique to identify and analyze the key stakeholders of the project, their roles, interests, expectations, and influence. It helps to align the project objectives with the stakeholder needs and to plan the communication and engagement strategies. Stakeholder mapping can be done at the initiation stage of the project and updated throughout the project as needed.

Persona creation: This is a technique to create fictional characters that represent the typical end users of the product. Personas help to empathize with the users and to design the product features and functions that suit their needs, goals, and behaviors. Persona creation can be done at the planning stage of the project and validated with real users during the execution stage.

User journey mapping: This is a technique to visualize the steps and interactions that the users go through when using the product. User journey mapping helps to identify the pain points, opportunities, and emotions of the users and to design the product features and functions that enhance their experience. User journey mapping can be done at the planning stage of the project and refined with user feedback during the execution stage.

Prototyping and testing: This is a technique to create and test low-fidelity or high-fidelity versions of the product with the users and stakeholders. Prototyping and testing help to validate the assumptions, gather feedback, and improve the product features and functions. Prototyping and testing can be done iteratively at the execution stage of the project and finalized at the closing stage. References:

1: Stakeholder analysis 101: a project manager’s guide - Office Timeline

2: 4 Reasons Project Stakeholder Feedback is Important

3: How to Gather and Control Stakeholder Feedback and Reaction

4: Overcoming the Challenges of Collecting Stakeholder Feedback for Project Management

[5]: Design Thinking for Project Managers - PMI

[6]: Design Thinking for Project Management - ProjectManager

According to the Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials, team building is a tool and technique used in the Develop Project Team process, which aims to improve the performance of the project team and enhance project outcomes. Team building activities can help the project manager to address the issues that arise from team member changes, such as loss of trust, communication gaps, and conflicts. Team building can also help the project manager to align the team members with the project goals and expectations, and to motivate them to achieve the key performance indicators (KPIs) that measure the team’s progress and success. References:

Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials, page 176, section 9.3.2.3

PMI PMP Quiz:35 Topic:1 Questions:171-175, question 3

According to the Agile Practice Guide, the product backlog prioritization is a continuous process that involves evaluating the relative value and urgency of the features or user stories that are planned for the next iteration or release. The product backlog prioritization should consider various factors, such as the customer needs, the stakeholder expectations, the market conditions, the technical dependencies, the risk exposure, and the feedback from previous iterations. Two of the most important factors that should be taken into account first are the cost of delaying some features against the business value they deliver, and the length of time each feature has been on the backlog. The cost of delay is a measure of how much value is lost or foregone by postponing the delivery of a feature. The longer a feature stays on the backlog, the more likely it is to lose its relevance, quality, or competitiveness. Therefore, the product backlog prioritization should aim to deliver the most valuable and urgent features as soon as possible, and avoid accumulating technical debt or waste. The complexity and the cost of development, the industry trends and the technical approach, and the reusing of components from another product are also relevant factors, but they are not the first ones to consider when reviewing and updating the product backlog priorities. References: Agile Practice Guide, pages 49-50, 54-55.

According to the PMBOK Guide, project closure is the process of finalizing all activities across all of the project management process groups to formally complete the project or phase1. Project closure involves verifying that all the project deliverables have been completed and accepted by the customer or sponsor, confirming that all the contractual obligations have been met, documenting the project performance and lessons learned, releasing the project resources, and archiving the project records2.

In this question, the project manager is faced with a problem that the client will not agree to closure, claiming that the project team has not performed the code inspections mandated in the development contract. The project team has performed the code inspections, however the records are not complete. This indicates that there is a discrepancy between the contractual requirements and the project documentation, which can lead to disputes, claims, or litigation. The project manager should approach this problem by holding a meeting with the project team, project sponsor, and the client to agree to the further work required to close the project and add to lessons learned. This way, the project manager can facilitate a constructive dialogue among the key stakeholders, clarify the expectations and obligations of each party, negotiate a mutually acceptable solution, and document the agreed actions and outcomes. This will also help to maintain the relationship with the client, ensure customer satisfaction, and capture the lessons learned for future projects.

The other options are not the best actions to take to solve this problem. Seeking expert legal advice on the interpretation of the clauses in the contract is a possible option, but it should be done after trying to resolve the issue amicably with the client and the sponsor. Seeking legal advice may also escalate the conflict and damage the trust and goodwill with the client. Closing the project and handing over the deliverables to the client is not advisable, as it may violate the contract terms and expose the project to legal risks. Holding a lessons learned workshop with the project team and project sponsor to avoid contractual compliance issues arising in future projects is a good practice, but it does not address the current issue with the client and the project closure.

In an agile environment, integration is not a separate phase that happens at the end of the project, but rather a continuous activity that happens throughout the project. Integration involves combining the work of different teams or individuals into a coherent whole that meets the customer needs and expectations. Frequent and continuous integration of work allows the project team to obtain early feedback, identify and resolve issues, and learn from the results. This helps to improve the quality, performance, and value of the product, and to reduce the risk of rework, delays, and defects. Therefore, the project manager should have ensured frequent and continuous integration of work to avoid the integration issues and the decline in the product release progress. The other options are not as effective or appropriate as frequent and continuous integration. Forming a separate quality assurance team to test all items at the end of each sprint would create silos, delays, and dependencies, and would not foster collaboration and ownership among the teams. Performing a Scrum of Scrums on a regular basis to help the teams remove impediments would be a good practice, but it would not address the integration issues directly, and it would depend on the frequency and quality of the communication and coordination among the teams. Arranging an online session on the integration concept and suggesting tools to the teams would be helpful, but it would not ensure that the teams actually integrate their work frequently and continuously, and it would not provide feedback and learning opportunities. References: Agile Practice Guide, 1st edition, Chapter 3.4.2, 3.5.2, PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 4.4.2, 4.6.2

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 14.2.2, “Information radiators are highly visible displays of project information that are easily accessible and frequently updated. They are used to communicate project status and progress to the project team and other stakeholders, especially in agile or hybrid approaches.” Therefore, the project lead should invite the executive to the project’s meeting space to determine if the project information radiators meet their needs, as this is the most effective and transparent way to provide an update on the project’s progress in an agile environment. Providing a link to the project’s shared drive for the executive to search through for any artifacts that are of interest (option A) may not be user-friendly or efficient, as the executive may not know what to look for or how to interpret the artifacts. Reaching out to the PMO for status report templates and providing project updates in that format (option C) may not be aligned with the agile principles or values, as it may introduce unnecessary documentation or bureaucracy. Asking the project sponsor or product owner to provide an update since the project lead should be trying to keep the team free from impediments (option D) may not be appropriate or respectful, as the project lead should also be responsible for communicating with the stakeholders and ensuring their satisfaction. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 14.2.2

PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, page 183, question 20

The project manager should meet with the subject matter experts (SMEs) to assess the impact of the new regulation on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The SMEs are the ones who have the knowledge and expertise to understand the implications of the new regulation and how it affects the project deliverables. The project manager should also involve the stakeholders, especially the project sponsor and the customer, in the assessment process to ensure their expectations and requirements are met. The project manager should then use the assessment results to determine the best course of action to address the change, such as modifying the project plan, requesting a change request, or escalating the issue to the appropriate authority. The project manager should follow the change management process as defined in the project management plan and the business analysis plan, and document the changes and their impacts in the project documents and the traceability matrix. The project manager should also communicate the changes and their impacts to the project team and the stakeholders, and obtain their buy-in and support.

The other options are not the best actions to take next, because they do not address the impact of the new regulation on the project objectives and deliverables. Consulting with the project sponsor to discuss a cost increase (option A) may be premature, as the cost impact may not be known until the assessment is done. Acquiring approval for an exception to the implementation of the new regulation (option B) may not be feasible or desirable, as it may compromise the compliance and quality of the project deliverables. Getting approval for the additional budget from the steering committee (option C) may also be premature, as the budget impact may not be known until the assessment is done. Moreover, the budget approval may not be sufficient to address the other impacts of the new regulation, such as scope, schedule, quality, and risk. References:

The PMI Guide to Business Analysis Includes The Standard for Business Analysis, Chapter 5: Solution Evaluation, Section 5.3.3: Assess Solution Limitations

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 7: Solution Evaluation, Section 7.3.3: Assess Solution Limitations

Business Analysis Techniques: 72 Essential Tools For Success, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, Section 5.13: Impact Analysis

Seven Steps to Mastering Business Analysis, Chapter 9: Solution Assessment and Validation

The project manager should analyze the reason for the gap in understanding with both sides and negotiate a solution, as this is a strategy for managing stakeholder dissatisfaction in agile projects. According to the Agile Alliance, one of the principles of agile software development is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software. However, sometimes the customer or stakeholder may not be satisfied with the product, even if it meets the acceptance criteria and is approved by them. This may happen due to various reasons, such as unclear or changing requirements, miscommunication, unrealistic expectations, or lack of feedback. The project manager should identify the root cause of the dissatisfaction and try to resolve it through dialogue and collaboration. The project manager should also use agile techniques, such as backlog refinement, user stories, sprint reviews, and retrospectives, to ensure that the product delivers value to the stakeholder and aligns with their vision and goals1.

The other options, asking the project team to perform the modifications, asking the stakeholder to submit a change request, or explaining to the stakeholder that the project can be closed, are not the best ways to manage stakeholder dissatisfaction in agile projects. Asking the project team to perform the modifications may not address the underlying issue of the dissatisfaction and may also introduce new risks or defects to the product. Asking the stakeholder to submit a change request may not be feasible or appropriate in an agile environment, where changes are expected and welcomed, as long as they add value to the product and do not compromise the quality or scope2. Explaining to the stakeholder that the project can be closed may not satisfy the stakeholder or improve the relationship, as it may imply that the project manager is not willing to listen to their feedback or concerns.

One of the principles of agile is to build projects around motivated individuals, give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done. Agile teams are expected to be self-organized, which means they can decide how to best accomplish their work, rather than being directed by others outside the team. Self-organization also implies that teams can inspect and adapt their own processes and practices, and continuously improve their performance and satisfaction. One of the key practices that enable self-organization and improvement is the retrospective, which is a regular meeting where the team reflects on what went well, what went wrong, and what can be done differently in the next iteration. A retrospective is a safe space for the team to share their feedback, concerns, and ideas, and to collaboratively come up with action items to address them. Therefore, if the project lead notices that the team is bored with their daily practices, the best course of action is to allow the team to self-organize and have them analyze the situation in their retrospective session and self correct. This way, the team can identify the root causes of their boredom, such as lack of challenge, variety, autonomy, or feedback, and propose solutions that suit their needs and preferences. The project lead can facilitate the retrospective and provide guidance and support, but should not impose any changes or solutions on the team, as this would undermine their self-organization and motivation. By allowing the team to self-organize and self correct, the project lead can foster a culture of trust, empowerment, and continuous learning within the team, and help them overcome their boredom and achieve higher levels of performance and satisfaction. References:

Agile Teams - Scaled Agile Framework

ProjectManagement.com - Beware the bored team member!

Mastering Agile Team Building: The Key to Enduring Success - Integrant

A user focus group is a group of potential or actual customers who provide feedback on a product or service. User focus groups can help project managers understand the needs, preferences, and expectations of the target market, as well as identify any problems or issues with the product or service12.

Defining a user focus group as external stakeholders with a high influence on outcomes means that the project manager recognizes the importance of involving the users in the project initiation and planning phases. By doing so, the project manager can ensure that the project aligns with the user requirements and delivers value to the customers34.

Defining a user focus group as external stakeholders also implies that the project manager will communicate with them regularly, solicit their feedback, and incorporate their suggestions into the project scope, schedule, budget, and quality5 . This can help prevent customer dissatisfaction and negative feedback, as well as increase customer loyalty and retention .

 Checking the risk register for a prepared response to a resource being suddenly unavailable is a proactive action that the project manager should take to deal with the situation. The risk register is a document that records the identified risks, their causes, impacts, probabilities, and responses. By consulting the risk register, the project manager can see if there is a contingency plan or a fallback plan for the loss of a key resource, and implement it accordingly. Checking if the team member’s activities are sufficiently documented to facilitate handover is another important action that the project manager should take to ensure the continuity and quality of the project work. The team member’s activities may include tasks, deliverables, dependencies, assumptions, constraints, and other information that are relevant to the project scope, schedule, and cost. By reviewing the documentation, the project manager can identify the gaps, risks, and issues that may arise from the absence of the team member, and take appropriate measures to address them. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition, Section 11.4.3, “Risk Register”

PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition, Section 4.3.3, “Project Management Plan”

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Guide, Section 4.2.2, “Documentation”

 This option reflects the project manager’s responsibility to communicate effectively with the key stakeholder and address their issues and expectations. The project manager should share the relevant project documents, such as the project charter, the project management plan, and the stakeholder engagement plan, and invite the key stakeholder to discuss any concerns they may have. The project manager should also seek to understand the root cause of the stakeholder’s dissatisfaction and try to resolve it in a collaborative and respectful manner. The other options are either too aggressive (B), too passive ©, or too premature (D) for the situation.

However, this is only a suggestion based on one source of reference. You may find other sources that support a different answer, or have a different interpretation of the question. Therefore, you should always check the validity and reliability of the information you find online, and compare it with your own knowledge and experience.

I hope this helps you with your question. If you need more information, you can use the links below to access the web search results. Thank you for using Bing.

 According to the PBA Guide, the product owner is the person who is responsible for defining and prioritizing the product backlog, which contains the requirements for the project. The product owner also provides feedback and acceptance for the deliverables produced by the development team. Therefore, the project manager should work with the product owner to clarify the requirement and the acceptance criteria for the task, as they are the best source of information and authority for the project scope. This is also consistent with the agile principles of collaboration, customer satisfaction, and responding to change. References:

PBA Guide, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.1, Roles and Responsibilities of the Product Owner

PBA Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1, Product Backlog

PBA Guide, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2, Feedback and Acceptance

PMBOK Guide, Chapter 13, Section 13.2.2.1, Agile/Adaptive Environments

PMBOK Guide, Appendix X3, Section X3.2, Agile Principles

 The project manager should request the high-performing team member to mentor the other team members. This is because mentoring is a way of recognizing and rewarding the team member’s expertise and contributions, as well as enhancing the skills and performance of the other team members. Mentoring can also foster a positive team culture, increase collaboration and trust, and reduce turnover and attrition. The project manager should also provide feedback and appreciation to the high-performing team member, and ensure that the mentoring process is aligned with the project objectives and expectations. The other options are not as effective or appropriate as requesting the high-performing team member to mentor the other team members. Promoting the higher performing team member to a higher position may not be feasible or desirable, as it may create resentment among the other team members, disrupt the team dynamics, or reduce the team member’s motivation and satisfaction. Reminding the high-performing team member to focus on shared rewards rather than individual rewards may be perceived as unfair or discouraging, as it may imply that the team member’s efforts are not valued or appreciated. Rewarding the high-performing team member privately to avoid team disruption may also be seen as unfair or secretive, as it may create a sense of favoritism or inequality among the team members, and undermine the team morale and cohesion. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 9.4.2, 9.4.3, The Benefits of Mentoring in Project Management - PMI

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project management information system (PMIS) is an information system consisting of the tools and techniques used to gather, integrate, and disseminate the outputs of project management processes. It is used to support all aspects of the project from initiating through closing, and can include both manual and automated systems. A PMIS can help the project manager to create, collect, store, manage, control, and distribute project information, such as the project schedule, to relevant stakeholders. Therefore, the project manager should have kept the documentation in the PMIS, and shared it with appropriate stakeholders, to ensure that the project schedule was updated and accessible. Updating the project management plan, assigning a project team member, or reviewing the risk register are not sufficient or relevant actions for handling the documentation for the project, as they do not address the issue of keeping the project schedule current and available. References: PMBOK Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 89-90, 558; PMI-PBA Guide, First Edition, pages 83-84, 87.

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, two actions that a project manager should consider while launching a new virtual team are:

Evaluate the project manager’s own strengths and weaknesses as a virtual team leader to identify avoidable pitfalls. This can help the project manager to develop the necessary skills and competencies to effectively lead, guide, and nurture a virtual team, such as communication, collaboration, motivation, trust, and cultural awareness12. The project manager can also seek feedback, coaching, or mentoring from other experienced virtual team leaders to improve their performance and avoid common mistakes3.

Establish in the beginning, how progress will be monitored and the best means for communicating progress. This can help the project manager to set clear expectations, goals, and standards for the virtual team, and to ensure that the team members are aligned, accountable, and informed throughout the project4 . The project manager can also use various communication and collaboration tools, such as video conferencing, chat, email, project management software, and online dashboards, to facilitate regular and effective communication and reporting among the virtual team members and stakeholders .

The other options, A, C, and E, are not actions that a project manager should consider while launching a new virtual team, but rather actions that a project manager should consider while planning or executing a project with a virtual team. Recruiting the best resources within the organization to be part of the virtual team is a human resource planning activity that involves identifying and acquiring the project team members. Identifying the types and quantities of resources required for each work package or activity is a resource management activity that involves estimating and allocating the resources needed to complete the project work. Verifying if team members are on more than one team and cannot devote enough time to this team is a performance management activity that involves monitoring and controlling the team members’ availability, workload, and productivity. References: 1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.4.2.2, "Team Development Stages". 2: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2.2, "Agile Principles". 3: Best practices for managing and developing virtual project teams, Section "Preparing for success — the project manager’s role". 4: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.4.3.1, "Team Performance Assessment". : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 10.2.2.1, "Communication Requirements Analysis". : 10 Tips to Manage Virtual Project Teams - Ganttic, Section "Communication tools". : Project and resource planning tools - Ganttic, Section "Project and resource planning tools". : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.1.3.1, "Project Team". : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.2.3.1, "Resource Requirements". : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9.6.3.1, "Work Performance Data".

B. Include an assessment to verify compliance in the next iteration. This option may be too late, as the project may already be in violation of the new regulation by continuing the testing phase without making any adjustments. The project manager should not wait for the next iteration to assess the compliance, but rather initiate a change request as soon as possible to avoid any legal or ethical issues.

C. Conduct an iteration review to address the new regulation. This option may not be sufficient, as an iteration review is a meeting to inspect the work done in an iteration and obtain feedback from the stakeholders2. An iteration review may not be the appropriate forum to address the new regulation, as it may require more analysis, discussion, and approval from the CCB. The project manager should not rely on the iteration review alone to address the new regulation, but rather submit a change request to formally document and communicate the change.

D. Start the tests over, adapting the trials to the new regulation. This option may be wasteful, as it may disregard the work done and the feedback obtained in the previous iterations. The project manager should not start the tests over without following the change management process, as it may create confusion, inconsistency, and conflict among the project team and stakeholders. The project manager should not make any changes to the project without obtaining the necessary approval from the CCB.

I hope this information helps you with your query. However, I suggest that you consult the official PMP and PBA reference materials and guides for more accurate and reliable information. Thank you for using Bing. ????

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 9.1.3, “The resource management plan is a component of the project management plan that provides guidance on how project resources should be categorized, allocated, managed, and released. It may be formal or informal, highly detailed or broadly framed, based on the needs of the project.” Therefore, the project manager should have used the resource management plan to identify the impacts of the other projects on the availability and allocation of the shared resources, and to plan for contingencies or alternatives to avoid or mitigate the delay. Updating the risk management plan and registering lessons learned for the project (option A) may be done after the delay is resolved, but not before. Reorganizing the team for the project based on the WBS (option B) may not be feasible or effective, as the shared resources may still have competing priorities or dependencies. Maintaining constant communication with the stakeholders of the other projects (option C) is a good practice, but not sufficient to prevent the delay from happening, as the project manager still needs to monitor and control the resource usage and performance. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 9.1.3

PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, page 181, question 16

The project manager should approach this situation by requesting that the customer reviews and clarifies feature definitions for the current sprint. This is because the customer is the primary source of the requirements and the best person to provide the technical details that the project team needs. By reviewing and clarifying the feature definitions, the customer can ensure that the project team understands the requirements correctly and can deliver the expected value in the current iteration. This will also help to avoid rework, scope creep, and customer dissatisfaction in the future.

The other options are not the best ways to approach this situation. Sending a burndown chart of the current sprint to the customer and seeking clarifications may not be effective, as the burndown chart only shows the progress of the work done, not the quality or accuracy of the work. The customer may not be able to provide the technical details based on the burndown chart alone. Educating the customer and having them participate in daily standup meetings may not be feasible, as the customer may not have the time, interest, or expertise to attend the daily meetings and learn about the project details. This may also create unnecessary dependencies and interruptions for the project team. Scheduling weekly meetings and product reviews with the customer to clarify requirements may be too late, as the project team needs the technical details in the current iteration, not in the next week. This may also delay the feedback and validation process and increase the risk of delivering the wrong product.

Some of the other options are not appropriate because:

A. Negotiate a reduced review attendance with the stakeholder and update the stakeholder engagement plan to reflect this reduced. This option may compromise the quality and effectiveness of the reviews, as the stakeholder may miss important information, feedback, or decisions. It may also create a perception of low priority or commitment from the stakeholder, which can affect the trust and relationship with the project team3. The stakeholder engagement plan should reflect the optimal level of engagement for each stakeholder, not the minimum4.

C. Record the issue in the issue log and escalate the conflict to the project sponsor for assistance. This option may be too drastic and premature, as the issue may not be a serious conflict that requires escalation. Escalation should be used as a last resort, when the project manager cannot resolve the issue by themselves or with the stakeholder5. Escalation may also damage the rapport and communication with the stakeholder, as it may imply that the project manager is unable to handle the situation or respect the stakeholder’s perspective.

D. Explain to the stakeholder that the stakeholder engagement plan requires their attendance at all reviews. This option may sound too rigid and authoritative, as it does not acknowledge the stakeholder’s concern or provide any justification for the frequency of the reviews. It may also create a sense of resentment or resistance from the stakeholder, who may feel that they are being forced to comply with a plan that they do not agree with or understand. The stakeholder engagement plan should be a flexible and collaborative tool, not a rigid and imposed one4.

I hope this information helps you with your query. However, I suggest that you consult the official PMP and PBA reference materials and guides for more accurate and reliable information. Thank you for using Bing. ????

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.5.2.3, one of the tools and techniques for managing team conflict is agile release planning. This involves conducting daily stand-up meetings or Scrum meetings, where team members can communicate their progress, issues, and impediments. The project manager or scrum master can facilitate these meetings and help resolve any conflicts that arise among team members or with other stakeholders. This strategy ensures that conflicts are handled in a timely manner and do not escalate or affect the project performance. The other options are not specific to agile or hybrid projects and do not address the root causes of conflict. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.5.2.3; PMP Practice Exam, question 77.

According to the PMBOK Guide, project managers need to adapt their approach and style to the changing environment and needs of the project1. When a project management office (PMO) is incorporating more adaptive technologies, such as agile or hybrid methods, the project manager and the project team need to acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to apply them effectively2. One of the ways to do this is to set up a training session for all project team members, where they can learn the principles, practices, and tools of the new methodology, and how to update the project artifacts accordingly3. This would help to improve the team’s performance, as well as their engagement and collaboration. The other options are not as effective as providing training, as they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of understanding and adoption of the new methodology. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 18

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 27

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 52

The finance team is a key stakeholder in the project, as they are responsible for approving the project budget and ROI. If they are not involved in building the business case for the project, they may not understand or agree with the project objectives, benefits, and assumptions. This can lead to conflicts, delays, and rework in the project execution. Therefore, the project manager should schedule a meeting with the product owner and the finance team to discuss the business case, clarify the requirements, expectations, and constraints, and agree on the course corrections needed to align the project with the organizational strategy and goals. This way, the project manager can ensure that the project delivers value to the organization and satisfies the stakeholder needs. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.1: Business Case, pp. 25-26

Project Management Professional (PMP) Handbook, Section 2.2: PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain III: Business Environment, Task 1: Plan and manage project compliance, pp. 16-17

How to Write a Business Case: 4 Steps to a Perfect Business Case Template, by ProjectManager.com, published on January 25, 2019

 In an agile project, the project manager should collaborate with the stakeholders and the product owner to manage changes in the product. Asking the stakeholders about the priority of this change will help the project manager understand the value and urgency of the change, and align the expectations of the stakeholders with the project vision. Asking the product owner to review the product backlog will help the project manager ensure that the change is properly prioritized and incorporated into the product backlog, which is the source of requirements for the agile project. Asking the team members to analyze the impact of this change, asking the sponsor to approve the change request, or asking the team members to include the change in the next iteration are not the best actions to take in an agile project, as they may introduce unnecessary delays, bureaucracy, or scope creep. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18, section 1.2.3 (Agile Considerations); page 176, section 5.1.1.1 (Project Stakeholders); page 179, section 5.1.3.1 (Project Charter); page 181, section 5.2.1.1 (Product Owner); page 182, section 5.2.3.1 (Product Backlog)

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key activities of the project manager is to monitor and evaluate the project performance and outcomes, and to use the data and information collected to support decision making and adaptation. This is especially important for projects that operate in a dynamic and uncertain environment, where agility, market adaptation, and a quick response to market offerings are critical success factors. The project manager should conduct periodical reviews of the project plans, objectives, and deliverables to ensure that they are aligned with the changing needs and expectations of the stakeholders, and to identify and address any issues or risks that may affect the project value delivery. Option C is the best answer for this question.

Option A is not the best answer because reviewing the project objectives with the project sponsor is not a key activity that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success. It is a good practice to have a clear and shared understanding of the project objectives with the project sponsor, but it is not sufficient to ensure the project’s agility, market adaptation, and responsiveness. The project manager should also engage other stakeholders, such as the customers, users, and team members, and review the project objectives with them as well.

Option B is not the best answer because requesting more funding from the project sponsor to hire additional skilled resources and to incorporate additional quality in the project delivery approach and outcome is not a key activity that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the project scope, schedule, or quality are affected by the changes in the market or the stakeholder needs, but it is not a proactive or adaptive activity that the project manager should perform regularly. Moreover, requesting more funding may not always be feasible or desirable, as it may increase the project costs and risks, and may not guarantee the project value delivery.

Option D is not the best answer because creating a business case after performing a market review, and then submitting it to the sponsor to modify the project deliverable to meet the newly defined objectives is not a key activity that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success. It is a possible activity that the project manager may perform if the project deliverable is no longer aligned with the business needs or the market opportunities, but it is not a frequent or iterative activity that the project manager should do to ensure the project’s agility, market adaptation, and responsiveness. Moreover, creating a business case may not always be necessary or appropriate, as it may delay the project delivery and may not reflect the current or future state of the market or the stakeholder needs. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 9-10, 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, 49-50.

In a situation where a project’s execution could impact a local community, particularly a school, it’s crucial for the project manager to ensure minimal disruption1. This can be achieved by liaising with the school to include nonworking project hours during school start and finish times1. This approach ensures that the project work does not interfere with the school’s operations, thus maintaining a smooth workflow for both the project and the school21. It’s also a demonstration of good project management practice, as it shows consideration for the project’s external stakeholders and their needs31. References: 

https://www.coursera.org/articles/project-management-lifecycle

 When a project is experiencing delays due to identified risks, the project manager should revise the project schedule and inform the stakeholders regarding any delays1. This approach ensures transparency and allows stakeholders to adjust their expectations accordingly. It’s also important to analyze the scope that is at risk and divide it into smaller, tangible parts. Setting a very short daily meeting or call with the key leaders of the delivery team to closely monitor progress can also help manage the project schedule effectively1.

A team charter is a document that is developed in a group setting that clarifies team direction while establishing boundaries. It is developed early during the forming of the team. The charter should be developed in a group session to encourage understanding and buy-in. The team charter has two purposes. First, it serves as a source of information for people who are not part of the team. Second, it serves as a reference for team members. In this case, the project manager is having trouble with meetings not going according to plan and ending in arguments. A team charter could have helped prevent this situation by setting clear expectations for team behavior, roles and responsibilities, and decision-making processes. References: Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents

 According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) principles, when transitioning from a predictive to an iterative approach, it’s crucial to maintain clear and transparent communication about project requirements and changes. This is often achieved through the use of product and sprint backlogs, which should be well-documented and visible to all team members. If the team is unsure of what needs to be done due to changes requested by the product owner, it indicates that the backlogs may not be adequately maintained or visible to the team. Therefore, the project manager should ensure that these backlogs are properly documented and accessible to the team. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification Handbook, PMBOK Guide (6th Edition), Chapter 3: Project Management Processes for a Project, Section 3.8 Closing Process Group. Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Handbook, Chapter 2: Needs Assessment.