Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions and Answers

 The best option for optimizing your cloud spend by ensuring that only a single instance of your infrastructure stack exists at a time is to confirm that the pipeline is storing and retrieving the terraform.tfstate file from Cloud Storage with the Terraform gcs backend. The terraform.tfstate file is a file that Terraform uses to store the current state of your infrastructure. The Terraform gcs backend is a backend type that allows you to store the terraform.tfstate file in a Cloud Storage bucket. By using the Terraform gcs backend, you can ensure that your pipeline has access to the latest state of your infrastructure and avoid creating multiple copies of the entire infrastructure stack.

The best option for detecting consumption of an error budget to protect customers and define release policies is to create a service level objective (SLO) and create an alert policy on select_slo_burn_rate. A SLO is a target value or range of values for a service level indicator (SLI) that measures some aspect of the service quality, such as availability or latency. An error budget is the amount of time or number of errors that a service can tolerate while still meeting its SLO. A select_slo_burn_rate is a metric that indicates how fast the error budget is being consumed by the service. By creating an alert policy on select_slo_burn_rate, you can trigger notifications or actions when the error budget consumption exceeds a certain threshold. This way, you can balance change, velocity, and reliability of the service by adjusting the release policies based on the error budget status.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General GKE and GitOps Knowledge:

The requirements are:

Enforce constraint templates (implying a policy agent like OPA Gatekeeper) on GKE.

Store policy parameters in a GitHub repository.

Automatically apply changes from the GitHub repository to the clusters.

This is a classic GitOps scenario.

A. Set up a GitHub action to trigger Cloud Build when there is a parameter change. In Cloud Build, run a gcloud CLI command to apply the change.This is a plausible CI/CD approach. GitHub Actions can trigger Cloud Build, which can then use kubectl or gcloud to apply configurations. However, this is a push-based imperative approach. GitOps tools offer a more declarative, pull-based model specifically designed for syncing Kubernetes configurations.  

B. When there is a change in GitHub, use a webhook to send a request to Cloud Service Mesh, and apply the change.Cloud Service Mesh (based on Istio) is primarily for managing traffic, security, and observability for microservices. It's not designed for applying general Kubernetes policy configurations like Gatekeeper constraints from a Git repository.  

C. Configure Config Sync with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Config Sync to apply the change.Config Sync is a Google Cloud product specifically designed for GitOps with GKE (and other Kubernetes clusters). It synchronizes configurations (including CustomResourceDefinitions for constraint templates and the constraints themselves) from a Git repository (like GitHub) to your clusters. It continuously monitors the repository and automatically applies any committed changes to the clusters, ensuring they remain in the desired state. This perfectly matches the requirements.  

D. Configure Config Connector with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Config Connector to apply the change.Config Connector allows you to manage Google Cloud resources (like Pub/Sub topics, Spanner instances, etc.) using Kubernetes-style declarative configurations and kubectl. While it uses Kubernetes tooling, its primary purpose is managing Google Cloud resources, not syncing general Kubernetes configurations like Gatekeeper constraints from Git. Config Sync is the tool for syncing arbitrary Kubernetes manifests from Git to a cluster.  

Config Sync is the Google Cloud tool built for the exact purpose described: maintaining consistency between Kubernetes cluster configurations and a Git repository using a GitOps model.

Reference (Based on Google Cloud GKE and Config Sync documentation):

Config Sync Overview: https://cloud.google.com/anthos-config-management/docs/config-sync-overview or https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/add-on/config-sync/overview (if referring to it as a GKE add-on). "Config Sync is a GitOps tool that helps you keep your Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Enterprise edition clusters synchronized with configs stored in a Git repository."  

It supports syncing various Kubernetes objects, including CustomResources, which are used by OPA Gatekeeper for defining constraints and constraint templates.

It automatically pulls changes from the Git repository and applies them, which meets the "automatically applied when changes occur" requirement.

To securely connect Cloud Build to an AlloyDB cluster using a private IP address and adhere to Google-recommended security practices, you need to address two main aspects:

Network Connectivity:Ensuring Cloud Build can reach the private IP of the AlloyDB cluster.

Authentication/Credential Management:Securely authenticating Cloud Build to the AlloyDB cluster.

Let's break down why Option B is the most suitable:

Cloud Build Private Pool:AlloyDB is accessed via a private IP in your VPC. Cloud Build's default build environment runs on Google-managed infrastructure outside your VPC and cannot directly access private IP addresses. To enable this, you must use aCloud Build private pool. A private pool can be configured with VPC peering to your default VPC, allowing build steps running within that pool to access resources like your AlloyDB cluster via their private IPs. Option B correctly includes "execute the schema migration script in a private pool."  

Service Account with Permissions (IAM Database Authentication):AlloyDB supports IAM database authentication. This is a Google-recommended security practice because it allows you to manage database access using Google Cloud's Identity and Access Management (IAM) rather than relying on traditional database passwords.  

You would create a dedicated service account for Cloud Build (or use the private pool's service account).

This service account would be granted the necessary IAM roles to connect to the AlloyDB instance (e.g., roles/alloydb.client) and a database-level IAM role for login (e.g., roles/alloydb.user or roles/alloydb.admin depending on the permissions needed for schema migration).  

Cloud Build would then be configured to use this service account. The "permission to access the database" in Option B refers to these IAM permissions. This method avoids managing and distributing database passwords.

Analyzing the options:

A. Set up a Cloud Build private pool to access the database through a static external IP address...

While using a private pool is correct for network access, routing this through a staticexternalIP for a resource that has aprivateIP is generally not the first-choice secure pattern if direct private access is feasible. It adds complexity and a potential external exposure point, even if firewalled. The aim is to keep traffic within the private network as much as possible.

B. Create a service account that has permission to access the database. Configure Cloud Build to use this service account and execute the schema migration script in a private pool.

This option correctly combines the use of aprivate pool(for private IP network access) with aservice account having permissions(strongly implying IAM database authentication for AlloyDB, which is a best practice). This is a secure and robust approach.

C. Add the database username and encrypted password to the application configuration file...

Storing credentials, even if "encrypted" (the method and key management for encryption are unspecified and problematic), in application configuration files checked into source control or packaged with the application is a significant security risk and not a recommended practice.

D. Add the database username and password to Secret Manager. When running the schema migration script, retrieve the username and password from Secret Manager.

UsingSecret Managerto store database usernames and passwords is a Google-recommended practiceifyou are using password-based authentication. However, this optionalonedoes not solve the network connectivity issue for Cloud Build to reach the private IP of AlloyDB. You would still need a private pool. While D is good for secret management, B offers a more comprehensive solution that includes both the network aspect and implies a more modern authentication method (IAM database auth). If the question forced a choice between only doing secure credential storage (D) or doing IAM auth + private networking (B), B is more complete for the overall task.  

Conclusion:Option B is the most aligned with Google-recommended security practices as it addresses both the necessary private network connectivity via a Cloud Build private pool and promotes the use of IAM-based database authentication for AlloyDB, which is generally preferred over managing passwords.

References (General Concepts):

Cloud Build Private Pools for VPC Access:Google Cloud documentation for Cloud Build explicitly details using private pools to connect to resources in a VPC network.

See:https://www.google.com/search?q=https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/private-pools/accessing-private-resources-with-private-pools

AlloyDB IAM Database Authentication:Google Cloud documentation for AlloyDB highlights IAM database authentication as a secure method.

See:https://www.google.com/search?q=https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/iam-authentication

Secret Manager:If password authentication were the only option, Secret Manager would be the recommended way to store those credentials.

See:https://cloud.google.com/secret-manager

Option B synergizes the benefits of private networking and modern IAM-based authentication for a comprehensive secure solution.

Your application runs on Google Cloud Platform (GCP). You need to implement Jenkins for deploying application releases to GCP. You want to streamline the release process, lower operational toil, and keep user data secure. What should you do?

https://plugins.jenkins.io/google-compute-engine/

https://sre.google/workbook/implementing-slos/

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/adopting-slos/

Latency is commonly measured as a distribution. Given a distribution, you can measure various percentiles. For example, you might measure the number of requests that are slower than the historical 99th percentile.

The correct answer is A. Select a latency metric for a request-based method of evaluation.

A latency metric measures how responsive your service is to users.For example, you can use thecloud.googleapis.com/http/server/response_latenciesmetric to measure the latency of HTTP requests to your service1. A request-based method of evaluation counts the number of successful requests that meet a certain criterion, such as being below a latency threshold, and compares it to the number of all requests.For example, you can define an SLI as the ratio of requests with latency below 300 ms to all requests2. A request-based method of evaluation is suitable for measuring performance over time, such as per calendar month.You can set an SLO for the SLI to be at least 90%, which means that you expect 90% of the requests to have latency below 300 ms in a month3.

https://medium.com/velotio-perspectives/exploring-upgrade-strategies-for-stateful-sets-in-kubernetes-c02b8286f251

The correct answer is B. Create an attestation for the builds that pass the load test by using a private key stored in Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS) authenticated through Workload Identity.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) or Cloud Run1.Binary Authorization uses attestations to certify that a specific image has completed a previous stage in the CI/CD pipeline, such as passing a load test2.Attestations are signed by private keys that are associated with attestors, which are entities that verify the attestations3.To follow Google-recommended practices, you should store your private keys in Cloud Key ManagementService (Cloud KMS), which is a secure and scalable service for managing cryptographic keys4.You should also use Workload Identity, which is a feature that allows Kubernetes service accounts to act as Google service accounts, to authenticate to Cloud KMS and sign attestations without having to manage or expose service account keys5.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A and option D require human intervention to sign the attestations, which is not scalable or automated. Option C exposes the service account JSON key as a Kubernetes Secret, which is less secure than using Workload Identity.